Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Inheritance pattern of imazethapyr tolerance in rice F2 and backcross progenies derived from KMP-175 × Robin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14761
Submitted
29 March 2026
Published
04-08-2026

Abstract

Herbicide tolerance is an essential trait for efficient weed management in direct-seeded rice systems (DSR), where early weed competition severely reduces crop establishment and productivity. The present study aimed to elucidate the inheritance pattern of imazethapyr tolerance in rice using F₂ and backcross populations derived from the cross KMP-175 × Robin. Segregating populations were evaluated under field conditions following imazethapyr application at 20 and 30 days after sowing (DAS). In the F2 population, 314 tolerant and 99 susceptible plants were recorded among 413 individuals, fitting the expected 3 : 1 Mendelian segregation ratio (X2 = 0.23, p = 0.63), indicating single gene control. The BCP1 population segregated into 67 tolerant and 61 susceptible plants, conforming to the expected 1 : 1 ratio (X2 = 0.28, p = 0.59), whereas all 95 plants in the BCP2 population exhibited tolerance. The segregation pattern across generations supports that imazethapyr tolerance in Robin is governed by a single dominant gene. Molecular validation using the RM6844 marker linked to the AHAS gene further supports this inheritance pattern. The monogenic dominant nature of the trait enables efficient selection and rapid introgression into elite cultivars. These findings provide a strong genetic basis for developing herbicide-tolerant rice cultivars suitable for direct-seeded production systems.

References

  1. 1. Rao AN, Johnson DE, Sivaprasad B, Ladha JK, Mortimer AM. Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Advances in Agronomy. 2007;93:153–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1
  2. 2. Devkota M, Devkota KP, Khanda CM, Sayre KD, Maraseni TN, McDonald AJ, Lamers JPA. Increasing profitability, yields and yield stability through sustainable crop establishment practices in rice-based systems of the Eastern Gangetic Plains. Agricultural Systems. 2019;173:414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.022
  3. 3. Kraehmer H, Jabran K, Mennan H, Chauhan BS. Global distribution of rice weeds - a review. Crop Protection. 2016;80:73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.10.027
  4. 4. Chauhan BS. Weed ecology and weed management strategies for dry-seeded rice in Asia. Weed Technology. 2012;26(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-11-00105.1
  5. 5. Chauhan BS, Opena J. Weed management and grain yield of rice sown at low seeding rates in mechanized dry-seeded systems. Field Crops Research. 2013;141:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.002
  6. 6. Tan S, Evans RR, Dahmer ML, Singh BK, Shaner DL. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. Pest Management Science. 2005;61:246–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.993
  7. 7. Tranel PJ, Wright TR. Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Science. 2002;50(6):700–12. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0700:RROWTA]2.0.CO;2
  8. 8. Yu Q, Powles SB. Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides: current understanding. Pest Management Science. 2014;70(9):1340–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3710
  9. 9. Newhouse KE, Singh BK, Shaner DL, Stidham MA, Patterson FL. Mutations in corn (Zea mays L.) acetolactate synthase conferring resistance to imidazolinone herbicides. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1992;83:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00229227
  10. 10. Shoba D, Raveendran M, Manonmani S, Utharasu S, Dhivyapriya D, Subhasini G, et al. Development and genetic characterization of a novel herbicide (imazethapyr) tolerant mutant in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice. 2017;10:10. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2017Rice...10...10S/doi:10.1186/s12284-017-0151-8
  11. 11. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin. 1987;19(1):11–15.
  12. 12. Rao VS. Principles of Weed Science. Oxford and IBH Publishing Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 1992;P. 540.
  13. 13. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA; 1989
  14. 14. Grover N, Kumar A, Yadav AK, Krishnan GS, Ellur RK, Bhowmick PK, et al.Marker assisted development and characterization of herbicide tolerant near isogenic lines of a mega Basmati rice variety, “Pusa Basmati 1121”. Rice. 2020;13(1):68.
  15. 15. Yu Q, Han H, Vila-Aiub MM, Powles SB. AHAS herbicide resistance endowing mutations: effect on AHAS functionality and plant growth. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2010;61(14):3925–34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20627897/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.