Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for resistance to gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) in north west alluvial plain of Bihar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12092
Submitted
3 October 2025
Published
21-04-2026

Abstract

A field experiment on screening of chickpea genotypes was evaluated for resistance to Helicoverpa armigera during rabi 2023–24 at the Agricultural Research Farm, RPCAU, Pusa. A total of fifteen genotypes, including the susceptible check P-3043, were evaluated for larval incidence during vegetative, 50 % flowering and 50 % maturity stages, pod damage and yield performance. The study found significant variation in larval populations of the gram pod borer during these stages. The larval incidence was lowest during the vegetative stage, ranging from 0.47 to 1.27 larvae plant-1, medium to high in the flowering stage (0.73 to 2.20 larvae plant-1) and peaked during 50 % maturity stage (1.87 to 3.67 larvae plant-1). Among all the screened genotypes, BG 4051 had the lowest overall mean larval population (1.02 larvae plant-1), while P-3043 had the highest overall mean larval population (2.38 larvae plant-1). The range of pod damage was from 15.04 % (BG 4051) to 27.40 % (P-3043), demonstrating the role of morphological features like trichomes and pod wall thickness in imparting resistance. Grain yield ranged from 803.1 to 1138.7 kg ha-1, with BG 4051 (1138.7 kg ha-1), KCK-2 (1118.7 kg ha-1) and HK 21–13 (1048.9 kg ha-1) generating better yields. Based on the pest resistance susceptibility rating scale, eight genotypes were classified as moderately resistant, five as intermediate and two as susceptible. The findings indicated that the presence of promising sources of resistance, with BG-4051, KCK-2 and HK 21–13, warrants further screening for use in breeding programs and they can be recommended for multilocation testing and subsequently variety release. These resistant genotypes can be integrated into host plant resistance-based IPM strategies, thereby reducing dependence on chemical insecticides in chickpea cultivation.

