Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Foliar efficacy of urea formulations in Bt cotton for enhancing yield and nitrogen use efficiency under rainfed black calcareous soils

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12472
Submitted
29 October 2025
Published
20-04-2026

Abstract

Inadvertent use of nitrogenous (N) fertilisers has resulted in low N use efficiency and cotton productivity in high yielding Bt cotton hybrids. Apparently, soil application of prilled urea is associated with substantial N losses posing serious threats to the ecosystem and environment. Consequently, foliar spray of N fertilisers is being practiced in rainfed cotton. However, literature on foliar efficacy of nano urea (12 %) in cotton remains limited. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted with 13 treatment combinations with urea and nano urea as foliar spray one-time at 35 days after sowing (DAS) and two-times at 35 and 55 DAS along with three recommended doses of nitrogen (100 %, 75 %, 50 % recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN)) and compared with foliar spray of urea once at 100 % RDN. The study results revealed few significant (p < 0.05) differences with foliar spray of urea formulations in growth and yield attributes over other treatments. Notably, nano urea two times spray + 100 % RDN significantly increased seed cotton (SC g plant-1) and seed cotton yield (SCY kg ha-1) by 9 % and 6 % respectively, compared to urea spray + 100 % RDN. Similarly, nano urea two times spray + 100 % RDN has significantly increased N concentration and uptake by 7 %, 12 % respectively compared to urea one time spray + 100 % RDN. In contrast, seed index and fiber quality were not significantly influenced by foliar spray of urea formulations. Economic calculations postulated that nano urea two times spray + 100 % RDN recorded the highest benefit to cost (BC), marginal cost benefit ratio (MCBR), with an additional net return of ₹4093 compared to other treatments. Overall, the study highlights the potential of urea formulations as foliar spray at 35 and 55 DAS with 100 % RDN in improving rainfed cotton production under black calcareous soil.

References

  1. 1. Blaise D, Venugopalan MV, Raju AR. Introduction of Bt cotton hybrids in India: Did it change the agronomy? Indian Journal of Agronomy. 2014;59(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i1.4534
  2. 2. Tewatia RK, Chanda TK. Trends in fertiliser nitrogen production and consumption in India. In: The Indian nitrogen assessment. Elsevier; 2017. p. 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811836-8.00004-5
  3. 3. Manikandan A, Blaise D, Dutta S, Satyanarayana T, Bussa B. Nutrient Expert for high yield and use efficiency in rainfed Bt cotton hybrids. Frontiers in Agronomy. 2021;3:777300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.777300
  4. 4. Shaviv A. Advances in controlled-release fertilisers. Advances in Agronomy. 2001;71:1–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71011-5
  5. 5. Oosterhuis D, Hake K, Burmester C. Physiology today. In: Newsletter of the cotton physiology program – National Cotton Council. 1991;(2):8.
  6. 6. Subramanian KS, Manikandan A, Thirunavukkarasu M, Rahale CS. Nano-fertilisers for balanced crop nutrition. In: Nanotechnologies in food and agriculture. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14024-7_3
  7. 7. Kumar N, Tripathi SC, Yadav DB, Samota SR, Venkatesh K, Sareen S, et al. Boosting wheat yield, profitability and NUE with prilled and nano urea in conservation tillage. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):18073. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44879-w
  8. 8. Guo L, Niu L, Zhu X, Wang L, Zhang K, Li D, et al. Moderate nitrogen application facilitates Bt cotton growth and suppresses population expansion of aphids (Aphis gossypii) by altering plant physiological characteristics. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2024;15:1328759. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1328759
  9. 9. Mejias JH, Salazar F, Perez Amaro L, Hube S, Rodriguez M, Alfaro M. Nanofertilisers: A cutting-edge approach to increase nitrogen use efficiency in grasslands. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2021;9:635114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.635114
  10. 10. India. Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilisers. Press Information Bureau (PIB). Delhi: Press Information Bureau; 2023.
  11. 11. Swify S, Mazeika R, Baltrusaitis J, Drapanauskaite D, Barcauskaite K. Modified urea fertilisers and their effects on improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Sustainability. 2023;16(1):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010188
  12. 12. Sikka R, Kalia A, Ahuja R, Sidhu SK, Chaitra P. Substitution of soil urea fertilization to foliar nano urea fertilization decreases growth and yield of rice and wheat. Plant and Soil. 2025;512(1):1475–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07157-w
  13. 13. Reddy KS, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Pooniya V, Prasanna R, Shrivastava M, et al. Relative performance of urea and nano-urea in conjunction with zinc fertilization on growth, productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in spring wheat. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2024;24(2):3593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01780-3
  14. 14. Sumanta S, Sagar L, Sankar T, Manohar A, Adhikary R, Maitra S, et al. Growth and productivity of rabi maize as influenced by foliar application of urea and nano-urea. Crop Research. 2022;57(3):136–40. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.019
  15. 15. Samanta S, Maitra S, Shankar T, Gaikwad D, Sagar L, Panda M, et al. Comparative performance of foliar application of urea and nano urea on finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn). Crop Research. 2022;57(3):166–70. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.025
  16. 16. Reddy KS, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Pooniya V, Prasanna R, Mandi S, et al. Relative performance of granulated and nano urea on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat–rice sequence. Plant Nano Biology. 2025;11:100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plana.2024.100131
  17. 17. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 1949;24(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
  18. 18. India. Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA). Press Information Bureau (PIB). Delhi: Press Information Bureau; 2023.
  19. 19. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1984.
  20. 20. Abro S, Rizwan M, Deho ZA, Abro SA, Sial MA. Identification of heat tolerant cotton lines showing genetic variation in cell membrane thermostability, stomata and trichome size and its effect on yield and fiber quality traits. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;12:804315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.804315
  21. 21. Upadhyay PK, Singh VK, Rajanna GA, Dwivedi BS, Dey A, Singh RK, et al. Unveiling the combined effect of nano fertilisers and conventional fertilisers on crop productivity, profitability and soil well-being. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2023;7:1260178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1260178
  22. 22. Kumar N, Tripathi SC, Yadav DB, Samota SR, Venkatesh K, Sareen S. Efficient nitrogen management in wheat through a combination of conventional and nano urea with optimized methods and timing. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2024;47(10):1630–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2316006
  23. 23. Reddy KS, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Parida BK, Bora R, Borate RB, et al. Nano DAP augments productivity, phosphorus use efficiency and profitability of spring wheat. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):24771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92364-3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.