Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Sustainable finger millet cultivation: Leveraging organic nutrient sources for productivity and soil health

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9617
Submitted
25 May 2025
Published
27-08-2025 — Updated on 29-09-2025
Versions

Abstract

Organic farming plays a pivotal role in promoting sustainable agriculture by enhancing soil health, improving crop productivity and minimizing environmental impacts. Finger millet, a vital rainfed crop, often encounters significant yield limitations due to poor soil fertility and inadequate nutrient availability. To address these challenges, a field study was conducted during the Kharif seasons of 2022-23 and 2023-24 at the Research Institute on Organic Farming, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of various organic nutrient sources on growth, yield, nutrient uptake, availability and microbial status of finger millet. The experiment comprised seven organic nutrient treatments applied on a nitrogen equivalency basis, along with an absolute control and was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The findings revealed that the application of poultry manure at 100 % nitrogen equivalency significantly enhanced plant growth, yield attributes, nutrient dynamics, soil microbial activity and enzymatic functions. Vermicompost and deoiled cake treatments also demonstrated notable improvements in productivity and soil health. Conversely, the absolute control consistently recorded the lowest values across all parameters. This study highlights the effectiveness of
organic nutrient management, particularly poultry manure, in sustainably enhancing finger millet productivity and soil health.

References

  1. 1. Cruz V, Cheng W, Tawaraya K. Yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems across climate types and sub-types: A meta-analysis. Agric Syst. 2023;211:103732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103732
  2. 2. Layek J, Rangappa K, Das A, Ansari MA, Choudhary S, Rajbonshi N, et al. Evaluation of millets for physio-chemical and root morphological traits suitable for resilient farming and nutritional security in Eastern Himalayas. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1198023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1198023
  3. 3. Nagaraja TE, Parveen SG, Aruna C, Hariprasanna K, Singh SP, Singh AK, et al. Millets and pseudocereals: A treasure for climate resilient agriculture ensuring food and nutrition security. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2024;84(1):1-37. https://doi.org/10.31742/ISGPB.84.1.1
  4. 4. Kaur S, Kumari A, Seem K, Kaur G, Kumar D, Verma S, et al. Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.): From staple to superfood - A comprehensive review on nutritional, bioactive, industrial, and climate resilience potential. Planta. 2024;260(3):75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-024-04502-2
  5. 5. Jerop R, Owuor G, Mshenga P, Kimurto P. Effects of finger millet innovations on productivity in Kenya. Cogent Food Agric. 2020;6(1):1830476. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1830476
  6. 6. Tal A. Making conventional agriculture environmentally friendly: Moving beyond the glorification of organic agriculture and the demonization of conventional agriculture. Sustainability. 2018;10(4):1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041078
  7. 7. Rastogi M, Verma S, Kumar S, Bharti S, Kumar G, Azam K, et al. Soil health and sustainability in the age of organic amendments: A review. Int J Environ Clim Chang. 2023;13(10):2088-102. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102870
  8. 8. Zhou W, Li M, Achal VA. Comprehensive review on environmental and human health impacts of chemical pesticide usage. Emerg Contam. 2024;100410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2024.100410
  9. 9. Singh NK, Sachan K, BP M, Panotra N, Katiyar D. Building soil health and fertility through organic amendments and practices: A review. Asian J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2024;10(1):175-97. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i1224
  10. 10. Raj S, Chaudhary S, Ghule NS, Baral K, Padhan SR, Gawande KN, Singh V. Sustainable farming and soil health enhancement through millet cultivation: A review. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2024;36(3):222-33. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i34418
  11. 11. Piper CS. Soil and plant analysis. Bombay: Hans Publishers; 1967.
  12. 12. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited; 1973.
  13. 13. Walkley A, Black CA. Estimation of organic carbon by chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  14. 14. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in the soil. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259-60.
  15. 15. Bray RH, Kurtz LT. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 1945;59:39-46.
  16. 16. Jackson HL. Soil chemical analysis. New York, USA: Prentice Hall of Inco; 1973.
  17. 17. Baruah TC, Barthakur HP. A text book of soil analysis. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.; 1997.
  18. 18. Chesnin L, Yien CH. Turbidimetric determination of available sulphur. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc. 1951;15:149-51.
  19. 19. Casida LE, Klen DA, Santoro J. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964;98:371-76.
  20. 20. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Assay of urease activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1972;4(4):479-87.
  21. 21. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 1969;1(4):301-307.
  22. 22. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley; 1984.
  23. 23. Anisuzzaman M, Rafii MY, Ramlee SI, Jaafar NM, Ikbal MF, Haque MA. The nutrient content, growth, yield, and yield attribute traits of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes as influenced by organic fertilizer in Malaysia. Sustainability. 2022;14(9):5692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095692
  24. 24. Samarakoon SG, Seran TH. Yield response of Abelmoschus esculentus as influenced by compost with Tithonia leaves. Int J Environ. 2023;12(2):56-70. https://doi.org/10.3126/ije.v12i2.65436
  25. 25. Prakash P, Sharanappa, Nagaraju. Effect of different establishment methods and organic nutrient sources on yield, yield attributes and economics of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn). Int J Environ Sci Nat Resour. 2018;12(3):56-60. https://doi.org/10.19080/IJESNR.2018.12.555836
