Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Multi-omics integration reveals pH-responsive regulatory networks underlying tea plant growth and quality formation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14923
Submitted
10 April 2026
Published
12-08-2026
Versions

Abstract

Tea plant growth, development and quality formation are strongly influenced by pH, which acts as a critical environmental factor. To systematically elucidate its regulatory mechanisms, this study employed a combined approach of physiology, transcriptomics and metabolomics to analyse the phenotypic responses, gene expression and metabolite accumulation dynamics of tea plants under different pH treatments. Results indicated that moderately elevated pH significantly enhanced the photosynthetic capacity of tea plant, promoted biomass accumulation and effectively elevated levels of key quality components including tea polyphenols and free amino acids in tea leaves. Omics analysis further revealed that pH elevation induced extensive transcriptional reprogramming and metabolic remodelling. For instance, genes associated with photosynthesis and carbon fixation pathways were specifically activated, while protein synthesis pathways such as ribosome assembly were suppressed. Correspondingly, the accumulation of quality-related metabolites, including amino acids, alkaloids and carbohydrates was significantly increased. Through integrated analysis using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM), this study constructed a multi-level regulatory network spanning molecular to phenotype and confirmed that pH synergistically drives tea plant growth and quality enhancement by coordinating photosynthetic gene expression and metabolic resource allocation. This research provides systematic experimental evidence for elucidating tea plants' adaptive mechanisms to pH, laying a theoretical foundation for precision management of tea plantation soils and targeted regulation of tea leaf quality.

