Research Articles
Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture
Effect of biodynamics on arthropod populations in green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) R.Wilczek)
Department of Entomology, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior 474 002, Madhya Pradesh, India
Department of Entomology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482 004, Madhya Pradesh, India
Department of Entomology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482 004, Madhya Pradesh, India
Department of Entomology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482 004, Madhya Pradesh, India
Department of Entomology, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur 482 004, Madhya Pradesh, India
Abstract
During the kharif season, green gram is a crucial pulse crop. However, arthropod pests, especially jassids and whiteflies, which also serve as yellow mosaic virus vectors, severely limit its yield. Biodynamic formulations and other sustainable pest management strategies are becoming increasingly popular since they are safe for beneficial insects and environment. A field study was carried out on management of arthropods on green gram with biodynamics at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, during the 2022–23 kharif season. Nine treatments, including an untreated control and three replications, were included in the randomised block design experiment. Two concentrations of biodynamic formulations, including Brahmastra, Agniastra, Neemastra and Dasparni Ark, were used. Crop yield, economics, safety to natural enemies, yellow mosaic virus incidence and pest populations all were observed. The result revealed that the most successful treatment was Brahmastra at 45 mL/L, which significantly reduced the infection of yellow mosaic virus as well as the populations of whiteflies and jassids. Brahmastra at 30 mL/L, Agniastra at 45 mL/L, Agniastra at 30 mL/L, Neemastra at 45 mL/L and Neemastra at 30 mL/L followed this treatment, which also produced the best seed production and economic benefits. In comparison, Dasparni Ark at 30 mL/L treatments were less successful. Additionally, it was discovered that all biodynamic treatments were safe for natural enemies. The study showed that biodynamic formulations, especially Brahmastra at 45 mL/L, provide a cost-effective, environmentally safe and efficient way to control whitefly and jassids in green gram. Adoption of these formulations can promote integrated pest control techniques and sustainable crop production, particularly for farmers looking for affordable and environmentally suitable substitutes.
References
- 1. ANGRAU. Green gram outlook report. Agriculture Market Intelligence Centre, Lam; 2021.
- 2. Jayappa, Ramappa HK, Devamani BD. Management of mung bean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5(5):596–601.
- 3. Singh SK, Singh PS. Screening of mung bean (Vigna radiata) genotype against major insects. Curr Adv Agric Sci. 2014;6(1):85–7.
- 4. India. Annual progress report 2021–22, DPD, Bhopal. Government of India; 2022.
- 5. Tamang S, Venkatarao P, Chakraborty G. Varietal screening of mung bean cultivars for resistance/tolerance against insect pests under Terai agro-ecological zone of West Bengal. Int J Plant Prot. 2017;10(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJPP/10.1/7-13
- 6. Selvi R, Muthiah AR, Manivannan N. Tagging of RAPD marker for MYMV resistance in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Asian J Plant Sci. 2006;5(2):277–80. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2006.277.280
- 7. Vairam N, Lavanya SA, Muthamilan M, Vanniarajan C. Screening of M3 mutants for yellow vein mosaic virus resistance in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Int J Plant Sci. 2016;11(2):265–9. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IJPS/11.2/265-269
- 8. Nair RM, Yang RY, Easdown WJ, Thavarajah D, Thavarajah P, Hughes JD, et al. Biofortification of mungbean (Vigna radiata) as a whole food to enhance human health. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93(8):1805–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6110
- 9. Duraimurugan P, Tyagi K. Pest spectra succession and yield losses in mung bean and urd bean under changing climatic scenario. Legume Res. 2014;37(2):212–22. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0976-0571.37.2.032
- 10. Pawar AV, Dahivalkar SS, Shigwan PS, Mehendale SK. Seasonal incidence of pests infesting green gram, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Pharma Innov. 2023;12(6):3191–4.
- 11. Saini D, Meena RS, Singh UP, Singh SP, Chandar AS. Assessment of crop yield losses in green gram due to major insect-pests. Biol Forum. 2023;15(9):1078–80.
- 12. Kumar M, Singh PS. Population dynamics of major insect pest of blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] in relation to weather parameters. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2016;9(4):673–7. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2016.00088.7
- 13. Parmar S, Choudhary JS, Dwarka, Patel DK, Saxena AK, Das SB. Succession of major arthropods in green gram, Vigna radiata (L.): a study at Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2025;28(10):108–15. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i103040
- 14. Singh SP, Singh SK, Chandra U. Incidence of insect pests on summer mungbean in relation to weather parameters. Biol Forum. 2022;14(3):1492–6.
