Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

An overview of mechanized cotton harvesting : Introduction of AI enabled robot and its implication in mechanization

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9512
Submitted
19 May 2025
Published
24-09-2025

Abstract

Cotton has been a pivotal crop throughout India's history, maintaining its significant social and economic importance in contemporary Indian society. In India, cotton is harvested manually using traditional hand-picking techniques. However, manual cotton-picking poses drawbacks such as high labor cost, labor shortage and risks to worker’s health due to prolonged exposure to pesticides and repetitive motion injuries, thereby affecting overall productivity and sustainability in the cotton industry. Mechanical harvesting employs advanced machinery to efficiently harvest cotton, reducing its dependence on manual labor and thereby boosting productivity in the fields. Mechanical cottonpicking presents challenges such as high initial investment costs for machinery, potential damage to crops, soil compaction and the need for skilled operators, limiting its widespread adoption in small land holdings. The integration of robotics, automation and precision agriculture has transformed cotton harvesting technology, replacing traditional methods. These innovations improve efficiency and productivity while supporting sustainability by minimizing environmental impact and ensuring continued success of cotton production. Further research and development in artificial intelligence, machine learning and sensor technology are expected to drive continued innovation, making cotton harvesting even more efficient, sustainable and cost-effective for farmers worldwide.

References

  1. 1. Anonymous. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana; 2010. Available from: http://www.pdexcil.org/news/anrpt4/tab23.htm.
  2. 2. Lanclos K, Meyer L, Dew T, Jarrell P, Soley G, Galbraith S, et al. The world and United States cotton outlook. Agricultural Outlook Forum; 2025. Available from: https://www.usda.gov/oce/ag-outlook-forum/commodity-outlooks
  3. 3. Prasad J, Majumdar G. Present practices and future needs for mechanization of cotton picking in India. Agric Engineer Today. 1999;23(5-6):1-20.
  4. 4. Sandhar NS. Mechanized picking of cotton in Punjab: some experiences. Agric Engineer Today. 1999;23(5-6):21-27.
  5. 5. Barnes E, Morgan G, Hake K, Devine J, Kurtz R, Ibendahl G, et al. Opportunities for robotic systems and automation in cotton production. AgriEngineer. 2021;3(2):339-62. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering3020023
  6. 6. Anonymous. ICAR - AICRP (Cotton) annual report 2024–2025. Available from: https://aiccip.cicr.org.in/pdf/annual_report/AICRP_AR_2024_25.pdf
  7. 7. Sanjay NA, Venkatramani NR, Harinee VS, Dinesh V. Cotton harvester through the application of machine learning and image processing techniques. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021;47:2200-05. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.050
  8. 8. Muthumilselvan M, Rangaswamy K, Ananthakrishnan D, Manian R. Mechanical picking of cotton. Agric Rev. 2007;28(2):118-26.
  9. 9. Anonymous. India faces uphill task in mechanizing cotton farming. Business Line [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/agri-biz/article2711909.ece
  10. 10. Sankaranarayanan K, Praharaj PS, Nalayini P, Bandyopadhyay KK, Gopalakrishnan N. Mechanization in cotton harvesting: need, prospects and challenges. J Cotton Res. 2020;13(2):45-52.
  11. 11. Kaur J, Singh K, Brar AS, Dhaliwal HS. Evaluation of cotton genotypes for mechanical harvesting. Indian J Agric Sci. 2017;87(9):1172-75. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v87i11.75790
  12. 12. Anonymous. Mechanization for sustainable agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); 2022. Available from: https://www.fao.org/sustainable-agricultural-mechanization/en/
  13. 13. Townsend B, Singh R, Almeida F. Global trends in cotton mechanization. Cotton Outlook Int. 2021;5:1-6.
  14. 14. Anonymous. ICAR - AICRP (Cotton) annual report 2019–2020. Available from: https://aiccip.cicr.org.in/pdf/annual_report/AICRP_AR_2019_20.pdf
  15. 15. Corley TE. Correlation of mechanical harvesting with cotton plant characteristics. Trans ASAE. 1970;13(6):768-78. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.38715
  16. 16. Kohli SS, Sharma K, Singh M, Sharma A, Mishra PK. Attribute-based coding, review and gap analysis of cotton harvesting processes and machines. Agric Eng Int: CIGR J. 2015;17(3):120-27.
  17. 17. Sharma A, Goyal L. Studies on portable vacuum type cotton picking. B.Tech Project Report. College of Agricultural Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana; 1999.
