Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Exploring the resource potential of water hyacinth and salvinia: A review

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11083
Submitted
4 August 2025
Published
12-05-2026

Abstract

Invasive aquatic plants such as Eichhornia crassipes Mart. (water hyacinth) and Salvinia molesta D. Mitch. pose severe threats to water bodies in Kerala, ranging from small streams to large lakes. These species disrupt natural ecosystems, degrade water quality and impose significant economic costs. By forming dense surface mats, they block sunlight from reaching native aquatic vegetation, thereby inhibiting its growth. This leads to reduced biodiversity, declining water quality and serious imbalances in aquatic ecosystems, adversely affecting fish, invertebrates and other wildlife that depend on native plants for food and habitat. Furthermore, these invasive weeds interfere with recreational activities such as swimming, boating and fishing, reducing the ecological, economic and social value of water resources. Mechanical control methods are commonly employed to manage these weeds; however, they often prove ineffective due to high costs, labour intensity, environmental disturbance and rapid regrowth from plant fragments. This highlights the need for more sustainable and efficient management strategies. One promising alternative is bio-utilisation, which involves converting invasive aquatic weeds into valuable resources. Bio-utilisation not only helps control the spread of invasive species but also supports ecological restoration and economic development. Potential applications include energy production, such as biogas and biofuels; agricultural inputs, including compost, organic manure, animal feed and substrates for mushroom cultivation; phytoremediation for environmental cleanup; and the production of health-related products, such as phytochemical extracts and medicinal compounds. Integrating bio-utilisation into aquatic weed management thus offers a dual benefit: effective control of invasive species and the promotion of ecological sustainability and economic resilience.

References

  1. 1. Kawade SS, Panchakarla S, Sapkale PH. Review on aquatic weeds and their management. Environ Ecol. 2023;41(4C):2900–8. https://doi.org/10.60151/envec/WILR4817
  2. 2. Sushilkumar. Aquatic weeds problems and management in India. Indian J Weed Sci. 2011;43(3–4):118–38.
  3. 3. Desseh MG, Melesse AM, Tilahun SA, Abate M, Dagnew DC. Water hyacinth: Review of its impacts on hydrology and ecosystem services-Lessons for management of Lake Tana. In: Melesse AM, Abtew W, Senay G, editors. Extreme hydrology and climate variability. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. p. 237–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815998-9.00019-1
  4. 4. Kumar PS, Ramani S, Singh SP. Natural suppression of the aquatic weed, Salvinia molesta D.S. Mitchell, by two previously unreported fungal pathogens. J Aquat Plant Manage. 2005;43:105–7.
  5. 5. Upadhyay RK, Panda SK. Salt tolerance of two aquatic macrophytes, Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia molesta. Biol Plant. 2005;49:157–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-7159-4
  6. 6. Tessema YA. Ecological and economic dimensions of the paradoxical invasive species Prosopis juliflora and policy challenges in Ethiopia. J Econ Sustain Dev. 2012;3:62–70.
  7. 7. Abosede IA, Peter OA. Biomass valorization: Agricultural waste in environmental protection, phytomedicine and biofuel. In: Tumurulu JS, editor. Biomass volume estimation and valorization for energy. London: IntechOpen; 2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/66102
  8. 8. Ahmed A, Bakar MS, Hamdani R, Park YK, Lam SS, Sukri RS, et al. Valorization of underutilized waste biomass from invasive species to produce biochar for energy and other value-added applications. Environ Res. 2020;186:109596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109596
  9. 9. Ulusal A, Apaydın Varol E, Bruckman VJ, Uzun BB. Opportunity for sustainable biomass valorization to produce biochar for improving soil characteristics. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2021;11:1041–51. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13399-020-00923-7
  10. 10. Masto RE, Kumar S, Rout TK, Sarkar P, George J, Ram LC. Biochar from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and its impact on soil biological activity. Catena. 2013;111:64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.06.025
  11. 11. Kassa Y, Amare A, Nega T, Alem T, Gedefaw M, Chala B, et al. Water hyacinth conversion to biochar for soil nutrient enhancement in improving agricultural product. Sci Rep. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84729-x
  12. 12. Zhang F, Wang X, Yin D, Peng B, Tan C, Liu Y, et al. Efficiency and mechanisms of Cd removal from aqueous solution by biochar derived from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). J Environ Manage. 2015;153:68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.043
  13. 13. Boban JM, Nair PV, Shiji ST, Cherian SE. Incorporation of water hyacinth in concrete. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2017;6(5):540–4.
