Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Carbon trading across borders: A comparative review of global trading mechanisms

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9175
Submitted
28 April 2025
Published
09-09-2025 — Updated on 29-09-2025
Versions

Abstract

The intensifying effects of global warming have pushed countries globally to adopt measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Collective national and international measures are necessary, as unbridled carbon emissions continue to exacerbate global warming, extreme weather, sea-level rise and to decline agricultural productivity, posing serious threats to food security, economic stability and public health. Developing countries are particularly vulnerable, with estimated annual climate-related changes exceeding USD 1.7 trillion due to their limited adaptive capacity. Addressing these causes, Carbon Trading presents a market-oriented solution, aspiring to mitigate GHGs by facilitating the buying and selling of emission permits. Under the Paris Agreement, a strongly regulated and tailored carbon market tailored to specific conditions can incentivize cost-effective mitigation, encourage green innovation and promote clean energy and net-zero efforts. A lack of a strong carbon market can lead to significant economic losses, with estimates suggesting that the potential reduction in GDP for developing countries could be as high as 2.8 % by 2050. However, significant challenges remain in price stability, carbon leakage avoidance and coordination with wider policy frameworks This review takes up carbon trading systems across six jurisdictions, viz. the European Union, China, New Zealand, Switzerland, South Africa and India, assessing their structure, problems of implementation, economic efficiency and environmental efficacy within the environments of both developing and developed economies. The reviewed literature reveals notable differences in market maturity, sectoral coverage and price management mechanisms, highlighting significant variations in these areas along with specific challenges.

References

  1. 1. Wagner A, Steen B, Johansson G, Zanghellini E, Jacobsson P, Johansson P, et al. Carbon dioxide capture from ambient air using amine‐grafted mesoporous adsorbents. Int J Spectrosc. 2013;2013(1):690186. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/690186
  2. 2. Grubb M. The Kyoto Protocol—a guide and assessment. Nature. 1999;402(6759):233-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/46293
  3. 3. Hepburn C. Regulation by prices, quantities, or both: a review of instrument choice. Oxf Rev Econ Policy. 2006;22(2):226-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj014
  4. 4. Dixit S, Bardiya S. Carbon trading in developing economies: challenges, opportunities, and best practices. Int J Multidiscip Res. 2024;6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.30282
  5. 5. Börzel T, Hamann R, Kranz N. Business and climate change governance: conclusions. In: Börzel T, Hamann R, Kranz N, editors. Business and climate change governance: South Africa in comparative perspective. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. p. 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302746_10
  6. 6. Eboli F, Davide M. The EU and Kyoto Protocol: achievements and future challenges. Rev Environ Energy Econ-Re3. 2012.
  7. 7. Laing T, Sato M, Grubb M, Comberti C. The effects and side-effects of the EU emissions trading scheme. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2014;5(4):509-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.283
  8. 8. Zhang Y-J, Wei Y-M. An overview of current research on EU ETS: evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Appl Energy. 2010;87(6):1804-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.020
  9. 9. Parker L. Climate change: the European Union’s emissions trading system (EU-ETS). In: Global Climate Change Revisited; 2007. p. 61-82.
  10. 10. Parker L. Climate change and the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS): looking to 2020. Congressional Research Service; 2010.
  11. 11. Vollebergh HR, Brink C. What can we learn from EU ETS? CESifo Working Paper; 2020.
  12. 12. Bruninx K, Ovaere M. COVID-19, Green Deal and recovery plan permanently change emissions and prices in EU ETS Phase IV. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1165. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28737-4
  13. 13. Anger A, Köhler J. Including aviation emissions in the EU ETS: much ado about nothing? A review. Transp Policy. 2010;17(1):38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.10.010
  14. 14. Nadolny Ł. Skuteczność systemu handlu emisjami Unii Europejskiej w zakresie redukcji emisji gazów cieplarnianych. Acta Univ Lodziensis Folia Oeconomica. 2015;2(313). https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.313.03
  15. 15. Pászto V, Zimmermannová J. Relation of economic and environmental indicators to the European Union Emission Trading System: a spatial analysis. GeoScape. 2019;13(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2019-0003
  16. 16. Gomółka K, Kasprzak P. ETS prices and renewable energy sources share in the energy mix—example of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Econ Environ. 2024;90(3):844. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.90.3.844
  17. 17. Sikora M, Orliński P. Hydrotreated vegetable oil fuel within the Fit for 55 package. Combust Engines. 2024;63(2):3-8. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-174554
  18. 18. Wu L, Gong Y, Wang C, Tang W. The effectiveness of the MSR in stabilizing EU ETS market and incentivizing low-carbon investment. 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2369229/v1
  19. 19. Trotignon R, Jouvet P-A, Solier B, Quemin S, Elbeze J. European carbon market: lessons on the impact of a market stability reserve using the Zephyr model. Working Papers 1511, Chaire Economie du climat; 2015.