  18. 18. Brar AS, Sarlach RS, Rathore J. Response of Desi cotton (Gossypium arboreum) hybrids to spacing and fertilizer levels under irrigated condition. J Cotton Res Dev. 2015;29:79-80.
  19. 19. Goyal R, Singh A, Dixit A, Manes GS. Study on the varietal characteristics of promising cotton varieties with reference to their suitability for modern cotton picker. J Res SKUAST-J. 2009;8(1):18-24.
  20. 20. Reddy SJ, Kumar A. Determination of physical properties of cotton plant in the development of cotton uprooter cum shredder. Madras Agric J. 2022;109:10-12.
  21. 21. Pandirwar AP, Pandey HS, Magar AP, Shirale AO, Singh D, Majumdar G, et al. Physical, chemical, thermal and mechanical properties of cotton stalk: an industrial multi-purpose cotton by-product. J Agric Engineer. 2023;60(2):188-204. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2023602.1807
  22. 22. Anonymous. The history of cotton strippers. Gas Engine Magazine; 2022. Available from: https://www.gasenginemagazine.com/farm-life/the-history-ofcotton-str
  23. 23. Bolner J. Picking cotton is beyond any doubt the most inhumane labor a person can perform. Spillway Review; 1996. Available from: www.spillwayreview.com
  24. 24. Tunio S. Cotton picking: measure for clean and high standard cotton. Report. Department of Agronomy, Sindh Agricultural University, Tandojam, Pakistan; 2001.
  25. 25. Sandhar NS, Goyal R. Basic studies for development of vacuum type cotton picker. In: Proceedings of 37th Annual Convention of ISAE; 2003 Jan 29-31. College of Technology and Engineering, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan. p. 29-31.
  26. 26. Garg IK. Design and development of power operated (knapsack type) cotton picker. Quarterly Report, Centre of AICRP on Farm Implement and Machinery, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana; 1999.
  27. 27. Singh A, Malhotra A. Development and performance evaluation of knapsack cotton picker. B.Tech Project Report. Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana; 2000.
  28. 28. Rangasamy K, Muthamilselvan M, Durairaj CD. Optimisation of machine parameters of pneumatic knapsack cotton picker. AMA Agric Mech Asia Afr Lat Am. 2006;37(3):9.
  29. 29. Sharma A, Ahuja SS, Sethi VP. Field evaluation of the developed experimental cotton-picking aid: Part II. AMA Agric Mech Asia Afr Lat Am. 2011;42(3):14.
  30. 30. Sharma A, Ahuja SS, Sethi VP, Singh D. Design and development of an experimental cotton-picking aid: Part I. AMA Agric Mech Asia Afr Lat Am. 2011;42(1):29.
  31. 31. Selvan MM, Rangasamy K, Ramana C, Kumaran GS. Development of power-tiller mounted cotton picker for selective picking with women operators. Indian J Agric Sci. 2018;84(10):1267-73. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v84i10.44217
  32. 32. Patil NA, Bhatt YC, Tiwari GS, Pawar SK, Wandkar S. Development and performance evaluation of pneumatic plucking system for knapsack type cotton plucker. Agric Engineer Today. 2015;39(2):25-31.
  33. 33. Verma VK, Ravi M. Performance evaluation of knapsack type portable engine operated cotton picker. Int J Agric Engineer. 2016;9(2):156-62. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJAE/9.2/156-162
  34. 34. Gora A, Singh RN, Chaudhary HS. Design and development of walking-type power-operated pneumatic cotton picker. J Agric Engineer. 2023;60(2):126-39. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2023602.1802
  35. 35. Mishra PK, Sharma A, Prakash A. Current research and development in cotton harvesters: a review with application to Indian cotton production systems. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e16124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16124
  36. 36. Street JH. Mechanizing the cotton harvest. Agric History. 1957 Jan 1;31(1):12-22.
  37. 37. Konduru S, Yamazaki F, Paggi M. A study of mechanization of cotton harvesting in India and its implications. J Agric Sci Technol B. 2013 Nov 1;3(11B):789.
  38. 38. Williford JR, Brashears AD, Barker GL. Harvesting. In: Cotton Ginners Handbook. 1994;(503):11-16.
  39. 39. Colwick RE. Technical committee members. S-2 cotton mechanization project: mechanized harvesting of cotton. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 100. Mississippi State: Southern Association of Agricultural Experiment Station Directors, Mississippi State University; 1965.
  40. 40. Brown HB, Ware JO. Cotton. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.; 1958. p. 566.
  41. 41. Hudspeth EB Jr. Status of once-over harvest machinery development. In: Summary Proceedings Western Cotton Production Conference; 1977. p. 58-59.
