Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp4 (2026): National Symposium on Recent Advances in Life Sciences

Breaking the colour barrier: Role of extremophiles in azo dye degradation

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.12941
Submitted
26 November 2025
Published
31-07-2026

Abstract

Effluents released from textile industries are a major source of environmental pollution containing largest and most extensively used category of synthetic azo dyes that are widely utilised in multiple industries and have limitations to the conventional physico-chemical treatments. Bioremediation is green remediation approach that involves microorganisms or their enzymes to degrade and detoxify the pollutants from the environment. Extremophiles that thrive at extreme environmental conditions such as hot water springs have the efficiency to decolorise and detoxify the azo dyes textile wastewater. The quantitative analysis show that extremophiles achieve more than 85–95 % decolorisation of different azo dye in a short retention time at high temperature and pH, with higher efficiency and degradation rate than mesophiles. The mechanism includes reductive cleavage of azo bonds, followed by mineralisation and co-metabolism, with the help of extremozymes such as azoreductase, laccase and peroxidase. Enzymes are integrated with nano-materials forming a nano-biocatalytic platform that enhance dye degradation removal efficiency. The current study highlights the potential and application of extremophilic bacteria as a sustainable bioresource in the remediation of azo dyes and places them at the centre of new generation wastewater treatment.

References

  1. 1. Khan S, Malik A. Environmental and health effects of textile industry wastewater. In: Environmental Deterioration and Human Health: Natural and Anthropogenic Determinants. Springer; 2013. p. 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7890-0_4
  2. 2. Tripathi M, Tripathi M, Singh S, Pathak S, Kasaudhan J, Mishra A, Bala S, et al. Recent strategies for the remediation of textile dyes from wastewater: a systematic review. Toxics. 2023;11(11):940. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11110940
  3. 3. Al-Tohamy R, Ali SS, Li F, Okasha KM, Mahmoud YA-G, Elsamahy T, et al. A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;231:113160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160
  4. 4. Alzain H, Kalimugogo V, Hussein K, Karkadan M. A review of environmental impact of azo dyes. Int J Res Rev. 2023;10(6):673–89. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230682
  5. 5. Gayathri K, Saranraj P, Nayak AK, Kesavardhini K, Lokeshwari B, Cardoso AM. Microbial innovations for sustainable wastewater management: a comprehensive review of azo dye bioremediation. Sustainability. 2026;18(6):3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063041
  6. 6. Bora N, Joshi DP, Sharma R. Contamination toxicity and remediation of stable dyes and oils in aquatic wastewater systems. Discov Environ. 2026;4(1):166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-026-00680-w
  7. 7. Kathing C, Saini G. A review of various treatment methods for the removal of dyes from textile effluent. Recent Prog Mater. 2022;4(4):1–15. https://doi.org/10.21926/rpm.2204028
  8. 8. Jamee R, Siddique R. Biodegradation of synthetic dyes of textile effluent by microorganisms: an environmentally and economically sustainable approach. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2019;9(4):114–18. https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2019.00018
  9. 9. Rane A, Joshi SJ. Biodecolorization and biodegradation of dyes: a review. Open Biotechnol J. 2021;15(1):97–109. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874070702115010097
  10. 10. Tekere M, Kalu CM. Extremophiles of polluted environments: mechanisms of surviving extreme pollution settings. Int J Agric Biosci. 2026;15(4):1618–31.
  11. 11. Afoma UM, Malik J, Singh S, Mishra AK, Naushad Z, Tomar A, et al. Sustainable solutions for textile dye based water pollution: a comprehensive review of degradation methods and enzymatic mechanisms. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2026;16(4):147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-025-06984-w
  12. 12. Mesbah NM. Industrial biotechnology based on enzymes from extreme environments. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:870083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.870083
  13. 13. da Rosa DF, Macedo AJ. The genus Anoxybacillus: an emerging and versatile source of valuable biotechnological products. Extremophiles. 2023;27(3):22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-023-01305-3
  14. 14. Guo G, Liu C, Hao J, Tian F, Ding K, Zhang C, et al. Development and characterization of a halo-thermophilic bacterial consortium for decolorization of azo dye. Chemosphere. 2021;272:129916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129916
  15. 15. Sharma J. Decolourization of dyes by Alcaligenes faecalis and Bacillus flexus isolated from textile effluent [thesis]. 2018.
  16. 16. Sarethy IP, Saxena Y, Kapoor A, Sharma M, Sharma SK, Gupta V, et al. Alkaliphilic bacteria: applications in industrial biotechnology. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;38(7):769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-011-0968-x
  17. 17. Tadesse M, Liu Y. Recent advances in enzyme immobilization: the role of artificial intelligence, novel nanomaterials, and dynamic carrier systems. Catalysts. 2025;15(6):571. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15060571