  14. 14. Sutar A, Sapkal N, Magdum K, Vhanwade A, Raj B, Patil SM. Effect of water hyacinth as bio admixture on the properties of concrete. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2023;10(6):85–8.
  15. 15. Abana E, Vega W, Gacias J, Ranon PJ, Talattad JD, Orata H, et al. Pulverized water hyacinth as an admixture for concrete. Int J Integr Eng. 2021;13(4):298–303. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2021.13.04.028
  16. 16. Mitikie BB, Avalewu WZ, Cherkos FD. Effect of water hyacinth ash on properties of concrete containing superplasticizer. Discov Civ Eng. 2025;2:21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-025-00174-3
  17. 17. Rezania S, Din MF, Taib MS, Ling YE, Chelliapan S, Kamyab H. Beneficial environmentally usage of water hyacinth: A mini review. Recent Adv Petrochem Sci. 2017;1(5):555–75. https://doi.org/10.19080/RAPSCI.2017.01.555575
  18. 18. Ansari AA, Naeem M, Gill SS, Alzuaibr FM. Phytoremediation of contaminated waters: An eco-friendly technology based on aquatic macrophytes application. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2020;46(4):371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2020.03.002
  19. 19. Sasidharan NK, Azim T, Devi DA, Mathew S. Water hyacinth for heavy metal scavenging and utilization as organic manure. Indian J Weed Sci. 2013;45(3):204–9.
  20. 20. Thampatti KC, Usha PB, Beena VI. Aquatic macrophytes for biomonitoring and phytoremediation of toxic metals in wetlands of Kuttanad. In: Proceedings of the Kerala Environment Congress; 2007 May 8–10; Thiruvananthapuram. Centre for Environment and Development (CED), Kerala.
  21. 21. Magar RB, Khan AN, Honnutagi A. Waste water treatment using water hyacinth. In: 32nd Engineering Congress, The Institution of Engineers; 2017; Chennai.
  22. 22. Malik A. Environmental challenge vis a vis opportunity: The case of water hyacinth. Environ Int. 2007;33(1):122–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.08.004
  23. 23. Van der Meer MB, Verdegem MC. Comparison of amino acid profiles of feeds and fish as a quick method for selection of feed ingredients: A case study for Colossoma macropomum. Aquac Res. 1996;27(7):487–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.1996.tb01278.x
  24. 24. Sunday AD. The utilization of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) by West African dwarf growing goats. Afr J Biomed Res. 2001;4(3):147–9. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajbr.v4i3.53904
  25. 25. Indulekha VP, Thomas CG, Anil KS. Utilization of water hyacinth as livestock feed by ensiling with additives. Indian J Weed Sci. 2019;51(1):6. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2019.00014.5
  26. 26. Woomer PL, Muzira R, Bwamiki D, Mutetikka D, Amoding A, Bekunda M. Biological management of water hyacinth waste in Uganda. Biol Agric Hortic. 2000;17(3):181–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2000.9754841
  27. 27. Polprasert C, Kongsricharoern N, Kanjanaprapin W. Production of feed and fertilizer from water hyacinth plants in the tropics. Waste Manag Res. 1994;12(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-242X(94)90016-7
  28. 28. Sundari SU, Gandhi A. Effect of vermicompost prepared from different organic wastes on growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench). Int J Recent Sci Res. 2013;4(5):568–71.
