Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Micronutrient dynamics and morphological performance of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) under North Bihar agroclimatic conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12154
Submitted
10 October 2025
Published
11-09-2026

Abstract

African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) is an economically important ornamental crop in North Bihar, India. There are fertiliser recommendations for commercial cultivation of marigolds, but systematic information on leaf micronutrient composition and its relationship with floral performance remains limited. A three-year (2021–2024) randomised block design (RBD) field trial was conducted with nine micronutrient treatment combinations involving soil and foliar applications of Zn, Mn, Fe and B, with leaf micronutrient profiling in African marigold (Tagetes erecta L. cv. Arka Abhi) under the humid subtropical conditions of North Bihar, India. Results of the analysed data showed significant phenotypic variation in micronutrient levels of the following from lower to upper range, i.e., Fe (555–847 ppm), Mn (61–130 ppm), Zn (14.7–44.4 ppm), Cu (10.6–26.5 ppm) and B (29–67 ppm). Strong positive correlations were observed between Fe-Mn content and flower yield (r = 0.70) and flowering duration (r = 0.74). Zinc showed a positive association with plant height (r = 0.61), while boron correlated with the shelf life of the flower (r = 0.59). Among the treatments, the combined application of micronutrients including soil application of Zn (2.5 kg/ha) + Mn (2.5 kg/ha) + B (1 kg/ha) + Fe (1.25 kg/ha) at planting and Zn-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) + Mn-EDTA + B + Fe-EDTA (0.2 % each) foliar application, exhibited optimal micronutrient balance with highest yield (762.55 g/plant), tallest plants (126.2 cm), longest flowering (81.66 days) and best shelf life (5.88 days), representing 78.9 % yield advantage over the check. The findings suggest that maintaining Fe (600–700 ppm), Mn (90–110 ppm), Zn (25–30 ppm) and B (45–60 ppm) in leaf tissue is crucial for superior floral performance under North Bihar's humid subtropical conditions. Maintaining optimal leaf levels of Fe (600–700 ppm), Mn (90–110 ppm), Zn (25–30 ppm) and B (45–60 ppm) is crucial for superior floral performance. Balanced micronutrient ratios rather than high individual levels drive crop performance and support effective, site-specific nutrient management in alkaline alluvial soils.

