Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Early Access

Integrated weed management approaches for sustainable weed suppression and yield optimization in aerobic rice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9349
Submitted
7 May 2025
Published
22-09-2025
Versions

Abstract

Aerobic rice, grown in well-drained non-puddled non-saturated soils, is a promising water saving approach that can reduce water consumption compared to traditional methods, but weed infestation remains a major constraint that significantly limits crop growth and yield. A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate effective combinations of physical and chemical methods along with various agronomic practices to analyse the impact of various weed management methods for aerobic rice cultivation. The study was conducted using a randomized block design, with three replications in ten treatment combinations. Among the different weed control strategies, the weed-free treatment recorded the lowest weed density (2.48 weeds/m² at maximum tillering and 3.39 weeds/m² at panicle initiation stage), highest weed control efficiency (94.7 % at maximum tillering and 93.2 % at panicle initiation stage), lowest weed index and highest grain yield (4977 kg/ha). This was followed by Pre-Emergence (PE) application of pendimethalin (0.75 kg/ha) at 5 DAS (Days After Sowing) followed by mechanical weeding at 30 DAS resulted in reduced weed density (5.37 weeds/m² at tillering and 9.12 weeds/m² at panicle initiation), improved weed control efficiency (73.76 % and 48.52 %) and a grain yield of 4833 kg/ha, this treatment also recorded the highest Benefit-Cost (B:C) ratio (2.23), establishing it as the most economically viable and profitable approach for weed management in aerobic rice cultivation. It was comparable to the chemical control using PE pendimethalin followed by Early Post-Emergence (EPoE) application of bispyribac sodium (25 g/ha) at 25 DAS, which recorded a B:C ratio of 2.00.

