Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Weed dynamics, nutrient uptake and crop productivity in wheat under organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient management practices after twenty-six years of experimentation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.11882
Submitted
20 September 2025
Published
30-04-2026

Abstract

A long-term field experiment initiated in 1995 at Research Farm of Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar, India, was selected for research experiment during rabi season of 2021–22 with treatments: recommended dose of nitrogen (N) (150 kg/ha) and phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5) (60 kg/ha); farmyard manure (FYM) at 15 t/ha alone and in combination with N (150 kg/ha) and P2O5 (30 kg/ha); poultry manure at 5 t/ha alone and in combination with N (150 kg/ha) and P2O5 (30 kg/ha); press mud at 7.5 t/ha alone and in combination with N (150 kg/ha) and P2O5 (30 kg/ha) in main plot and weed management: pendimethalin at 1.5 kg/ha as pre-emergence alone and its sequential application with clodinafop + metsulfuron methyl (ready mix) at 64 g/ha as post-emergence; weedy check and weed-free in sub-plot with 3 replications in a split-plot design. Application of FYM at 15 t/ha + N (150 kg/ha) and P2O5 (30 kg/ha) produced a grain yield of 5341 kg/ha, representing a significant 17.4 % increase over the recommended dose of N (150 kg/ha) and P2O5 (60 kg/ha) with lowest weed density of Anagallis arvensis and Melilotus indica. Conversely, the highest weed density of Coronopus didymus, Rumex dentatus and Phalaris minor was observed under press mud at 7.5 t/ha + N (150 kg/ha) and P2O5 (30 kg/ha). Furthermore, the sequential application of pendimethalin at 1.5 kg/ha followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron methyl (ready mix) at 64 g/ha significantly increased yield and resulted in the lowest weed density. Under weedy check conditions, weeds removed 10.71, 5.87 and 73.22 kg/ha of N, phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) respectively reducing grain yield by 34.5 % compared to weed free conditions.