References

  1. 1. Dixit GP, Singh S, Jayalakshmi V, Srivastava AK, Gaur PM. Chickpea improvement-accomplishments, challenges and strategies. In: Proceedings of National Symposium on Pulses for Nutritional Security and Agricultural Sustainability; 2017; IIPR, Kanpur. 2017:45.
  2. 2. Patil SB, Goyal A, Chitgupekar SS, Kumar S, El-Bouhssini M. Sustainable management of chickpea pod borer: a review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2017;37(3):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0428-8
  3. 3. FAOSTAT statistical database [Internet]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2023 [cited 2026 Jan 30]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/
  4. 4. Jukanti AK, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Chibbar RN. Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(1):S11–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512000797
  5. 5. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). FoodData Central [Internet]. Washington (DC): USDA; 2021 [cited 2026 Jan 30]. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/174288/nutrients
  6. 6. Johnson N, Johnson CR, Thavarajah P, Kumar S, Thavarajah D. The roles and potential of lentil prebiotic carbohydrates in human and plant health. Plants People Planet. 2020;2(4):310–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10103
  7. 7. Merga B, Haji J. Economic importance of chickpea: production, value and world trade. Cogent Food Agric. 2019;5(1):1615718. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1615718
  8. 8. Nusrat JM, Tahsina SH, Harun-ORM, Anamul HM, Asif UR, Khadija K, et al. Morpho-physiochemical and genotypic characterization of rhizobia from chickpea (Cicer arietinum) root nodules. Plant Sci Today. 2025;12(3):1–12. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8876
  9. 9. Rupela OP, Saxena MC. Nodulation and nitrogen fixation in chickpea. Wallingford (UK): CAB International; 1987:191–206.
  10. 10. Shrestha R, Neupane RK, Adhikari NP. Status and future prospects of pulses in Nepal. In: Regional Workshop on Pulse Production held at Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), Kathmandu, Nepal; 2011:24–25.
  11. 11. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. Indiastat agri [Internet]. New Delhi: Indiastat; 2023 [cited 2026 Jan 30]. https://www.indiastatagri.com/data/agriculture/agricultural-production
  12. 12. Gurjar G, Mishra M, Kotkar H, Upasani M, Soni P, Tamhane V, et al. Major biotic stresses of chickpea and strategies for their control. In: Vudem DR, Poduri NR, Khareedu VR, editors. Pests and pathogens: management strategies. Hyderabad: BS Publications; 2011. p. 87–134.
  13. 13. Gowda DK, Sharanabasappa S, Halle D. Screening of resistant chickpea genotype for Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Karn J Agric Sci. 2005;18(4):1107–8.
  14. 14. Luckmann WH, Metcalf RL. Introduction to insect pest management. New York: Wiley; 1975:3–35.
  15. 15. Hashmi AA. Insect pest management (taxonomy and identification). Islamabad: National Agric Res Council (NARC); 1994;3:154.
  16. 16. Jeyarani S, Sathiah N, Karuppuchamy P. Field efficacy of Helicoverpa armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus isolates against H. armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on cotton and chickpea in Tamil Nadu. Plant Protect Sci. 2010;46(3):116–22. https://doi.org/10.17221/30/2009-PPS
  17. 17. Tabashnik BE, Van Rensburg JB, Carrière Y. Field-evolved insect resistance to Bt crops: definition, theory and data. J Econ Entomol. 2009;102(6):2011–25. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0601
  18. 18. Cothran RD, Brown JM, Relyea RA. Proximity to agriculture is correlated with pesticide tolerance: evidence for the evolution of amphibian resistance to modern pesticides. Evol Appl. 2013;6(5):832–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12069
  19. 19. Singh BA, Mandal KO. Environmental impact of pesticides belonging to newer chemistry. In: Integrated pest management. Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers; 2013:152–90.
  20. 20. Lal OP. An outbreak of pod borer, Heliothis armigera (Hübner) on chickpea in eastern Uttar Pradesh (India). J Entomol Res. 1996;20(2):179–81.
  21. 21. Patel CC, Koshiya DJ. Population dynamics of gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) Hardwick on cotton, pigeonpea and chickpea. Gujarat Agric Univ Res J. 1999;22(2):62–7.
  22. 22. Golla SK, Rajasekhar P, Sharma SP, Hariprasad K, Sharma H. Antixenosis and antibiosis mechanisms of resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera in wild relatives of chickpea, Cicer arietinum. Euphytica. 2018;214(5):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2168-5
  23. 23. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18(2):265–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/18.2.265a
  24. 24. Lateef SS, Sachan JN. Host-plant resistance to Helicoverpa armigera in different agroecological contexts. In: Chickpea in nineties: proceedings of the second international workshop on chickpea, ICRISAT, Patancheru Andhra Pradesh; 1989:181–9.
  25. 25. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 1967.
  26. 26. Sheoran OP. Statistical package for agricultural scientists (OPSTAT). Hisar (India): CCS HAU; 2026 [cited 2026 Mar 8]. https://opstat.somee.com/opstat/
  27. 27. Reddy MS, Agnihotri M. Screening of chickpea tolerant genotypes against pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) at hotspot Pantnagar. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6(4):590–4.
  28. 28. Sharma H, Shukla A, Bhowmick AK, Sharma AK. Evaluation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) under field conditions. J Ent Zool Stud. 2018;6(5):597–602.
  29. 29. Mishra VK, Devi MS. Field screening of chickpea genotypes for locating resistance sources against pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). J Entomol Res. 2024;48(2):191–7. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4576.2024.00039.0
  30. 30. Meenambigai C, Samanta A, Samanta S, Hedayetullah M. Field screening of chickpea genotypes against gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in new alluvial zone of West Bengal. J Entomol Res. 2023;47:896–900. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4576.2023.00165.2
  31. 31. Shahzad K, Iqbal A, Khalil SK, Khattak S. Response of different chickpea, Cicer arietinum genotypes to the infestation of pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera with relation to trichomes. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2005;1(1):120–24.
  32. 32. Vanambathina P, Rachaputi RC, Sultanbawa Y, Phan AD, Henry RJ, Brier H. Biochemical basis of resistance to pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) in Australian wild relatives of pigeon pea. Legume Sci. 2021;3(4):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.101
  33. 33. Dinesh K, Singh RB, Anusha S. Varietal response of chickpea against the gram pod borer, H. armigera (Hub.) under natural field conditions. J Ent Zool Stud. 2017;5(2):938–42.
  34. 34. Rehman SU, Hassan MW, Jamil M, Akram M. Screening of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties against Helicoverpa armigera under semi-arid climatic conditions. Legume Res. 2017;40(2):379–83. https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0i0.7589
  35. 35. Deepak V, Singh PS, Singh SK. Screening of chickpea genotypes against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner. J Food Legumes. 2018;31(2):101–05.
  36. 36. Kumar P, Singh PS, Saroj AK, Chaitanya G, Kumar R. Field screening of certain chickpea genotypes against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). J Entomol Res. 2022;46:957–61. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4576.2022.00163.3
  37. 37. Cheema HK, Singh RS, Taggar GK, Sandhu JS, Kooner BS. Screening of chickpea genotypes for resistance against gram pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hübner) under field conditions. J Res Punjab Agric Univ. 2010;47:1–3.
  38. 38. Deshmukh SG, Sureja BV, Jethva DM, Sonune VR, Joshi MD. Field screening of chickpea germplasms against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Legume Res. 2010;33(2):150–51.
  39. 39. Udavant R, Bantewad S, Rani R, Radhika R, Tupe A. Response evaluation of chickpea genotypes for resisting Helicoverpa armigera (Hub) throughout growing season and correlating with yield parameter. Int J Environ Agric Biotech. 2024;9(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab.92.1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.