Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Effect of herbicide mixture and mechanical weeding on weed dynamics and yield of kharif groundnut

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12331
Submitted
17 October 2025
Published
29-08-2026

Abstract

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is the major oilseed crop in India and it plays a major role in bridging the vegetable oil deficit in the country. Weed infestation poses a significant challenge and is a serious problem in reducing the productivity of groundnut. The sole application of herbicides is unable to control the later germinating weeds; hence, to mitigate the weed-related losses and increase the yield, an integrated weed management strategy needs to be studied. In view of the above, the present investigation was planned to evaluate the “effect of herbicide mixture and mechanical weeding on weed dynamics and yield of kharif groundnut”. The field experiment was conducted in the loamy sand soil of All India Coordinated Research Project on Weed Management (AICRP) on Weed Management Farm, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, during three consecutive kharif seasons of 2022–24. The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design (RBD) with three replications. The treatments included T1: Pendimethalin 30 % emulsifiable concentrate (EC) 750 g active ingredient per hectare (a.i./ha),  T2: Flumioxazin 50 % suspension concentrate (SC) 125 g a.i./ha, T3: Diclosulam 84 % water dispersible granules (WDG) 25.2 g a.i./ha,   T4: Oxyfluorfen 23.5 % EC + pendimethalin 30 % EC (tank mix) 188 + 500 g a.i./ha,  T5: Diclosulam 84 % WDG + pendimethalin 30 % EC (tank mix) 25.2 + 500 g  a.i./ha, T6: Pendimethalin 30 % +  imazethapyr 2 % EC (ready mix (RM)) 800 g a.i./ha, T7: Sodium acifluorfen 16.5 %  +  clodinafop propargyl 8 % EC  (RM) 245 g a.i./ha, T8: Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1 % w/w  +  fomesafen 11.1 % w/w soluble concentrate (SL) (RM) 250 g a.i./ha, T9: Propaquizafop 2.5 %  +  imazethapyr 3.75 % w/w micro-emulsion (ME)  (RM)  125 g a.i./ha, T10: Quizalofop ethyl 7.5 %  +  imazethapyr 15 % w/w EC (RM) 90 g a.i./ha, T11: Intercultivation (IC) followed by hand weeding (HW) at 20 and 40 days after sowing (DAS) and T12: Weedy check. In treatments T₁–T₁₀, IC followed by HW at 40 DAS was carried out as a common practice. Results revealed that significantly lower density and dry biomass of weeds, weed index, higher weed control efficiency, shelling percentage, seed index, pod yield and benefit-to-cost ratio (B: C) were recorded in application of either diclosulam 25.2 g a.i./ha pre-emergence (PE) followed by IC + HW at 40 DAS or sodium acifluorfen + clodinafop propargyl 245 g a.i./ha post-emergence (PoE) followed by IC  +  HW at 40 DAS or fluazifop-p-butyl + fomesafen 250 g a.i./ha PoE followed by IC + HW at 40 DAS or propaquizafop  +  imazethapyr 125 g a.i./ha PoE followed by IC + HW at 40 DAS or IC followed by HW at 20 and 40 DAS. Residue of all the applied herbicides in groundnut mature pods, stover and in soil were found below the limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.01 mg/kg at the time of harvest.

References

  1. 1. Wesley JV, Burke IC, Clewis SB, Thomas WE, Wilcut JW. Critical period of grass vs. broadleaf weed interference in peanut. Weed Tech. 2008;22:68–73. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-037.1
  2. 2. Agasimani CA, Shanwad UK, Arvindkumar BN, Shivamurthy SD. Integrated weed management-A long term case study in groundnut-wheat cropping system in northern Karnataka. Res J Agril Sci. 2010;1(3):196–200.
  3. 3. Maity SK, Mukherjee PK. Effect of brown manuring on grain yield and nutrient use efficiency in dry direct seeded Kharif rice. Ind J Weed Sci. 2011;43(1&2):61–66.
  4. 4. Kumar V, Gill GS. Weed index a new method for reporting weed control traits. Ind J Agron. 1969;6(2):96–98.
  5. 5. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental designs. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1957. p. 546–68.
  6. 6. Bera S, Ghosh RK. Microflora population and physico chemical properties of soil of potato as influenced by oxyfluorfen 23.5 % EC. Uni J Agril Res. 2014;2(4):135–40. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2014.020403
  7. 7. Lehotay SJ. Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe approach for determining pesticide residues. In: Martínez Vidal JL, Frenich AG, editors. Methods in Biotechnology, Vol. 19: Pesticide Protocols. New Jersey: Humana Press Inc.; 2006. p. 239–62. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-929-X:239
  8. 8. Lakshmidevi TG, Patel VJ, Patel BD, Chaudhari DD. Effect of herbicide mixtures on weeds and yield of summer groundnut. Ind J Weed Sci. 2022;54(3):328–30. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2022.00060.0
  9. 9. Pawar SB, Mahatale PV, Thakare SS, Sawarkar SD. Weed management in groundnut with tank-mix application of post emergence herbicides. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;6:2169–173.
  10. 10. Priya RS, Chinnusamy C, Murali Arthanari P, Janaki P, Babu C. Evaluation of oxyfluorfen (23.5 % EC) Herbicide on Weed Control, Economics and Profitability of groundnut in the Western Zone of Tamil Nadu. Chem Sci Rev Lett. 2017;6(21):88–93. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2017/34088
  11. 11. Trimurthulu N, Ashok S, Latha M, Rao AS. Influence of pre-emergence herbicides on the soil microflora during the crop growth of Blackgram, (Vigna mungo L). Int J Curr Microb Appl Sci. 2015;4(6):539–46.
  12. 12. Kotnake P, Goud VV, Jadhav SD, Paslawar AN. Pre- and post-emergence herbicidal impact on nodulation of soybean crop and soil biological indicators. Ind J Weed Sci. 2025;57(1):131–34. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2025.00021.4
  13. 13. Dixit JP, Kasana BS, Singh YK. Effect of pre and post emergence herbicides on pod yield and economics of groundnut. Int J Farm Sci. 2016;6(1):90–95.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.