Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Exploring lithium toxicity in rice: An in vitro study on morphological and biochemical parameters

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9655
Submitted
27 May 2025
Published
20-08-2025 — Updated on 16-09-2025
Versions

Abstract

Lithium (Li) is a known emerging contaminant and its effects on plant growth and metabolism are not fully understood. Most of the studies have been conducted using soil as the medium or by using hydroponics. The present study explores how different concentrations of lithium affect growth, chlorophyll level, phenolic compound accumulation and Peroxidase (POD) activity in Oryza sativa L. under in vitro conditions.  Seeds were cultured on Woody Plant Medium (WPM) supplemented with lithium sulfate (Li₂SO₄) for 21 days. Chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll content were quantified and total phenolic content and POD enzyme activity were assessed to evaluate oxidative stress and metabolic changes. Morphological observations, including growth and symptoms of stress, were also recorded.  Chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll content showed an initial increase at lower lithium concentrations (1-2 mg/L), followed by a decline at (3-10 mg/L). In contrast, total phenolic content exhibited a consistent, dose-dependent increase, indicating progressive activation of oxidative stress pathways. POD enzyme activity peaked at 5 mg/L but declined at higher concentrations, likely due to enzyme inhibition under intensified stress conditions. Morphologically, lithium-treated plants displayed stunted growth, with pronounced stress symptoms such as browning of roots and stems at enhanced lithium levels of 3-10 mg/L. Growth inhibition at elevated lithium levels (2-10 mg/L) was evidenced by a reduction in biomass.

References

  1. 1. Bolan N, Hoang SA, Tanveer M, Wang L, Bolan S, Sooriyakumar P, et al. From mine to mind and mobiles - Lithium contamination and its risk management. Environ Pollut. 2021;290:118067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118067
  2. 2. Yang X, Wen H, Lin Y, Zhang H, Liu Y, Fu J, et al. Emerging research needs for characterizing the risks of global lithium pollution under carbon neutrality strategies. Environ Sci Technol. 2023;57:5103-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01431
  3. 3. Tanveer M, Hasanuzzaman M, Wang L. Lithium in environment and potential targets to reduce lithium toxicity in plants. J Plant Growth Regul. 2019;38:1574-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09957-2
  4. 4. Srinivasan S, Shanthakumar S, Ashok B. Sustainable lithium-ion battery recycling: a review on technologies, regulatory approaches and future trends. Energy Reports. 2025;13:789-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.12.043
  5. 5. Sankar TK, Abhilash, Meshram P. Environmental impact assessment in the entire life cycle of lithium-ion batteries. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2024;262:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44169-023-00054-w
  6. 6. Karri A, Parida T, Shaik R, Srinivas N. Contamination of lithium in soils and its uptake in plant species. In: Inouhe M, Walther GR, Gupta DK, editors. Lithium and nickel contamination in plants and the environment. Singapore: World Scientific; 2024. p. 35-48 https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811283123_0002
  7. 7. Shakoor N, Adeel M, Ahmad MA, Zain M, Waheed U, Javaid RA, et al. Reimagining safe lithium applications in the living environment and its impacts on human, animal and plant system. Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2023;15:100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100252
  8. 8. Iordache AM, Voica C, Roba C, Nechita C. Evaluation of potential human health risks associated with Li and their relationship with Na, K, Mg and Ca in Romania's nationwide drinking water. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1456640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456640
  9. 9. Shahzad B, Tanveer M, Hassan W, Shah AN, Anjum SA, Cheema SA, et al. Lithium toxicity in plants: reasons, mechanisms and remediation possibilities - a review. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;107:104-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.034
  10. 10. Lloyd G, McCown BH. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Comb Proc Int Plant Prop Soc. 1980;30:421-7.
  11. 11. Sadasivam S, Manickam A. Biochemical methods. 4th ed. New Delhi: New Age International. 2023:201-2.
  12. 12. Malick CP, Singh MB. Estimation of total phenols in plant enzymology and histoenzymology. Ludhiana: Kalyani Publishers; 1980. p. 286
  13. 13. Laukkanen H, Rautiainen L, Taulavuori E, Hohtola A. Changes in cellular structures and enzymatic activities during browning of Scots pine callus derived from mature buds. Tree Physiol. 2000;20:467-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.7.467
  14. 14. Jiang L, Wang L, Zhang L, Tian C. Tolerance and accumulation of lithium in Apocynum pictum Schrenk. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5559. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5559
  15. 15. Li X, Gao P, Gjetvaj B, Westcott N, Gruber MY. Analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome of Brassica carinata seedlings after lithium chloride exposure. Plant Sci. 2009;177:68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.03.013
  16. 16. Hawrylak-Nowak B, Kalinowska M, Szymańska MA. Study on selected physiological parameters of plants grown under lithium supplementation. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2012;149(3):425-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9435-4
  17. 17. Xu Y, Shui X, Gao M, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhu Z, et al. Toxicological effects and mechanisms of lithium on growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant system in the freshwater microalga Chromochloris zofingiensis. J Hazard Mater. 2024;469:133898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133898
  18. 18. Markkola AM, Ohtonen R, Tarvainen O. Peroxidase activity as an indicator of pollution stress in the fine roots of Pinus sylvestris. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1990;52:149-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00283120
  19. 19. Cirilli M, Caruso G, Gennai C, Urbani S, Frioni E, Ruzzi M, et al. The role of polyphenoloxidase, peroxidase and β-glucosidase in phenolics accumulation in Olea europaea L. fruits under different water regimes. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00717
  20. 20. Huang G. Physiological and biochemical adaptations of plants to environmental stress. J Plant Bio Technol. 2023;6(3):150. https://doi.org/10.35841/aapbm-6.3.150
  21. 21. Davis D, Narasimhan S. Detrimental effects of lithium on in vitro seedlings of pea (Vigna radiata). Res J Biotechnol. 2024;19:87-90. https://doi.org/10.25303/1901rjbt087090
  22. 22. Custódio L, Charles G, Magné C, Barba-Espín G, Piqueras A, Hernández JA, et al. Application of in vitro plant tissue culture techniques to halophyte species: a review. Plants. 2023;12:126. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010126

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.