  42. 42. Kirk IW, Hudspeth EB, Wanjura DF. A broadcast and narrow-row cotton harvester. Texas Agric Exp Station; 1964.
  43. 43. Schroeder EW, Porterfield JG. The development of the Oklahoma brush-type cotton stripper. Oklahoma Agric Exp Station; 1954.
  44. 44. Smith HP. Progress in the study of the mechanical harvesting of cotton. Texas Agric Exp Station; 1935.
  45. 45. Walhood VT, Addicott FT. Harvest-aid programs: principles and practices. In: Advances in production and utilization of quality cotton: principles and practices; 1968. p. 407-43.
  46. 46. Williamson EB, Riley JA. Interrelated effects of defoliation, weather and mechanical picking on cotton quality. 1961;164-5.
  47. 47. Leon R, Wright DL, Brecke BJ. Cotton defoliation and harvest aid guide: SS-AGR-181/AG188, 10/2013. EDIS. 2013 Oct 31;2013(9). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ag188-2013
  48. 48. Chandrasekaran P, Ashok S, Sampath S. Cotton defoliant chemicals: a powerful tool for mechanical harvest in cotton. Vigyan Varta. 2022;3(6):147-9.
  49. 49. Gormus O, El Sabagh A, Kurt F. Impact of defoliation timings and leaf pubescence on yield and fiber quality of cotton. J Agric Sci Technol. 2017 Jul 10;19(4):903-15.
  50. 50. Barber LT, Hayes RM, Dodds DM, Reynolds DB. Mid-south cotton defoliation guide. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Lonoke, Arkansas; 2013.
  51. 51. Main CL, Hayes RM. Cotton harvest aids. University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture; 2009.
  52. 52. Silvertooth JC, Norton ER. Cotton defoliation evaluations. Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona; 1999. Report No.: AZ1170. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/197458
  53. 53. Baker KD, Hughs E, Foulk J. Cotton quality as affected by changes in spindle speed. Appl Eng Agric. 2010;26(3):363-9. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.29949
  54. 54. Wanjura JD, Baker K, Barnes E. Harvesting. J Cotton Sci. 2017;21(1):70-80. https://doi.org/10.56454/AXFA4722
  55. 55. Sharma K, Singh M, Kohli SS, Mishra P, Sharma A. Design and development of self-propelled walk-behind finger type cotton stripper. Agr Eng. 2014;4:35-46.
  56. 56. Mishra PK, Singh M, Manes GS, Dixit A, Mandal B. Computer-aided refinement and development of tractor operated cotton stripper. Indian J Agric Sci. 2018;88(4):665-68. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v88i4.79155
  57. 57. Mishra PK, Singh M, Sharma K, Patel B. Modification and development of self-propelled walk-behind finger type cotton stripper. Agric Engineer Today. 2018;42(3):70-77.
  58. 58. Mishra PK. Development and evaluation of tractor operated header for cotton harvesting [PhD thesis]. Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University; 2017.
  59. 59. Ibrahim MM, Alsheka MA, Abdesalam MS. Small unit for Egyptian cotton harvester. Misr J Agric Engineer. 2014;31(4):1317-30. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2014.98245
  60. 60. Matchanov R, Rizayev A, Astanakulov K, Tolibaev A, Karimov N. Combined cotton picker with interchangeable devices. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Bristol: IOP Publishing; 2021 Mar 1. Vol. 677, No. 5. p. 052021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/677/5/052021
  61. 61. Deshmukh AS, Mohanty A. Affordable and lightweight handheld cotton picker for biotechnological applications in India. J Chem Pharm Sci. 2016;974:2115.
  62. 62. Anonymous. SIMA kapas cotton plucker. 2021. Available from: https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/agriculture/pdf/cotton/sima%20kapas%20plucker%20catalough.pdf
  63. 63. Pabuayon IL, Kelly BR, Mitchell-McCallister D, Coldren CL, Ritchie GL. Cotton boll distribution: a review. Agron J. 2021;113(2):956-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20516
  64. 64. Kumar S, Kashyap M, Saluja A, Bhattacharya M. Segmentation of cotton bolls by efficient feature selection using conventional fuzzy C-means algorithm with perception of color. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies (IC3T 2015). Springer India; 2016. Vol. 1. p. 731-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2517-1_70
  65. 65. Li Y, Cao Z, Lu H, Xiao Y, Zhu Y, Cremers AB. In-field cotton detection via region-based semantic image segmentation. Comput Electron Agric. 2016;127:475-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.006
  66. 66. Fue KG, Rains GC, Porter WM. Real-time 3-D measurement of cotton boll positions using machine vision under field conditions. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences; 2018 Jan 3-5; San Antonio, TX. p. 43-54.