  26. 26. Farhad W, Cheema MA, Hammad HM, Saleem MF, Fahad S, Abbas F, et al. Influence of composted poultry manure and irrigation regimes on some morpho-physiology parameters of maize under semiarid environments. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:19918-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2125-9
  27. 27. Upendranaik P, Rao S, Desai BK, Krishnamurthy D, Yadahalli VG. Effect of different sources of organic manures on growth and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) under integrated organic farming system. Adv Res. 2018;13(2):1-6. https://doi.org/10.9734/AIR/2018/38541
  28. 28. Sangeetha SP, Balakrishnan A, Devasenapathy P. Influence of organic manures on yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) in rice-blackgram cropping sequence. Am J Plant Sci. 2013;4:1151-57. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.45141
  29. 29. Khaliq A, Shehzad M, Huma MK, Tahir MM, Javeed HM, Saeed MF, et al. Synergistic effects of urea, poultry manure, and zeolite on wheat growth and yield. Soil Syst. 2024;8(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems8010018
  30. 30. Barszcz M, Tuśnio A, Taciak M. Poultry nutrition. Phys Sci Rev. 2024;9(2):611-50. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0122
  31. 31. Mayele JM, Abu FR. Determining the effects of selected organic fertilizer on growth and yields of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum: Var. Rio Grande Tomatoes) in Mundri West County, Western Equatoria State, South Sudan. Agric Sci. 2023;14(9):1343-74. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2023.149089
  32. 32. Narmhikaa N. Residual effect of organic nutrients on growth and yield of hybrid Napier (Pennisetum perpureum × Pennisetum americarnum) var. CO-4. World J Adv Res Rev. 2023;20(2):454-58. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.2.2281
  33. 33. Cooperband L, Bollero G, Coale F. Effect of poultry litter and composts on soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability and corn production. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2002;62:185-94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015538823174
  34. 34. Soremi A, Adetunji M, Adejuyigbe C, Bodunde J, Azeez J. Effects of poultry manure on some soil chemical properties and nutrient bioavailability to soybean. Int J Agric Ecol Res. 2017;11(3):1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/JAERI/2017/32419
  35. 35. Azeez JO, Ibijola TO, Adetunji MT, Adebisi MA, Oyekanmi AA. Chemical characterization and stability of poultry manure tea and its influence on phosphorus sorption indices of tropical soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2014;45(20):2680-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2014.932373
  36. 36. Hoover NL, Kanwar R, Soupir ML. Effects of poultry manure application on phosphorus in soil and tile drain water under a corn-soybean rotation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015;226:138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2403-9
  37. 37. Chng HY, Ahmed OH, Majid NMA. Improving phosphorus availability, nutrient uptake and dry matter production of Zea mays L. on a tropical acid soil using poultry manure biochar and pineapple leaves compost. Exp Agric. 2016;52(3):447-65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479715000204
  38. 38. Adegoke J, Oyekanmi O, Alabi B, Hassan O. Influence of manures on some soil fertility properties, yield and agronomic efficiencies of soybean (Glycine max) on degraded acid soil. J Exp Agric Int. 2023;45(7):42-49. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2023/v45i72130
  39. 39. Ganapathi, Ganapathi MA, Shankar, Gajanan GN. Effect of long term use of chemical fertilizers and organic manure on soil fertility and sustainable productivity of finger millet in alfisols of dryland. Environ Ecol. 2008;26(2A):872-76.
  40. 40. Dawar R, Karan S, Bhardwaj S, Meena DK, Padhan SR, Reddy KS, Bana RS. Role of sulphur fertilization in legume crops: A comprehensive review. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(21):718-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070626
  41. 41. Zhen Z, Liu H, Wang N, Guo L, Meng J, Ding N. Effects of manure compost application on soil microbial community diversity and soil microenvironments in a temperate cropland in China. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e108555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108555
  42. 42. Brooks JP, Tewolde H, Adeli A, Shankle MW, Way TR, Smith RK, et al. Effects of subsurface banding and broadcast of poultry litter and cover crop on soil microbial populations. J Environ Qual. 2018;47(3):427-35. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2017.09.0382
  43. 43. Devi S, Sharma CR, Singh K. Microbiological biodiversity in poultry and paddy straw wastes in composting systems. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43:288-96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822012000100034
  44. 44. Wan L, Wang X, Cong C, Li J, Xu Y, Li X, et al. Effect of inoculating microorganisms in chicken manure composting with maize straw. Bioresour Technol. 2020;301:122730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122730
  45. 45. Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Gondek K, Baran A. Effect of poultry litter biochar on soil enzymatic activity, ecotoxicity and plant growth. Appl Soil Ecol. 2016;105:144-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.006
  46. 46. Erhunmwunse AS, Olayinka A, Atoloye IA. Nutrient mineralization from nitrogen- and phosphorus-enriched poultry manure compost in an ultisol. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2018;50(2):185-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1556290
  47. 47. Garg S, Bahl GS. Phosphorus availability to maize as influenced by organic manures and fertilizer P associated phosphatase activity in soils. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(13):5773-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.10.063
  48. 48. Waldrip HM, He Z, Erich MS. Effects of poultry manure amendment on phosphorus uptake by ryegrass, soil phosphorus fractions and phosphatase activity. Biol Fertil Soil. 2011;47:407-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0546-4
  49. 49. Kutu FR, Mokase TJ, Dada OA. Assessing microbial population dynamics, enzyme activities and phosphorus availability indices during phospho-compost production. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. 2019;8:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-018-0231-9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.