Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Genetic diversity analysis of endemic Cycas species using ISSR and SSR markers

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12223
Submitted
12 October 2025
Published
19-08-2026 — Updated on 29-09-2026
Versions

Abstract

Cycas nayagarhensis is a recently discovered cycad species in Odisha, India. Only a few populations were located in different regions of Nayagarh district. Due to the small population size, the species is under severe threat. A study was conducted to determine the genetic status of the population using various molecular markers. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) were utilised in the study. A total of 20 ISSR markers amplified 132 loci and 10 SSRs amplified 29 loci. The combined data were analysed through STRUCTURE software and revealed seven distinct populations (K = 7). Based on the combined data, the dendrogram segregated the samples into two distinct clusters. The clusters have high bootstrap values and cophenetic correlation, indicating the stability of the groups.  A high degree of genetic similarity and less polymorphism showed the alarming conditions of the species. Average similarity among different samples was 0.78, with maximum and minimum similarity being 0.98 and 0.52 respectively. Among the different populations, maximum diversity was observed for Dasapalla (Population 02). Since there are few individuals in these populations, all the populations may be given special attention to conserve the species. This study will help formulate a conservation strategy for the endangered Cycas species.

 

References

  1. 1. Singh R, Radha P, Khuraijam JS. A new species, a new combination and a new subsection of Cycas from Odisha, northern Eastern Ghats of India. Asian J Conserv Biol. 2015;4:3–14.
  2. 2. Khuraijam JS, Roy RK. Indian Cycas under severe threat. Curr Sci. 2016;111(11):1756–58.
  3. 3. Virk JK, Gupta V, Kumar S, Singh R, Bansal P. Ashtawarga plants—suffering a triple standardisation syndrome. J Tradit Complement Med. 2017;7(4):392–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.011
  4. 4. Zarchini M, Hashemabadi D, Kaviani B, Fallahabadi PR, Negahdar N. Improved germination conditions in Cycas revoluta L. by using sulfuric acid and hot water. Plant Omics. 2011;4(7):350–53.
  5. 5. Frankel OH, Soulé ME. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press; 1981.
  6. 6. Acharya L, Mukherjee AK, Panda PC. Separation of the genera in the subtribe Cassiinae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) using molecular markers. Acta Bot Bras. 2011;25:223–33. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062011000100026
  7. 7. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(22):6531–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.22.6531
  8. 8. Rohlf FJ. NTSYS-pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.02i. Setauket (NY): Exeter Software; 2000.
  9. 9. Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JX. POPGENE version 1.32: the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Edmonton (AB): Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta; 1997.
  10. 10. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.2.945
  11. 11. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6(1):288–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
  12. 12. Jaccard P. Sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat. 1908;44:223–70.
  13. 13. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco (CA): W.H. Freeman; 1973.
  14. 14. Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;98(1):107–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051046
  15. 15. Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, et al. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet. 1997;95:163–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050544
  16. 16. Ghislain M, Zhang D, Fajardo D, Huamán Z, Hijmans RJ. Marker-assisted sampling of Andean potato using RAPD markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 1999;46(6):547–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008724007888
  17. 17. Geng Q, Wang Z, Tao J, Kimura MK, Liu H, Hogetsu T, et al. Ocean currents drove genetic structure of seven dominant mangrove species along the coastlines of southern China. Front Genet. 2021;12:615911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.615911
  18. 18. Nybom H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol Ecol. 2004;13(5):1143–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x
  19. 19. Charlesworth D, Willis JH. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(11):783–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2664
  20. 20. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1993;24:217–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.001245
  21. 21. Clugston JA, Ruhsam M, Kenicer GJ, Henwood MJ, Milne RI, Nagalingum NS. Conservation genomics of an Australian cycad Cycas calcicola and the absence of key genotypes in botanic gardens. Conserv Genet. 2022;23(3):449–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-022-01442-5
  22. 22. Xiao LQ, Ge XJ, Gong X, Hao G, Zheng SX. ISSR variation in the endemic and endangered plant Cycas guizhouensis (Cycadaceae). Ann Bot. 2004;94(1):133–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch122