- 15. Parmar S, Saxena AK, Das SB, Choudhary J. Population dynamics of arthropods in green gram [Vigna radiata (L.)] and their correlation with meteorological data at Jabalpur district of Madhya Pradesh, India. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2024;27(11):1252–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i111711
- 16. Li SJ, Xue X, Ahmed MZ, Ren SX, Du YZ, Wu JH, et al. Host plants and natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in China. Insect Sci. 2011;18(1):101–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01395.x
- 17. Singh Y, Jha A, Verma S, Mishra VK, Singh SS. Population dynamics of sucking insect pests and its natural enemies on okra agro ecosystem in Chitrakoot region. Afr J Agric Res. 2013;8(28):3814–9. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR12.1743
- 18. Ramesh SV, Sahu PP, Prasad M, Praveen S, Pappu HR. Gemini viruses and plant hosts: a closer examination of the molecular arms race. Viruses. 2017;9(9):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9090256
- 19. Malathi VC, John P. Mungbean yellow mosaic viruses. In: Van Regenmortel M, Mahy B, editors. Desk encyclopedia of plant and fungal virology. London: Academic Press; 2009. p.217–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012374410-4.00708-1
- 20. Kabir M, Afzal Hossain M, Farhat T, Yasmin S, Rahman N, Md F. Effects of different botanicals and chemicals on the incidence of sucking insect pests and their impact on mosaic disease of mung bean. Niaz Md Farhat Rahman. 2014;3:62–8.
- 21. Hossain MA, Islam KMS, Mondal ATMAI. Effect of sowing date on lentil aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch infestation and yield contributing characters of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). J Bio Sci. 2000;8:115–7.
- 22. Sekar S, Nalini R. Varietal screening of mungbean genotypes against whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.), mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) and cercospora leaf spot. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(3):1278–85. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.147
- 23. Nariani TK. Yellow mosaic of mungbean (Phaseolus aureus L.). Indian Phytopathol. 1960;13(1):24–9.
- 24. Thongmeearkom P, Honda Y, Saito Y, Syamananda R. Nuclear ultrastructural changes and aggregates of virus-like particles in mungbean cells affected by mungbean yellow mosaic disease. Phytopathology. 1981;71:41–4. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-71-41
- 25. Patel RD, Bharpoda TM, Board PK, Bhatt NA, Mahida RD. Efficacy of different bio-pesticides against sucking pests of Bt cotton. Adv Res J Crop Improv. 2017;6(1):171–80.
- 26. Pathak VM, Verma VK, Rawat BS, Kaur B, Babu N, Sharma A, et al. Current status of pesticide effects on the environment, human health and its eco-friendly management as bioremediation. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:962619. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.962619
- 27. Bhullar MB, Heikal MH, Kaur P, Kaur R. Efficacy of natural products and biorationals against two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) infesting brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) under protected cultivation. Int J Acarol. 2021;47(8):677–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2021.1987982
- 28. Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1984.
- 29. Logeswaran K, Kambrekar DN, Mallapur CP, Biradar MS. Management of sucking pests of capsicum by using botanicals under protected condition. J Farm Sci. 2023;36(1):91–7. https://doi.org/10.61475/jfm.v36i01.323
- 30. Kumar GVS, Sarada O. Evaluation of cow based fermented organic products for non-insecticidal pest management in castor. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(10):292–300. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.910.037
- 31. Ananthi M, Selvaraju P, Sundaralingam K. Evaluation of seed biopriming with biocontrol agents and biopesticides spraying on pests and its effect on seed yield and quality in chilli. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2017;5(4):667–72.
- 32. Sreekanth M, Ramana MV. Performance of certain indigenous products against pod borers in pigeonpea. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2020;8(6):960–4. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5ah.10691
- 33. Subha B, Marabi RS, Das SB, Chaukikar K, Gupta V. Bio-efficacy of biodynamics and botanicals against major insect pests of summer green gram and their impact on natural enemies. Int J Adv Biochem Res. 2025;9(9):263–6. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i9d.5584
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.