Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Agri-robotics in smallholder agriculture: A comprehensive review of recent efficient and affordable technologies

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9063
Submitted
24 April 2025
Published
12-01-2026

Abstract

This review emphasizes how agri-robotics is transforming small-scale farming by solving issues related to labour shortages, inefficiency in conventional methods and the growing need for sustainable agricultural practices. The study examines various agri-robots suitable for near future adoption on small-scale farms. Examples include IARI’s seeding robot for precise planting, the Smart Core robot for automatic soil sampling and the Evo robot for advanced weeding. Additionally, it covers the tomato plucker robot developed by Octaneaon, a duck robot for weeding in paddy fields and agricultural drones utilized for targeted spraying and crop monitoring. These robots are demonstrating clear enhancements in operational efficiency, crop yields and optimal resource utilization. Their applications include autonomous seeding, intelligent irrigation, multi-functional harvesting and soil sampling, all of which contribute to enhanced precision agriculture. Government initiatives like Sub-Mission on Agricultural Mechanization (SMAM), Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY), Custom Hiring Centers (CHCs) and the Namo Drone Didi (NDD) scheme provide both financial and technical assistance, accelerating the adoption of these technologies. Experimental research indicates that drone-assisted herbicide application results in improved weed control effectiveness, increased yield and that diesel-powered robots are more energy-efficient. The drip irrigation systems utilizing soil moisture sensors as an automated irrigation method have better water use efficiency. This paper concludes that government policies, research findings and user-friendly innovations make agri-robots suitable for small-scale farmers and foster sustainable agricultural practices.

