Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research communications

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Assessment of the potentially of low seeding rate on the growth, yield and economy of jute in Bangladesh

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12378
Submitted
22 October 2025
Published
16-05-2026 — Updated on 03-07-2026
Versions

Abstract

The optimisation of seeding rate is crucial for enhancing the growth, fibre yield and profitability of jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). A field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of varying seeding rates on the growth, yield and economic performance of jute. The experiment followed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 6 different seeding rates as treatments. Seeding rate ranged from 1.50 to 6.00 kg ha-1, each mixed with inert material to maintain uniform application. Results demonstrated that seeding rate significantly influenced plant growth, yield and profitability. Increasing the seeding rate from 1.5 to 6.0 kg ha-1 increased plant density but reduced plant height, basal diameter and leaf number due to intensified intra-specific competition for light and nutrients. The highest fibre yield (3.70 t ha-1), net return (100057 BDT) and benefit–cost ratio (BCR = 2.07) were achieved at 2.50 kg ha-1, while higher rates (≥6.0 kg ha-1) resulted in yield and profit decline. Correlation analysis revealed positive associations between fibre yield and both plant height (r = 0.776) and basal diameter (r = 0.771). Principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed these relationships, with the first 2 components explaining 76.6 % of the total variance. Overall, a low seeding rate (2.5–3.0 kg ha-1) ensured optimal plant population, efficient resource use and maximum profitability, with 2.50 kg ha-1 identified as the most economically viable rate for C. olitorius cultivation in southwestern Bangladesh.

