Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp4 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - III

A comparative analysis of hand weeding and herbicides application on weed control, nutrient balance, yield and economics of maize (Zea mays L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9658
Submitted
27 May 2025
Published
29-10-2025

Abstract

Weeds impose significant challenges in maize production, leading to decreased grain yield and profit. The crop-weed competition for plant's required resources like light, water and nutrients, ultimately hinders maize growth and yield. To address this concern, field experiments were conducted for two years (Kharif 2021 and 2022) at the Experimental Farm, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, India and compared the effects of hand weeding with those of sequential and sole application of Pre-Emergence (PE) and Post-Emergence (PoE) herbicides in maize. The experiment was designed under a randomized complete block design with three replications and nine treatments. The treatments consisted of unweeded control (T1), hand weeding twice at 15 and 30 Days After Sowing (DAS) (T2), PE application of atrazine at 1 kg a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS (T3), PoE application of topramezone at 25.2 g a.i ha-1 on 18 DAS (T4), PoE application of tembotrione at 120 g a.i ha-1 on 18 DAS (T5), PoE application of halosulfuron methyl at 67.5 g a.i ha-1 on 18 DAS (T6), PE application of atrazine at 1 kg a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS + PoE application of topramezone at 25.2 g a.i ha-1 on 18 DAS (T7), PE application of atrazine at 1 kg a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS + PoE application of tembotrione at 120 g a.i ha-1 on 18 DAS (T8) and PE application of atrazine at 1 kg a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS + PoE application of halosulfuron methyl at 67.5 g a.i ha-1 on 18 DAS (T9). The results indicated that hand weeding twice at 15 and 25 DAS recorded significantly superior weed control efficiency (89.82 and 83.31 %), weed control index (90.11 and 87.87 %), maize growth attributes and grain yield (6732 and 6831 kg ha-1) and stover yield (10920 and 11071 kg ha-1) during the years 2021 and 2022 respectively. However, it was on par with PE application of atrazine at 1 kg a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS + PoE application of topramezone at 25.2 g a.i ha-1/tembotrione at 120 g a.i ha-1on 18 DAS. This suppressed the weeds nutrient uptake and enhanced nutrient uptake by maize. Thus, lower post-harvest actual balance and net gain of soil available nutrients were noticed with these treatments. Concerning economics, PE application of atrazine at 1 kg a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS + PoE application of topramezone at 25.2 g a.i ha-1 on 18 DAS may offer a more effective way to increase profitability in maize cultivation.