References

  1. 1. Barrow NJ, Hartemink AE. The effects of pH on nutrient availability depend on both soils and plants. Plant Soil. 2023;487(1):21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05960-5
  2. 2. Gondal A, Hussain I, Ijaz A, Zafar A, Ch B, Zafar H, et al. Influence of soil pH and microbes on mineral solubility and plant nutrition: A review. Int J Agric Biol Sci. 2021;5(1):71–81. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4625364
  3. 3. Rakhmankulova ZF, Fedyaev VV, Podashevka OA, Usmanov IY. Alternative respiration pathways and secondary metabolism in plants with different adaptive strategies under mineral deficiency. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2003;50(2):206–12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022973130775
  4. 4. Sun Y, Fernie AR. Plant secondary metabolism in a fluctuating world: climate change perspectives. Trends Plant Sci. 2024;29(5):560–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2023.11.008
  5. 5. Tsai HH, Schmidt W. The enigma of environmental pH sensing in plants. Nat Plants. 2021;7(2):106–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-00831-8
  6. 6. Watanabe T, Osaki M. Mechanisms of adaptation to high aluminum condition in native plant species growing in acid soils: a review. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2002;33(7–8):1247–60. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120003885
  7. 7. Yan P, Wu L, Wang D, Fu J, Shen C, Li X, et al. Soil acidification in Chinese tea plantations. Sci Total Environ. 2020;715:136963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136963
  8. 8. Yu T, Lu Y, Rouzi M, Zhang Y, Alimu Y, Remutula M, et al. Root morphology, leaf photosynthesis and chloroplast ultrastructure responses of peanut seedlings to soil acidification. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2025;25(1):1453–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-025-02213-5
  9. 9. Li Z-X, Yang W-J, Ahammed GJ, Shen C, Yan P, Li X, et al. Developmental changes in carbon and nitrogen metabolism affect tea quality in different leaf position. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;106:327–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.027
  10. 10. Xiang P, Marat T, Huang J, Cheng B, Liu J, Wang X, et al. Response of photosynthetic capacity to ecological factors and its relationship with EGCG biosynthesis of tea plant (Camellia sinensis). BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06106-8
  11. 11. Li C-L, Xu J, Xu H-M, Liu J, Zhang L-X, Wang Z-K. Analysis of growth resistance mechanisms and causes in tea plants (Camellia sinensis) in high-pH regions of Northern China. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1131380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1131380
  12. 12. Kudirka G, Viršilė A, Sutulienė R, Laužikė K, Samuolienė G. Precise management of hydroponic nutrient solution pH: The effects of minor pH changes and MES buffer molarity on lettuce physiological properties. Horticulturae. 2023;9(7):837. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070837
  13. 13. Zhang B, Tang L, Chen Z, Chen X, You L, Pan R, et al. Comparative and synergistic impacts of lime and biochar on soil properties, nitrogen transformation and microbial function in acidic soils under tobacco cropping. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1530128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1530128
  14. 14. Le VS, Herrmann L, Hudek L, Nguyen TB, Bräu L, Lesueur D. How application of agricultural waste can enhance soil health in soils acidified by tea cultivation: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2022;20(1):813–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01313-9
  15. 15. Manzoor, Ma L, Ni K, Ruan J. Influence of organic and inorganic fertilisers on tea growth and quality and soil properties of tea orchards' top rhizosphere soil. Plants. 2024;13(2):207. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020207
  16. 16. Wang C, Han J, Pu Y, Wang X. Tea (Camellia sinensis): a review of nutritional composition, potential applications and omics research. Appl Sci. 2022;12(12):5874. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12125874
  17. 17. Huang B, Zhang J. Secondary metabolism in tea plants: pathways and regulatory mechanisms. J Tea Sci Res. 2024;14(6):313–21. https://doi.org/10.5376/jtsr.2024.14.0029
  18. 18. Liu C-C, Liu Z-H. Genetic basis of stress tolerance in tea: a research insight. J Tea Sci Res. 2025;15(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.5376/jtsr.2025.15.0005
  19. 19. Yue C, Cao H, Zhang S, Shen G, Wu Z, Yuan L, et al. Multilayer omics landscape analyses reveal the regulatory responses of tea plants to drought stress. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253:126582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126582
  20. 20. Huang F, Lei Y, Duan J, Kang Y, Luo Y, Ding D, et al. Investigation of heat stress responses and adaptation mechanisms by integrative metabolome and transcriptome analysis in tea plants (Camellia sinensis). Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):10023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60411-0
  21. 21. Yu H, Li D, Wu Y, Miao P, Zhou C, Cheng H, et al. Integrative omics analyses of tea (Camellia sinensis) under glufosinate stress reveal defense mechanisms: a trade-off with flavor loss. J Hazard Mater. 2024;473:134542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134542
  22. 22. Hu Z, Yao X, Chen H, Li F, Zhao H, Tang H, et al. Changes and dynamics of the main quality components in tea leaves of four tea cultivars during the shading process. Sci Hortic. 2024;333:113242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113242
