Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2025)

Influence of arecanut based cropping systems and nutrient management practices on growth, flowering and yield of arecanut

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.9837
Submitted
4 June 2025
Published
12-08-2025 — Updated on 27-08-2025
Versions

Abstract

Arecanut (Areca catechu L.) has a lot of unused area in monocropping, which makes medicinal and aromatic plants a good way to increase production. However, there isn't much research on integrated nutrition management in arecanut systems under agroclimatic conditions of Odisha. Hence, a field study was conducted during 2021–22 and 2022–23 in a five-year-old fruit-bearing arecanut plantation (cv. Mohitnagar). The experiment followed a split plot design with three cropping systems as main factor, such as C1: arecanut + Curcuma longa (turmeric) + C. caesia (black turmeric); C2: arecanut + Andrographis paniculata (kalmegh) + Ocimum sanctum (tulsi); C3: arecanut + Withania somnifera (ashwagandha) + Rauvolfia serpentina (sarpagandha). The sub-factor included three nutrient management treatments: N1: organic recycling + 100 % nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) through recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF); N2: organic recycling + 100 % NPK through soil test based dose (STD) and N3: organic recycling + 75 % NPK (STD) + biofertilizer consortia. Pooled results over the two-year study showed that organic recycling of biomass with application of 100 % NPK (STD) in the arecanut + ashwagandha + sarpagandha cropping system recorded maximum vegetative growth in terms of plant height, canopy spread and annual leaf production. Meanwhile, cropping system applied with 75 % NPK (STD), biofertilizer consortia and organic recycling of biomass, resulted in highest number of flowering bunch (3.62), fruit set (32.16 %), number of fruits (326.35), fruit weight (48.11 g) and fresh fruit yield (15.13 kg palm-1).