References

  1. 1. GiaqBose TK, Yadav LP, Pal P, Das P, Parthasarathy VA. Commercial flowers. Vol. 2. Kolkata: Naya Udyog; 2003. p. 658–97.
  2. 2. Singh AK. Flower crops: cultivation and management. New Delhi: New India Publishing Agency; 2006. p. 147–68. https://doi.org/10.59317/9789389992311
  3. 3. Marschner H, Marschner P. Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2012. 651 p.
  4. 4. Kumar S, Singh R, Bhattacharya A. Influence of micronutrients on growth and flowering of marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). J Ornamental Hortic. 2018;21(3-4):142–7.
  5. 5. Broadley MR, White PJ, Hammond JP, Zelko I, Lux A. Zinc in plants. New Phytol. 2007;173(4):677–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01996.x
  6. 6. Hänsch R, Mendel RR. Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12(3):259–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.006
  7. 7. Camacho-Cristóbal JJ, Rexach J, González-Fontes A. Boron in plants: deficiency and toxicity. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008;50(10):1247–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00742.x
  8. 8. Yruela I. Copper in plants: acquisition, transport and interactions. Funct Plant Biol. 2009;36(5):409–30. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP08288
  9. 9. Singh MV. Micronutrient nutritional problems in soils of India and improvement for human and animal health. Indian J Fertil. 2009;5(4):11–56.
  10. 10. Shukla AK, Behera SK, Singh VK, Prakash C, Sachan AK, Dhaliwal SS, et al. Pre-monsoon spatial distribution of available micronutrients in surface soils and their management zones in Indian Indo-Gangetic Plain. Soil Tillage Res. 2020;207:104846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234053
  11. 11. Pandey M, Yadav B, Chauhan A. Effect of zinc and boron levels on growth, flowering and yield of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Plant Arch. 2019;19(2):2510–4.
  12. 12. Deshmukh PB, Kadam AS, Chavan NG. Effect of micronutrients on growth, flowering and yield of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). J Soils Crops. 2016;26(1):46–50.
  13. 13. Chirukuri P, Singh UC, Khangjarakpam G, Nandigamd B, Athokpam HS. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, flowering and yield of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) cv. Pusa Basanti Gainda. J Agric Ecol. 2023;15:69–73. https://doi.org/10.58628/JAE-2315-111
  14. 14. Wolf B. A comprehensive system of leaf analyses and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1982;13(12):1035–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628209367332
  15. 15. Duncan DB. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics. 1955;11(1):1–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  16. 16. Römheld V, Marschner H. Evidence for a specific uptake system for iron phytosiderophores in roots of grasses. Plant Physiol. 1986;80(1):175–80. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.80.1.175
  17. 17. Lindsay WL, Schwab AP. The chemistry of iron in soils and its availability to plants. J Plant Nutr. 1982;5(4-7):821–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168209363012
  18. 18. Millaleo R, Reyes-Díaz M, Ivanov AG, Mora ML, Alberdi M. Manganese as essential and toxic element for plants: transport, accumulation and resistance mechanisms. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2010;10(4):470–81. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162010000200008
  19. 19. Sinclair SA, Krämer U. The zinc homeostasis network of land plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(9):1553–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.05.016
  20. 20. Marschner H. Zinc uptake from soils. In: Robson AD, editor. Zinc in soils and plants. Dordrecht: Springer; 1993. p. 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0878-2_5
  21. 21. Brown PH, Bellaloui N, Wimmer MA, Bassil ES, Ruiz J, Hu H, et al. Boron in plant biology. Plant Biol. 2002;4(2):205–23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-25740
  22. 22. Abbasifar A, Shahrabadi F, ValizadehKaji B. Effects of green synthesized zinc and copper nano-fertilizers on the morphological and biochemical attributes of basil plant. J Plant Nutr. 2020;43(8):1104–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1724305
  23. 23. Thirumalmurugan V, Manivannan K, Nanthakumar S. Influence of micronutrients on growth, flowering and yield of African marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;10(3):461–3.
  24. 24. Kavi Kishor PB, Sangam S, Amrutha RN, Sri Laxmi P, Naidu KR, Rao KRSS, et al. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr Sci. 2005;88(3):424–38.
  25. 25. White AC, Rogers A, Rees M, Osborne CP. How can we make plants grow faster? A source-sink perspective on growth rate. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(1):31–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv447
  26. 26. Zhao Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308
  27. 27. Nelson N, Ben-Shem A. The complex architecture of oxygenic photosynthesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5(12):971–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1525
  28. 28. Mahawer LN, Jat G, Sharma P. Micronutrient management in annual ornamentals under Indian conditions: a review. Indian J Hortic. 2018;75(1):115–21.
  29. 29. Guerinot ML. The ZIP family of metal transporters. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1465(1-2):190–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(00)00138-3
  30. 30. Mengel K, Kirkby EA. Principles of plant nutrition. 5th ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. 849 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1009-2
  31. 31. Blevins DG, Lukaszewski KM. Boron in plant structure and function. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1998;49:481–500. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.481
  32. 32. Kumar N, Srivastava GC, Dixit K. Role of sucrose synthase and invertases during petal senescence in rose (Rosa hybrida L.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2008;83(4):520–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2008.11512416
  33. 33. Yruela I. Copper in plants. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2005;17(1):145–56. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202005000100012
  34. 34. Kumar G. Effect of micronutrients (Fe and Zn) on flowering and yield attributes of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) cv. Mayur 5. Indian J Agric Sci. 2019;89(9):1282–6. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v89i8.92846
  35. 35. Havlin JL, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD. Soil fertility and fertilizers: an introduction to nutrient management. 8th ed. New Delhi: Pearson Education; 2014. 516 p.
  36. 36. Shukla AK, Sinha NK, Tiwari PK, Prakash C, Behera SK. Spatial distribution and management zones of micronutrients in the intensively cultivated Trans-Gangetic Plains of India. Environ Monit Assess. 2017;189:206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5920-x
  37. 37. Fernández V, Sotiropoulos T, Brown PH. Foliar fertilization: scientific principles and field practices. Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA); 2013. 140 p.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.