  23. 23. Jahan I, Shopan J, Rahman MM, Sarkar A, Baset MA, Zhang Z, et al. Long-term traditional fertilization alters tea garden soil properties and tea leaf quality in Bangladesh. Agronomy. 2022;12(9):2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12092128
  24. 24. Wang D, Liu B, Li F, Wang Z, Hou J, Cao R, et al. Status and influential factors of soil nutrients and acidification in Chinese tea plantations: a meta-analysis. SOIL. 2025;11(1):175–91. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-175-2025
  25. 25. Yu J, Wang Q, Wang W, Ma R, Ding C, Wei K, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic insights into temperature-dependent changes in catechin and anthocyanin accumulation in tea plants with different leaf colors. Plant Stress. 2024;14:100705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100705
  26. 26. Zhang Q, Li M, Jia M, Zhou Z, Wang Y, Liao Y, et al. Joint transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of molecular physiological mechanisms of tea tree roots in response to pH regulation. Horticulturae. 2025;11(7):821. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11070821
  27. 27. Wang H-B, Lin L-W, Wang Y-H. Technical specification for tea production, processing and safety inspection. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press; 2020.
  28. 28. Liu X, Zhao J, Xue L, Zhao T, Ding W, Han Y, et al. A comparison of transcriptome analysis methods with reference genome. BMC Genomics. 2022;23(1):232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08465-0
  29. 29. Zhao Y, Li M-C, Konaté MM, Chen L, Das B, Karlovich C, et al. TPM, FPKM, or normalized counts? A comparative study of quantification measures for the analysis of RNA-seq data from the NCI patient-derived models repository. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):269. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02936-w
  30. 30. Wen O, Ning J, Zhu X, Jiang Y, Wang J, Yuan H, et al. UPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis revealed the dynamic changes and conversion mechanism of non-volatile metabolites during green tea fixation. LWT. 2024;198:116010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116010
  31. 31. Long A, Zhang J, Yang L, Ye X, Lai N, Tan L, et al. Effects of low pH on photosynthesis, related physiological parameters and nutrient profiles of citrus. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00185
  32. 32. Aung TT, Shi F, Zhai Y, Xue J, Wang S, Ren X, et al. Acidic and alkaline conditions affect the growth of tree peony plants via altering photosynthetic characteristics, limiting nutrient assimilation and impairing ROS balance. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):5094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095094
  33. 33. Jia M, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Lin S, Chen Y, Hong L et al. Effect of soil pH on the uptake of essential elements by tea plant and subsequent impact on growth and leaf quality. Agronomy. 2024;14(6):1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14061338
  34. 34. Larionova T, Bastola S, Aksinina T, Anufrieva K, Wang J, Shender V, et al. Alternative RNA splicing modulates ribosomal composition and determines the spatial phenotype of glioblastoma cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(10):1541–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-00994-w
  35. 35. Vorländer MK, Rothe P, Kleifeld J, Cormack ED, Veleti L, Riabov-Bassat D, et al. Mechanism for the initiation of spliceosome disassembly. Nature. 2024;632(8024):443–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07741-1
  36. 36. Panchal P, Miller AJ, Giri J. Organic acids: versatile stress-response roles in plants. J Exp Bot. 2021;72(11):4038–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab019
  37. 37. Walker RP, Chen ZH, Famiani F. Gluconeogenesis in plants: a key interface between organic acid/amino acid/lipid and sugar metabolism. Molecules. 2021;26(17):5129. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175129
  38. 38. Ye J, Wang Y, Wang Y, Hong L, Jia X, Kang J, et al. Improvement of soil acidification in tea plantations by long-term use of organic fertilisers and its effect on tea yield and quality. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1055900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1055900
  39. 39. Yu Y, Wang J, Lou R, Wu W, Wang Z, Jiang Q, et al. Optimizing fertilization under varying cultivation conditions: insights from a meta-analysis on tea yield and quality. J Environ Manage. 2025;392:126808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126808
  40. 40. Chen L, Liu M, Cai Y, Wu L, Zhang Q. Magnesium deficiency differentiated effects on root growth and shoot metabolism by regulating the distribution of photosynthetic products in tea plants. Sci Hortic. 2024;338:113748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113748
  41. 41. Shu X, Jin M, Wang S, Xu X, Deng L, Zhang Z, et al. The effect of nitrogen and potassium interaction on the leaf physiological characteristics, yield and quality of sweet potato. Agronomy. 2024;14(10):2319. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102319
  42. 42. Jáuregui I, Ancín M, García-Mina JM, Zamarreño AM, Iglesias-Sanchez A, Florez-Sarasa I, et al. Permanent crop cover as a strategy for drought-resistant viticulture: insights on how rhizosphere metagenomics influences leaf-level omics for an enhanced overall plant response. Front Plant Sci. 2025;16:1543171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1543171
  43. 43. Zhang Y, Song M, He Y, Si Y. Research on the pathogen causing root rot on Phyllanthus emblica from the perspectives of identification, bionomics, fungicide sensitivity assay and transcriptome analysis under different pH stress. Front Microbiol. 2025;16:1612979. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1612979

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.