  20. 20. Falcke F, Madlener R. Potential impacts of the planned market stability reserve on speculators’ behavior in the EU emissions trading system. FCN Working Paper No. 09/2016; 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2916157
  21. 21. Azarova V, Mier M. MSR under exogenous shock: the case of COVID-19 pandemic. ifo Working Paper No. 338; 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724330
  22. 22. Ziller J. Advanced introduction to European Union law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2023. p. 162. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802208945
  23. 23. Dechezleprêtre A, Nachtigall D, Venmans F. The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance. J Environ Econ Manage. 2018;118:102758. https://doi.org/10.1787/4819b016-en
  24. 24. Jaraitė J, Maria CD. Did the EU ETS make a difference? An empirical assessment using Lithuanian firm-level data. Energy J. 2016;37(2):68-92. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.2.jjar
  25. 25. Marin G, Marino M, Pellegrin C. The impact of the European Emission Trading Scheme on multiple measures of economic performance. Environ Resour Econ. 2018;71:551-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0180-4
  26. 26. Chan HSR, Li S, Zhang F. Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy. 2013;63:1056-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.032
  27. 27. Narassimhan E, Gallagher KS, Koester S, Alejo JR. Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems. Clim Policy. 2018;18(8):967-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827
  28. 28. Pan J, Cross JL, Zou X, Zhang B. To tax or to trade? A global review of carbon emissions reduction strategies. Energy Strategy Rev. 2024;55:101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101508
  29. 29. Hintermann B, Zarkovic M. Carbon pricing in Switzerland: a fusion of taxes, command-and-control, and permit markets. ifo DICE Rep. 2020;18(01):35-41.
  30. 30. Prébandier M. Personal carbon trading applied to Swiss air travel-Guaranteeing a fair access to climate ambitious aviation. Infoscience; 2024.
  31. 31. Panos E, Kannan R, Hirschberg S, Kober T. An assessment of energy system transformation pathways to achieve net-zero carbon dioxide emissions in Switzerland. Commun Earth Environ. 2023;4(1):157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00768-0
  32. 32. Demski C, Poortinga W, Whitmarsh L, Böhm G, Fisher S, Steg L, et al. National context is a key determinant of energy security concerns across Europe. Nat Energy. 2018;3(10):882-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0235-8
  33. 33. Burg V, Bowman G, Hellweg S, Thees O. Long-term wet bioenergy resources in Switzerland: drivers and projections until 2050. Energies. 2019;12(18):3585. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183585
  34. 34. Van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, Gernaat DE, Van Den Berg M, Bijl DL, De Boer HS, et al. Alternative pathways to the 1.5 C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nat Clim Chang. 2018;8(5):391-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8
  35. 35. Thees O, Erni M, Lemm R, Stadelmann G, Zenner EK. Future potentials of sustainable wood fuel from forests in Switzerland. Biomass Bioenergy. 2020;141:105647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105647
  36. 36. Welfens PJ, Yu N, Hanrahan D, Geng Y. The ETS in China and Europe: dynamics, policy options and global sustainability perspectives. Int Econ Econ Policy. 2017;14(3):517-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0371-0
  37. 37. Richter JL, Mundaca L. Market behavior under the New Zealand ETS. Carbon Manag. 2013;4(4):423-38. https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.13.42
  38. 38. Hood C. Reviewing existing and proposed emissions trading systems. OECD; 2010. p. 110.