  18. 18. Aneja K, Purohit A, Yadav SK. Metal-resistant mesophilic laccase from Achromobacter species: identification, physical characterisation, and dye bioremediation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2026:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-025-05495-8
  19. 19. Pinheiro LRS, Gradíssimo DG, Xavier LP, Santos AV. Degradation of azo dyes: bacterial potential for bioremediation. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031510
  20. 20. Ding J, Huang Z, Zhang D, Qu Y, Zhang S, Zhang C, et al. Rational structural design of aromatic azo photoactive small molecules for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2025;54(22):10363–96. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5CS00334B
  21. 21. Ward DM, Ferris MJ, Nold SC, Bateson MM. A natural view of microbial biodiversity within hot spring cyanobacterial mat communities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(4):1353–70. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1353-1370.1998
  22. 22. Soy S, Lakra U, Prakash P, Suravajhala P, Nigam VK, Sharma SR, et al. Exploring microbial diversity in hot springs of Surajkund, India through 16S rRNA analysis and thermozyme characterization from endogenous isolates. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):14221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41515-5
  23. 23. Narsing Rao MP, Dong ZY, Luo ZH, Li MM, Liu BB, Guo SX, et al. Physicochemical and microbial diversity analyses of Indian hot springs. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:627200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.627200
  24. 24. Puente-Sanchez F, Chavarria M. Diversity of extremophiles in time and space. Microorganisms. 2021;9(12):2472. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9122472
  25. 25. Ditiawati P, Yohandini H, Madayanti F. Microbial diversity of acidic hot spring (Kawah Hujan B) in geothermal field of Kamojang area, West Java, Indonesia. Open Microbiol J. 2009;3:58. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285800903010058
  26. 26. Qiu H, Shen F, Yin A, Liu J, Wu B, Li Y, et al. Biodegradation and detoxification of azo dyes by halophilic/halotolerant microflora isolated from the salt fields of Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:877151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.877151
  27. 27. Gursahani Y, Gupta S. Decolourization of textile effluent by a thermophilic bacterium Anoxybacillus rupiensis. J Pet Environ Biotechnol. 2011;2:1–4.
  28. 28. Sharma N, Leung IK. Novel thermophilic bacterial laccase for the degradation of aromatic organic pollutants. Front Chem. 2021;9:711345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.711345
  29. 29. Gallo G, Aulitto M. Advances in extremophile research: biotechnological applications through isolation and identification techniques. Life. 2024;14(9):1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14091205
  30. 30. Srinivasan S, Bankole PO, Sadasivam SK. Biodecolorization and degradation of textile azo dyes using Lysinibacillus sphaericus MTCC 9523. Front Environ Sci. 2022;10:990855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.990855
  31. 31. Wang J, Zhang X, Li Y, Wang H, Liu Z, Chen Q, et al. Bacterial laccase of Anoxybacillus ayderensis SK3-4 from hot springs showing potential for industrial dye decolorization. Ann Microbiol. 2020;70(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-020-01593-6
  32. 32. Mohammad BT, Al Daghistani HI, Jaouani A, Abdel-Latif S, Kennes C. Isolation and characterization of thermophilic bacteria from Jordanian hot springs: Bacillus licheniformis and Thermomonas hydrothermalis isolates as potential producers of thermostable enzymes. Int J Microbiol. 2017;2017(1):6943952. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6943952
  33. 33. Opperman DJ, Sewell BT, Litthauer D, Isupov MN, Littlechild JA, van Heerden E. Crystal structure of a thermostable old yellow enzyme from Thermus scotoductus SA-01. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;393(3):426–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.011
  34. 34. Ngo ACR, Tischler D. Microbial degradation of azo dyes: approaches and prospects for a hazard-free conversion by microorganisms. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(8):4740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084740
  35. 35. Champagne PP, Ramsay J. Reactive blue 19 decolouration by laccase immobilized on silica beads. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;77(4):819–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1208-1
  36. 36. Aragaw TA, Bogale FM, Gessesse A. Adaptive response of thermophiles to redox stress and their role in the process of dye degradation from textile industry wastewater. Front Physiol. 2022;13:908370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.908370
  37. 37. Matsumoto KI, Mukai Y, Ogata D, Shozui F, Nduko JM, Taguchi S, et al. Characterization of thermostable FMN-dependent NADH azoreductase from the moderate thermophile Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86(5):1431–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2351-7
  38. 38. Guan G, Li B, Xu L, Qian J, Zou B, Huo S, Ding Z, et al. Improving the properties of laccase through heterologous expression and protein engineering. Microorganisms. 2025;13(6):1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13061422