References

  1. 1. United States Department of Agriculture. World agricultural production. Washington (DC); 2024. p.20.
  2. 2. Gong F, Yang L, Tai F, Hu X, Wang W. Omics of maize stress response for sustainable food production: opportunities and challenges. Omics. 2014;18(12):714-32. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2014.0125
  3. 3. Halli HM, Angadi SS, Govindasamy P, Madar R, Sannagoudar MS, El-Sabrout AM, et al. Integrated effect of deficit irrigation and sowing methods on weed dynamics and system productivity of maize-cowpea sequence on vertisols. Agronomy. 2021;11(4):808. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040808
  4. 4. Das A, Kumar MG, Ramkrushna I, Patel DP, Layek J, Panwar AS, et al. Weed management in maize under rainfed organic farming system. Indian J Weed Sci. 2016;48:168-72. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00042.3
  5. 5. Kumar B, Prasad S, Mandal D, Kumar R. Influence of integrated weed management practices on weed dynamics, productivity and nutrient uptake of rabi maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6:1431-40. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.175
  6. 6. Moss S, Ulber L, den-Hoed I. A herbicide resistance risk matrix. Crop Prot. 2019;115:13-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.09.005
  7. 7. Manibharathi S. Herbicide resistance and its management strategies-a review. Madras Agric J. 2023;110(7-9):122. https://doi.org/10.29321/MAJ.10.200005
  8. 8. Gaurav SK, Verma SK, Meena RS, Maurya AC, Kumar S. Nutrients uptake and available nutrients status in soil as influenced by sowing methods and herbicides in kharif maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2018;11(1):17-24.
  9. 9. Lavanya Y, Srinivasan K, Chinnamuthu C, Arthanari PM, Shanmugasundaram S, Chandrasekhar C. Effect of weed control methods on growth and yield of maize in western zone of Tamil Nadu. Int J Chem Stud. 2021;9:122-5. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1c.11474
  10. 10. Sharma P, Duary B, Singh R. Tank mix application of tembotrione and atrazine to reduce weed growth and increase productivity of maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2018;50(3):305–08. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2018.00066.7
  11. 11. Jain LK, Verma MP, Parewa HP, Choudhary A. Impact of organic weed and nutrient management practices on soil physico-chemical properties and nutrient balance in maize (Zea mays L.) of western Rajasthan. J Cereal Res. 2023;15(1):135-43. https://doi.org/10.25174/2582-2675/2023/124313
  12. 12. Watson DJ. The physiological basis for variation in yield. Adv Agron. 1952;14:101-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60307-7
  13. 13. Mani VS, Malla ML, Gautam KC, Bhagwandas B. Weed killing chemicals in potato cultivation. Indian Farming. 1973;23(8):17-8.
  14. 14. Mishra A, Tosh GC. Chemical weed control studies on dwarf wheat. J Res (OUAT). 1979;10:1-6.
  15. 15. Yoshida S, Farno DA, Cook JH, Gomez KA. Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. 3rd ed. Philippines: IRRI; 1976. p.70-6
  16. 16. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.; 1973. p.498
  17. 17. Halli HM, Angadi SS. Influence of land configuration and deficit irrigation on nutrient uptake and grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.). J Farm Sci. 2019;32(4):397-402.
  18. 18. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci. 1956;25:259-60.
  19. 19. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus by extraction with NaHCO₃. Circ USDA. 1954;939.
  20. 20. Sadanandan N, Mahapatra IC. A study of the nitrogen status of the soil as affected by multiple cropping. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 1973;21(2):173-5.
  21. 21. Gopinath PP, Parsad R, Joseph B, Adarsh VS. GrapesAgri1: collection of shiny apps for data analysis in agriculture. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6(63):3437. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03437
  22. 22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Rome, Italy; 2022.
  23. 23. ICAR-IIMR. Indian maize scenario. Ludhiana: Indian Institute of Maize Research; 2021.
  24. 24. Wasnik VK, Ghosh PK, Halli HM, Gupta G. Effect of tillage and weed control measures on the yield and economic efficiency of maize under rainfed conditions of semi-arid region. Indian J Weed Sci. 2022;54(1):51-7. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2022.00009.0
  25. 25. Pfister K, Arntzen CJ. The mode of action of Photosystem II-specific inhibitors in herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. Z Naturforsch C. 1979;34(11):996-1009. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1979-1123
  26. 26. Sharma N, Rayamajhi M. Different aspects of weed management in maize (Zea mays L.): a brief review. Adv Agric. 2022;(1):7960175. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7960175
  27. 27. Chhokar RS, Sharma RK, Gill SC, Singh RK. Mesotrione and atrazine combination to control diverse weed flora in maize. Indian J Weed Sci. 2019;51(2):145-50. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2019.00032.7
  28. 28. Shukla R, Bhatnagar A, Rawat A, Rawat S, Kumar S. Growth and productivity of maize (Zea mays) as influenced by sequential and combined application of tank mix herbicides. Indian J Agron. 2024;69(1):83-6. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i1.5487
  29. 29. Singh A, Chand M, Singh N, Prasad G, Punia SS, Weber S. Tembotrione for weed management in kharif maize and its residual effect on succeeding wheat crop in western Indo-Gangetic plain of India. Phytoparasitica. 2025;53(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01238-3
  30. 30. Grossmann K, Ehrhardt T. On the mechanism of action and selectivity of the corn herbicide topramezone: a new inhibitor of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Pest Manag Sci. 2007;63(5):429-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1341
  31. 31. Bera S, Ghosh RK. Effect of integrated weed and nutrient management in green gram-rice-onion cropping sequence on yield and nitrogen balance sheet. J Crop Weed. 2013;9(2):159-64.
  32. 32. Halli HM, Shivakumar BG, Wasnik VK, Govindasamy P, Yadav VK, Swami S, et al. Co-implementation of deficit irrigation and nutrient management strategies to strengthen soil-plant-seed nexus, water use efficiency and yield sustainability in fodder corn. Eur J Agron. 2025;168:127609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127609
  33. 33. Mishra JS, Rao SS, Patil JV. Influence of sorghum cultivars and weed management practices on nutrient uptake by crop and weeds in semi-arid tropical India. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2014;19(4):351-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-014-0115-6
  34. 34. Sairam G, Jha AK, Verma B, Porwal M, Dubey A, Meshram RK. Effect of mesotrione 40% SC on weed growth, yield and economics of maize (Zea mays L.). Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(7):608-16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i71913
  35. 35. Iyarin TM, Aravind Kumar BN, Babu R, Nirmalnath PJ, Hebsur NS, Halli HM, et al. Nanocomposite based slow release atrazine effectively controlled Striga asiatica incidence and enhanced sugarcane yield. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):30821. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81117-3
  36. 36. Ghosh D, Brahmachari K, Brestic M, Ondrisik P, Hossain A, Skalicky M, et al. Integrated weed and nutrient management improve yield, nutrient uptake and economics of maize in the rice-maize cropping system of Eastern India. Agronomy. 2020;10(12):1906. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10121906
  37. 37. Elankavi S, Reddy BM, Venkatachalam SR, Natarajan SK, Ranjith SRR, Jaya SP, Senthamil E. Enhancing growth, yield and nutrient use efficiency in hybrid maize through integrated nutrient and weed management strategies. Plant Sci Today. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7082
  38. 38. Kaur R, Kumar S, Kumar P, Dass A, Singh T. Synergistic effects of crop establishment methods and weed management on maize (Zea mays L.). Prod Water Util. 2024;67(2):14.
  39. 39. Kalaimathi V, Sivakumar C, Parasuraman P, Sivakumar R, Ragunath KP, Rani MA. Effect of chemical and non-chemical weed management practices in direct seeded rice. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):1812-20. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183479
  40. 40. Pavithra G, Velayutham A, Shanmugam PM, Boominathan P, Bharathi C. Effect of non-chemical weed management practices on weed dynamics and yield in blackgram (Vigna mungo). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):1666-73. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183442

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.