Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Response of rabi mustard (Brassica juncea L.) to varying irrigation regimes and fertigation schedules under maize-mustard cropping system

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12588
Submitted
4 November 2025
Published
01-07-2026

Abstract

The limited availability of irrigation water and inefficient nutrient use are major constraints affecting mustard (Brassica juncea L.) productivity in India. To enhance yield and resource-use efficiency, a field experiment was conducted at the Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Jagtial, during rabi seasons of 2019–20, 2020–21 and 2021–22 to study the effect of irrigation regimes and fertigation levels on growth, yield, water productivity and economics of mustard under drip irrigation. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three irrigation levels [0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 times the cumulative Class A pan evaporation (Epan)] in the main plots and four fertigation levels (75 %, 100 %, 125 % and 150 % of recommended dose of nitrogen and potassium) in the subplots, replicated thrice. Pooled results indicated that irrigation at 1.2 Epan recorded the highest seed yield (982 kg ha-1), stalk yield (2771 kg ha-1) and gross returns (₹48197 ha-1), whereas the highest water productivity (0.54 kg m-3) was achieved with 0.8 Epan. Among fertigation treatments, 150 % RDN + K significantly enhanced plant height, siliquae plant-1, seeds siliqua-1, seed yield (1040 kg ha-1) and net returns (₹25811 ha-1) compared to 75 % RDN + K. The interaction between irrigation and fertigation was non-significant for most parameters. The above findings highlight that adopting 1.2 Epan irrigation with 150 % RDN + K fertigation can substantially improve mustard productivity and farm profitability under drip systems, making it a viable strategy for farmers facing resource constraints. Additionally, the higher water productivity observed with 0.8 Epan suggests that growers in water-limited regions can optimise water use without severe yield penalties by adjusting irrigation levels appropriately.

References

  1. 1. Chauhan JS, Singh M, Singh D. Status and prospects of rapeseed–mustard production in India: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2022;39(3):131–8.
  2. 2. Anonymous. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India; 2024.
  3. 3. Hegde DM. Carrying capacity of Indian agriculture: Oilseeds. Current Science. 2012;102(6):867–73.
  4. 4. Patel JR, Yadav MS, Chauhan DA. Drip fertigation scheduling for mustard under North Gujarat conditions. Journal of Agricultural Physics. 2019;19(2):118–23.
  5. 5. Meena NL, Singh A, Choudhary S. Effect of irrigation and fertigation on growth and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2020;37(2):125–30.
  6. 6. Singh RK, Verma SK, Pandey S. Scheduling irrigation based on IW/CPE ratio in mustard under semi-arid conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2018;63(4):482–6.
  7. 7. Jackson ML. Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India; 1973.
  8. 8. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 20th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2016.
  9. 9. CACP. Price Policy for Rabi Crops: The Marketing Season 2020–21. New Delhi: Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices, Government of India; 2020.
  10. 10. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. 4th ed. New Delhi: ICAR Publications; 1985.
  11. 11. Singh D, Kumar R, Meena RS. Effect of irrigation and nutrient levels on growth and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2019;64(3):365–70.
  12. 12. Sharma P, Chauhan RS, Mehta RS. Influence of irrigation regimes and fertigation on performance of mustard under semi-arid conditions. Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2020;37(2):123–9.
  13. 13. Patel VR, Parmar KB, Patel BM. Response of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) to irrigation and nitrogen levels under North Gujarat conditions. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7(3):254–62.
  14. 14. Kumar S, Singh AK, Yadav RK. Effect of drip fertigation on growth and yield of mustard in sandy loam soils of Haryana. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 2020;22(1):57–61.
  15. 15. Yadav SK, Pandey V, Singh AK. Effect of irrigation scheduling and nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of mustard. Journal of AgriSearch. 2019;6(1):20–5.
  16. 16. Pandey V, Patel D, Yadav R. Effect of fertigation and irrigation regimes on productivity and profitability of mustard. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 2020;54(4):485–9.
  17. 17. Meena H, Singh B, Dhyani BP. Impact of irrigation levels and integrated nutrient management on yield attributes and productivity of mustard. Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2018;35(1):52–6.
  18. 18. Chaudhary A, Rathore RS, Yadav S. Growth and yield response of mustard to irrigation frequency and nitrogen levels. Legume Research. 2021;44(3):345–51.
  19. 19. Ghosh S, Das A, Patra P. Influence of irrigation and fertilizer levels on yield attributes and yield of Indian mustard. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2020;90(6):1135–40.
  20. 20. Patidar M, Singh RK, Meena R. Effect of irrigation and nutrient management on yield and economics of mustard under limited water conditions. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2021;9(2):154–9.
  21. 21. Tripathi ML, Chauhan JS, Singh B. Effect of irrigation and fertility levels on productivity and economics of mustard (Brassica juncea). Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2019;36(2):142–8.
  22. 22. Giri AN, Choudhary SK, Singh SP. Drip irrigation and fertigation effects on growth, yield and water productivity of mustard. Agricultural Water Management. 2021;252:106880.
  23. 23. Kumawat S, Meena H, Verma AK. Productivity, water-use efficiency and economics of mustard under different irrigation and nitrogen levels. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation. 2020;48(1):72–8.
  24. 24. Das A, Yadav SK, Singh R. Effect of fertigation scheduling on nutrient uptake and harvest index of mustard under drip irrigation. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2021;66(2):199–205.
  25. 25. Kaur P, Singh B, Sharma SC. Water productivity and yield of mustard under drip irrigation and fertigation systems. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 2018;55(4):37–44.
  26. 26. Sharma R, Kumar P, Yadav M. Water use efficiency and yield performance of mustard under drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation. Agricultural Water Management. 2021;248:106765.
  27. 27. Yadav AK, Patel MM, Bairwa SK. Economic evaluation of irrigation and nutrient management practices in mustard. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2021;76(3):430–7.
  28. 28. Patil S, Jadhav S, Mane P. Influence of drip fertigation on growth, yield and economics of mustard in semi-arid regions of Maharashtra. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 2022;34(6):89–97.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.