Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp3 (2025): Advances in Plant Health Improvement for Sustainable Agriculture

Multi-trait based index selection for drought stress in foxtail millet genotypes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9382
Submitted
8 May 2025
Published
10-10-2025

Abstract

Foxtail millet is recognized as the second among the small millets after finger millet. It has been documented that foxtail millet exhibits a notable degree of tolerance to drought conditions. Nonetheless, the extent of drought tolerance displayed by foxtail millet varies across different genotypes. Consequently, the selection of genotypes with superior drought tolerance is imperative for prospective breeding initiatives. Hence, the current investigation was conducted to evaluate the response of foxtail millet genotypes for drought stress based on morpho-physiological and root related traits with the aim of identifying drought-tolerant genotypes. A total of twenty-three foxtail millet genotypes were examined at the Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute (PAJANCOA & RI) located in Karaikal during the Kharif season of 2024. The experimental design included RBD (Randomized Block Design) with two distinct treatments (control and drought condition), each replicated three times. A comprehensive array of morphological, physiological and root-related characteristics was recorded and analysed statistically. Apart from four traits- Canopy Temperature (CTP), Leaf Temperature (LTP), Root Length (RLT) and Root Shoot Ratio (RSR) all the remaining traits exhibited a statistically significant decline in mean performance when subjected to reproductive drought stress in comparison to optimal growth conditions. The Multi-Trait Genotype-Ideotype Distance Index (MGIDI) was employed to assess and identify the genotypes that exhibited optimal performance across twenty traits. The findings indicated that genotype GPUF 18 (G5) emerged as the highest performer across both treatment conditions, showcasing its adaptability and potential for further breeding applications. Additionally, the genotypes were evaluated utilizing nine plant abiotic stress indices, which revealed significant correlations that could facilitate the selection of tolerant genotypes under varying stress scenarios. Genotype IIMR FxM 12 (G3), characterized by a low Average Sum of Rank (ASR), was identified as a drought-tolerant foxtail millet genotype predicated on single-plant yield. This study identified drought-tolerant genotypes to develop drought-resistant foxtail millet.

References

  1. 1. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. In: Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Véronique S, Alberola C, editors. Sustainable agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer. 2009. p.153–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12
  2. 2. Seghatoleslami MJ, Kafi M, Majidi E. Effect of drought stress at different growth stages on yield and water use efficiency of five proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes. Pak J Bot. 2008;40(4):1427–32.
  3. 3. Mal B, Padulosi S, Ravi SB, editors. Minor millets in South Asia: learnings from IFAD-NUS project in India and Nepal. Rome (Italy): Bioversity International; Chennai (India): M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation. 2010. p. 185
  4. 4. Prabhakar PC, Ganiger BB, Bhat S, Nandini C, Kiran TV, Manjunath HA. Improved production technology for foxtail millet. Technical Bulletin. 2017;3:2017-18.
  5. 5. Lata C, Sahu PP, Prasad M. Comparative transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) during dehydration stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;393(4):720–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.068
  6. 6. Chaudhry UF, Khalid MN, Aziz S, Amjad I, Khalid A, Noor H, et al. Genetic studies in different F2 segregating population for yield and fiber quality traits in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Curr Opin Crop Sci. 2022;3(3):135–51. https://doi.org/10.62773/jcocs.v3i3.174
  7. 7. Ashok S, Senthil A, Sritharan N, Punitha S, Divya K, Ravikesavan R. Yield potential of small millets under drought condition. Madras Agric J. 2018;105(7–9)(2):370–2. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.2018.000163
  8. 8. Farooq M, Wahid A, Lee DJ, Cheema SA, Aziz T. Drought stress: comparative time course action of the foliar applied glycinebetaine, salicylic acid, nitrous oxide, brassinosteroids and spermine in improving drought resistance of rice. J Agron Crop Sci. 2010;196(5):336–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00422.x
  9. 9. Liu Y, Fiskum G, Schubert D. Generation of reactive oxygen species by the mitochondrial electron transport chain. J Neurochem. 2002;80(5):780–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-3042.2002.00744.x
  10. 10. Olivoto T, Nardino M, Meira D, Meier C, Follmann DN, de Souza VQ, et al. Multi-trait selection for mean performance and stability in maize. Agron J. 2021;113(5):3968–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20741
  11. 11. Bizari EH, Val BHP, Pereira EdM, Mauro AOD, Unêda-Trevisoli SH. Selection indices for agronomic traits in segregating populations of soybean. Rev Ciênc Agron. 2017;48(1):110–7. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170012
  12. 12. Smith HF. A discriminant function for plant selection. Ann Eugen. 1936;7(3):240–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x
  13. 13. Benakanahalli NK, Sridhara S, Ramesh N, Olivoto T, Sreekantappa G, Tamam N, et al. A framework for identification of stable genotypes based on MTSI and MGDII indexes: An example in guar (Cymopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agronomy. 2021;11(6):1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061221
  14. 14. Pour-Aboughadareh A, Sanjani S, Chaman-Abad HN, Mehrvar MR, Asadi A, Amini A. MGIDI and WAASB indices: The useful approaches for selection of salt-tolerant barley genotype at the early growth and maturity stages. Res Square. 2021. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-304576/v1
  15. 15. el hadj DH, Tellah S, Goumeida K, Aitouakli S, Tifest C, Ammi N, et al. Evaluation of adaptability of different faba bean landraces under Mediterranean field conditions of central-northern Algeria. Agronomy. 2022;12(7):1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12071660
  16. 16. Gabriel A, de Resende JTV, Zeist AR, Resende LV, Resende NCV, Zeist RA. Phenotypic stability of strawberry cultivars based on physicochemical traits of fruits. Hortic Bras. 2019;37:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-053620190112
  17. 17. Anwaar HA, Perveen R, Mansha MZ, Abid M, Sarwar ZM, Aatif HM, et al. Assessment of grain yield indices in response to drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(7):1818–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.12.009
  18. 18. Kamrani M, Hoseini Y, Ebadollahi A. Evaluation for heat stress tolerance in durum wheat genotypes using stress tolerance indices. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2018;64(1):38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1326104
  19. 19. Choudhary RS, Biradar DP, Katageri IS. Evaluation of sorghum RILs for moisture stress tolerance using drought tolerance indices. Pharma Innov J. 2021;10(4):39–45.
  20. 20. Gholamhoseini M. Evaluation of sesame genotypes for agronomic traits and stress indices grown under different irrigation treatments. Agron J. 2020;112(3):1794–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20167
  21. 21. Khalili M, Naghavi MR, Aboughadareh AP, Talebzadeh SJ. Evaluating of drought stress tolerance based on selection indices in spring canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.). J Agric Sci. 2012;4(11):78–85.
  22. 22. Ganjeali A, Porsa H, Bagheri A. Assessment of Iranian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasms for drought tolerance. Agric Water Manag. 2011;98(9):1477–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.017

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.