Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Nutrient impact on growth, yield and quality of oats: A review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9073
Submitted
24 April 2025
Published
04-02-2026

Abstract

Oats (Avena sativa L.) represent a vital serial crop extensively grown for both human and animal consumption. Effective nutrient management is crucial for influencing the growth, health and quality of crops. This review investigates the effect of both macro and macronutrients on oat production, focusing on their roles in biomass accumulation, grain yield and nutritional quality. Additionally, the review addresses sustainable nutrient management approaches to enhance oat productivity. It talks about the latest advancements in cutting-edge trend management strategies like precision agriculture, biofertiliser use and integrated nutrient management. Furthermore, the review examines how changing climatic conditions affect nutrient needs and oat production, underscoring the necessity of adaptive strategies to maximise yield across various agroclimatic environments.

References

  1. 1. Araújo SO, Peres RS, Barata J, Lidon F, Ramalho JC. Characterising the agriculture 4.0 landscape-emerging trends, challenges and opportunities. Agronomy. 2021;11(4):667. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040667
  2. 2. Government of India. 20th Livestock Census. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture; 2020.
  3. 3. Pandey HO, Upadhyay D. Global livestock production systems: classification, status and future trends. In: Mondal S, Singh RL, editors. Emerging issues in climate smart livestock production. Academic Press; 2022. p. 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822265-2.00017-X
  4. 4. Singh DN, Bohra JS, Tyagi V, Singh T, Banjara TR, Gupta G. A review of India’s fodder production status and opportunities. Grass Forage Sci. 2022;77(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12561
  5. 5. Kumar A, Rajpali SK, Handa DP. Estimation of forage yield in oat (Avena sativa L.) by sampling methods. Crop Res. 1992;5(2):370–5.
  6. 6. Devi U, Panghaal D, Kumar P, Sewhag M, Kumar P. Effect of nitrogen fertilisers on yield and quality of oats: a review. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(2):1999–2005.
  7. 7. Sharma A, Verma R, Singh M. Influence of phosphorus application on oat yield. J Agric Res. 2022;74(2):345–56.
  8. 8. Saha S, Shankar T, Barik AK. Effect of nutrient management on growth, productivity and quality of oats with special emphasis on zinc and boron. Int J Bioresource Sci. 2020;7(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.30954/2347-9655.01.2020.6
  9. 9. Singh VI, Patra AB. Effect of FYM and manganese on yield and uptake of nutrients in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Ann Plant Soil Res. 2017;19(4):381–4.
  10. 10. Kebede G, Worku W, Jifar H, Feyissa F. Grain yield productivity, nutrient uptake, use efficiency and profitability of oat (Avena sativa L.) as influenced by variety and levels of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisers in the central highlands of Ethiopia. J Crop Sci Biotechnol. 2024;27(3):287–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-023-00230-3
  11. 11. Bibi H, Hameed S, Iqbal M, Al-Barty A, Darwish H, Khan A, et al. Evaluation of exotic oat (Avena sativa L.) varieties for forage and grain yield in response to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorous. PeerJ. 2021;9:e12112. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12112
  12. 12. Finnan J, Burke B, Spink J. The effect of nitrogen timing and rate on radiation interception, grain yield and grain quality in autumn sown oats. Field Crops Res. 2019;231:130–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.001
  13. 13. Yan W, Fregeau-Reid J, Ma BL, Pageau D, Vera C. Nitrogen fertiliser complements breeding in improving yield and quality of milling oat. Crop Sci. 2017;57(6):3291–302. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2017.05.0290
  14. 14. Wang B, Deng J, Wang T, Ni W, Feng Q, Lan J. Effect of seeding options on interspecific competition in oat (Avena sativa L.)–common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) forage crops. Agronomy. 2022;12(12):3119. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123119
