Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Impact of Rabi maize in paddy fallow through farmers’ participatory adoption

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9294
Submitted
5 May 2025
Published
18-09-2025 — Updated on 10-10-2025
Versions

Abstract

Maize is a staple food grain in the eastern Himalayas of India, traditionally grown only during the Kharif seasons using local cultivars. The cultivation of Rabi maize is a relatively new concept in the hills; however, favourable agro-climatic conditions offer potential for higher economic returns and proper utilisation of paddy fallow. A study was conducted in the adopted cluster villages (05 villages), Ri-Bhoi district, Meghalaya, covering a 15-hectare area, using a participatory approach to investigate the adoption of improved maize cultivars during the Rabi season. The results showed that DA 61 A and RCM 75 had promising growth and yield performances (5.2-5.8 green cob MT/ha). Prior to intervention, all the respondents grew only local varieties, and the growing seasons were mainly Kharif (76.67 %) and Zaid (23.33 %), with none cultivating during the Rabi season. In the post-intervention period, most respondents partially adopted Rabi maize cultivation technology, with a 60.0 % overall adoption level. Partial adoption was mainly due to a preference for high-value vegetables (ranked first at 100 %) and non-availability of varieties (96.67 %). The highest gross return, net return and benefit-cost ratio were recorded in improved cultivars (DA 61A and RCM 76). A negative correlation (r = -0.547*) was observed between disease incidence and Rabi maize yield. Adoption of Rabi maize cultivars shows promise for enhancing the socio-economic status and livelihoods of participating farmers.

References

  1. 1. Wattoo FM, Rana RM, Fiaz S, Zafar SA, Noor MA, Hassan HM, et al. Identification of drought tolerant maize genotypes and seedling based morpho-physiological selection indices for crop improvement. Sains Malays. 2018;47:295–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2018-4702-11
  2. 2. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. Press Information Bureau (PIB). [Internet]. India: Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare; 2023 [cited 2024 Sep 28].
  3. 3. Das A, Patel DP, Munda GC, Ghosh PK. Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility of maize (Zea mays)-mustard (Brassica campestris) cropping system. Indian J Agric Sci. 2010;80(1):85-88.
  4. 4. Singh AK, Chakraborti M, Datta M. Improving rice-based cropping pattern through soil moisture and integrated nutrient management in mid-tropical plain zone of Tripura, India. Rice Sci. 2014;21(5):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(13)60190-0
  5. 5. Babu S, Mohapatra KP, Layek J, Firake DM, Kumar A, Behere GT, et al. Maize production technology in Meghalaya. Technical Bulletin: RC-Umiam/IIMR-Maize Project/1. Umiam (India): ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region; 2019.
  6. 6. Mayee CD, Datar VV. Phyto-pathometry. Tech Bull. 1(Special Bul. 3). Parbhani (India): Marathwada Agricultural University; 1986.
  7. 7. Danson J, Lagat M, Kimani M, Kuria A. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for resistance to gray leaf spot and common rust diseases of maize. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7(18):3247–54. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB07.801
  8. 8. Wheeler BEJ. An introduction to plant diseases. London: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1969.
  9. 9. Mexico. CIMMYT Economics Program. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economics training manual. No. 27 [Internet]. Texcoco: The Institute; 1988.
  10. 10. Wander AE. Economic analysis of farm change using the partial budget. Redes. 2001;6(3):47–54.
  11. 11. Guzman G. Human development report: Philippines case study. New York: UNDP; 1990.
  12. 12. Muhammad A, Shah P, Hatam M, Jan MT. Comparative growth and vegetative development of land races and improved varieties of soybean. Pak J Agron. 2003;2(4):214–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ja.2003.214.216
  13. 13. Bhatia VS, Tiwari SP, Joshi OP. Yield and its attributes as affected by planting dates in soybean (Glycine max) varieties. Indian J Agric Sci. 1999;69(10):696–99.
  14. 14. Eagles HA, Hardacre AK. Genetic variation in maize for early seedling growth in a low temperature environment. New Zealand J Agric Res. 1979;22(4):553–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1979.10417823
  15. 15. Lavanya GR, Lal GM, Archana B. Genetic variability and inter-relationship among grain yield and it’s components in maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(23):177-84. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2331577
  16. 16. Rotundo JL, Zinselmeier C, Hoffman N, Ferhatoglu C, Jobbagy E, Oliver P, Borras L. Breeding progress is a major contributor to improved regional maize water productivity. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):13765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96534-1
  17. 17. Layek J, Das A, Ramkrushna GI, Trivedi K, Yesuraj D, Chandramohan M, et al. Seaweed sap: A sustainable way to improve productivity of maize in North-East India. Int J Environ Stud. 2015;72(2):305–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2015.1010855
  18. 18. Singh N, Rajendran RA, Shekhar M, Jat SL, Kumar R, Kumar RS. Rabi maize opportunities challenges. Technical Bull. 2012;9:32–54.
  19. 19. Ushasri B, Suresh T. Contributing factors for high yield in Rabi maize. Just Agric. 2022;2(12):1–3.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.