Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp4 (2026): National Symposium on Recent Advances in Life Sciences

Assessment of grain filling dynamics and yield response of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under terminal heat stress

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12888
Submitted
23 November 2025
Published
20-04-2026

Abstract

Wheat yield is highly influenced by the grain filling duration (GFD), during which grains accumulate assimilates. The duration and rate of grain filling directly affect grain weight, thousand-grain weight and final yield, making this stage especially critical in heat-prone regions. To assess the impact of heat stress on grain filling and yield components, a two-year field study (2023–2024 and 2024–2025) was conducted at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Banasthali Vidyapith, Tonk, Rajasthan, using diverse wheat genotypes procured from the Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal. A paired t-test at <0.05 level were carried out between timely and late sown in GFD and in grain weight per plant to check the significant effect of sowing dates on wheat genotypes heat susceptibility index (HIS) values varied significantly among the 16 genotypes, indicating different levels of sensitivity to heat stress. A strong positive Pearson correlation (R2 = 0.7556) in 2023–2024 and (R2 = 0.697) in 2024–2025 was observed between HSI for grain filling duration and HSI for grain weight per plant. Genotypes HD2501, HD2985, HD2177 and DBW90 consistently showed low HSI values for both traits and were identified as heat-tolerant. In contrast, SWATI, UP2425 and DBW222, exhibited high susceptibility and were classified as heat-sensitive. Overall, grain filling duration emerged as a reliable selection trait for identifying heat-tolerant wheat genotypes for breeding and cultivation in heat-affected environments.

References

  1. 1. Zheng X, Qiao L, Liu Y, Wei N, Zhao J, Wu B, et al. Genome-wide association study of grain number in common wheat from Shanxi under different water regimes. Front Plant Sci. 2022;12:806295. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.806295
  2. 2. Zhang X, Li L, Zhang G, Jiu A, Chen C, Zhou J, et al. Straw burial increased wheat yield by decreasing soil moisture levels in a lower Yangtze River field. Field Crops Res. 2025;331:110006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110006
  3. 3. Gerard G, Mondal S, Pinera-Chavez F, Rivera-Amado C, Molero G, Crossa J, et al. Enhanced radiation use efficiency and grain filling rate as the main drivers of grain yield genetic gains in the CIMMYT elite spring wheat yield trial. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):10975. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60853-6
  4. 4. Sharma S, Singh VK, Kumar S, Patel V, Pundir S, Kumar A , et al. Comprehensive analysis of genomic loci associated with glaucousness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through genome-wide association study. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2025;31:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-025-01624-z
  5. 5. Fang Q, Zhang H, He J, Li H, Wang H, Li D, et al. Water use strategies and shoot and root traits of high-yielding winter wheat cultivars under different water supply conditions. Agronomy. 2024;14(4):826. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040826
  6. 6. Hou P, Gao Q, Ren Y, Yu J, Gao L, Liu X, et al. Straw returning and night-warming improve grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of winter wheat under rice–wheat rotation. J Integr Agric. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.12.012
  7. 7. Liang Z, Feng J, Li J, Tang Y, He T, Nangia V , et al. Grain-filling strategies of wheat of contrasting grain sizes under various planting patterns and irrigation levels. Crop J. 2024;12(3):897–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2024.04.012
  8. 8. Fan X, Chen D, Che H, Wang Y, Du Y, Hu X . Deep storage irrigation enhances grain yield of winter wheat by improving plant growth and grain-filling process in Northwest China. Agronomy. 2025;15(8):1852. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15081852
  9. 9. Li A, Hao C, Wang Z, Geng S, Jia M, Wang F, et al. Wheat breeding history reveals synergistic selection of pleiotropic genomic sites for plant architecture and grain yield. Mol Plant. 2022;15(3):504–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2022.01.004
  10. 10. Lekhana MV, Meena RK, Anirudh TV, Barman M, Kumar A, Reddy MS , et al. Effect of terminal heat stress on stay-green and senescence process could explain genetic variation in grain yield and nutritional profile in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-025-01345-z
  11. 11. Ullah B, Lou H, Arif M, Zhang S, Khan HA, Sadozai KN , et al. Optimizing NPK fertilization for enhanced performance of Chinese wheat hybrids under agro-climatic condition of Peshawar Valley. Agronomy. 2024;14(9):1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091904
  12. 12. Yadav A, Upreti H, Singhal GD. Crop water stress index and yield relationships for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops grown under different drip and flood irrigated treatments. J Agron Crop Sci. 2024;210(6):e12775. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12775
  13. 13. Gulino D, Lopes MS. Phenological adaptation of wheat varieties to rising temperatures: Implications for yield components and grain quality. Plants. 2024;13(20):2929. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13202929
  14. 14. Fischer RA, Maurer R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res. 1978;29(5):897–912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.