Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Response of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) to foliar application of nano di-ammonium phosphate (DAP)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12856
Submitted
21 November 2025
Published
01-08-2026

Abstract

Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) is a nutrient rich cruciferous vegetable valued for its vitamins, antioxidants and minerals. Using nano di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) in vegetable production has become important due to improve nutrient use efficiency, control nutrient release and reduce nutrient losses and leads to increased crop productivity and sustainability. A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2024 to evaluate the effects of two nano DAP formulations (8 : 16 : 0 and 2 : 5 : 0) as foliar sprays at different concentrations in combination with  75 % of recommended dose of nitrogen and phosphorus (RDNP) on broccoli hybrid NS 50. The trial used randomised block design (RBD) with  10 treatments and 3 replications. The results revealed that the treatment with 75 % RDNP + nano DAP (2 : 5 : 0) at 5 mL L-1 recorded the highest root girth (23.14 cm), north-south plant spread (67.13 cm), main head weight (440.17 g), head diameter (15.23 cm), marketable yield (12681.40 kg ha-1), number of side sprouts (6.00) and ascorbic acid content (95.08 mg/100 g), achieving a 23.76 % higher yield than 100 % recommended dose of fertiliser (RDF). The above-mentioned treatment also ensured the earliest head initiation (67 days after sowing (DAS)), 50 % head initiation (68 DAS) and peak harvest (84 DAS) along with the highest soil organic carbon (SOC) (10.31 g kg-1), net income (₹936781) and benefit-cost ratio (2.60). This study suggests that 75 % RDNP + nano DAP (2 : 5 : 0) at 5 mL L-1 is highly effective for improving growth, earliness, yield, quality, economic returns and soil fertility of broccoli, while lowering the requirement of conventional fertilisers up to 25 %.

