Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Early Access

Development of an algorithm for selecting repeat crops type and predicting yield in the conditions of agriculture in Uzbekistan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10820
Submitted
22 July 2025
Published
01-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

The classification challenges in agricultural decision-making are tackled through the development of a rule-enrichment algorithm based on artificial intelligence and knowledge graph techniques. This study focused on the selection of an appropriate second season crop under Uzbekistan’s agricultural condition using knowledge base graphs. In order to solve this problem, agro-climatic conditions were systematically collected and represented through the construction of graph - based knowledge base (KB) structures. After collecting data, the dataset was structured and processed to enable the extraction of the predicates (logical rules). The study also demonstrates a data-normalisation workflow that supports rule extraction and knowledge graph construction for classifying second-season crop types. A key contribution of this work is the implementation of a numerical-predicate enrichment algorithm that enhances the KB and supports accurate rule formation. The proposed enrichment algorithm substantially improved both rule quality and classification performance, as demonstrated by the detailed results presented in this study. The algorithm was partially tested through a software prototype deployed on agricultural datasets from the Jizzakh region, demonstrating its practical applicability.

References

  1. 1. Zhang J, Zhao W, Xie G, Chen H. Ontology-based knowledge management system and application. Procedia Eng. 2011;15:1021–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.189
  2. 2. Agnolucci P, Rapti C, Alexander P, De Lipsis V, Holland RA, Eigenbrod F, et al. Impacts of rising temperatures and farm management practices on global yields of 18 crops. Nat Food. 2020;1(10):562–8.
  3. 3. Khajeh AN, Pernelle N, Saïs F. REGNUM: Generating logical rules with numerical predicates in knowledge graphs. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on the Semantic Web (ESWC 2023), Hersonissos, Greece. Springer. 2023. p. 248–63.
  4. 4. Galárraga LA, Preda N, Suchanek FM. Mining rules to align knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Automated Knowledge Base Construction, San Francisco, CA, USA. ACM. 2013. p. 43–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2509558.2509566
  5. 5. Zeng Q, Patel J, Page D. QuickFOIL: Scalable inductive logic programming. Proc VLDB Endow. 2014;8(3):197–208. https://doi.org/10.14778/2735508.2735510
  6. 6. Ortona S, Meduri V, Papotti P. Robust discovery of positive and negative rules in knowledge bases. In: 2018 IEEE 34th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE); 2018. p. 1168–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2018.00108
  7. 7. Bidgoli M, Barmaki R, Nasiri M. Mining numerical association rules via multi-objective genetic algorithms. Inf Sci. 2013;233:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.01.028
  8. 8. Jaramillo I, Garzas J, Redchuk A. Numerical association rule mining from a defined schema using the vmo algorithm. Appl Sci. 2021;11:13–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136154
  9. 9. Lajus J, Galarraga L, Suchanek F. Fast and exact rule mining with AMIE. In: The Semantic Web. Springer International Publishing. 2020. p. 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_3
  10. 10. Raximov NO, Kuvandikov JT, Khasanov DR. The importance of loss function in artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT 2022), Tashkent, Uzbekistan. IEEE. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISCT55600.2022.10146883
  11. 11. Kumar R, Singh M, Prabhat K, Singh JP. Crop selection method to maximize crop yield rate using machine learning technique (IEEE). International Conference on Smart technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials (ICSTM). 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTM.2015.7225403
  12. 12. Agalave HR. Effect of environmental factors on productivity of crop. Int J Bot Stud. 2017;2(1):14–6.
  13. 13. Deshmukh D, Rajawat A, Goyal SB, Kumar J, Potgantwar A. Analysis of machine learning technique for crop selection and prediction of crop cultivation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Lalitpur, Nepal. IEEE. 2023. p. 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT57646.2023.10134371
  14. 14. Rahimov NO, Khasanov DR. The mathematical essence of logistic regression for machine learning. International scientific and technical conference: Computer Science And Engineering Technologies, Jizzakh, Uzbekistan. 2022. p. 102–5. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7239169
  15. 15. Rakhimov NO, Xasanov DR. Selection of crops by region using machine learning classification algorithms. J Sci Innov Dev. 2024;7(2):36–47.
  16. 16. Adamczak R, Grabczewski K, Duch W. A new methodology of extraction, optimization and application of crisp and fuzzy logical rules. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2001;12(2):277-306. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.914524
  17. 17. Li N, Xu L, Ma Y, Liu J, Martinez CJ, Li Z. (α, β)-Lock resolution method of linguistic truth-valued intuitionistic fuzzy first-order logic. In: Proc 18th Int Conf Intell Syst Knowl Eng (ISKE); 2023. p.444-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISKE60036.2023.10481169
  18. 18. Rakhimov NO, Khasanov DR, Abdulhakimov HN. Predicting the yield of grain crops using basic machine learning algorithms. Sci J Digit Transform Artif Intell. 2024;2(5):40–6.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.