  39. 39. Bösch M, Elsasser P, Rock J, Weimar H, Dieter M. Extent and costs of forest-based climate change mitigation in Germany: accounting for substitution. Carbon Manag. 2019;10(2):127-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1577180
  40. 40. Carver T, Dawson P, O’Brien S, Kotula H, Kerr S, Leining C, et al. Including forestry in an emissions trading scheme: lessons from New Zealand. Front For Glob Change. 2022;5:956196. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.956196
  41. 41. Bullock D. Emissions trading in New Zealand: development, challenges and design. Environ Polit. 2012;21(4):657-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.688360
  42. 42. Leining C, Kerr S. Lessons learned from the New Zealand emissions trading scheme. AgEcon Search. Working Paper; 2016. http://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.290573
  43. 43. Carver T, Dawson P, Kerr S. Including forestry in an emissions trading scheme: lessons from New Zealand. SSRN; 2017. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015082
  44. 44. Leining C, Kerr S. Managing scarcity and ambition in the NZ ETS. AgEcon Search. Working Paper; 2019. http://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.290395
  45. 45. Tao M, Poletti S, Wen L, Sheng MS. Enhancing New Zealand's emissions trading scheme: a comprehensive sector-level assessment for a stronger regulatory framework. J Environ Manag. 2024;352:120106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.120106
  46. 46. Keohane N, Petsonk A, Hanafi A. Toward a club of carbon markets. Clim Change. 2017;144:81-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2045-1
  47. 47. Zhao X-G, Wu L, Li A. Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;79:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.051
  48. 48. Liu L, Chen C, Zhao Y, Zhao E. China’s carbon-emissions trading: overview, challenges and future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;49:254-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.051
  49. 49. Xiong L, Shen B, Qi S, Price L, Ye B. The allowance mechanism of China’s carbon trading pilots: a comparative analysis with schemes in EU and California. Appl Energy. 2017;185:1849-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.088
  50. 50. Stoerk T, Dudek DJ, Yang J. China’s national carbon emissions trading scheme: lessons from the pilot emission trading schemes, academic literature, and known policy details. Clim Policy. 2019;19(4):472-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1517643
  51. 51. Li K, Luo Z, Hong L, Wen J, Fang L. The role of China's carbon emission trading system in economic decarbonization: evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities. Heliyon. 2024;10(1):e23799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23799
  52. 52. Shi B, Li N, Gao Q, Li G. Market incentives, carbon quota allocation and carbon emission reduction: evidence from China's carbon trading pilot policy. J Environ Manag. 2022;319:115650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115650
  53. 53. Zhou Q, Cui X, Ni H, Gong L, Mao S. The impact of China's carbon trading policy on enterprises' energy-saving behavior. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24326
  54. 54. Zhao C, Ju S, Xue Y, Ren T, Ji Y, Chen X. China’s energy transitions for carbon neutrality: challenges and opportunities. Carbon Neutrality. 2022;1(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43979-022-00007-3
  55. 55. Deng Z, Li D, Pang T, Duan M. Effectiveness of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China. Clim Policy. 2018;18(8):992-1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1398772
  56. 56. Zhao S, Wang M, Chen L, Li J. Economic incentives for pollution control in China through the lens of the carbon trading market and its effectiveness and challenges. Law Econ. 2024;3(3):50-4. https://doi.org/10.56397/LE.2024.03.07
  57. 57. Bai J, Ma W, Wang Y, Jiang J. Political incentives in market-based environmental regulation: evidence from China’s carbon emissions trading scheme. Heliyon. 2024;10(4):e25730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25730
  58. 58. Pan X, Pu C, Yuan S, Xu H. Effect of Chinese pilots carbon emission trading scheme on enterprises' total factor productivity: the moderating role of government participation and carbon trading market efficiency. J Environ Manag. 2022;316:115228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115228
  59. 59. Abiodun TP, Nwulu N, Olukanmi P. Pioneering emission trading in Africa: an architectural design of a blockchain-powered carbon trading system. J Br Blockchain Assoc. 2024;7(2). https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-7-2-(4)2024
  60. 60. Jooste D. Emissions trading scheme for South Africa: Opportunities and challenges. Stellenbosch University; 2011.
  61. 61. Ranson M, Stavins RN. Linkage of greenhouse gas emissions trading systems: learning from experience. Clim Policy. 2016;16(3):284-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.997658
  62. 62. Oke AE, Aigbavboa CO, Dlamini SA. Carbon emission trading in South African construction industry. Energy Procedia. 2017;142:2371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.176
  63. 63. Goldblatt M. Comparison of emissions trading and carbon taxation in South Africa. In: Putting a price on carbon in South Africa and other developing countries. London: Routledge; 2020. p. 511-26. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775717-5
  64. 64. Zhang J, Li J, Ye D, Sun C. The impact of digital economy of resource‐based city on carbon emissions trading by blockchain technology. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022;2022(1):6366061. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6366061
  65. 65. Maumoh I, Onoja A, Alhassan I, Muhideen S. Opportunities, progress and challenges in carbon emission pricing and markets for East and South African regions. Res Sq. 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2197259/v1
  66. 66. Nong D, Simshauser P, Nguyen DB. Greenhouse gas emissions vs CO₂ emissions: comparative analysis of a global carbon tax. Appl Energy. 2021;298:117223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117223
  67. 67. Abel S, Mukarati J, Jeke L, Le Roux P. Carbon tax and environmental quality in South Africa. Int J Energy Econ Policy. 2023;13(2):484-8. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13923
  68. 68. Arndt C, Davies R, Makrelov K, Thurlow J. Low carbon development and carbon taxes in South Africa. AgEcon Search. 2011. p. 24.