  67. 67. Fue KG, Porter WM, Rains GC. Deep learning-based real-time GPU-accelerated tracking and counting of cotton bolls under field conditions using a moving camera. In: 2018 ASABE Annual International Meeting. St. Joseph (MI): ASABE; 2018. p. 1. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800831
  68. 68. Sun S, Li C, Paterson A, Jiang Y, Robertson J. 3D computer vision and machine learning-based technique for high throughput cotton boll mapping under field conditions. In: 2018 ASABE Annual International Meeting. St. Joseph (MI): ASABE; 2018. p. 1. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800677
  69. 69. Sun S, Li C, Chee PW, Paterson AH, Jiang Y, Xu R, et al. Three-dimensional photogrammetric mapping of cotton bolls in situ based on point cloud segmentation and clustering. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2020;160:195-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.12.011
  70. 70. Singh N, Tewari VK, Biswas PK, Pareek CM, Dhruw LK. Image processing algorithms for in-field cotton boll detection in natural lighting conditions. Artif Intell Agric. 2021;5:142-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2021.07.002
  71. 71. Singh N, Tewari VK, Biswas PK, Dhruw LK. Lightweight convolutional neural network models for semantic segmentation of in-field cotton bolls. Artif Intell Agric. 2023;8:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2023.03.001
  72. 72. Singh N, Tewari VK, Biswas PK, Dhruw LK, Pareek CM, Singh HD. Semantic segmentation of in-field cotton bolls from the sky using deep convolutional neural networks. Smart Agric Technol. 2022;2:100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100045
  73. 73. Xu Z, Latif MA, Madni SS, Rafiq A, Alam I, Habib MA. Detecting white cotton bolls using high-resolution aerial imagery acquired through unmanned aerial system. IEEE Access. 2021;9:169068-81. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3138847
  74. 74. Fue KG, Porter WM, Barnes EM, Rains GC. Ensemble method of deep learning, color segmentation and image transformation to track, localize and count cotton bolls using a moving camera in real-time. Trans ASABE. 2021;64(1):341-52. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.13112
  75. 75. Wang N, Zhai Y, Zhang L. Automatic cotton mapping using time series of Sentinel-2 images. Remote Sens. 2021;13(7):1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071355
  76. 76. Ma Y, Chen X, Huang C, Hou T, Lv X, Zhang Z. Monitoring defoliation rate and boll-opening rate of machine-harvested cotton based on UAV RGB images. Eur J Agron. 2023;151:126976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126976
  77. 77. Han T, Li C. Developing a high precision cotton boll counting system using active sensing. In: 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting. St. Joseph (MI): ASABE; 2019. p. 1. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201901343
  78. 78. Adke S, Li C, Rasheed KM, Maier FW. Supervised and weakly supervised deep learning for segmentation and counting of cotton bolls using proximal imagery. Sensors. 2022;22(10):3688. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103688
  79. 79. Fue K, Porter W, Barnes E, Li C, Rains G. Center-articulated hydrostatic cotton harvesting rover using visual-servoing control and a finite state machine. Electronics. 2020;9(8):1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081226
  80. 80. Fue K, Porter W, Barnes E, Li C, Rains G. Evaluation of a stereo vision system for cotton row detection and boll location estimation in direct sunlight. Agronomy. 2020;10(8):1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081137
  81. 81. Gharakhani H, Thomasson JA, Lu Y. An end-effector for robotic cotton harvesting. Smart Agric Technol. 2022;2:100043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100043
  82. 82. Maja JM, Polak M, Burce ME, Barnes E. CHAP: cotton-harvesting autonomous platform. AgriEngineer. 2021;3(2):199-217. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering3020013
  83. 83. Sambandam M. Green robot machinery: precision cotton picking machine; 2022. Available from: https://www.agricultural-robotics.com/news/greenrobot-machinery-precision-cotton-picking-machine
  84. 84. Wang M, Wei J, Yuan J, Xu K. A research for intelligent cotton-picking robot based on machine vision. In: 2008 International Conference on Information and Automation. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2008 Jun 20. p. 800-03. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICINFA.2008.4608107
  85. 85. Groeneveld R. Indian start-up develops autonomous cotton picker. Field Robots, Future Farming; 2022. Available from: https://www.futurefarming.com/tech-in-focus/field-robots/indian-start-up-develops-autonomous-cotton-picker/
  86. 86. Thapa S. Development of a robotic cotton harvesting system based on the approach of harvesting multiple cotton bolls at a time [master’s thesis]. Athens (GA): University of Georgia; 2023.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.