Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025)

Impact of integrated nutrient management on growth, productivity and soil biochemical property of kharif rice

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.7788
Submitted
17 February 2025
Published
18-03-2025 — Updated on 01-04-2025
Versions

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2022 and 2023 to evaluate the performance of rice under integrated nutrient management using inorganic, organic and nano fertilizers. The experiment was designed as a Randomized Block Design (RBD) for rice during Kharif. The rice variety “Kalinga Dhan 1204” was sown in July with seven treatments: T1- Control (No fertilizer), T2- Full soil test based nitrogen recommendation (STBNR) through inorganic sources, T3- Full STBNR through organic sources (FYM), T4- Full STBNR through 50 % organic (FYM) + 50 % inorganic sources, T5- Full STBNR through 25 % organic (FYM) + 75 % inorganic sources, T6- 50 % N through inorganic sources + 2 nano urea spray (Tillering & PI stage), T7- 75% N through inorganic sources + 2 nano urea spray (Tillering & PI stage). Pooled data indicated application of Full STBNR through 25 % organic (FYM) + 75 % inorganic sources resulted in highest plant height (117.05 cm), leaf area index (LAI) (5.26), dry matter production per square meter (1085.50 g m-2), number of tillers per square meter (393.17), panicle length (26.60 cm), panicle weight (2.96 g), number of filled grains per panicle (166.67), grain yield (6.64 t ha-1), straw yield (7.45 t ha-1) and harvest index (47.13 %).

References

  1. FAO. 2023. The state of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023. Rome: Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  2. Yaduvanshi NP, Sharma DR. Effect of organic sources with and without chemical fertilizing on productivity of rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) sequence and plant nutrients balance in a reclaimed sodic soil. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2010;80(6).
  3. Sirisena DN, Dissanayake DM, Somaweera KA, Karunaratne V, Kottegoda N. Use of nano-K fertilizer as a source of potassium in rice cultivation. In First National Nanotechnology Conference 2012 Aug 24 (Vol. 98).
  4. Huang S, Wang L, Liu L, Hou Y, Li L. Nanotechnology in agriculture, livestock and aquaculture in China. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2015;35:369-400. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0274-x
  5. Liu R, Lal R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;514:131-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104
  6. Prem, B. Nano Urea the Philosophy of Future. 2021 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 353260539
  7. Yaduvanshi NP, Sharma DR, Swarup A. Impact of integrated nutrient management on soil properties and yield of rice and wheat in a long-term experiment on a reclaimed sodic soil. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 2013;61(3):188-94.
  8. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science. 1934;37(1):29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  9. Khan MU, Qasim M, Khan IU, Qasim M, Khan IU. Effect of integrated nutrient management on crop yields in rice-wheat cropping system. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 2007;23(4):1019.
  10. Asewar BV, Dahiphale VV, Chavan GV, Katare NB, Sontakke JS. Effect of ferrous sulphate on grain yield of upland Basmati rice. Journal of Maharashtra Agriculture University. 2000; 25 (2): 209-10.
  11. Benzon HR, Rubenecia MR, Ultra Jr VU, Lee SC. Nano-fertilizer affects the growth, development and chemical properties of rice. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research. 2015;7(1):105-17. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n4p20
  12. Kumar VI, Kumar T, Singh G, Singh RA. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield of rice and its residual effect on wheat in rice-wheat system under lowland. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 2017;19(4):360-5.
  13. Moe K, Moh SM, Htwe AZ, Kajihara Y, Yamakawa T. Effects of integrated organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield and growth parameters of rice varieties. Rice Science. 2019;26(5):309-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13030444
  14. Quasem JM, Mazahreh AS, Abu-Alruz K. Development of vegetable-based milk from decorticated sesame (Sesamum indicum). American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2009;6(5):888. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2009.888.896
  15. Sahayaraj K, Madasamy M, Radhika SA. Insecticidal activity of bio-silver and gold nanoparticles against Pericallia ricini Fab. (Lepidaptera: Archidae). J. Biopestic. 2016;9(1):63-72. https://doi.org/10.57182/jbiopestic.9.1.63-72
  16. Siddaram S, Murali K, Manjunatha BN, Ramesha YM, Basavaraja MK, Policepatil AS. Effect of nitrogen levels through organic sources on growth, dry matter production and nutrient uptake of irrigated aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.). 2010;426-29.
  17. Roy DK, Singh BP. Effect of level and time of nitrogen application with and without vermicompost on yield, yield attributes and quality of malt barley (Hordeum vulgare). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2006;51(1):40-2. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v51i1.4963
  18. Kumari S, Kumari R, Kumar R, Kohli A, Singh YK, Kumar G, et al. Combining vermicompost with inorganic fertilizers improved rice yield and affected potassium pools under rice-based cropping systems in inceptisols. Compost Science & Utilization. 2024;31(1-2):9-24. http://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2023.2292588
  19. Jana K, Mondal R, Mallick GK. Growth, productivity and nutrient uptake of aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by different nutrient management practices. Oryza-An International Journal on Rice. 2020;57(1):49-56. https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2020.57.1.6
  20. Lin D, Xing B. Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environmental Pollution. 2007;150(2):243-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.016.
  21. Laila N, Sarkar MA, Paul SK, Rahman A. Yield performance of aromatic fine rice as influenced by integrated use of vermicompost and inorganic fertilizers. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2020;18(2):260-5. https://doi.org/10.5455/JBAU.90309
  22. Urmi TA, Rahman MM, Islam MM, Islam MA, Jahan NA, Mia MA, et al. Integrated nutrient management for rice yield, soil fertility, and carbon sequestration. Plants. 2022;11(1):138. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010138
  23. Kumar Y, Tiwari KN, Singh T, Sain NK, Laxmi S, Verma RA, et al. Nanofertilizers for enhancing nutrient use efficiency, crop productivity and economic returns in winter season crops of Rajasthan. Annals of Plant and Soil Research. 2020;22(4):324-35. https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2020.10001
  24. Harsini MG, Habibi H, Talaei GH. Study the effects of iron nano chelated fertilizers foliar application on yield and yield components of new line of wheat cold region of Kermanshah province. 2014;95-102.
  25. Khalil MH, Abou-Hadid AF, Abdrabou RT, Al-halim A, AbdEl-Maaboud MS. Response of two maize cultivars (Zea mays L.) to organic manur and mineral nano nitrogen fertilizer under Siwa Oasis conditions. Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2019;27(1):299-312. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajs.2019.43527
  26. Pandey MP, Verulkar SB, Sharma D. Rice research: past achievements, present scenario and future thrust. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2010;80(6):447-69.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.