  69. 69. Van Heerden J, Blignaut J, Bohlmann H, Cartwright A, Diederichs N, Mander M. The economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax in South Africa: a dynamic CGE modelling approach. S Afr J Econ Manag Sci. 2016;19(5):714-32. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v19i5.1401
  70. 70. Steenkamp L-A. To incentivise or penalise: an analysis of the proposed carbon tax in South Africa. In: The green market transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017. p. 47-63. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111171.00014
  71. 71. Nemavhidi M, Jegede AO. Carbon tax as a climate intervention in South Africa: a potential aid or hindrance to human rights? Environ Law Rev. 2023;25(1):11-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529231155718
  72. 72. Benecke G. Varieties of carbon governance: taking stock of the local carbon market in India. J Environ Dev. 2009;18(4):346-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496509347084
  73. 73. Sirohi S. CDM: is it a ‘win–win’ strategy for rural poverty alleviation in India? Clim Change. 2007;84(1):91-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9270-9
  74. 74. Gupta A. Climate change and Kyoto Protocol: an overview. In: Handbook of environmental and sustainable finance. Academic Press; 2016. p. 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803615-0.00001-4
  75. 75. Vashishtha S, Vashishtha DS. The evolution of the Indian carbon market: challenges, opportunities, and policy frameworks. SSRN; 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5082032
  76. 76. Kumar P. Energy Conservation Amendment Bill 2022: it all boils down to targets for industries. Down To Earth. 2022;10.
  77. 77. Gorain S, Malakar A, Chanda S. An analysis of carbon market and carbon credits in India. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Sociol. 2021;39(2):40-9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2021/v39i230570
  78. 78. Jaspal M. To price or not to price? making a case for a carbon pricing mechanism for India. New Delhi: ORF, Observer Research Foundation; 2022.
  79. 79. Mitra, A. Reconciling India's Climate and Industrial Targets: A Policy Roadmap. Observer Research Foundation; 2021.
  80. 80. Hazra ND. Emission trading schemes (ETS) in India: an overview. Sustain Agri Food Environ Res. 2023;11. https://doi.org/10.7770/safer-V11N1-art2634
  81. 81. Karedla Y, Mishra R, Patel N. The impact of economic growth, trade openness and manufacturing on CO₂ emissions in India: an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) bounds test approach. J Econ Finance Adm Sci. 2021;26(52):376-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-06-2020-0114
  82. 82. Manjunatha N, Kumar R. A study on carbon credits trading in Indian context. Int J Commer Manag Stud. 2024;9(3).
  83. 83. Acworth W, Schambil K, Bernstein T. Market stability mechanisms in emissions trading systems. Berlin: ICAP; 2020.
  84. 84. Munot S. Green economy and sustainable development in India: challenges and opportunities. Int J Sci Res. 2022;13(4):330-5. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR24405172819
  85. 85. Ray S, Ray A. Some aspects of carbon trading: issues and challenges with reference to India. Adv Appl Econ Finance. 2012;1(2):95-106.
  86. 86. Jain JK, Jain H, Agrawal M. Prospects and challenges of carbon credit trading in India. Int J Adv Res Commer Manag Soc Sci. 2023;6(1):83–94.
  87. 87. Dixit S, Bardiya S. Carbon trading in developing economies: challenges, opportunities, and best practices. Int J Multidiscip Res. 2024;6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.30282
  88. 88. Niu Y, Abdullayev V, Alyar AV, Kamran AT. Green technologies and their role in mitigating climate change: a comparative study across developing nations. ESTIDAMAA. 2023;2023:27-35. https://doi.org/10.70470/ESTIDAMAA/2023/004
  89. 89. Patil M, Boraste S, Minde P. A comprehensive review on emerging trends in smart green building technologies and sustainable materials. Mater Today Proc. 2022;65:1813-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.137
  90. 90. Esty DC, Winston A. Green to gold: how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
  91. 91. Bhattacharjee P. Benefits, risks and trade-offs in renewable and low carbon technologies for green energy electricity production in India. Sachetas. 2023;2(2):49-57. https://doi.org/10.55955/220005
  92. 92. Panos E, Kannan R, Hirschberg S, Kober T. An assessment of energy system transformation pathways to achieve net-zero carbon dioxide emissions in Switzerland. Commun Earth Environ. 2023;4(1):157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00884-w
  93. 93. Zeng X, Duan M, Yu Z, Li W, Li M, Liang X. Data-related challenges and solutions in building China’s national carbon emissions trading scheme. Clim Policy. 2018;18(Suppl 1):90-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1454889
  94. 94. Carver T, Dawson P, Kerr S. Including forestry in an emissions trading scheme: lessons from New Zealand. SSRN; 2017. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015082

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.