  29. 29. Oguttu PA. Vermicomposting water hyacinth: Turning fisherman’s nightmare into farmers future. Int J Res Innov Appl Sci. 2019;4(1):11–4.
  30. 30. Prabhu MJ. Water hyacinth: A potential source for compost [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2025 Jun 21].
  31. 31. Deka H, Deka S, Baruah H. Vermicomposting of water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms employing indigenous earthworm species. In: Proc Int Conf Chem Agric Med Sci; 2013 Dec 29-30; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  32. 32. Bhattacharya A, Kumar P. Water hyacinth as a potential biofuel crop. Electron J Environ Agric Food Chem. 2010;9(1):112–22.
  33. 33. Sudhakar K, Ananthakrishnan R, Goyal A. Biogas production from a mixture of water hyacinth, water chestnut and cow dung. Int J Sci Eng Technol Res. 2013;2(1):35–7.
  34. 34. Carnaje NP, Talagon RB, Peralta JP, Shah K, Paz-Ferreiro J. Development and characterisation of charcoal briquettes from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)–molasses blend. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207135
  35. 35. Midhun VC, Jayaprasad G, Anto A, Anish R. Preparation and characterization of water hyacinth briquettes. Mater Today Proc. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.157
  36. 36. Munjeri K, Ziuku S, Maganga H, Siachingoma B, Ndlovu S. On the potential of water hyacinth as a biomass briquette for heating applications. Int J Energy Environ Eng. 2015;6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-015-0195-8
  37. 37. Das A, Ghosh P, Paul T, Ghosh U, Pati BR, Mondal KC. Production of bioethanol as useful biofuel through the bioconversion of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). 3 Biotech. 2016;6(1):70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0385-y
  38. 38. Shanab SMM, Hanafy EA, Shalaby EA. Water hyacinth as a non-edible source for biofuel production. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2017;9(2):255–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9816-6
  39. 39. Masami GOO, Usui IY, Urano N. Ethanol production from the water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes by yeast isolated from various hydrospheres. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2008;2(5):110–3.
  40. 40. Zhang Q, Wei Y, Han H, Weng C. Enhancing bioethanol production from water hyacinth by new combined pretreatment methods. Bioresour Technol. 2018;251:358–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.085
  41. 41. Ngo T, Ball AS, Shahsavari E. The current status, potential benefits and future prospects of the Australian biogas sector. J Sustain Bioenergy Syst. 2021;11:14–32. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2021.111002
  42. 42. Njogu P, Kinyua R, Muthoni P, Nemoto Y. Biogas production using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) for electricity generation in Kenya. Energy Power Eng. 2015;7:209−16. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2015.75021
  43. 43. Times of India. Water hyacinth may be new green fuel source [Internet]. Chennai; 2013 [cited 2025 Jun 5].
  44. 44. Gunnarsson CC, Petersen CM. Water hyacinths as a resource in agriculture and energy production: A literature review. Waste Manag. 2007;27:117–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.12.011
  45. 45. Bote MA, Naik VR, Jagdeeshgouda P. Production of biogas with aquatic weed water hyacinth. Bioresour Technol. 2016;219:2372–80.
  46. 46. Karthikeyan A, Harish V, Jayaprabakar J, Dhana Raju V, Lingesan S, Prabhu A, et al. Novel water hyacinth biodiesel as a potential alternative fuel for existing unmodified diesel engines: Performance, combustion and emission characteristics. Energy. 2019;179:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.207
  47. 47. Ejigu N, Sitotaw B, Girmay S, Assaye H. Evaluation of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) production using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) biomass supplemented with agricultural wastes. Int J Food Sci. 2022;2022:9289043. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9289043
  48. 48. Onchonga NA, Olima D, Oginda M. Utilization of water hyacinth as an alternative substrate for mushroom farming: A study of Vihiga Mushroom Project in Western Kenya. Int J Educ Res. 2013;10:1–10.