References

  1. 1. Raliya R, Saharan V, Dimkpa C, Biswas P. Nanofertilizer for precision and sustainable agriculture: current state and future perspectives. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(26):6487–503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02178
  2. 2. Azeem B, Kushaari K, Man ZB, Basit A, Thanh TH. Review on materials and methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. J Control Release. 2020;181(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.020
  3. 3. Shang Y, Hasan MK, Ahammed GJ, Li M, Yin H, Zhou J. Applications of nanotechnology in plant growth and crop protection: a review. Molecules. 2019;24(14):2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24142558
  4. 4. Khan Z, Sharma S, Singh B. Nano fertilizers: a sustainable approach to improving agricultural productivity. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(22):6264–73. https://doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01488
  5. 5. Mahmoud M, Patel M, Tran H. Nano fertilizers for enhancing nutrient use efficiency and reducing environmental pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2021;787:147489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147489
  6. 6. Rana S, Meena M, Verma P. Nano-fertilizers: applications in sustainable agriculture. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2022;22(1):1–15.
  7. 7. Ali S, Raza S, Liang W. Impact of nano fertilizers on crop productivity and environmental sustainability. Agric Syst. 2023;195:103181.
  8. 8. Zhao X, Zhang L, Zhang Q. Application of nano-phosphorus fertilizers in rice cultivation for sustainable agriculture. Field Crops Res. 2022;267:108158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108158
  9. 9. Shan F, Li D, Zhu J, Kang S, Wang J. Effects of vertical smashing rotary tillage on root growth characteristics and yield of broccoli. Agriculture. 2022;12(7):928. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070928
  10. 10. Zhang D, Hamauzu Y. Phenolics, ascorbic acid, carotenoids and antioxidant activity of broccoli and their changes during conventional and microwave cooking. Food Chem. 2004;88(4):503–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.065
  11. 11. Tejaswini T, Varma LR, Verma P. Interaction effect of different plant spacing on performance of different varieties with respect to yield and economics of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica L.) under North Gujarat conditions. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(6):685–9. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.080
  12. 12. Tiwari N. Broccoli: a health beneficial vegetable. Rashtriya Krishi. 2016;11(2):37–9.
  13. 13. Thamburaj S, Singh N. Textbook of vegetables, tuber crops and spices. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research; 2001.
  14. 14. Riby JE, Xue L, Chatterji U, Bjeldanes EL, Firestone GL, Bjeldanes L. Activation and potentiation of interferon-gamma signaling by 3,3'-diindolylmethane in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69(2):430–9. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.105.017053
  15. 15. Zhao H, Lin J, Grossman HB, Hernandez LM, Dinney CP, Wu X. Dietary isothiocyanates, GSTM1, GSTT1, NAT2 polymorphisms and bladder cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(10):2208–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22577
  16. 16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Global vegetable production statistics. Rome: FAO; 2023.
  17. 17. Sharma R, Verma A, Singh P. Trends in global production and export potential of cruciferous vegetables. Int J Hortic Sci. 2022;17(2):45–52.
  18. 18. Mielke MS, Schaffer B, Li C. Use of a SPAD meter to estimate chlorophyll content in Eugenia uniflora L. leaves as affected by contrasting light environments and soil flooding. Photosynthetica. 2010;48(3):332–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-010-0043-2
  19. 19. Hughes DE. Titrimetric determination of ascorbic acid with 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol in commercial liquid diets. J Pharm Sci. 1983;72:126–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600720208
  20. 20. Neeruggi R, Devaraju, Srinivasa, Narayan V, Mavarkar S, Ravi CS. Effect of nano DAP and urea on growth, yield and quality of chilli. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2024;30:S12–4. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2024.v30i04s.003
  21. 21. Chamuah S, Gogoi S, Dutta S, Bhattacharjee D, Sharma S, Das K. Impact of nano-DAP on growth and development of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.). Int J Environ Clim Change. 2023;13(12):1298–304. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123795
  22. 22. Raja S, Chandrasekaran IR, Subramanian KS, Kannan SB, Govindhasamy A, Ponnusamy J, et al. Impact of Gromor Nano DAP on growth, physiology, yield and quality of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). SSRN. 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5189698
  23. 23. Akshara B, Shimi GJ, Pillai SP, Thomas UC, Gopinath PP. Effect of foliar applied DAP and nano DAP on growth and yield of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Ecol Environ Conserv. 2024;30:S180–5. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2024.v30i04s.031
  24. 24. Venkatraj N, Rajkumar M. Effect of foliar application of nano urea and nano DAP on growth and yield parameters of grapes (Vitis vinifera cv. Muscat Hamburg). Ecol Environ Conserv. 2025;31:394–7. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2025.v31i01s.069
  25. 25. Kumar K, Dahiya S. The comparative impact of chemical fertilizers, nano-urea and nano-DAP on growth and yield of wheat crop. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2024;8(7):1133–9. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i7n.1714
  26. 26. Pooja SS, Bahadur V, Kerkketta A, Deepanshu. Effect of nano fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(22):328–35. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231383
  27. 27. Ruban S, Nandinidevi M, Naik BP, Rajan R. Effect of nano DAP on growth and yield of vegetable cowpea (yard long bean). Agrica. 2023;12(1):70–6. https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-448X.2023.00009.3
  28. 28. Attri M, Sharma N, Mehta S, Mecarty JS. Effects of seedling dipping and foliar application of nano DAP on growth, yield and economics of fine rice. Bangladesh J Bot. 2023;52(4):1025–31. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v52i4.70589
  29. 29. Moinuddin SK. Effect of nano DAP and seaweed extract on the growth and productivity of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Inceptisols [MSc thesis]. Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya; 2024.
  30. 30. Kushwaha RK, Bharose R, Tripathi M, Katiyar D, Singh RK, Rajput R, et al. Effect of nano urea and nano DAP conjugated with potassium on physical and chemical properties of soil, growth and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) var. Sudha. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2024;8(7):633–7. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i7h.1560
  31. 31. Yewale SV, Ugale NS, Danawale NJ, Ghodke SK, Patil MR, Bodake PS, et al. Response of foliar spray of nano DAP and nutrients on growth, yield and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int J Res Agron. 2025;8(1S):306–10. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2025.v8.i1Se.2422
  32. 32. Reddy KS, Shivay YS, Kumar D, Parida BK, Bora R, Borate RB, et al. Nano DAP augments productivity, phosphorus use efficiency and profitability of spring wheat. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):24771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92364-3
  33. 33. Keerthana S, Rajavel M, Senthil A, Prasanthrajan M, Sivakumar V. Physiological evaluation of nano DAP on growth and yield of tomato. Plant Sci Today. 2025;11(Suppl 4). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.5596
  34. 34. Sarika K, Ramesh G, Srinivasulu K, Latha M. Effect of nano DAP on growth and economics in chickpea. Andhra Agric J. 2024;71(2):141–4. https://doi.org/10.61657/aaj.2024.106

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.