References

  1. 1. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Statistical yearbook Bangladesh 2023: agriculture-crops, livestock, forestry and fishery section. 43rd ed. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics; 2024:149–50.
  2. 2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Jute, kenaf, sisal, abaca, coir andallied fibres statistical bulletin. Vol. 2. 2023.
  3. 3. Akter S, Sadekin MN, Islam N. Jute and jute products of Bangladesh: contributions and challenges. Asian Bus Rev. 2020;10(3):143–52. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v10i3.480
  4. 4. Islam MM. Varietal advances of jute, kenaf and mesta crops in Bangladesh: a review. Int J Bioorg Chem. 2019;4(1):24–41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbc.20190401.15
  5. 5. Monira S, Ali MI, Sarker UK, Islam MS, Zaman F, Begum M, et al. Efficacy and economics of different weed control practices in boro rice under High Ganges River floodplain of Bangladesh. J Agric Food Environ. 2022;3(3):32–9. https://doi.org/10.47440/JAFE.2022.3307
  6. 6. Ali MI, Monira S, Rashed M, Salim M, Salam MA, Das RC. Effect of herbicidal weed control practices on yield performance of T Aman rice varieties in Bangladesh. J Agrofor Environ. 2022;15(2):14-20. https://doi.org/10.55706/jae1513
  7. 7. Hossain MM, Azad MAK, Soren EB, Alam MN, Ahmed MS, Islam MS, et al. Enhancing growth, yield andnutritional value of Capsicum annuum: evaluating micronutrient efficiency and varietal performance. J Agric Food Res. 2025;21:101945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101945
  8. 8. Hossain MM, Shibasaki Y, Nakao R, Nitano K, Goto F. Optimization of ionic strength of nutrient solution for enhanced hydroponic watermelon yield and quality in greenhouse. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):25976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07250-9
  9. 9. Ali MI, Sarkar MAR, Paul SK. Influence of plant nutrient management on the yield performance of transplant Aman rice (Oryza sativa L.). Arch Agric Environ Sci. 2018;3(1):49-53.https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2018.030106
  10. 10. Ali MI, Monira S, Kumar T, Islam MS, Das RC. Influence of plant nutrient management on yield and yield attributes of BJRI tossa pat-8. Asian J Crop Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2023;8(1):293-8.
  11. 11. Masum SM, Ali MH, Islam MS, Sultana S. Influence of plant spacing and post emergence herbicide on the yield of white jute (Corchorus capsularis). Int J Sustain Agric. 2011;3(3):82-7.
  12. 12. Ghorai AK, Chakraborty AK. Economy of low density sowing in jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(9):292-300. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.037
  13. 13. Ban Z. Effects of planting density on yield and fiber quality of transgenic hybrid Bt cotton Hanmian 646. 2014.
  14. 14. Islam MM, Xiaoying J, Uddin E, Bhuiyan F. Status and constraints of jute cultivation in Bangladesh: an experience from selected upazilas under Chandpur district. Asian J Agric Rural Dev. 2015;5(8):175-86.
  15. 15. Niloy AC. Jute: solution to global challenges and opportunities of Bangladesh. SEISENSE Bus Rev. 2021;1(2):59-75. https://doi.org/10.33215/sbr.v1i2.633
  16. 16. Mgolozeli S, Tesfamariam EH, Beletse Y. Yield, mineral content and root growth response of jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) to planting density and water availability. J Agric Food Res. 2022;10:100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100384
  17. 17. Rakesh J, Sree Rekha M, Sujani CR. Yield and economics of olitorius jute at different plant densities and topping practices. Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(7):489-94. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i71901
  18. 18. Baloch AW, Soomro AM, Javed MA, Ahmed M, Bughio HR. Optimum plant density for high yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Asian J Plant Sci. 2002;1:25-7. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.25.27
  19. 19. Abebe A, Filmon Y. Effect of seed rate on yield and yield components of tef (Eragrostis tef Trotter) at Konso and Arbaminch, southern Ethiopia. J Nat Sci Res. 2018;8(5):38-45.
  20. 20. Getahun D, Tigist A, Adise D. Influence of seed rate and row spacing on growth and yield of tef (Eragrostis tef). Adv Crop Sci Technol. 2018;6:2329-8863.
  21. 21. Liang M, Baiser B, Hallett LM. Consistent stabilizing effects of plant diversity across spatial scales and climatic gradients. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022;6:1669-75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01868-y
  22. 22. Li J, Martin A, Carver LA, Armstrong S, Givens SR, Walters K. Optimizing sowing density for parsley, cilantro andsage in controlled environment production: balancing productivity and plant quality. Horttechnology. 2024;34(3):305-12. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05381-23
  23. 23. Hall J, Bhattarai SP, Midmore DJ. Effect of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) planting density on weed suppression, crop growth, physiological responses andfibre yield in the subtropics. Renew Bioresour. 2014;2(1):1. https://doi.org/10.7243/2052-6237-2-1
  24. 24. Dimitriev VL, Makushev AE, Kayukova OV, Eliseeva LV, Shashkarov LG, Lozhkin AG. Influence of seeding rates on yield and technological qualities of hemp fiber. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;677(4):042038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/677/4/042038
  25. 25. Mitra B, Samajdar T. Frontline demonstration: an effective tool for enhancing yield of jute fibre in sub-Himalayan plains (Terai zone) of West Bengal, India. Agric Sci Digest. 2013;33(1):38-41.
  26. 26. Roy AKGS. Weed smothering (Corchorus olitorius L.) in jute by its high-density broadcast sowing using cover crop principle. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2022;11(3):108-19. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2022.1103.013
  27. 27. Ahmed K, Saleh A, Musa A, Kalu G. Determination of selected parameters that influence planting space uniformity on maize seed. Fudma J Sci. 2023;7(2):30-3. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2023-0702-1702
  28. 28. Liu S, Baret F, Allard D. A method to estimate plant density and plant spacing heterogeneity: application to wheat crops. Plant Methods. 2017;13:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0187-1
  29. 29. Ahmmed S, Jahiruddin M, Razia S, Begum RA, Biswas JC, Rahman ASMM, et al. Fertilizer recommendation guide-2018. Bangladesh Agric Res Council (BARC); 2018.
  30. 30. Tareq MZ, Sarker MSA, Islam MW, Rony MNH, Islam A, Hossain MA. Population density affects vegetative growth and yield of BJRI Deshi Pat Shak-3. Trop Agrobiodiversity. 2023;1:13-5. https://doi.org/10.26480/trab.01.2023.13.15
  31. 31. Thapa B, Katuwal DR. Effect of seedling density on growth characteristics of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) cv. KF-65 in nursery. Turk J Agric Food Sci Technol. 2024;12(2):138-42. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i2.138-142.6126
  32. 32. Wang L, Ma L, Peng Z. Effects of planting density on seedling growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia. 2010.
  33. 33. Hossain MM, Shibasaki Y, Goto F. Assessment of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) fruit photosynthetic performance based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameter and its impact on yield and quality. Sci Hortic. 2026;357:114685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2026.114685
  34. 34. Ahmed MS, Hasan MM, Islam MS, Hossain MM, Kaium MA, Islam MK. Response of onion (Allium cepa) to nitrogen and potassium fertilizers rate on growth and yield in the northwestern region of Bangladesh. Int J Agric Biol. 2025;34(1).https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.2347
  35. 35. Hossain MM, Shibasaki Y, Goto F. Enhancement of growth and quality of winter watermelon using LED supplementary lighting. Horticulturae. 2025;11(3):262. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11030262
  36. 36. Ghorai AK, Chakraborty AK. Low density jute sowing to minimise cost of different operations in integrated weed management system. In: Proc Int Seminar on Agri Skills for Convergence in Research, Industry andLivelihood (AGRIL), BCKV, Kalyani, West Bengal, India; 2019:110.
  37. 37. Deng G, Guanghui D, Yang Y, Bao Y, Feihu L. Planting density and fertilization evidently influence the fiber yield of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Agronomy. 2019;9(7):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070368

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.