  49. 49. Mukhopadhyay SB. Oyster mushroom cultivation on water hyacinth biomass: Assessment of yield performances, nutrient and toxic element contents of mushrooms. In: Passari AK, Sanchez S, editors. An introduction to mushroom. London: IntechOpen; 2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90290
  50. 50. Jafari N. Ecological and socio-economic utilization of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). J Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2010;14(2):43–9. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v14i2.57834
  51. 51. Vaishnavi H. This man from Andhra is using weeds to make handicrafts and provide livelihood to poor women [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2025 Jun 6].
  52. 52. Raj SK, Syriac EK. Invasive alien weeds as bioresource: A review. Agric Rev. 2016;37(3):196-204. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.v37i3.3535
  53. 53. Islam MN, Rahman F, Papri SA, Faruk MO, Das AK, Adhikary N, et al. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms.) as an alternative raw material for the production of bio-compost and handmade paper. J Environ Manage. 2021;294:113036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113036
  54. 54. George S, Thomas S, Nedumpillil NN, Jose S. Extraction and characterization of fibres from water hyacinth stem using custom made decorticator. J Nat Fibers. 2023;20(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2023.2212927
  55. 55. Chonsakorn S, Srivorradatpaisan S, Mongkholrattanasit. Effects of different extraction methods on some properties of water hyacinth fiber. J Nat Fibers. 2019;16(7):1015–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.1448316
  56. 56. Punitha S, Sangeetha K, Bhuvaneshwari. Processing of water hyacinth fiber to improve its absorbency. Int J Adv Res. 2015;3(8):290–4.
  57. 57. Gayathri. Amazing benefits of hyacinth herb for skin, hair and health [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2025 Jun 15].
  58. 58. Ramadas LP, Ponnusamy J. Antiaging activity of the skin cream containing ethyl acetate extract of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2014;6(1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/943287
  59. 59. Sharma AK, Sharma V, Sharma V, Sharma JK, Singh R. Multifaceted potential of Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) ladened with numerous value added therapeutic properties. Plant Arch. 2020;20(2):2059–65.
  60. 60. Bakrim WB, Ezzarial A, Karouach F, Sobeh M, Kibret M, Hafidi M, et al. Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms: A comprehensive review of its chemical composition, traditional use and value added products. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:842511. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.842511
  61. 61. Aboul-Enein AM, Al-Abd AM, Shalaby EA, Abul-Ela F, Nasr-Allah AAN, Mahmoud AM. Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms from water parasite to potential medicinal remedy. Plant Signal Behav. 2011;6(6):834–6. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.6.6.15166
  62. 62. Aboul-Enein AM, Shanab SMM, Shalaby EA, Zahran MM, Lightfoot DA, El-Shemy HA. Cytotoxic and antioxidant properties of active principles isolated from water hyacinth against four cancer cell lines. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:397. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-397
  63. 63. Rufchaei R, Abbas-Mohammadi M, Mirzajani A, Nedaei S. Evaluation of the chemical compounds and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the leaves of Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth). Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2021;17(1):e101436. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp.101436
  64. 64. Thamaraiselvi S, Lalitha P, Jayanthi P. Preliminary studies on phytochemicals and antimicrobial activity of solvent extracts of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. Asian J Plant Sci Res. 2017;2:115–22.
  65. 65. Baehaki A, Lestari SD, Agustina W, Putri SD. Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of water hyacinth flowers (Eichhornia crassipes) extract. Pharmacogn J. 2022;14:955–7. https://doi.org/10.5530/pj.2022.14.196
  66. 66. Alam K, Chowdhury MAT. Floating vegetable gardening (FVG) as a sustainable agricultural system in Bangladesh: Prospects for Kaptai Lake, Rangamati, Chittagong Hill-Tracts. OIDA Int J Sustain Dev. 2018;11(3):43–57.
