Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

Harnessing rural households’ intentions to adopt ethnobotanical knowledge

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8956
Submitted
18 April 2025
Published
22-10-2025

Abstract

Ethnobotanical practices, rooted in indigenous knowledge, offer sustainable solutions for health, nutrition and agriculture, yet their adoption remains understudied, due to socio-economic or institutional constraints. This research examines factors influencing farmers’ intention to adopt ethnobotanical practices in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu. It aims to identify the key drivers and barriers. Using a quantitative method, data were collected through interviews with 540 respondents across 12 blocks and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Results indicate that Perceived Benefits (PB), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Social Influence (SI) and Access to Resources (AR) positively influence adoption, while Institutional Support (IS) showed a weak negative correlation, suggesting inadequate alignment with local needs. The study highlights the potential of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) as catalysts for integrating traditional knowledge with modern agricultural systems through improved resource access and collective marketing. Key findings underscore the importance of community-centric approaches in promoting ethnobotanical practices, emphasizing the need for policy reforms to enhance institutional responsiveness. The study concludes that empowering FPOs to bridge indigenous and scientific knowledge systems can significantly improve rural livelihoods, health resilience and agricultural sustainability. Recommendations include strengthening local capacity-building initiatives, refining extension services to better incorporate traditional wisdom and fostering participatory models of knowledge exchange. These insights provide actionable pathways for policymakers and development practitioners to leverage ethnobotanical knowledge for sustainable rural transformation.

References

  1. 1. Monika A, Dhivya C. Ethnobotany and agriculture: a timeless relationship for sustainable farming. Greenaria. 2024;2:197-8.
  2. 2. Pandey AK, Tripathi Y. Ethnobotany and its relevance in contemporary research. J Med Plants Stud. 2017;5(3):123-9.
  3. 3. Philip KS. Indigenous knowledge: science and technology studies. In: Wright JD, editor. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 113-4.
  4. 4. Shisanya CA. Role of traditional ethnobotanical knowledge and indigenous institutions in sustainable land management in western Highlands of Kenya. In: Indigenous people and sustainable development. IntechOpen; 2017. p. 159. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69890
  5. 5. Sam S. Importance and effectiveness of herbal medicines. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(2):354-7.
  6. 6. Kumar A, Kumar S, Komal RN, Singh P. Role of traditional ethnobotanical knowledge and indigenous communities in achieving sustainable development goals. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3062-5. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063062
  7. 7. Cotton CM. Ethnobotany: principles and applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
  8. 8. Martin GJ. Ethnobotany: a methods manual. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2496-0
  9. 9. Balick MJ, Cox PA. Plants, people, and culture: the science of ethnobotany. New York: Scientific American Library; 1996.
  10. 10. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl. 2000;10(5):1251-62. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
  11. 11. Srithi K, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P, Srisanga P, Trisonthi C. Medicinal plant knowledge and its erosion among the Mien (Yao) in northern Thailand. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009;5(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.02.035
  12. 12. Ladio AH, Lozada M. Patterns of use and knowledge of wild edible plants in distinct ecological environments: a case study of a Mapuche community from northwestern Patagonia. Biodivers Conserv. 2004;13(6):1153-73. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000018150.79156.50
  13. 13. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211.
  14. 14. Femi O, Ruiz P, Martinez MP, Perez IR. Food values and purchase decisions in emerging markets: empirical evidence from Kenya. Cogent Bus Manag. 2023;10(3):2287771. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2287771
  15. 15. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319-40.
  16. 16. Turner NJ, Cuerrier A, Joseph L. Well grounded: indigenous Peoples' knowledge, ethnobiology and sustainability. People Nat. 2022;4(3):627-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10321
  17. 17. Lee MC. Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2009;8(3):130-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006
  18. 18. Boslaugh S, editor. Encyclopedia of epidemiology. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2007.
  19. 19. Pearl J. Causality. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2009.
  20. 20. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 4th ed. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2016.
  21. 21. Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H, editors. Handbook of partial least squares. Berlin: Springer; 2010.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.