References

  1. 1. Fukagawa NK, Ziska LH. Rice: Importance for global nutrition. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2019;65:S2-3. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.65.S2
  2. 2. India. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Economics and Statistics Division. Agricultural statistics at a glance. New Delhi: Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare; 2023 https://tinyurl.com/ys5znf3h
  3. 3. Bouman BA, Hengsdijk H, Hardy B, Bindraban PS, Tuong TP, Ladha JK. Water-wise rice production. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute; 2002. p. 356
  4. 4. Tuong TP, Bouman BAM, Mortimer M. More rice, less water-integrated approaches for increasing water productivity in irrigated rice-based systems in Asia. Plant Prod Sci. 2005;8(3):231-41. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.231
  5. 5. Lal B, Nayak AK, Gautam P, Tripathi R, Singh T, Katara J. Aerobic rice: A water saving approach for rice production. Popular Kheti. 2013;1(2):1-4.
  6. 6. Amudha K, Thiyagarajan K, Sakthivel N. Aerobic rice: A review. Agric Rev. 2009;30(2):145-9.
  7. 7. Singh S, Ladha JK, Gupta RK, Bhushan L, Rao AN. Weed management in aerobic rice systems under varying establishment methods. Crop Prot. 2008;27(3-5):660-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.09.012
  8. 8. Das TK, Behera B, Nath CP, Ghosh S, Sen S, Raj R, et al. Herbicides use in crop production: An analysis of cost-benefit, non-target toxicities and environmental risks. Crop Prot. 2024;181:106691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106691
  9. 9. Gianessi LP. The increasing importance of herbicides in worldwide crop production. Pest Manag Sci. 2013;69(10):1099-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3598
  10. 10. Gianessi LP, Reigner NP. The value of herbicides in US crop production. Weed Technol. 2007;21(2):559-66. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-130.1
  11. 11. Parven A, Meftaul IM, Venkateswarlu K, Megharaj M. Herbicides in modern sustainable agriculture: Environmental fate, ecological implications and human health concerns. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2025;22(2):1181-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05818-y
  12. 12. Mortensen DA, Egan JF, Maxwell BD, Ryan MR, Smith RG. Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience. 2012;62(1):75-84. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.12
  13. 13. Krishnaprabu S. Sustainable weed management practices in direct seeded rice: A review. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(2S):1-11. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i2ak.11194
  14. 14. Rajakumar D, Subramanian E, Maragatham N, Thiyagarajan G. Biointensive weed management in aerobic dry sown rice: A review. Agric Rev. 2010;31(2):127-32.
  15. 15. Parihar RK, Srivastav VK, Kumar S, Kumar V. Weed dynamics, weed control efficiency and yield of aerobic rice as influenced by different weed management practices in eastern UP. J Environ Biol. 2020;41(6):1735-40. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/41/6/SI-264
  16. 16. Mahilang K, Choudhary S, Victor V, Sonboier K. Design and development of power operated rotary weeder for rice. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2017;24(5):1-7. https://doi.org/10.9734/CJAST/2017/37844
  17. 17. Alizadeh MR. Field performance evaluation of mechanical weeders in the paddy field. Sci Res Essays. 2011;6(25):5427-34.
  18. 18. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. Manila: International Rice Research Institute; New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984
  19. 19. Ragesh KT, Jogdand SV, Victor DV. Field performance evaluation of power weeder for paddy crop. Curr Agric Res J. 2018;6(3):441-8. https://doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.6.3.24
  20. 20. Singh VP, Singh G, Singh RK. Integrated weed management in direct seeded spring sown rice under rainfed low valley situation of Uttaranchal. Indian J Weed Sci. 2001;33:63-6.
  21. 21. Kalaimathi VC, Sivakumar P, Parasuraman R, Sivakumar KP, Ragunath, Aneesa Rani MS. Effect of chemical and non-chemical weed management practices in direct seeded rice. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):1812-20. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183479
  22. 22. Khaliq AK, Matloob AM, Shafiq HM, Cheema ZA, Wahid AW. Evaluating sequential application of pre and post emergence herbicides in dry seeded fine rice. Pak J Weed Sci Res. 2011;17(2):111-23.
  23. 23. Pant C, Dhakal S, Sah SK, Karkee SS. Effect of herbicide application on weed density and yield of wet direct seeded spring rice at Sundarpur, Nepal. Agron J Nepal. 2023;7:94-102. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajn.v7i1.62161
  24. 24. Patel TU, Vihol KJ, Thanki JD, Gudaghe NN, Desai LJ. Weed and nitrogen management in direct-seeded rice. Indian Soc Weed Sci. 2018;50(4):320-3. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2018.00069.2
  25. 25. Dhruw J, Victor VM, Malathi KM. Techno economic evaluation of different types of power weeder in Chhattisgarh region. J Sci Res Rep. 2025;31(5):1-3. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i53000
  26. 26. Singh S, Pandey D, Chanda SS, Singh PK, Tiwari HN, Singh DK, et al. Integrated weed management in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.): An experimental investigation. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(23):166-74. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i234228
  27. 27. Saravanane P, Mala S, Chellamuthu V. Integrated weed management in aerobic rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 2016;48(2):152-4. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00038.1
  28. 28. Ramesh T, Rathika S. Effect of weed management techniques on drip irrigated aerobic rice. Plant Arch. 2020;20(2):4462-6.
  29. 29. Mohanty DK, Bhuyan J. Evaluation of different mechanical weed control methods in rice field. J Krishi Vigyan. 2020;8(2):115-9. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2020.00024.0
  30. 30. Kashyap S, Singh VP, Guru SK, Pratap T, Singh SP, Kumar R. Effect of integrated weed management on weed and yield of direct seeded rice. Indian J Agric Res. 2022;56(1):33-7. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.a-5775
  31. 31. Raosaheb GN, Petkar AP, Bhutada SH. Design and development of rotary power weeder. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;9(2):1063-8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.124
  32. 32. Rao MMV, Nagarjuna D, Ramana Murthy KV. Productivity and profitability in dry direct sown rice through mechanization. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;9(1):17-20. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1a.11245
  33. 33. Rajkhowa DJ, Deka NC, Borah N, Barua IC. Effect of herbicides with or without paddy weeder on weeds in transplanted summer rice (Oryza sativa). Indian J Agron. 2007;52(2):107-10. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v52i2.4902
  34. 34. Mohan SS, Sanjana G, Avinash D, Rohitha M, Kumar DA. Performance evaluation of power weeder in sugarcane crop. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2020;39(38):70-81. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i3831097
  35. 35. Islam AS, Islam MT, Islam MS, Rahman AL, Rahman MA. Performance evaluation of BRRI power weeder for low land rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation. The Agriculturists. 2017;15(1):40-8. https://doi.org/10.3329/agric.v15i1.33427
  36. 36. Senthilkumar T, Duraisamy VM, Asokan D. Evaluation of power weeders for mechanized weeding in pulse crop cultivation. Madras Agric J. 2023;99:1. https://doi.org/10.29321/maj.10.100096
  37. 37. Pusdekar VR, Pagar PC, Atram KS, Kothikar RB, Mairan NR. Effect of pre and post emergence herbicide on weed control in direct seeded lowland rice. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(6).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.