  67. 67. Food and Agriculture Organization. Floating gardens in Bangladesh [Internet]. n.d. [cited 2025 Jul 2].
  68. 68. Irfanullah HM, Adrika A, Ghani A, Khan ZA, Rashid MA. Introduction of floating gardening in the North Eastern wetlands of Bangladesh for nutritional security and sustainable livelihood. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2008;23(2):89−96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170507002074
  69. 69. Haq RAHM, Ghosal TK, Ghosh P. Cultivating wetland in Bangladesh [Internet]. ILEIA; 2004 [cited 2025 Jul 2].
  70. 70. Moozhiyil M, Pallauf J. Chemical composition of the water fern, Salvinia molesta and its potential as feed source for ruminants. Econ Bot. 1986;40(3):375–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858995
  71. 71. Leterme P, Londono AM, Ordonez DC, Rosales A, Estrada F, Bindelle J, et al. Nutritional value and intake of aquatic ferns (Azolla filiculoides Lam. and Salvinia molesta Mitchell.) in sows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2010;155:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.10.002
  72. 72. Chantiratikul P, Meechai P, Nakbanpote W. Antioxidant activities and phenolic contents of extracts from Salvinia molesta and Eichhornia crassipes. Res J Biol Sci. 2009;4:1113–7.
  73. 73. Kumar P, Pant M, Negi GCS. Soil physico-chemical properties and crop yield improvement following lantana mulching and reduced tillage in rainfed croplands in the Indian Himalayan Mountains. J Sustain Agric. 2009;33:636–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440040903073719
  74. 74. Kwabiah B, Stoskopf NC, Voroney RP, Palm CA. Palm nitrogen and phosphorus release from decomposing leaves under sub-humid tropical conditions. Biotropica. 2001;33:229–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00174.x
  75. 75. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. Vermiremediation of an invasive and pernicious weed salvinia (Salvinia molesta). Ecol Eng. 2016;91:432–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.010
  76. 76. Kayarga G, Naveen NE, Rudragouda FC, Chaitanya HS, Jayaprakash SM. Effect of varied levels of Salvinia molesta vermicompost on soil fertility and crop productivity of rice under coastal conditions of Udupi, Karnataka. Indian J Weed Sci. 2024;56(2):204–7. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2024.00033.2
  77. 77. Kumar TG, Premalatha M, Gajalakshmi S, Abbasi SA. A new process for the rapid and direct vermicomposting of the aquatic weed salvinia (Salvinia molesta). Bioresour Bioprocess. 2014;1:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-014-0026-4
  78. 78. Kumar TG. Efficiency of Eudrilus eugeniae Kinberg in vermicomposting three different forms of salvinia (Salvinia molesta Mitchell). World J Adv Res Rev. 2023;17(3):443–8. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.3.0403
  79. 79. Choudhary MI, Naheed N, Abbaskhan A, Musharraf SG, Siddiqui H. Phenolic and other constituents of fresh water fern Salvinia molesta. Phytochemistry. 2008;69(4):1018–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.10.028
  80. 80. Nithya TG, Jayanthi J, Raghunathan MG. Phytochemical, antibacterial and GC-MS analysis of a floating fern Salvinia molesta DS Mitchell (1972). Int J PharmTech Res. 2015;8(9): 85–90.
  81. 81. Mithraja MJ, Marimuthu J, Mahesh M, Paul ZM, Jeeva S. Phytochemical studies on Azolla pinnata R Br., Marsilea minuta L. and Salvinia molesta Mitch. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1(1):26–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60116-0
  82. 82. Md Salleh NA, Pa’ee F, Manan NA, Sabran SF, Abu Bakar FI, Muhammad N, et al. Phytochemical and biological evaluation of selected Malaysian plant extract. Trop J Nat Prod Res. 2023;7(11):5106–14.