References

  1. 1. National Horticulture Board. Horticulture Statistics at a Glance, 2021–22 (2nd estimate). Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer Welfare, Horticulture Statistics Division, Government of India, 1–3. Available from: Horticultural Crops 2021-22 (Second Adv Est).xlsx
  2. 2. Bhat R, Sujatha S, Chowdappa P. Arecanut-based cropping system. Indian J Arecanut Spices Med Plants. 2016;18(4):35-41. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i9.61349
  3. 3. Sujatha S, Bhat R. Response of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia A.) intercropped in arecanut to irrigation and nutrition in humid tropics of India. Agric Water Manag. 2010;97(7):988-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.031
  4. 4. Balasimha D. Cropping systems. In: Arecanut. Kasaragod, Kerala: Central Plantation Crops Research Institute; 2004. p. 103-30.
  5. 5. Bhat R, Sujatha S. Root distribution of arecanut (Areca catechu L.) as influenced by drip fertigation in a laterite soil. Indian J Agric Sci. 2008;78(9):803-806.
  6. 6. Viswanathan TV, Radhakrishnan VV, Reghunath BR, Prasannakumari KT. Patchouli (Pogostemon cablin) as an intercrop in young coconut (Cocos nucifera) garden. Indian J Agric Sci. 1992;62(9):616-17.
  7. 7. Maheswarappa HP, Nanjappa HV, Hegde MR. Influence of agronomic practices on growth, productivity and quality of galangal (Kaempferia galanga L.) grown as intercrop in coconut garden. J Plantn Crops. 2000;28(1):72-81.
  8. 8. Reddy DVS, Biddappa CC. Coconut based cropping/farming systems in India. J Plantn Crops. 2000;28(1):1-18.
  9. 9. Vishwajith KP, Sahu P, Dhekale B, Noman M, Mishra P. Exploring the feasibility of arecanut based farming systems in augmenting farm economy: A case study in Karnataka India. J Crop Weed. 2015;11:127-33.
  10. 10. Thakur NS, Attar SK, Chauhan RS. Horti-medicinal agroforestry systems: A potential land use for commercial cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants. In: Gupta SK, Panwar P, Kaushal R editors. Agroforestry for increased production and livelihood security; 2017. p. 163-83.
  11. 11. Nair GS, Sudhadevi PK, Kurian A. Introduction of medicinal and aromatic plants as intercrops in coconut plantations. In: Raychauduri SP, editor. Recent advances in medicinal, aromatic and spice crops. New Delhi: Today and Tomorrows Printers and Publishers; 1989. p. 163–85.
  12. 12. Franzel S, Jaenicke H, Janssen W. Choosing the right trees: Setting priorities for multipurpose tree improvement. ISNAR Research Report No. 8. The Hague, Netherlands: International Service for National Agricultural Research; 1996.
  13. 13. Ayuk ET, Duguma B, Franzel S, Kengue J, Mollet M, Tiki-Manga T, et al. Uses, management and economic potential of Irvingia gabonensis in the humid lowland of Cameroon. For Ecol Manage. 1999;113:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00323-5
  14. 14. Government of India (GOI). Report of the taskforce on medicinal plants in India. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Yojana Bhawan; 2000.
  15. 15. Rao EVSP, Puttanna K, Rao RSG, Kumar S. Prospect of commercial mediculture and recent advances in agrotechnologies of aromatic plants in South India. J Med Aromat Plant Sci. 2000;22(1B):207-13.
  16. 16. Rao MR, Palada MC, Becker BN. Medicinal and aromatic plants in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst. 2004;61:107-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028993.83007.4b
  17. 17. Mohapatra S, Sahoo SC, Samant D, Swain SC. Influence of integrated nutrient management on physico-chemical properties of soil, growth, flowering and yield of guava grown as a component crop in coconut-based cropping system. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(22):102-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss%2F2023%2Fv35i224117
  18. 18. Singh HP, Singh G. Nutrient and water management in guava. In: Proceedings of 1st International Guava Symposium, CISH, Lucknow. Acta Hortic. 2007;735:389–97. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.735.55
  19. 19. Adak T, Kumar K, Singha A. Spatio-temporal variations in soil moisture and soil temperature under high density guava orchard system. Proceedings of 5th Indian Horticulture Congress on Horticulture for Food and Environment Security; 2012 Nov 6–9; Ludhiana, India. Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University; 2012. p. 397.
  20. 20. Sujatha S, Bhat R, Balasimha D, Kannan C. Crop diversification in arecanut plantation through intercropping of medicinal and aromatic plants. J Plantation Crops. 2006;34:318-22.
  21. 21. Sujatha S, Bhat R, Chowdappa P. Cropping systems approach for improving resource use in arecanut (Areca catechu) plantation. Indian J Agric Sci. 2016;86(9):1113-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v86i9.61349
  22. 22. Mishra PJ, Swain SC. A note on evaluation of different agri-horti systems in watersheds for Eastern Ghat High land zone of Orissa. Orissa J Hort. 2001;29:112–14.
