Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. sp1 (2025): Recent Advances in Agriculture by Young Minds - II

Digital soil fertility mapping of a Pashupathihal-2 micro-watershed in Kundgol taluk, Karnataka state through GIS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9720
Submitted
30 May 2025
Published
05-08-2025 — Updated on 18-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

The study evaluates the spatial variability of soil fertility in the Pashupathihal-2 micro-watershed (428.8 ha) using remote sensing-assisted digital soil mapping and GIS-based geostatistical techniques to support precision nutrient management. The study revealed considerable spatial variability in soil physicochemical and nutrient characteristics, indicating heterogeneous soil health and fertility status. The soils were primarily slightly to strongly alkaline, with pH values ranging from 8 to 9.16 (mean 8.66). They exhibited non-saline electrical conductivity levels (mean 0.57 dS/m), typical of the black clay vertisols found in the region. Organic carbon levels varied from 0.15 to 0.87 %, with 79.61 % of the area falling into the medium organic carbon category, reflecting moderate organic matter content. Nitrogen levels were predominantly low (mean 140.83 kg/ha), with nearly 30 % of the area classified as very low, suggesting potential nutrient depletion possibly linked to reduced organic matter. Phosphorus availability (mean 27.92 kg/ha) remained within a moderate range, although its uneven distribution suggests the need for site-specific fertilization. Potassium content was generally sufficient (mean 475.32 kg/ha) due to inherent soil properties but showed spatial discrepancies that may affect nutrient balance. Micronutrient assessment revealed a critical deficiency in iron, with 80.56 % of the area below the sufficiency threshold (<4.5 ppm), while manganese, copper and zinc were reported in adequate quantities throughout the watershed. These findings highlight the contribution of geospatial tools in identifying soil constraints, facilitating precision nutrient management and supporting sustainable agricultural practices through informed land-use planning.