  83. 83. Ng YS, Chan DJC. Wastewater phytoremediation by Salvinia molesta. J Water Process Eng. 2017;15:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.08.006
  84. 84. Dhir B, Kumar R. Adsorption of heavy metals by Salvinia biomass and agricultural residues. Int J Environ Res. 2010;4(3):427–32.
  85. 85. George GT, Gabriel JJ. Phytoremediation of heavy metals from municipal wastewater by Salvinia molesta. Saudi J Life Sci. 2017;2(3):108–15.
  86. 86. Harikumar PSP, Jesitha K, Sreechithra M. Remediation of endosulfan by biotic and abiotic methods. J Environ Prot. 2013;4:418–25. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2013.45050
  87. 87. Al-Baldawi IA, Abdullah SRS, Almansoory AF, Ismail NI, Hasan HA, Anuar N. Role of Salvinia molesta in decolorization of methyl orange dye from water. Sci Rep. 2020;10:13980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70740-5
  88. 88. King C, McIntosh D, Fitzsimmons K. Giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta) as a partial feed for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). In: Bolivar RB, Mair GC, Fitzsimmons K, editors. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Tilapia in Agriculture; 2004 Sep 12–16; Manila, Philippines. p. 750–4.
  89. 89. Ma'rifah B, Atmomarsono U, Suthama N. Nitrogen retention and productive performance of crossbred native chicken due to feeding effect of Kayambang (Salvinia molesta). Int J Sci Eng. 2013;5(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.12777/ijse.5.1.19-24
  90. 90. Gena F, Mahfudz LD, Sumarsono S. Utilizing Salvinia molesta as an alternative protein source in broiler diet and the effect on performance, breast muscle and abdominal fat. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci. 2014;7(7):46–52. https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-07744652
  91. 91. Santoso SI, Setiadi A. Profitable utilization of giant salvinia, Salvinia molesta, as local duck feed. Int J Poult Sci. 2016;5(4):121–5. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2016.121.125
  92. 92. Nova TD, Yelita Y, Machicula R. Level of the use of (Kiambang) as an eco-friendly duck feed in Indonesia. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2022;10(10):2100–7. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2022/10.10.2100.2107
  93. 93. Kawaroe M, Effendi H, Palupi ZI, Hendra NS, Lestari DF. Utilization of aquatic weed (Salvinia molesta) as a raw material for biogas production. J Pengolah Hasil Perikan Indones. 2019;22(2):209–17. https://doi.org/10.17844/jphpi.v22i2.27891
  94. 94. Mathew A, Bhui I, Banerjee SN, Goswami R, Chakraborty AK, Shome A, et al. Biogas production from locally available aquatic weeds of Santiniketan through anaerobic digestion. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2015;17(6):1861–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0877-6
  95. 95. Haridas V, Nileena CB. Studies on biogas production from Salvinia molesta: An aquatic weed. Int J Multidiscip Res. 2024;6(2):1. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.18671
  96. 96. Arzoo A, Meher K, Pradhan AK. Elemental content present in waste Salvinia molesta D S Mitch. and its utilization in soil for soil quality improvement. Int J Bot Stud. 2020;5(5):504–5.
  97. 97. Room PM, Thomas PA. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in Salvinia molesta Mitchell in the field: Effects of weather, insect damage, fertilizers and age. Aquat Bot. 1986;24:213–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(86)90058-6
  98. 98. Krishna KR. Agroecosystems: soils, climate, crops, nutrient dynamics and productivity. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16300
  99. 99. Arthur GD, Stirk WA, Novak O, Hekera P, Staden JV. Occurrence of nutrients and plant hormones (cytokinins and IAA) in the water fern Salvinia molesta during growth and composting. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;61:137–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.002
  100. 100. Kumar B, Kumar SB, Agarwal BK, Sinha AK, Shahi DK. Effect of Salvinia molesta on soil fertility and yield of soybean in acid alfisol soil. Int J Stat Appl Math. 2023;8(7):1–4. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i2Sa.524

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.