  23. 23. Nath V, Das B, Rai M, Dey P, Kumar S, Kumar M. Mango based cropping system for uplands of sub-humid plateau region of Eastern India. Prog Hortic. 2003;35:142-45.
  24. 24. Swain SC, Patro L. Horticulture based cropping system—A strategy for sustainable development in rainfed upland. In: Patro L, Tripathy SN, editors. Environmental Hazards. New Delhi: Sonali Publications; 2007. p. 44-69.
  25. 25. Maheswarappa HP, Krishnakumar V, Reddy DV, Dhanapal RR, Zachariah J. Performance of different varieties/hybrids of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) as mixed crop in coconut garden. J Plantn Crops. 2012;40(2):82-87.
  26. 26. Deka KK, Bora P, Talukdar J. Performance of different varieties and hybrids of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) as mixed crop in arecanut garden of Assam, India. Agric Sci Digest. 2016;36(4):272-76.
  27. 27. Desai N, Shreenivasa KR, Anitha MS, Shankara MH. Effect of intercropping system of vegetables on yield and economics of arecanut plantation. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(21):1280-87. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i214107
  28. 28. Ramanandam G, Padma E, Kalpana M, Maheswarappa HP. Potential coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) hybrids for yield and quality for coastal region of Andhra Pradesh (India). Indian J Agric Sci. 2017;87(8):1073-76.
  29. 29. Veluru A, Subramanian P, Singh K, Banyal N, Panwar S, Selvamani V, et al. Evaluation of indigenous rose varieties as intercrop under coconut plantation in India. Indian J Hortic. 2021;78(3):273-79. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2021.00039.6
  30. 30. Maheswarappa HP, Thomas G, Gupta A, Bhat R, Palaniswami C. Productivity and nutrient status of coconut (Cocos nucifera) as influenced by integrated nutrient management with vermi composted coconut leaves. Indian J Agron. 2014;59:455-59.
  31. 31. Jayasekhar S, Muralidhar K. Economics of coconut based cropping/farming systems. In: Thomas GV, Krishnakumar V, Maheswarappa HP, Palaniswami C, editors. Coconut Based Cropping/Farming System. Kasaragod: Central Plantation Crops Research Institute; 2010. p. 208-21.
  32. 32. Ghosh DK, Bandopadhyay A. Performance of some coconut cultivars and hybrids in alluvial plains of West Bengal. J Crop Weed. 2015;11(1):197-99.
  33. 33. Nath J, Deka K, Saud B, Maheswarappa H. Intercropping of medicinal and aromatic crops in adult coconut garden under Brahmaputra valley region of Assam. JPC. 2015;43(1):17-22.
  34. 34. Chandrashekhar G, Bhattacharjee H. Growth and yield characters of arecanut (Areca catechu L.) in Terai zone of West Bengal. Pharma Innov J. 2019;8(6):427–29.
  35. 35. Swain SC, Dora DK, Sahoo SC, Padhi SK, Sanyal D. Influence of mango-based intercropping systems on improvement of soil health under rainfed situation. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2012;43(15):2018-26.
  36. 36. Sudhalakshmi C, Rajakumar D, Rani S, Maheswarappa HP. Soil fertility, system productivity and economic viability of coconut-based high density multi-species cropping system in Tamil Nadu, India. J Plantn Crops. 2021;49(3):182-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2021.v49.i3.7452
  37. 37. Rath S, Swain SC. Performance of intercrops in bearing mango orchards in Eastern Ghat highland zones of Orissa. Indian J Dryland Agric Res Dev. 2006;21:12-15.
  38. 38. Tripathi P, Shah S, Kashyap SD, Tripathi A. Fruit yield and quality characteristics of high density Prunus persica (L.) Batsch plantation intercropped with medicinal and aromatic plants in the Indian Western Himalayas. Agrofor Syst. 2019;93:1717-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0276-9
  39. 39. Kumar NP. Effect of intercropping on fruit crops: A review. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;9(12):745-55.
  40. 40. Samitha F, Senthamizh SB, Aneesa RMS, Sivakumar R, Sasikumar K. Sustainable diversification in Indian agriculture: Effectiveness of integrating horticultural crops as intercrops in mono-cropping coconut system. Plant Sci. 2024;11(4S):01-10. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5363
  41. 41. Tong C, Yu R, Chen S, Hu A, Dong Z, Tang L, et al. Intercropping in coconut plantations regulate soil characteristics by microbial communities. Agriculture. 2024;14(9):1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091564
  42. 42. Hongal S, Sowjanya TV, Kulkarni S, Maheswarappa HP, Gurumurthy SB, Shivakumar KM, et al. Different farming systems concerning soil health and yield of arecanut and black pepper. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2023;35(18):1722-30. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183452
  43. 43. Sudha R, Nirala V, Diwakar Y, Rajesh MK, Samsudeen K. Variability and principal component analysis for yield and associated traits in West Coast Tall coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) palms. Indian J Genet. 2021;81(3):469-73.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.