References

  1. 1. FAO. Status of the world’s soil resources: main report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2015.
  2. 2. Biradar B, Jayadeva HM, Shivaraj S, Geetha KN. GIS-based assessment and thematic mapping of micro-nutrient (DTPA-extractable, Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn) status in Honnavalli micro-watershed of Hassan District of Karnataka. Mysore J Agric Sci. 2020;54(4):25–38.
  3. 3. Anand S, Ravikumar D, Gurumurthy KT, Thippeshappa GN, Shoba S. Assessment and mapping of soil fertility status in Byrapura micro-watershed of Nandi sub-watershed using geospatial techniques. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2025;9(4):653–65. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i4h.4170
  4. 4. Lal R. Sustainable soil management and climate change. J Soil Water Conserv. 2020;75(6):123A–9A.
  5. 5. ICAR-IISS. Soil fertility atlas of Karnataka. Bhopal: Indian Institute of Soil Science; 2023.
  6. 6. Kumar P, Roy A, Didawat RK, Kumar S. GIS-based soil fertility assessment of a micro-watershed of semi-arid tropics in southern India. Ann Plant Soil Res. 2022;24(4):606–10. https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2022.10216
  7. 7. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd. 1973:498.
  8. 8. Sahrawat KL, Buford JR. Modification in the alkaline permanganate method for assessing the availability of soil nitrogen in upland soils. Soil Sci. 1982;133(6):53–7.
  9. 9. Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42(3):421–8. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
  10. 10. Walkley AJ, Black CA. An examination of rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils. Soil Sci. 1934;63(4):251–64.
  11. 11. Vrieling A, Van der Meer F, Steege H. Use of high-resolution remote sensing for mapping soil properties in the semi-arid region of Northern India. J Remote Sens. 2017;38(12):1193–203.
  12. 12. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM. An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
  13. 13. Kumar SN, Gowda JV, Parama VR, Satish A. Quantifying and mapping of soil nutrients in Bantanahalli micro-watershed using GIS and GPS. J Soil Water Conserv. 2017;16(1):18–24. https://doi.org/10.5958/2455-7145.2017.00003.0
  14. 14. Raddy G, Lalitha BS, Jayadeva HM, Subbarayappa CT. Soil fertility assessment and balanced fertilizer recommendation for improved crop productivity in Hanjihalli micro watershed using GIS and GPS. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(5):1125–8.
  15. 15. NBSS & LUP. Soil fertility evaluation and mapping at district level in India. Nagpur: National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Indian Council of Agricultural Research. 2011:120.
  16. 16. Anand S, Gurumurthy KT, Thippeshappa GN, Sridhara CJ, Ravikumar D, Shoba S. Exploring soil nutrient dynamics: assessment and mapping in Sunnadhahalli micro-watershed: a geospatial approach. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2024;8(12S):1442–56. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i12Sr.3377
  17. 17. Seth P, Chikkaramappa T, Biswal SS, Gulnaz Y. Soil fertility mapping of macro nutrients and micro nutrients in Kumachahalli micro watershed of Chamarajanagar District of Karnataka. Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5(6):938–43.
  18. 18. Balasubramani K, Gomathi M, Bhaskaran G, Kumaraswamy K. GIS-based spatial multi-criteria approach for characterization and prioritization of micro-watersheds: a case study of semi-arid watershed, South India. Appl Geomat. 2019;11:289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-019-00261-y
  19. 19. Chikkaramappa T, Kadalli GG, Patel GM, Prakash SS, Rajashekarappa KS, Chaithra MC. Identification of soil fertility constraints in Boranakunte-1 micro-watershed, Tumkur district, Karnataka. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2021;69(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2021.00015.3
  20. 20. Prabhavathi M, Adhikari RN, Raizada A, Biswas H, Kumar PM, Naik BS, et al. Identification of soil fertility constraints using GIS for sustainable crop production in the watershed of semi-arid tropics. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2023;71(2):159–71. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2023.00022.1
  21. 21. Seth PS, Chikkaramappa T. Fertility status of Kumachahalli micro-watershed soils in Chamarajanagar district, Karnataka. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2018;72(3):171–89.
  22. 22. Kumar A, Chauhan N, Kumar S, Patel UB, Pramanik M. Micro-watershed planning using prioritisation approach integrated with geospatial techniques and compromise programming: a case study of Bacchanshiv Gad (Alaknanda River), India. J Geol Soc India. 2023;99(5):647–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-023-2365-2
  23. 23. Khalkho MPD, Patel M. Development of different thematic maps of the micro-watershed using geospatial techniques. Int J Chem Stud. 2019;7(1):988–91.
  24. 24. Abate K, Mohammed M, Kibret K. Soil fertility assessment and mapping of spatial variability at Amareganda-Abajarso sub-watershed, north-eastern Ethiopia. East Afr J Sci. 2016;10(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.20372/eajs.v10i1.323
  25. 25. George TR, Bhat JA, Ahmad M, Wani DMM, Ramzan S, Yadav R. Mapping of spatial variability of soil texture and macronutrients in Wangath watershed, Ganderbal District of Jammu and Kashmir using GIS. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(2):628–42.
  26. 26. Pachpor SD, Nagaraju MSS, Srivastava R, Barthwal AK, Nasre RA, Mohekar D. Characterization and evaluation of land resources for management of Savli micro-watershed in Wardha district of Maharashtra using geospatial technologies. Agropedology. 2012;22(1):8–17.
  27. 27. Hegde R, Bardhan G, Niranjana KV, Bhaskar BP, Singh SK. Spatial variability and mapping of selected soil properties in Kaligaudanahalli micro-watershed, Gundlupet taluk, Chamarajanagar district, under hot semi-arid agro-subregion of Central Karnataka Plateau, India. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1:518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0486-4
  28. 28. Patil PL, Kuligod VB, Gundlur SS, Katti J, Nagaral IN, Shikrashetti P, et al. Soil fertility mapping in Dindur sub-watershed of Karnataka for site-specific recommendations. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2016;64(4):381–90. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2016.00050.5
  29. 29. Harshitha S, Ganapathi M, Gurumurthy KT, Mavarkar NS, Soumya TM. Fertility status of Hebbalagere micro-watershed in Channagiri taluk, Davanagere district of Karnataka using GIS technique. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6(2):56–69.
  30. 30. Meenkshi Bai R, Vidyavathi GY, Yadahalli GS, Rajesh NL, Rudramurthy HV. Soil fertility status of Pannur North-3 microwatershed of Manvi Taluk, Raichur District, Karnataka. Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5(5):1949–55.
  31. 31. Pujari KL, Patil PL, Dasog GS, Hebsur NS, Manjunath MV, Alagundagi SC. Identification of soil fertility constraints by geographic information system technique in Kotur microwatershed. J Farm Sci. 2016;29(1):32–6.
  32. 32. Biradar B, Jayadeva HM, Channakeshava S, Geetha KN, Sannagoudar MS, Pavan AS, et al. Assessment of soil fertility through GIS techniques and thematic mapping in the micro-watershed of Hassan, Karnataka. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9(4):3218–28. https://doi.org/10.22271/phyto.2020.v9.i4af.12116
  33. 33. Vasundhara R, Hegde R, Dharumarajan SV, Niranjana KV. Spatial assessment of soil fertility status in Shiratti sub-watershed of semi-arid tropics in Southern India. Int J Bioresour Stress Manag. 2020;11(2):163–70. https://doi.org/10.23910/ijbsm/2020.11.2077
  34. 34. Hegde R, Kumar M, Niranjana MB, Seema KV, Dhanorkar BA. Study on the soil fertility and mapping in Ramasamudram-1 micro-watershed of Yadgir Taluk and District of Karnataka, India. Int J Bioresour Stress Manag. 2021;12(4):348–60. https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2021.2262
  35. 35. Kavitha C, Sujatha MP. GIS-based soil fertility mapping in agro ecological units of central part of Kerala, India. Int Res J Environ Sci. 2021;10(2):24–37.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.