Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of moisture regimes and crop diversification on system productivity and soil health under North Bihar conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10321
Submitted
27 June 2025
Published
20-06-2026

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in a split-plot design and replicated thrice. The treatments comprised 5 cropping systems as the main plot, viz. C1: rice - wheat - fallow, C2: rice - wheat - green gram, C3: rice - maize - dhaincha, C4: rice - maize + potato - dhaincha, C5: rice - maize + green pea - dhaincha and moisture regimes I1 - IW/CPE = 0.6, I2 - IW/CPE = 0.8, I3 - IW/CPE = 1 as sub plot. Residues of crops were incorporated after the harvest of the crop. Experimental results revealed that the maximum REY (27.56 t/ha) production efficiency (83.05 kg/ha/day), Profitability (962.46 ₹/ha/day) and higher N, P, K uptake (399.97, 93.15, 343.14 kg/ha) were recorded under the C4 cropping system, which were significantly superior to other cropping systems. The highest relative production efficiency (175.18 %) and land use efficiency (91.64 %) were observed in C4 and C2 treatments. Maximum addition of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (153.66, 36.93, 227.66 kg/ha) through residue, MWD (3.540 mm), organic carbon content (0.497 %), available N, P2O5, K2O in soil (245.88,37.10, 153.58 kg/ha) and minimum bulk density (1.361 mg/m3) were observed in C5 which was significantly superior to other. The nutrient balance sheet shows a negative value, with the least losses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (61.95, 31.19, 24.69) observed in C5. In moisture regimes, maximum REY (17.21 t/ha) production efficiency (53.26 kg/ha/day), profitability (603.94 ₹/ha/day) and N, P, K uptake by crops (303.61, 82.72, 265.08 kg/ha) were recorded under I3, which was significantly superior to I2 and I1. Maximum N, P, K (116.35, 35.14, 196.39 kg/ha) addition to soil and least losses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (162.63, 45.55, 48.96) kg/ha were observed at I3 in the nutrient balance sheet.

References

  1. 1. Kumari A, Kumar V, Kumar R, Kumar M. Effect of residue management and cropping system on direct deeded rice and system productivity. Curr J Appl Sci Technol. 2020;39(20):132–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i2030832
  2. 2. Kumar N, Nath CP, Das K, Hazra KK, Venkatesh MK, Singh SS, et al. Combining soil carbon storage and crop productivity in partial conservation agriculture of rice-based cropping systems in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil Tillage Res. 2024;239:106029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106029
  3. 3. Lal R. Managing soils for negative feedback to climate change and positive impact on food and nutritional security. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2020;66(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1718548
  4. 4. Das S, Biswas S, Ramakrishnan B, Das TK, Purakayastha TJ, Gawade BH, et al. Biological soil health with conventional and qPCR-based indicators under conservation agriculture-based rice-wheat cropping system in Indo-Gangetic Plain. Appl Soil Ecol. 2024;193:105128.
  5. 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105128
  6. 6. Giller KF, Witter E, Corbeels M, Tittonell P. Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics' view. Field Crops Res. 2009;114(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017
  7. 7. Das TK, Nath CP, Das S, Biswas S, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, et al. Conservation agriculture in rice-mustard cropping system for five years: Impacts on crop productivity, profitability, water-use efficiency and soil properties. Field Crops Res. 2020;250:107781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107781
  8. 8. Jat ML, Chakraborty D, Ladha JL, Rana DS, Gathala MK, McDonald A, et al. Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in South Asia. Nat Sustain. 2020;3(4):336–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0500-2
  9. 9. Jat RK, Sapkota TB, Singh RG, Jat ML, Kumar M, Gupta RK. Seven years of conservation agriculture in a rice-wheat rotation of Eastern Gangetic plains of South Asia: Yield trends and economic profitability. Field Crops Res. 2014;164:199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.015
  10. 10. Bouman BAM, Mew TW, Brar DS, Peng S, Dawe D, Hardy B, editors. Examining the water-shortage problem in rice systems: water-saving irrigation technologies. Los Baños (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute; 2003.
  11. 11. Israelsen OW, Hansen VE. Irrigation principles and practices. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1953.
  12. 12. Subbiah BV, Asija GL. A rapid procedure for assessment of available nitrogen in rice soil. Curr Sci. 1956;25(8):259–60.
  13. 13. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture; 1954. (USDA Circular No. 939).
  14. 14. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Ltd; 1973. p. 183–204.
  15. 15. Raghuwanshi RKS, Umat R, Nema ML, Dubey DD. Balance sheet of nitrogen, phosphorus and potash in soil as influenced by wheat (Triticum aestivum) - based crop sequence. Indian J Agron. 1991;36(3):322–5.
  16. 16. Gomez K, Gomez A. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  17. 17. Nandan R, Singh SS, Kumar V, Singh V, Hazra KK, Nath CP, et al. Crop establishment with conservation tillage and crop residue retention in rice-based cropping systems of Eastern India: yield advantage and economic benefit. Paddy Water Environ. 2018;16(3):477–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0641-3
  18. 18. Kumari A, Kumar R, Sinha T, Kumari S, Kumar R. Effect of diversification on system productivity and profitability under North Bihar condition. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(10):3928–32. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i103067
  19. 19. Jat HS, Kumar P, Sutaliya HM, Kumar S, Choudhary M, Singh Y, et al. Conservation agriculture based sustainable intensification of basmati rice-wheat system in North-West India. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2019;65(10):1370–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1566708

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.