Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Spatial rice yield estimation using semi-physical and crop simulation models: A comparative approach

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9444
Submitted
15 May 2025
Published
13-07-2025 — Updated on 22-07-2025
Versions

Abstract

This study presents a comparative assessment of two modelling approaches for estimating spatial rice yields across the Cauvery delta zone (CDZ) in Tamil Nadu, viz., (a) a process-based crop simulation model (DSSAT-CERES Rice) and (b) a semi-physical model (SPM). The DSSAT model was calibrated using field data, cultivar-specific genetic coefficients and further refined through the integration of leaf area index (LAI) derived from Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery. In contrast, the SPM utilized remote sensing-derived inputs such as photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), fraction of absorbed PAR (FPAR), temperature and water stress indices and radiation use efficiency (RUE) to compute yield via net primary productivity (NPP). Results revealed that DSSAT achieved higher alignment with crop cutting experiment (CCE) data (88.6 %) than SPM (83.3 %), attributed to its capability to simulate complex crop-soil-climate interactions. However, the SPM demonstrated greater scalability and ease of implementation, particularly in regions with limited field data. The study highlights the strengths and limitations of each approach, offering insights into model selection based on accuracy, data availability and operational feasibility. These findings suggest that integration of remote sensing and crop modelling could serve as a valuable strategy for
improving regional yield forecasting and enhancing agricultural decision-making.

References

  1. 1. Jabed MA, Murad MA. Crop yield prediction in agriculture: A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning approaches, with insights for future research and sus-tainability. Heliyon. 2024;10(24):e40836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40836
  2. 2. Saleem A, Anwar S, Nawaz T, Fahad S, Saud S, Ur Rahman T, et al. Securing a sustainable future: The climate change threat to agriculture, food security, and sustainable development goals. J Umm Al-Qura Univ Appl Sci. 2024;11:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00177-3
  3. 3. Autio A, Johansson T, Motaroki L, Minoia P, Pellikka P. Constraints for adopting climate-smart agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Southeast Kenya. Agric Sys. 2021;194:103284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103284
  4. 4. Fang H, Liang S, Chen Y, Ma H, Li W, He T, et al. A comprehensive review of rice map-ping from satellite data: Algorithms, product characteristics and consistency assessment. Sci Remote Sens. 2024;10:100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2024.100172
  5. 5. Jha MN, Kumar A, Dubey S, Pandey A. Yield estimation of rice crop using semi-physical approach and remotely sensed data. In: Jha CS, Pandey A, Chowdary V, Singh V, editors. Geospatial technologies for resources planning and management. Cham: Springer; 2022. p.1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98981-1_15
  6. 6. Mandapati R, Gumma MK, Metuku DR, Maitra S. Field-level rice yield estimations under different farm practices using the crop simulation model for better yield. Plant Sci Today. 2024;11(1):234-40. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2690
  7. 7. Parag M, Lottering R, Peerbhay K, Agjee N, Poona N. The use of synthetic aperture radar technology for crop biomass monitoring: A systematic review. Remote Sens Appl Soc Envi-ron. 2024;33:101107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101107
  8. 8. Holecz F, Barbieri M, Collivignarelli F, Gatti L, Nelson A, Setiyono TD, et al. An operation-al remote sensing based service for rice production estimation at national scale. In: Proceed-ings of the living planet symposium. 2013. https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1492.8643
  9. 9. Aspert F, Bach-Cuadra M, Cantone A, Holecz F, Thiran JP. Time-varying segmentation for mapping of land cover changes. In: ENVISAT Symposium. 2007.
  10. 10. Nelson A, Setiyono T, Rala AB, Quicho ED, Raviz JV, Abonete PJ, et al. Towards an operational SAR-based rice monitoring system in Asia: Examples from 13 demonstration sites across Asia in the RIICE project. Remote Sens. 2014;6(11):10773-10812. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61110773
  11. 11. Chaurasia G, Saxena S, Tripathy R, Chaudhari KN, Ray SS. Semi physical approach for sugarcane yield modelling with remotely sensed inputs. Vayu Mandal. 2017;43(1):11-22.
  12. 12. Liang S, Ma W, Sui X, Wang M, Li H. An assessment of relations between vegetation green FPAR and vegetation indices through a radiative transfer model. Plants. 2023;12(10):1927. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12101927
  13. 13. Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, Zhao CX. Water-deficit stress-induced anatomical changes in higher plants. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2008;331(3):215-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2008.01.002
  14. 14. Pai DS, Rajeevan M, Sreejith OP, Mukhopadhyay B, Satbha NS. Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25 × 0.25) long period (1901-2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region. Mausam. 2014;65(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v65i1.851
  15. 15. Sigman DM, Hain MP. The biological productivity of the Ocean. Nature Edu Knowl. 2012;3(6):1-16.
  16. 16. Lake L, Guilioni L, French B, Sadras VO. Field pea. In: Sadras VO, Calderini DF, editors. Crop physiology case histories for major crops. Academic Press; 2021. p. 320-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819194-1.00009-8
  17. 17. Deka RL, Hussain R, Singh KK, Baxla A, Rao V, Balasubramaniyam R. Rice phenology and growth simulation using CERES-Rice model under the agro-climate of upper Brahma-putra valley of Assam. Mausam. 2016;67(3):591-98. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v67i3.1374
  18. 18. Guo Y, Wu W, Bryant CR. Quantifying spatio-temporal patterns of rice yield gaps in dou-ble-cropping systems: A case study in pearl river delta, China. Sustain. 2019;11(5):1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051394
  19. 19. Pazhanivelan S, Geethalakshmi V, Tamilmounika R, Sudarmanian NS, Kaliaperumal R, Ra-malingam K, et al. Spatial rice yield estimation using multiple linear regression analysis, semi-physical approach and assimilating SAR satellite derived products with DSSAT crop simulation model. Agron. 2022;12(9):2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092008
  20. 20. Peng D, Huang J, Li C, Liu L, Huang W, Wang F, et al. Modelling paddy rice yield using MODIS data. Agric For Meteorol. 2014;184:107-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.09.006
  21. 21. Gumma MK, Nukala RM, Panjala P, Bellam PK, Gajjala S, Dubey SK, et al. Optimizing crop yield estimation through geospatial technology: A comparative analysis of a semi-physical model, crop simulation, and machine learning algorithms. Agri Eng. 2024;6(1):786-802. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6010045

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.