Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp1 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Carbon footprint assessment of GKVK campus: A comprehensive GHG inventory based on IPCC and GHG protocol guidelines

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10841
Submitted
23 July 2025
Published
09-03-2026

Abstract

The study conducted a detailed carbon footprint assessment of the Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra (GKVK) campus, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, using internationally recognised standards such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines and the greenhouse gas (GHG) Protocol. As institutions are increasingly recognised for their contribution to GHG emissions through energy use, transport, waste and food services, this research quantified emissions across scope 1 (direct), scope 2 (indirect from purchased electricity) and scope 3 (other indirect emissions). Activity data were collected from institutional records, surveys and field assessments, while emission factors were sourced from IPCC (6th assessment report) AR6, the united nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) GHG calculator v2.6 and Central Electricity Authority (CEA) guidelines. The total GHG emissions from the GKVK campus were estimated at 7606.545 tonnes CO₂e/yr, with scope 1 contributing 42.08 %, scope 2 contributing 20.46 % and scope 3 contributing 37.46 %. Major sources included liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) usage (1334884 kg CO₂e), grid electricity (1556180 kg CO₂e), food waste (1622855 kg CO₂e), refrigerant leakage (982430 kg CO₂e) and student commuting (879466 kg CO₂e). While the study provides a comprehensive institutional GHG baseline, it is limited to one academic year and excludes embodied emissions from infrastructure. The findings establish a replicable framework for Indian educational institutions to measure, manage and mitigate emissions. Future research should extend this model to multi-campus assessments and long-term carbon management planning, strengthening the roadmap toward carbon-neutral academic ecosystems and supporting India’s broader net-zero commitments.