References

  1. 1. King A. Technology: The future of agriculture. Nature. 2017;544:521. https://doi.org/10.1038/544S21a
  2. 2. Billingsley J, Oetomo D, Reid J. Agricultural robotics [TC spotlight]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2009;16(4):16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2009.934829
  3. 3. Oetomo D, Billingsley J. Special issue on agricultural robotics. Intell Serv Robot. 2010;3(4):207–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-010-0079-y
  4. 4. Kondo N, Nishitsuji Y, Ling PP, Ting KC. Visual feedback guided robotic cherry tomato harvesting. Trans ASAE. 1996;39(6):2331–8. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27744
  5. 5. Åstrand B, Baerveldt AJ. An agricultural mobile robot with vision-based perception for mechanical weed control. Auton Robots. 2002;13(1):21–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015674004201
  6. 6. Camara BS, Camara F, Berthe A, Oswald A. Micro-dosing of fertilizer-a technology for farmers' needs and resources. Int J Agri Sci. 2013;3(5):387–99.
  7. 7. Divya CH, Ramakrishna H, Praveena G. Review article: Seeding and fertilization using an automated robot. Int J Curr Res. 2013;5(3):461–6.
  8. 8. Sunitha KA, Suraj GS, Sowrya PN, Atchyut Sriram G, Shreyas D, Srinivas T. Agricultural robots designed for seeding mechanism. Front Automob Mech Eng. 2017;197:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/197/1/012043
  9. 9. Chikowo R, Faloya V, Petit S, Munier-Jolain NM. Integrated weed management systems allow reduced reliance on herbicides and long-term weed control. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2009;132(3–4):237–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.009
  10. 10. Wu X, Aravechia S, Lottes P, Stachniss C, Pradalier C. Robotic weed control using automated weeds and crop classification. J Field Robot. 2020;37:322–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21938
  11. 11. Bodunde OP, Adie UC, Ikumapayi OM, Akinyoola JO, Aderoba AA. Architectural design and performance evaluation of a ZigBee technology-based adaptive sprinkler irrigation robot. Comput Electron Agric. 2019;160:168–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.03.021
  12. 12. Bac CW, Roorda T, Reshef R, Berman S, Hemming J, van Henten EJ. Analysis of a motion planning problem for sweet-pepper harvesting in a dense obstacle environment. Biosyst Eng. 2016;146:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.07.004
  13. 13. Fue KG, Porter WM, Barnes EM, Rains GC. An extensive review of mobile agricultural robotics for field operations: Focus on cotton harvesting. Agric Eng. 2020;2(150):174. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering2010010
  14. 14. Li Z, Miao F, Yang Z, Chai P, Yang S. Factors affecting human hand grasp type in tomato fruit-picking: A statistical investigation for ergonomic development of harvesting robot. Comput Electron Agric. 2019;157:90–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.047
  15. 15. Williams HAM, Jones MH, Nejati M, Seabright MJ, Bell J, Penhall ND, et al. Robotic kiwifruit harvesting using machine vision, convolutional neural networks and robotic arms. Biosyst Eng. 2019;181:140–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.03.007
  16. 16. Kumar P, Ashok G. Design and fabrication of smart seed sowing robot. Mater Today Proc. 2020;39:354–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.432
  17. 17. Jayakrishna PVS, Reddy MS, Sai NJ, Susheel N, Peeyush KP. Autonomous seed sowing agricultural robot. In: 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI). IEEE; 2018. p. 2332–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2018.8554622
  18. 18. Nagdeve T, Jangde P, Tandulkar H, Dhara S, Ukani N, Chakole S. Design of automated seed sowing robot for BT cotton seed. In: 2020 Second International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA). IEEE; 2020. p. 303–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRCA48905.2020.9183259
  19. 19. Santhi PV, Kapileswar N, Chenchela VKR, Prasad CHVS. Sensor and vision based autonomous AGRIBOT for sowing seeds. In: 2017 International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS). IEEE; 2018. p. 242–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECDS.2017.8389873
  20. 20. Indian Agricultural Research Institute. Annual report. New Delhi: IARI; 2018. p. 83.
  21. 21. Saiz V, Rovira F, Millot C. Performance improvement of a vineyard robot through its mechanical design. In: 2017 ASABE Annual International Meeting. Paper No: 1701120; 2017.
  22. 22. Xu E, Hou BM, JiaNa BI, Shen ZG, Wang B. Smart agriculture based on internet of things. In: International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST). IEEE; 2021. p. 157–62.
  23. 23. Tillett ND, Hague T, Grundy AC, Dedousis AP. Mechanical within-row weed control for transplanted crops using computer vision. Biosyst Eng. 2008;99:171–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.09.026
  24. 24. Åstrand B, Baerveldt AJ. An agricultural mobile robot with vision-based perception for mechanical weed control. Auton Robots. 2002;13:21–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015674004201
  25. 25. Cloutier DC, Van der Weide RY, Peruzzi A, Leblanc ML. Mechanical weed management. In: Non-chemical weed management: principles, concepts and technology; 2007. p. 111–34. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932909.0111
  26. 26. Griepentrog HW, Nørremark M, Nielsen J. Autonomous intra-row rotor weeding based on GPS. In: Proceeding of CIGR World Congress Agricultural Engineering for a Better World. Bonn, Germany; 3rd–7th September 2006. p. 2–6.
  27. 27. Silwal A, Davidson JR, Karkee M, Mo C, Zhang Q, Lewis K. Design, integration and field evaluation of a robotic apple harvester. J Field Robot. 2017;34(2):1140–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21715
  28. 28. Li T, Qiu Q, Zhao CJ, Xie F. Task planning of multi-arm harvesting robots for high-density dwarf orchard. Trans CSAE. 2021;37(2):1–10.
  29. 29. Peng Y, Liu J, Hie M, Shan H, He M, Hou GY. Research progress of urban dual-arm humanoid grape harvesting robot. In: 2021 IEEE 11th Annual International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems (CYBER). Paper No: 459. IEEE; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBER53097.2021.9588266
  30. 30. Zhao Y, Gong L, Liu C, Huan Y. Dual-arm robot design and testing for harvesting tomato in greenhouse. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016;49(16):161–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.030
  31. 31. Ling X, Zhao YS, Gong L, Liu CL, Wang T. Dual-arm cooperation and implementing for robotic harvesting tomato using binocular vision. Robot Auton Syst. 2019;114:134–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2019.01.019
  32. 32. Wang Z. Robot obstacle avoidance and navigation control algorithm research based on multisensory information fusion. In: Proceeding of 11th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA). IEEE; 2018. p. 351–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICTA.2018.00086
  33. 33. Blok PM, van Boheemen K, van Evert FK, IJsselmuiden J, Kim G. Robot navigation in orchards with localization based on particle filter and Kalman filter. Comput Electron Agric. 2019;157:261–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.046
  34. 34. Kumar S, Shivani J, Mishra J, Kumar S, Bharati R. Efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides on complex weed flora in direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) in the eastern plains. Indian J Agric Sci. 2018;88(3):387–92. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i3.78502
  35. 35. Paul RAI, Arthanari PM, Pazhanivelan S, Kavitha R, Djanaguiraman M. Drone-based herbicide application for energy saving, higher weed control and economics in direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agric Sci. 2023;93(7):704–9. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v93i7.137859
  36. 36. Ganesh MI. The ironies of autonomy. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2020;7(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00646-0
  37. 37. Subramaniam R, Hajjaj SSH, Gsangaya KR, Sultan MTH, Mail MF, Hua LS. Redesigning dispenser component to enhance performance crop-dusting agriculture drones. Mater Today Proc. 2023;81:166–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.015
  38. 38. Raja V, Bhaskaran B, Nagaraj K, Sampathkumar J, Senthilkumar S. Agricultural harvesting using integrated robot system. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci. 2022;25:152. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v25.i1.pp152-158
  39. 39. Linford J, Haghshenas-Jaryani M. A ground robotic system for crops and soil monitoring and data collection in New Mexico chile pepper farms. Discov Agric. 2024;2(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00113-3
  40. 40. Nagarajan K, Ramanathan SP, Thiyagarajan G, Panneerselvam S. Optimization of irrigation scheduling under different types of automated drip irrigation system for tomato. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(7):3315–9. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.387
  41. 41. Jeyaprakash P, Ramesh T, Vallal Kannan S. Optimization of herbicide dose and spray fluid for drone-based weed management in irrigated barnyard millet. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2024;22(6):6173–86. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2206_61736186
  42. 42. Bručienė I, Aleliūnas D, Šarauskis E, Romaneckas K. Influence of mechanical and intelligent robotic weed control methods on energy efficiency and environment in organic sugar beet production. Agriculture. 2021;11(5):449. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050449
  43. 43. Press Information Bureau (PIB). Sub-Mission on Agricultural Mechanization; 2023.
  44. 44. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (MoA & FW). Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana; 2023.
  45. 45. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (MoA & FW). Mechanization and Technology; 2020.
  46. 46. Press Information Bureau (PIB). Namo Didi Drone Scheme; 2024.
  47. 47. Matsuo Y, Yukumoto O, Yamamoto S, Noguchi N, Hara Y. Enhanced adaptability of tilling robot (2nd report) - Execution of various operations by tilling robot. JARQ. 2013;47(2):153–64. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.47.153

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.