Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Optimizing maize productivity: Impact of sowing dates on growth and yield parameters of diverse genotypes in Karnataka's southern dry zone

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9449
Submitted
15 May 2025
Published
26-09-2025

Abstract

This study examined the impact of various sowing windows on growth parameters and yield attributes of maize genotypes in the southern dry zone of Karnataka, India. Field experiments were conducted during the Kharif seasons of 2021 and 2022 at Haradanahally village, Chamarajanagara district, using a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Two maize hybrids MAH 14-5 and Hema were evaluated across four sowing windows (1st week of June 3rd week of June 1st week of July and 3rd week of July) under rainfed conditions. Plant growth parameters (plant height, number of leaves and leaf area) were measured at 30th, 60th and 90th days after sowing (DAS) and yield attributes (cob length, kernels per cob, cob girth, rows per cob, test weight, grain yield and stover yield) were recorded at harvest. Results indicated that the MAH 14-5 hybrid, sown during the 1st week of July (H1D3), consistently performed better across both years in terms of plant height (218.23 cm), number of leaves (16.61), leaf area (8318 cm²), cob length (17.03 cm), kernels per cob (580.64), test weight (34.46 g), grain yield (6980 kg/ha) and stover yield (9155 kg/ha). In contrast, the Hema hybrid, sown during the 1st week of June (H2D1), recorded the lowest performance across all parameters. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments and post hoc tests confirmed that optimal performance was achieved through the combination of MAH 14-5 and 1st week of July sowing. These findings suggest that proper synchronization between sowing time and hybrid selection can enhance resource use efficiency and maize productivity under rainfed conditions in Karnataka’s southern dry zone. This research provides site-specific recommendations to help farmers make informed decisions on the sowing time of different maize hybrids under similar agroclimatic conditions.

