Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

Foliar nanofertilizers: Effects on crop uptake, yield and soil health in puddled transplanted rice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9003
Submitted
21 April 2025
Published
06-10-2025

Abstract

The primary aim of the study was to investigate the impact of foliar application of nano-formulated nutrients-specifically nano nitrogen, nano phosphorus and nano potash-on the growth, development and yield performance of transplanted rice cultivated under puddled soil conditions. A field experiment took place from December 2023 to April 2024 during the late Rabi season at the Department of Agronomy, V.O.Chidambaranar Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam, Tamil Nadu, India. The experiment used a randomized block design with fourteen treatments, consisting of various combinations of nano NPK with different times of foliar application and three replications. The soil of the experimental plot was sandy clay loam with a pH of 7.73, which is slightly saline in nature. The soil contains organic carbon of 6.41 g/kg, with available nitrogen at 287.42 kg/ha, available phosphorus at 25.15 kg/ha and available potassium at 152.37 kg/ha. The results showed that the 100 % recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) in rice treatment achieved the highest nutrient uptake (N, P, K) and, in turn, the grain yield, while foliar application of nano N, P and K fertilizers, particularly when applied four times, closely matched with the performance of RDF. Nanofertilizers enhanced nutrient absorption due to their smaller particle size and better leaf penetration. However, both RDF and nano foliar fertilization had minimal impact on soil chemical properties (pH, EC and organic carbon) and microbial activity, indicating that nutrient delivery primarily occurred through the foliage rather than altering the soil environment. In terms of economics, foliar application of nano N, P and K at three times was more cost-effective and profitable than four times in puddled transplanted rice.

References

  1. 1. Mishra C, Jena D, Parida NR, Subudhi RN, Pani SK, Giri VV et al. Adoption of fertilizer technology for rice cultivation in Kalahandi District, Odisha. Multidiscip Sci J. 2024;6(12):e2024294. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024294
  2. 2. Vinci G, Ruggieri R, Ruggeri M, Prencipe SA. Rice production chain: environmental and social impact assessment-a review. Agric. 2023;13(2):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020340
  3. 3. Annamalai N, Johnson A. Analysis and forecasting of area under cultivation of rice in India: univariate time series approach. SN Comp Sci. 2023;4(2):193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01604-0
  4. 4. Ganapathy S, Nageswari K, Jayakumar J, Veeramani P. Evaluation of CO 52 rice variety for enhanced productivity in Cuddalore district of Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2024;36 (8):432–36. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i84872
  5. 5. Ghasemi M, Ghorban N, Madani H, Mobasser H, Nouri. M. Effect of foliar application of zinc nano oxide on agronomic traits of two varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Res. 2017;52(6):195–201. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-1761.2017.00017.1
  6. 6. Manikandan A, Subramanian K. Evaluation of zeolite based nitrogen nanofertilizers on maize growth, yield and quality on inceptisols and alfisols. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2016;9(4):1–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2016/22103
  7. 7. Kumar M, Singh Y, Maurya SK, Maurya SK, Maurya DK, Sachan R et al. Efficient use of nano-fertilizer for increasing productivity and profitability along with maintain sustainability in rice crop: a review. Int J Environ Clim Chang. 2023;13(10):1358–68. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102788
  8. 8. Nandy P, Das SK, Tarafdar JC. Effect of integrated nutrient management and foliar spray of zinc in nanoform on rice crop nutrition, productivity and soil chemical and biological properties in Inceptisols. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2023;23(1):540–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-01064-8
  9. 9. Ding Y, Zhao W, Zhu G, Wang Q, Zhang P, Rui Y. Recent trends in foliar nanofertilizers: a review. Nanomaterials. 2023:13(21):2906. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13212906
  10. 10. Liao Y, Zheng S, Lu Y, Yang Z, Nie J, Xie J. Long-term effect of fertilizer application on rice yield, potassium uptake in plants and potassium balance in double rice cropping system. Front Agric China. 2010;4(4):406–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-010-1043-5
  11. 11. Lahari S, Hussain S, Parameswari Y, Sharma S. Grain yield and nutrient uptake of rice as influenced by the nano forms of nitrogen and zinc. Int J Environ Clim Chang. 2021;11(7):1–6. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i730434
  12. 12. Corredor E, Testillano PS, Coronado MJ, González-Melendi P, Fernández-Pacheco R, Marquina C et al. Nanoparticle penetration and transport in living pumpkin plants: in situ subcellular identification. BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-9-45
  13. 13. Al-Juthery HW, Lahmod NR, Al-Taee RA. Intelligent, nanofertilizers: A new technology for improvement nutrient use efficiency. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;735:012086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/735/1/012086
  14. 14. Kaya C, Ashraf M. Foliar fertilization: A potential strategy for improving plant salt tolerance. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2014;43(2):94–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2023.2270253
  15. 15. Behera HS, Pany BK, Nayak BK, Mohapatra A, Kumar A. A mixture of inorganic nitrogenous fertilizers and farmyard manure has an effect on the soil's pH, EC organic carbon, BD and porosity after rice (Oryza sativa L.) is harvested. Int J Stat Appl Math. 2023;8(3):210–4.
  16. 16. Alimohammadi M, Panahpour E, Naseri A. 2020. Assessing the effects of urea and nano-nitrogen chelate fertilizers on sugarcane yield and dynamic of nitrate in soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2020;66 (2):352–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1727298
  17. 17. Elekhtyar NM, Al-Huqail AA. Effect of foliar application of phosphorus, zinc and silicon nanoparticles along with mineral NPK fertilization on yield and chemical compositions of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agric. 2023;13(5):1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051061
  18. 18. Shende S, Gedam V, Satpute A, Ghule N. Response of dry seeding of Kharif paddy (Oryza sativa L.) varieties to different fertilizer levels on nutrient (NPK) content, nutrient (NPK) uptake and available nutrient (NPK) at harvest. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(6):1877-83. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6aa.11039
  19. 19. Pudhuvai B, Koul B, Das R, Shah MP. Nanofertilizers (NFs) for resurgence in Nutrient use efficiency (NUE): a sustainable agricultural strategy. Curr Poll Rep. 2024;11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-024-00331-9
  20. 20. Dubey AN, Chattopadhyaya N, Mandal N. Variation in soil microbial population and soil enzymatic activities under zincated nanoclay polymer composites (ZNCPCs), nano-ZnO and Zn solubilizers in rice rhizosphere. Agric Res. 2021;10(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-020-00488-x
  21. 21. Jat L, Singh Y. Short-term effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil properties and enzyme activities in rice production. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(2):185–94.
  22. 22. Yamuna BG, Kumar D. Influence of fertilizer levels applied through conventional and fertigation on yield components and yield of aerobic rice. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(4):3015–9. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i4ac.12069
  23. 23. Mittal S, Sharma SK. Effect of different approaches of fertilizer recommendations on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of rice under SRI. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7(2):761–5.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.