Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Response surface-based optimisation of design parameters in a cotton stalk harvesting machine

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12459
Submitted
1 November 2025
Published
29-06-2026

Abstract

Cotton stalk management after harvest remains a critical challenge in Indian agriculture due to high labour requirements and environmental concerns associated with residue burning. This study presents a novel optimisation-driven design approach for a cotton stalk harvesting machine by integrating a laboratory-scale prototype with response surface methodology (RSM) to systematically evaluate and optimise key operational parameters. Unlike conventional approaches, this work establishes a quantitative relationship between machine design variables and performance indicators, enabling predictive optimisation for field applicability. The effects of peripheral speed, forward speed and blade type were investigated through 26 experimental runs, focusing on the bulk density and machine output of chopped cotton stalks. Results demonstrated that blade type and operational speeds significantly influenced performance, with strong interaction effects between peripheral speed and blade type at the 1 % significance level. Bulk density ranged from 143.85 to 249.38 kg m-3, while machine output varied between 211.3 and 573.5 kg hr-1. The optimised parameter combination, consisting of a peripheral speed of 57.95 m s-1, a forward speed of 2.21 km hr-1 and L-type blade, yielded a predicted output of 573.67 kg hr-1 and a bulk density of 255.27 kg m-3. Importantly, these optimised conditions provide practical operational benchmarks for field-scale implementation, demonstrating the potential to enhance chopping efficiency, reduce manual labour dependency and minimise environmental impacts. The study thus contributes a scalable and performance-validated framework for improving cotton residue management under real agricultural conditions.

References

  1. 1. Bhuvaneshwari S, Hettiaarachchi H, Meegoda JN. Crop residue burning in India: policy changes and potential solutions. J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050832
  2. 2. Raja D, Kalarani MK, Janaki P. Impact of farm implements in cotton cultivation. Agric Update. 2009;4(1–2):62–4.
  3. 3. Lee WC, Yousuf S, Hamid NSA, Baharin BS. Optimizing conditions for enzymatic clarification of banana juice using response surface methodology (RSM). J Food Eng. 2006;73:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.01.005
  4. 4. Dubler K. Impact cutting in mowing forage crops. Hohenheimer Arbeiten. 1972;62:55–60.
  5. 5. Kanafojski C, Karwowski T. Agricultural machines, theory and construction. Crop-harvesting machines. Vol. 2. Warsaw (Poland): National Center for Scientific, Technical and Economic Information; 1976.
  6. 6. Goyal R, Mahal JS, Manes GS. Performance evaluation of flail unit of forage harvester on sorghum fodder. Agric Res J. 2016;53(2):264–7. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2016.00049.1
  7. 7. Eltarhuny MM, Fouda T. Utilization of self-propelled harvester and shredder machines for removing some field crop residues. Manag Econ Eng Agric Rural Dev. 2012;12(1):67–70.
  8. 8. Omran MS. Study of the performance of the most widely used shredders for crop residues in Egypt. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Misr Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008 Dec 12–13, Egypt; 2008.
  9. 9. Myers RH. Response surface methodology. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon Inc.; 1971. p. 1–69.
  10. 10. Li Y, Du X, Song Z, Li F. Test of shear mechanical properties of cotton stalks. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 2011;27(2):124–30.
  11. 11. Ghorbani Z, Hemmat A, Masoumi AA. Physical and mechanical properties of alfalfa grind as affected by particle size and moisture content. J Agric Sci Technol. 2012;14:65–76.
  12. 12. Świetochowski A, Lisowski A, Dąbrowska-Salwin M. The effect of particle sizes on the density and porosity of the material. In: Proc Int Conf Trends Agric Eng, 2016 Sep 7–9, Prague, Czech Republic; 2016. p. 609–14.
  13. 13. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 9th ed. New York: Wiley; 2017.
  14. 14. El-Khateeb HA, El-Keway AA. Development and evaluation of cutting knives to suit cutting wet and dry field residues. J Soil Sci Agric Eng Mansoura Univ. 2012;3(6):601–16. https://doi.org/10.21608/jssae.2012.54339
  15. 15. Mady MA, Abdel-Hadi MA, Abd-Allah YE, Ali MF. A study on some engineering parameters of cutting and chopping machine for agricultural wastes. Misr J Agric Eng. 2015;32(4):1775–800. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2015.97881

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.