References

  1. 1. Smith J, Taylor A. The role of universities in achieving carbon neutrality: a global perspective. Environ Stud J. 2023;44(2):125–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/esj.2023.01.012
  2. 2. Kumar P, Sharma R. Greenhouse gas emissions from educational institutions in India: a review. J Environ Manag. 2021;56(4):401–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.04.013
  3. 3. Smith P. Global emissions in the context of climate change: impacts and mitigation. Glob Environ Change J. 2023;58(1):15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglobal.2023.01.003
  4. 4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021. p. 65–67.
  5. 5. Stern N. The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139051967
  6. 6. World Resources Institute. World resources report: the changing global carbon budget. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute; 2023. p. 22–24. http://www.wri.org
  7. 7. Jain A, Mehta S. Integrating sustainability in university campuses: carbon footprint and green strategies. Sustain Sci. 2022;17(3):259–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01080-4
  8. 8. World Bank. State and trends of carbon pricing 2022. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2022. p. 22–28.
  9. 9. Xie Z, Zhang L. Carbon footprint of higher education institutions in China: challenges and opportunities. Sustain Dev. 2021;29(6):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2231
  10. 10. Bansal S, Sharma A. Reducing scope 3 emissions through student commuting: a case study of Indian campuses. Transp Environ. 2021;36(6):812–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranenv.2021.04.012
  11. 11. Patel S, Reddy M. A review of university carbon management strategies in South Asia. Int J Clim Change. 2022;12(4):68–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17568790.2022.2097605
  12. 12. Press Information Bureau (PIB). India’s 5-point “Panchamrit” climate commitment at COP26. New Delhi: Government of India; 2021. p. 53–59.
  13. 13. Sharma A, Sharma R. Post-COVID emissions from India: trends and future projections. Environ Sci Policy. 2023;108(7):120–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.014
  14. 14. NITI Aayog. India’s energy and emissions outlook: towards net-zero by 2070. New Delhi: Government of India; 2021. p. 43–49.
  15. 15. Joshi S, Mehta A. India’s green recovery post-COVID: assessing the role of renewable energy in emission reductions. Renew Energy. 2021;14(1):905–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.061
  16. 16. Central Electricity Authority. CO₂ baseline database for the Indian power sector – Version 19. New Delhi: Government of India; 2023. p. 90–94.
  17. 17. Chang W, Yao L. Updates to the GHG protocol: methodology for estimating emissions in educational institutions. J Environ Manag. 2022;274(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111179
  18. 18. Carter J, Green D. A comparative study of GHG emission factors: implications for campus carbon audits. Environ Res Lett. 2020;15(10):89–102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7b92
  19. 19. N Soundarya, HG Ashoka, K Devaraja, MN Thimmegowda. Impact of rainwater recharging on the yield of borewells at the GKVK Campus, Bengaluru. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2021. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2021/v11i830461
  20. 20. World Resources Institute. World resources report: the changing global carbon budget. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute; 2023. p. 24–26. http://www.wri.org
  21. 21. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). GHG emissions calculator version 2.6. Bonn: UNFCCC; 2023. http://unfccc.int
  22. 22. Thomas R, Gupta M. Climate performance benchmarking for universities: a carbon audit framework. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2020;21(6):1153–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2020-0012
  23. 23. Ghosh A, Ghosh S. Estimating scope 3 carbon emissions in Indian universities: a case study approach. J Clean Prod. 2022;370(4):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.12.014
  24. 24. Hoque N, Das AK, Khan AM. Evaluating GHG emissions from Indian educational institutions: an empirical case study. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2023;42(3):13–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13319
  25. 25. Environmental Protection Agency. Emission factors for greenhouse gas inventories. Washington (DC): US Environmental Protection Agency; 2021. p. 35–37.
  26. 26. Shahzad K, Raza H. Assessing the carbon footprint of university campuses: a review of existing methods. Sustainability. 2020;12(7):27–66. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072766
  27. 27. Kumar V, Singh A. Scope-wise emission discrepancies in institutional carbon footprints: a case study. Int J Environ Sustain. 2021;8(5):122–9. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJES.2021.114259
  28. 28. Brander M, Sood A, Wylie C, Haughton A, Lovell J. Electricity-specific emission factors for grid electricity. Ecometrica. 2011;14(1):8–22. https://doi.org/10.35716/ECO/2011
  29. 29. Rani P, Tripathi S. Waste-to-energy technologies in universities: a review of carbon footprint reduction potential. Waste Manag. 2022;105(1):208–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.005
  30. 30. Kalghatgi GT, Sharma S. Sustainability assessment of a university campus in southern India. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2020;21(4):655–72.
  31. 31. Ramachandra TV, Shwetmala. Emissions from India’s transport sector: statewide synthesis. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(34):5510–7.
  32. 32. Patel D, Moudgil R. Carbon footprint of Indian campuses: current status and future directions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2022;45(1):204–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.01.010
  33. 33. Joshi R, Kumar M, Basu P. Carbon footprint and energy consumption assessment in Indian educational institutions. Energy Build. 2021;250:111564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111564
  34. 34. Ramachandra TV, Aithal BH, Sreejith K. GHG footprint of major cities in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;44:473–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.059
  35. 35. Surampalli RY, Zhang TC, Ojha CSP. Carbon footprint analysis of wastewater treatment plants. ASCE Publ. 2016;15(8):57–65.
  36. 36. Lee H, Nam D. Assessing scope 3 emissions in universities: student and staff commuting patterns. Environ Pollut. 2022;282:117136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117136
  37. 37. Barman P, Singh R. Emission reduction through campus energy management: a case study of Indian universities. Int J Energy. 2021;54(8):1137–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijenergy.2021.07.006
  38. 38. Mishra A, Gupta R. Sustainable transport solutions for universities: case study and mitigation strategies. Sustain Transp J. 2022;14(2):98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sustrans.2022.03.011
  39. 39. Sharma R, Agarwal A. Role of solar power in university campuses: a case study of carbon emissions reduction. J Renew Energy. 2022;19(3):331–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2022.08.017
  40. 40. Tiwari P, Dhawan S. Measuring the carbon footprint of Indian universities: a framework for future research. J Environ Res. 2022;40(7):671–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvres.2022.05.021
  41. 41. Goyal M, Singh S. Reducing carbon emissions in universities through renewable energy: a case study from India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2023;128:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109845
  42. 42. Tran D, Hoang T. Carbon mitigation strategies in educational campuses: best practices and case studies. Energy Rep. 2021;7(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.016
  43. 43. Bhat K, Singh H. Carbon footprint analysis in university campuses: a framework for action. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2021;83:106–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.06.003
  44. 44. Chakrabarti S, Das M. Emission reduction opportunities in higher education campuses: a case study approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;47:145–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.04.021
  45. 45. Narayan S, Bose S. Comparative analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in universities: international vs Indian campuses. Sustain Dev. 2022;30(2):317–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2193

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.