References

  1. 1. India. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. 2023. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2058534
  2. 2. Singh RP, Verma SK, Kumar S. Weed management for enhancing yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in eastern India. Indian J Agric Sci. 2020;90(7):1352–55.
  3. 3. Singh AP, Bhullar MS, Yadav R, Chowdhury T. Weed management in zero-till wheat. IJWS. 2015;47(3):233–39.
  4. 4. Kordbacheh F, Flaten DN, Gulden RH. Weed community dynamics under repeated fertilization with different nutrient sources over 5 years. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2023;346:108328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108328
  5. 5. Sheoran S, Prakash D, Raj D, Yadav PK, Singh R, Gupta RK, et al. Organic manure and fertilizer N management strategies improve soil health at different growth stages of pearl millet under pearl millet–wheat sequence. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06128-2
  6. 6. Qaswar M, Jing H, Ahmed W, Dongchu L, Shujun L, Lu Z, et al. Yield sustainability, soil organic carbon sequestration and nutrients balance under long-term combined application of manure and inorganic fertilizers in acidic paddy soil. Soil Tillage Res. 2020;198:104569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104569
  7. 7. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Gallardo A, Bowker MA, Wallenstein MD, Quero JL, et al. Decoupling of soil nutrient cycles as a function of aridity in global drylands. Nature. 2013;502(7473):672–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12670
  8. 8. Zhang HQ, Yu XY, Zhai BN, Jin ZY, Wang ZH. Effect of manure under different nitrogen application rates on winter wheat production and soil fertility in dryland. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2016;39(1):012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/39/1/012048
  9. 9. Sheoran S, Raj D, Antil RS, Mor VS, Dahiya DS. Productivity, seed quality and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient management practices after twenty years of fertilization. Cereal Res Commun. 2017;45(2):315–25. https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.45.2017.014
  10. 10. Dotaniya ML, Meena MD, Choudhary RL, Meena MK, Meena VD, Singh HV, et al. Determining application rates of FYM and pressmud to improve soil health properties in salt degraded soils. PLoS One. 2025;20(1):e0317463. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317463
  11. 11. Fu J, Li L, Wang Y, Yan B, Wei W, Zhou Y, et al. Regulation of weed community diversity in wheat field in black soil by different fertilization measures. J Plant Nutr Fertil. 2025;31(7):1274–84. https://doi.org/10.11674/zwyf.2024545
  12. 12. Walia MK, Walia SS, Dhaliwal SS. Long term impact of chemical fertilizers and organic manures on weed dynamics of rice in rice–wheat system. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2014;3(3):1260–67.
  13. 13. Tanwar K, Hooda VS, Dagar H, Raj D. Long-term effects of FYM and nitrogen application on weeds, nutrient uptake and crop productivity of wheat in subtropical north-western India. J Plant Nutr. 2022;45(1):141–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1949466
  14. 14. Lindner RC. Rapid analytical methods for some of the more common inorganic constituents of plant tissues. Plant Physiol. 1994;19(1):76–86.
  15. 15. Koenig R, Johnson C. Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in biological materials. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed. 1942;14(2):155–56.
  16. 16. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd; 1973. p. 151–54.
  17. 17. Misra R, Puri GS. Indian manual of plant ecology. Dehradun: English Book Depot; 1954. p. 67–81.
  18. 18. Sheoran OP, Tonk DS, Kaushik LS, Hasija RC, Pannu RS. Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. In: Hooda DS, Hasija RC, editors. Recent advances in information theory, statistics and computer application. Hisar: CCS HAU; 1998.
  19. 19. Diaz M. Consequences of compost press mud as fertilizers. DJ IJAMMR. 2016;1(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.18831/djmicro.org/2016011005
  20. 20. Lal B, Gautam P, Raja R, Tripathi R, Shahid M, Mohanty S, et al. Weed seed bank diversity and community shift in a four-decade-old fertilization experiment in rice–rice system. Ecol Eng. 2016;86:135–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.10.030
  21. 21. Sangwan M, Hooda VS, Singh J, Duhan A. Herbicidal weed management in dual purpose tall wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J Agric Sci. 2019;89(9):1509–12. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i9.93514
  22. 22. Bhatia RK, Singh VP, Amarjeet. Integrated nutrient management and weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Haryana J Agron. 2012;28(1–2):61–65.
  23. 23. Efthimiadou A, Froud WR, Eleftherohorinos I, Karkanis A, Bilalis DJ. Effects of organic and inorganic amendments on weed management in sweet maize. Int J Plant Prod. 2012;6(3):291–308.
  24. 24. Rani SP, Duary B, Priyatam S. Effect of tillage and weed management practices on weed control and yield in wheat. IJCMAS. 2020;9(6):2328–35. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.906.285
  25. 25. Saqib M, Khaliq A, Tanveer A, Aziz T. Impact of different nitrogen management options and weed competition periods on weed dynamics, productivity and profitability of bread wheat. Arab J Geosci. 2022;15:865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10146-x
  26. 26. Patel VY, Patel BD, Patel VJ, Chaudhari DD, Chaudhari NJ. Effect of herbicide combinations on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by weeds in irrigated wheat. Int J Chem Stud. 2020;8(5):1279–82. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5r.10478
  27. 27. Brar BS, Singh J, Singh G, Kaur G. Effects of long-term application of inorganic and organic fertilizers on soil organic carbon and physical properties in maize–wheat rotation. Agronomy. 2015;5:220–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5020220
  28. 28. Singh R, Singh P, Singh VK, Singh VP, Pratap T. Effect of different herbicides on weed dry matter and yield of wheat. IAC. 2012;2:138–39.
  29. 29. Randhawa M, Dhaliwal SS, Sharma V, Toor AS, Sharma S, Kaur M. Ensuring yield sustainability and nutritional security through enriching manures with fertilizers under rice–wheat system in north-western India. J Plant Nutr. 2021;45(4):540–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1943748
  30. 30. Chesti MH, Kohli A, Sharma AK. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield of and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum) and soil properties under intermediate zone of Jammu and Kashmir. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2013;61(1):1–6.
  31. 31. Dhaliwal SS, Naresh RK, Mandal A, Walia MK, Gupta RK, Singh R, et al. Effect of manures and fertilizers on soil physical properties, build-up of macro and micronutrients and uptake in soil under different cropping systems: A review. J Plant Nutr. 2019;42(20):2873–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1659337
  32. 32. Hu C, Qi YC. Soil biological and biochemical quality of wheat–maize cropping system in long-term fertilizer experiments. Exp Agric. 2011;47:593–608. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479711000445
  33. 33. Kumar B, Hasanain M, Raza MB, Yadav RB, Singh RK, Mishra R, et al. Effect of weed management practices on nutrient uptake and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian J Agric Sci. 2022;92(3):405–407.
  34. 34. Zahoor. Influence of integrated use of chemical and organic fertilizers on yield and yield components of wheat. IJACS. 2014;7(1):21–25.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.