  15. 15. McCabe CP, Burke JI. Oat (Avena sativa) yield and grain fill responses to varying agronomic and weather factors. J Agric Sci. 2021;159(1–2):90–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859621000320
  16. 16. Midha LK, Duhan BS, Arya S. Performance of promising entries of oat (Avena sativa L.) under different nitrogen levels. Forage Res. 2015;41(2):122–5.
  17. 17. Godara AS, Satpal S, Duhan BS, Pahuja SK. Effect of different nitrogen levels on forage yield, quality and economics of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Forage Res. 2016;41(4):233–6.
  18. 18. Sheoran RS, Satpal S, Joshi UN, Duhan BS, Kumari P, Arya S, et al. Agronomic evaluation of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes for forage yield, quality and economics under varying levels of nitrogen. Forage Res. 2017;43(1):35–8.
  19. 19. Ali I, Zamir SI, Hussain M, Shan MD, Ajmal M. Agro-economic studies of different oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars under varying nitrogen levels. J Environ Agric Sci. 2017;13:31–9.
  20. 20. Finnan JM, Spink J. Identification of yield limiting phenological phases of oats to improve crop management. J Agric Sci. 2017;155(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000071
  21. 21. Kumar U, Laza MR, Soulié JC, Pasco R, Mendez KV, Dingkuhn M. Analysis and simulation of phenotypic plasticity for traits contributing to yield potential in twelve rice genotypes. Field Crops Res. 2017;202:94–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.037
  22. 22. Mahadevan M, Calderini DF, Zwer PK, Sadras VO. The critical period for yield determination in oat (Avena sativa L.). Field Crops Res. 2016;199:109–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.09.021
  23. 23. Rawat AR, Agrawal SB, Patle NP. Effect of soil enrichment in conjunction with bio organics and chemical fertilisers on yield and quality of fodder oat (Avena sativa L.). J Trop For. 2012:59–63.
  24. 24. Malta MR, Furtini Neto AE, Alves JD, Guimarães PT. Efeito da aplicação de zinco via foliar na síntese de triptofano, aminoácidos e proteínas solúveis em mudas de cafeeiro. Brazilian J Plant Physiol. 2002;14:31–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202002000100004
  25. 25. Jat K, Kaushik MK. Quality and economics of fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) as influenced by irrigation and nitrogen under southern Rajasthan. Forage Res. 2018;44(1):28–31.
  26. 26. Joshi RV, Patel BJ, Patel KM. Effect of nitrogen levels and time of application on growth, yield, quality, nitrogen, phosphorus content and uptake for seed production of oat (Avena sativa L.). Forage Res. 2015;41(2):104–8.
  27. 27. Verma C, Thanki JD, Singh D, Chaudhari SN. Effect of nitrogen, bio-fertiliser and farm yard manure on yield and nutrient uptake in oat (Avena sativa L.). Bioscan. 2016;11(1):499–501.
  28. 28. Malik PR, Duhan BS, Midha LK, Sheoran HS. Interactive effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and cutting management on micro-nutrients uptake by oat (Avena sativa L.). Forage Res. 2015;41:68–71.
  29. 29. Kumar N, Satpal L, Kharor N, Bhardwaj S. Effect of different nitrogen levels on forage yield and quality of promising entries of single cut oat. Forage Res. 2023;48(4):482–6.
  30. 30. Kebede G, Worku W, Feyissa F, Jifar H. Agro-morphological traits-based genetic diversity assessment on oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes in the central highlands of Ethiopia. All Life. 2023;16(1):2236313. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895293.2023.2236313
  31. 31. Ashenafi A. Genetic diversity, relationship between characters and aluminium toxicity tolerance of Avena species from Ethiopia [Doctoral Dissertation]. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
  32. 32. Joshi YP, Singh V. Studies on the production potential and forage quality of different varieties of oats (Avena sativa L.). Forage Res. 2015;8:49–54.
  33. 33. Patel N, Reddy G, Kumar P. Zinc application in oat cultivation: a case study from Maharashtra. Indian J Plant Nutr. 2019;38(2):289–98.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.