  23. 23. Keppel G, Hodgskiss PD, Plunkett GM. Cycads in the Pacific. New York (NY): NYBG Press; 2012.
  24. 24. Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol Lett. 2006;9(5):615–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00889.x
  25. 25. Sun Y, Hu H, Huang H, Vargas-Mendoza CF. Chloroplast diversity and population differentiation of Castanopsis fargesii (Fagaceae): a dominant tree species in evergreen broad-leaved forest of subtropical China. Tree Genet Genomes. 2014;10(6):1531–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-014-0774-0
  26. 26. Hmissi S, Chograni H, Yangui I. Genetic diversity and population structure patterns in Lavandula stoechas L. wild germplasms using ISSR and EST-SSR markers and implications for conservation. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2024;71:2859–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-023-01820-4
  27. 27. Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.005
  28. 28. Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature. 1994;371(6492):65–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/371065a0
  29. 29. Kuparinen A, Keith JM, Suvanto S. The demographic drivers of extinction debt in plants and animals. Oikos. 2017;126(3):366–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03883
  30. 30. Bertorelle G, Raffini F, Bosse M. Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in conservation biology. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(8):492–503. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00448-x
  31. 31. Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2006;37:433–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110145
  32. 32. Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A. Understanding inbreeding depression, purging and genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016;31(12):940–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005
  33. 33. Schoen DJ, Toczydlowski RH. Population genomic signatures of founding events in autonomously self-fertilising plants: A test with Impatiens capensis. New Phytol. 2026;250(1):616–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70880
  34. 34. Ralls K, Ballou JD, Dudash MR, Eldridge MDB, Fenster CB, Lacy RC, et al. Call for a paradigm shift in the genetic management of fragmented populations. Conserv Lett. 2018;11(2):e12412. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12412
  35. 35. Wang YQ, Liu J, Xiao SY, Xi HH, Gong X, Feng XY. A genomic perspective on adaptation to heterogeneous environments for Cycas segmentifida (Cycadaceae), an endemic cycad in southwest China. Ann Bot. 2025:mcaf067. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf067
  36. 36. Yessoufou K, Bamigboye SO, Daru BH, Van der Bank M. Evidence of constant diversification punctuated by a mass extinction in the African cycads. Ecol Evol. 2014;4(1):50–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.880
  37. 37. Griffith MP, Meerow AW, Calonje M, Gonzalez E, Nakamura K, Francisco-Ortega J. Genetic patterns of Zamia in Florida are consistent with ancient human influence and recent near extirpation. Int J Plant Sci. 2022;183(3):169–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/718529
  38. 38. Huang S, Chiang YC, Schaal BA, Chou CH, Chiang TY. Organelle DNA phylogeography of Cycas taitungensis, a relict species in Taiwan. Mol Ecol. 2001;10(11):2669–81. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01383.x
  39. 39. Jian SG, Ren H, Liu N, Wang J, Zhang QM. Genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered plant Cycas fairylakea (Cycadaceae). Biodivers Sci. 2007;15(4):355–65.
  40. 40. Wang DL, Li ZC, Hao G. Genetic diversity of the endangered plant Cycas szechuanensis revealed by ISSR markers. Acta Phytotaxon Sin. 2006;44(5):561–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7254.2006.00323.x
  41. 41. Feng XY, Wang Y, Gong X. Genetic diversity and conservation of Cycas balansae (Cycadaceae) in China. Biodivers Sci. 2012;20(5):568–76.
  42. 42. Frankham R. Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv. 2005;126(2):131–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.002
  43. 43. Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R. Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(42):15261–4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403809101
  44. 44. Frankham R, Bradshaw CJA, Brook BW. Genetics in conservation management: revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses. Biol Conserv. 2014;170:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.036
  45. 45. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 1931;16(2):97–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/16.2.97
  46. 46. Hoffmann AA, Sgrò CM. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature. 2011;470(7335):479–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09670
  47. 47. Whiteley AR, Fitzpatrick SW, Funk WC, Tallmon DA. Genetic rescue to the rescue. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30(1):42–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.009

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.