Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Association of Pantoea agglomerans with citrus canker of lemon in the northern region of West Bengal

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.15278
Submitted
27 April 2026
Published
20-07-2026

Abstract

Lemon is valued for its nutritional and therapeutic benefits. Its production in the northern region of West Bengal is severely affected by citrus canker, one of the most destructive bacterial diseases of citrus. The isolation of different bacterial isolates for the present investigation was performed during 2024. Whereas the virulence study was conducted across two cropping seasons (2024–25) to identify the virulent bacterial isolates associated with citrus canker under the local conditions of North Bengal. Twenty bacterial isolates were obtained and they were evaluated through pathogenicity test. Among the isolates, five showed consistent virulence under artificial inoculation conditions. Isolate no. 4 (UBKVXAC4) was found to be most virulent, showing maximum disease severity index (39.43 % in first year and 40.05 % in second year) and disease increase percentage (64.57 % and 67.79 % in first and second year). Molecular characterisation using 16S rRNA gene sequencing identified three isolates as Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, while two were identified as Pantoea agglomerans, suggesting a potential involvement in the development of canker-like symptoms. Further confirmation using Xac-specific primers targeting the hrpW gene showed amplification only in X. axonopodis pv. citri isolates, whereas no amplification was detected in the P. agglomerans isolates. The findings indicate that, besides the primary citrus canker pathogen, P. agglomerans may also be associated with canker-like symptoms in lemon under the agro-climatic conditions of northern West Bengal. This study highlights the diversity of bacterial communities associated with citrus canker and provides useful information for future disease management and resistance screening programmes.

References

  1. 1. Chaudhry NA, Khan AR, Hameedullah. Introduction of acclimatized exotic citrus. Citrus fruit varieties at Horticultural Research Station, Sahiwal. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Seminar on Citriculture in Pakistan; 1992; University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. p. 15.
  2. 2. National Horticulture Board. Indian Horticulture Database. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2023.
  3. 3. FAO. FAOSTAT. 2024. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home
  4. 4. APEDA. Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. 2024. https://apeda.gov.in/FreshFruitsAndVegetables
  5. 5. Das AK. Citrus canker – a review. J Appl Hortic. 2003;5:52–60. https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2003.v05i01.15
  6. 6. Schubert TS, Rizvi SA, Sun X, Gottwald TR, Graham JH, Dixon NW. Meeting challenge of eradicating citrus canker in Florida-again. Plant Dis. 2001;85:340–56. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.4.340
  7. 7. EPPO/CABI. Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri. In: Smith IM, McNamara DG, Scott PR, Holderness M, editors. Quarantine Pests for Europe. 9th ed. Wallingford (UK): CABI International; 1997.
  8. 8. Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Lacy G, Sechler AJ, Agarkova I, Stromberg P, et al. Reclassification of Xanthomonas species pathogenic on citrus. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2005;28:494–518.
  9. 9. Rangaswami G, Soumini RCK. Disease of citrus canker in Madras State. Indian Hortic. 1957;5:50–57.
  10. 10. Manulis S, Barash I. Pantoea agglomerans pvs. gypsophilae and betae, recently evolved pathogens? Mol Plant Pathol. 2003;4:307–14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00178.x
  11. 11. Goto M, Tadauchi Y, Okabe N. Interaction between Xanthomonas citri and Erwinia herbicola in vitro and in vivo. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn. 1979;45:618–24. https://doi.org/10.3186/jjphytopath.45.618
  12. 12. Krishnapillai V. Horizontal gene transfer. J Genet. 1996;75:219–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931763
  13. 13. Schaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. 3rd ed. St. Paul (MN): APS Press; 2001.
  14. 14. Claus D. A standardized Gram staining procedure. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1992;8:451–52.
  15. 15. Suslow TV, Schroth MN, Isaka M. Application of a rapid method for Gram differentiation of plant pathogenic and saprophytic bacteria without staining. Phytopathology. 1982;72:917–18.
  16. 16. Koch R. Die Ätiologie der Tuberkulose. Berl Klin Wochenschr. 1884;21:221–30.
  17. 17. Fatima A, Ghazanfar MU, Raza W, Ahmad S. Screening of citrus cultivars against citrus canker and its allelopathic management. J Agric Hortic Res. 2019;2:1–6.
  18. 18. Bock CH, Gottwald TR, Parker PE, Cook AZ, Ferrandino F, Parnell S, et al. The Horsfall-Barratt scale and severity estimates of citrus canker. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2009;125:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9455-x
  19. 19. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:697–703. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991
  20. 20. William S, Feil H, Copeland A. Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB. Sigma. 2012;50:6876.
  21. 21. R Core Team. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024. https://www.r-project.org/
  22. 22. Katkar M, Raghuwanshi KS, Chimote VP, Borkar SG. Pathological, bio-chemical and molecular diversity amongst the isolates of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri causing citrus canker in acid lime from different agro-climatic region of India. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol. 2016;1:302–15.
  23. 23. Iqbal S, Iftikhar S, Rasool A. Assessment and molecular characterization of citrus canker causing pathotypes. Int J Agron Agric Res. 2016;8:93–100.
  24. 24. Graham JH, Gottwald TR. Variation aggressiveness of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citrumelo associated with citrus bacterial spot in Florida citrus nurseries. Phytopathology. 1990;80:190–96
  25. 25. Kharat VM, Bramhankar SB, Thakur KD, Isokar SS, Pillai T, Dinkwar GT. Management of citrus canker bacterium by using botanicals and chemicals. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(2):1878–82. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2ac.9032
  26. 26. Goto M, Takahashi T, Messina MA. A comparative study of the strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri isolated from citrus canker in Japan and cancrosis B in Argentina. Jpn J Phytopathol. 1980;46:329–38. https://doi.org/10.3186/jjphytopath.46.329
  27. 27. Fatima S, Anjum T, Bajwa R, Shahid AA. Identification of indigenous Xanthomonas isolates through 16S rRNA gene amplification and SDS PAGE analyses. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2012;6:3651–55. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.093
  28. 28. Marchi G, Sisto A, Cimmino A, Andolfi A, Cipriani M, Evidente A, et al. Interaction between Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi and Pantoea agglomerans in olive knots. Plant Pathol. 2006;55:614–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01449.x
  29. 29. Lawrence JG. Horizontal and vertical gene transfer: the life history of pathogens. Contrib Microbiol. 2005;12:255–71. https://doi.org/10.1159/000081699

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.