Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026)

Dissecting gene action in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using generation mean analysis across multiple crosses

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14698
Submitted
25 March 2026
Published
03-06-2026 — Updated on 10-06-2026
Versions

Abstract

The study aimed to estimate gene action governing yield and its components in rice using generation mean analysis (GMA) across multiple crosses. Understanding the genetic basis of important agronomic traits is crucial for developing high-yielding and stable rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. This study employed five parameter model of GMA to assess the nature and extent of gene actions specifically additive, dominance and epistatic effects on grain yield and other key traits across 12 diverse rice crosses. Five generations (P1, P2, F1, F2 and F3) were developed and evaluated over multiple growing seasons to encompass the full spectrum of genetic interactions. The results showed significant scaling tests in most crosses, indicating that digenic epistatic models were necessary for trait inheritance. Additive gene effects were prominent for traits like plant height (PH), panicle length (PL) and flag leaf length (FLL), suggesting that these traits can be improved through straightforward selection methods. In contrast, traits such as the number of productive tillers (NPT), 100-seed weight (SW) and grain yield per plant (GYP) were largely influenced by dominance and duplicate epistasis, highlighting the importance of heterosis breeding. Additionally, complementary epistasis was observed in certain traits across selected crosses, underscoring the role of specific gene interactions. These findings provide valuable insights into the gene actions specific to each trait and offer a roadmap for developing targeted breeding strategies in rice.

References

  1. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2019. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2019.
  2. 2. Gurdev S K. Strategies for increasing the yield potential of cereals: case of rice as an example. Plant Breed. 2013;132(5):433–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.1991
  3. 3. Douglas S F. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New Delhi: Pearson Education India; 1996.
  4. 4. Sultana RA, Ansari NA, Ramesha MS, Sankar AS, Krishna KM. Generation mean analysis of quantitative traits in restorer lines of Oryza sativa. Ann Plant Soil Res. 2016;18:586–90. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/AJBS/11.1/151-161
  5. 5. Zewdu Z. Combining ability analysis of yield and yield components in selected Oryza sativa genotypes. Cogent Food Agric. 2020;6(1):1811594. https://doi:10.1080/23311932.2020.1811594
  6. 6. Kenneth Mather. Biometrical genetics: the study of continuous variation. Br Sci News. 1948;2:316.
  7. 7. Biometrical genetics: the study of continuous variation Hayman BI. The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity. 1958;12:371–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1958.36
  8. 8. Jinks JL, Jones RM. Estimation of the components of heterosis. Genetics. 1958;43(2):223–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/43.2.223
  9. 9. Uzokwe VN, Asafo-Adjei B, Fawole I, Abaidoo R, Odeh IO, Ojo DK, et al. Generation mean analysis of phosphorus-use efficiency in freely nodulating soybean crosses grown in low-phosphorus soil. Plant Breed. 2017;136(2):139–46. https://doi:10.1111/pbr.12453
  10. 10. Subbulakshmi K, Shunmugavalli N, Muthuswamy A. Generation mean analysis for yield and quality traits in F2 and F3 generation of Oryza sativa. Electron J Plant Breed. 2016;7(3):491–95. https://doi:10.5958/0975-928X.2016.00063.6
  11. 11. Mather K, Jinks JL. Biometrical genetics: study of continuous variation. 3rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3406-2
  12. 12. Robert Wayne Allard. Principles of plant breeding. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
  13. 13. Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 1985.
  14. 14. Ullah MZ, Bashar MK, Bhuiyan MS, Khalequzzaman M, Hasan MJ. Interrelationship and cause-effect analysis among morpho-physiological traits in boro Oryza sativa of Bangladesh. Int J Plant Breed Genet. 2011;5(3):246–54. https://doi:10.3923/ijpbg.2011.246.254
  15. 15. Ekka RE, Sarawgi AK, Kanwar RR, Patel VK. Genetic variability analysis in traditional Oryza sativa germplasm in Chhattisgarh. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 2012;27(1):40–43.
  16. 16. Ghosh SC, Sharma D. Genetic parameters of agromorpho-physiological traits in Oryza sativa. Electron J Plant Breed. 2012;3(1):711–14.
  17. 17. Sathya R. Genetic studies (heritability and genetic advance) from three line rice hybrids under aerobic condition. Trends Biosci. 2014;7(18):2642–45.
  18. 18. Tiwari GC, Jatav NK. Combining ability analysis for grain yield and its related characters in Oryza sativa. Trends Biosci. 2014;7(13):1444–48.
  19. 19. Prapakaran M, Pushpam R, John Joel A, Manonmani S, Uma D, Sritharan N, et al. Exploring gene action and combining ability for yield improvement in Oryza sativa landraces. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(2). https://doi:10.14719/pst.6657
  20. 20. Chandramohan Y, Srinivas B, Thippeswamy S, Padmaja D. Diversity and variability analysis for yield parameters in Oryza sativa genotypes. Indian J Agric Res. 2016;50(6):609–13. https://doi:10.18805/ijare.v0iOF.10777
  21. 21. Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Miranda Filho JD. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0_12

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.