Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Economic viability of selected seaweed farming techniques in Coastal India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11244
Submitted
12 August 2025
Published
13-07-2026

Abstract

Seaweed farming is gaining importance in India’s blue economy due to its potential to provide sustainable livelihoods and environmental benefits. The country’s coastal waters, particularly in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, are suitable for cultivating commercially important species such as Kappaphycus alvarezii and Gracilaria edulis. This study was undertaken to assess the economic performance of selected seaweed farming methods and identify the most profitable options for coastal communities. Primary data were collected from 180 farmers, 90 each from Mandapam taluk in Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu and the Visakhapatnam coast of Andhra Pradesh covering establishment cost, operational expenses, yields and revenues. The analysis compared multiple cultivation systems, including raft-based bamboo, tube nets, monoline and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) rafts, using indicators such as net returns, benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and return on investment (ROI). Results showed that raft-based bamboo culture for K. alvarezii (BCR 3.60) and for G. edulis (BCR 3.48) were the most profitable, offering high returns with relatively low operational complexity. Species-specific differences in performance were influenced by environmental conditions, farming system suitability and no input requirements. Monoline methods were moderately profitable for K. alvarezii but less suitable for G. edulis, while HDPE rafts yielded lower returns due to high initial costs. The study concludes that matching species to appropriate cultivation systems can significantly enhance profitability. Expanding seaweed farming in India will require improved seed supply, targeted training and better market linkages to strengthen its role in coastal livelihood security and marine conservation.

References

  1. 1. Johnson B, Murugaiyan K, Ramalingam JR, Kannan R, Kotiya AS. Comparative economic analysis of seaweed farming systems in coastal India. J Appl Phycol. 2023;35:2305-18.
  2. 2. Veeragurunathan V, Ganesan M, Thiruppathi S, Narayanakumar R, Venkatesan J, Kumar CS. Commercial scale cultivation of Kappaphycus alvarezii along the southeast coast of India: Technological evolution and prospects. Indian J Fish. 2015;62:1-8.
  3. 3. Bindu MS. Role of women in seaweed farming in coastal villages of Tamil Nadu. Seaweed Res Utiln. 2009;31:97-104.
  4. 4. McHugh DJ. A guide to the seaweed industry. FAO Fish Tech Pap 441. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations; 2003.
  5. 5. Duarte CM, Wu J, Xiao X, Bruhn A, Krause-Jensen D. Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change mitigation and adaptation? Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00100
  6. 6. Valderrama D, Cai J, Hishamunda N, Ridler N. Social and economic dimensions of carrageenan seaweed farming. FAO Fish Aquac Tech Pap 580. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations; 2013.
  7. 7. FAO. The global status of seaweed production, trade and utilisation. Globefish Res Programme. Vol. 124. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations; 2018.
  8. 8. Narayanakumar R, Krishnan M. Economic viability of farming Kappaphycus alvarezii in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Fish. 2011;58:69-73.
  9. 9. Hurtado AQ, Critchley AT, Trespoey A, Bleicher-Lhonneur G. Cultivation of tropical red seaweeds in the Philippines and Vietnam: A comparison. J Appl Phycol. 2008;20:567-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9339-z
  10. 10. Chapman ARO, Anderson RJ, Vreeland VJ. Commercial seaweed cultivation: Global trends and future prospects. Bot Mar. 2015;58:319-33.
  11. 11. Sahoo D, Yarish C. Mariculture of seaweeds. In: Pereira L, Neto JM, editors. Marine algae: Biodiversity, taxonomy, environmental assessment and biotechnology. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014. p. 319-36.
  12. 12. Johnson B, Ganesan M, Kotiya AS, Krishnan M, Kannan R. Profitability analysis of Kappaphycus alvarezii farming in Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu. Seaweed Res Utiln. 2017;39:25-34.
  13. 13. Krishnan M, Narayanakumar R. Economic viability of seaweed farming in India: a comparative analysis of methods. Seaweed Res Utiln. 2010;32:101-07.
  14. 14. Kumar CS, Eswaran K, Rao PS, Ganesan M, Thiruppathi S. Productivity and profitability of Kappaphycus alvarezii cultivation under monoline and raft methods. Indian J Fish. 2012;59:63-68.
  15. 15. Eswaran K, Ganesan M, Ramalingam JR, Rajasankar J, Rao SPV. Studies on the growth of Gracilaria edulis under different culture methods. Seaweed Res Utiln. 2002;24:33-39.
  16. 16. Sakthivel M. Seaweed farming: a viable livelihood option for coastal communities in India. Mar Fish Infor Serv T&E Ser. 1999;162:1-5.
  17. 17. Bindu MS. Empowering women through seaweed farming: A case from Tamil Nadu, India. J Mar Biol Assoc India. 2010;52:234-40.
  18. 18. Kotyal K, Siddayya, Ranganath G. Economic viability and scalability of tube net seaweed farming for Kappaphycus alvarezii in coastal communities of India. AATCC Rev. 2025;13:299-305. https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.03.299

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.