References

  1. 1. ICAR–Indian Institute of Maize Research. Annual report 2023–24. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 2024.
  2. 2. Sakib AN, Haque M. Corn to ethanol: design, simulate and statistical optimization for sustainable biofuel production. Res Bioeng Biomed Sci. 2025;2025:1–22.
  3. 3. Barakatullah R, Rabbani S, Safdary AJ. Effect of sowing date and plant density on yield and yield components of three maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in Takhar climatic conditions of Afghanistan. Cent Asian J Plant Sci Innov. 2021;2:109–20.
  4. 4. Jeganathan VS, Archontoulis SV, Licht MA. Agro climatic zone wise drought hazards in Karnataka under historical and future climate scenarios. MAUSAM. 2024;75(2):583–96. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v75i2.6323
  5. 5. Grote U, Fasse A, Nguyen TT, Erenstein O. Food security and the dynamics of wheat and maize value chains in Africa and Asia. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;4:617009. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.617009
  6. 6. Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics, Ministry of Commerce and Industry. 2023.
  7. 7. Hugar AY. Crop-weather relations in maize (Zea mays L.) under different sowing windows and planting geometry in Northern transition zone of Karnataka. Dharwad: University of Agricultural Sciences; 2015.
  8. 8. Zhiipao RR, Pooniya V, Biswakarma N, Kumar D, Shivay YS, Dass A, et al. Timely sown maize hybrids improve the post anthesis dry matter accumulation, nutrient acquisition and crop productivity. Sci Rep. 2023;13:1688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28224-9
  9. 9. Liu N, Li L, Li H, Liu Z, Lu Y, Shao L. Selecting maize cultivars to regulate canopy structure and light interception for high yield. Agron J. 2022;115(2):770–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21278
  10. 10. Thimmegowda MN, Manjunatha MH, Huggi L, Bal SK, Sarath Chandran MA, Soumya DV, et al. Impact of rainfall variability on major crops using the deficient rainfall impact parameter (DRIP): a case study over Karnataka, India. Meteorol Appl. 2025;32(2):e70032. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70032
  11. 11. Kumar M, Ramesh K, Prasad R. Effect of sowing time and hybrids on growth and productivity of maize. Indian J Agron. 2020;65(2):142–7.
  12. 12. Kumar A. Effect of date of sowing and varieties on growth and yield parameters in spring maize (Zea mays L.). Kanpur: Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology; 2023.
  13. 13. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  14. 14. Organic Farming Research Station. Annual report submitted to India Meteorological Department. Naganahalli, Mysuru, India. 2002.
  15. 15. Sreeramulu KR, Ramachandrappa BK, Nanjappa HV, Shivakumar MS, Govindaraju BM, Somanna SU, et al. Agroclimatic characterization of Southern Dry Zone of Karnataka (NARP Agroclimatic Zone-6). Agrometeorology Section, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore, India. 2018.
  16. 16. Bhanuprakash HR, Sapkal DR, Hanumanthappa M, Rajath HP, Pandey S. Nanotechnology in agriculture for improving crop yield: a review. J Food Chem Nanotechnol. 2023;9(S1):S420–8. https://doi.org/10.17756/jfcn.2023-s1-053
  17. 17. Baum ME, Archontoulis SV, Licht MA. Planting date, hybrid maturity and weather effects on maize yield and crop stage. Agron J. 2019;111(1):303–13. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.04.0297
  18. 18. Sharma V, Yadav R, Meena H. Influence of sowing dates on growth and yield attributes of maize. J Crop Weed. 2018;14(3):84–9.
  19. 19. Subramanian V, Rao GV, Rajkumar M. Leaf area development and light interception in maize under varying management conditions. Int J Plant Sci. 2016;11(2):302–6.
  20. 20. Singh SK, Reddy KS. Role of leaf area in maize productivity. J Agrometeorol. 2019;21(4):450–4.
  21. 21. Liu Z, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. Optimizing row spacing to boost maize yield via enhanced photosynthesis and biomass accumulation. Field Crops Res. 2025;267:108151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.108151
  22. 22. Xu X, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. Quantifying contributions of leaf area and longevity to leaf area duration and yield in maize. Field Crops Res. 2022;279:108463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108463
  23. 23. Hou X, Liu X, Zhang H, et al. A global analysis of dry matter accumulation and allocation for maize under varying planting densities. Field Crops Res. 2022;284:108575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108575
  24. 24. Patil BN, Hiremath SM, Kalaghatagi SB. Contribution of leaf traits to grain yield in maize. Agric Sci Dig. 2017;37(1):24–8.
  25. 25. Chaudhary M, Timsina J, Ladha JK. Agronomic and genetic factors influencing maize productivity. Field Crops Res. 2017;204:43–56.
  26. 26. Reddy RS, Ramesh K, Singh M. Influence of crop growth parameters on yield attributes in maize under different sowing windows. Indian J Agron. 2016;61(2):182–7.s
  27. 27. Kumar R, Yadav DS. Effect of planting time and cultivars on yield and quality of maize. Res Crops. 2015;16(2):254–9.
  28. 28. Sharma V, Yadav R, Meena H. Influence of sowing dates on yield and yield components of maize. J Crop Weed. 2018;14(3):84–9.
  29. 29. Subramanian V, Rao GV, Rajkumar M. Impact of sowing window and hybrid selection on maize productivity. Int J Plant Sci. 2016;11(2):302–6.
  30. 30. Singh SK, Reddy KS. Contribution of yield attributes to maize grain yield under different agro climatic zones. J Agrometeorol. 2019;21(4):450–4.
  31. 31. Jat ML, Saharawat YS, Gupta R. Improving stover yield and soil health through integrated agronomic management in maize systems. Agric Syst. 2012;113:88–95.
  32. 32. Rajath HP, Kumar C, Hanumanthappa M, Bhanuprakash HR, Yogesh GS, Chandrakala H, et al. Impact of weather parameters on maize agroecosystem and adaptation strategies under changing climatic conditions: a review. Plant Sci Today. 2023;10(sp1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2164

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.