  39. 39. Yuan X, Tian G, Zhao Y, Zhao L, Wang H, Ng TB. Degradation of dyes using crude extract and a thermostable and pH-stable laccase isolated from Pleurotus nebrodensis. Biosci Rep. 2016;36(4):e00365. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20160163
  40. 40. Rodríguez-Escribano D, Pliego-Magán R, de Salas F, Aza P, Gentili P, Ihalainen P, et al. Tailor-made alkaliphilic and thermostable fungal laccases for industrial wood processing. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022;15(1):149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-022-02247-2
  41. 41. Salem MA, Nour El-Din HT, Hashem AM, Aziz RK. Genome-scale investigation of the regulation of azoR expression in Escherichia coli using computational analysis and transposon mutagenesis. Microb Ecol. 2024;87(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-024-02380-5
  42. 42. Zhuang M, Sanganyado E, Xu L, Zhu J, Li P, Liu W. High throughput sediment DNA sequencing reveals azo dye degrading bacteria inhabit nearshore sediments. Microorganisms. 2020;8(2):233. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020233
  43. 43. Koul B, Poonia AK, Yadav D, Jin JO. Microbe-mediated biosynthesis of nanoparticles: Applications and future prospects. Biomolecules. 2021;11(6):886. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060886
  44. 44. Siddiqi KS, Husen A, Rao RA. A review on biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles and their biocidal properties. J Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0334-5
  45. 45. Essghaier B, Dridi R, Mottola F, Rocco L, Zid MF, Hannachi H. Biosynthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles from the extremophile plant Aeonium haworthii and their antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-diabetic capacities. Nanomaterials. 2022;13(1):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13010100
  46. 46. Mikhailova EO. Gold nanoparticles: biosynthesis and potential of biomedical application. J Funct Biomater. 2021;12(4):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12040070
  47. 47. Mahlaule-Glory LM, Mapetla S, Makofane A, Mathipa MM, Hintsho-Mbita NC. Biosynthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles for the degradation of methylene blue dye, sulfisoxazole antibiotic and removal of bacteria from real water. Heliyon. 2022;8(9):e10536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10536
  48. 48. Alsaiari NS, Amari A, Katubi KM, Alzahrani FM, Harharah HN, Rebah FB, et al. The biocatalytic degradation of organic dyes using laccase immobilized magnetic nanoparticles. Appl Sci. 2021;11(17):8216. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178216
  49. 49. Parvathiraja C, Paulkumar K, Gupta JK, Mouni L, Almutairi TM, Nguyen VH. Biogenic synthesis of SnO₂ nanoparticles using Albizia saman leaf extract for visible light-driven photocatalytic dye degradation and antibacterial applications. Arab J Sci Eng. 2026;51(2):1639–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-025-10200-2
  50. 50. Rouhani S, Azizi S, Kibechu RW, Mamba BB, Msagati TA. Laccase immobilized Fe₃O₄-graphene oxide nanobiocatalyst improves stability and immobilization efficiency in the green preparation of sulfa drugs. Catalysts. 2020;10(4):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10040459
  51. 51. Gao Z, Yi Y, Zhao J, Xia Y, Jiang M, Cao F, et al. Co-immobilization of laccase and TEMPO onto amino-functionalized magnetic Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles and its application in acid fuchsin decolorization. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2018;5(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-018-0215-7
  52. 52. Wang H, Zhang W, Zhao J, Xu L, Zhou C, Chang L, et al. Rapid decolorization of phenolic azo dyes by immobilized laccase with Fe₃O₄/SiO₂ nanoparticles as support. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52(12):4401–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie302627c
  53. 53. Nandasana M, Ghosh S. Biogenic nanoparticles for dye removal. In: Advances in Chemical Pollution, Environmental Management and Protection. Elsevier; 2024. p. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apmp.2023.06.013
  54. 54. Miyawaki A, Sakai S. Immobilization of laccases on mechanically ground silk fibroin nanofibers for enhanced stability. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;282:136745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136745
  55. 55. Farastoon Dashti SS, Ansari I, Emamshoushtari MM, Helchi S, Lessage G, Heran M, et al. Comparison of batch and continuous operation modes for maxilon red azo dye removal using Chlorella vulgaris microalgae within photobioreactor (PBR) and a dynamic membrane photobioreactor (DMPBR). Front Membr Sci Technol. 2025;4:1653159. https://doi.org/10.3389/frmst.2025.1653159
  56. 56. Zdarta J, Jankowska K, Bachosz K, Degórska O, Kaźmierczak K, Nguyen LN, et al. Enhanced wastewater treatment by immobilized enzymes. Curr Pollut Rep. 2021;7(2):167–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-021-00183-7
  57. 57. Peñaranda PA, Noguera MJ, Florez SL, Husserl J, Ornelas-Soto N, Cruz JC, et al. Treatment of wastewater, phenols and dyes using novel magnetic torus microreactors and laccase immobilized on magnetite nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(10):1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101688
  58. 58. Ilyas A, Batool K. Innovative enzymatic and microbial approaches for wastewater bioremediation: Advances in enzyme engineering, biotechnology, and nanotechnology for sustainable water management-A comprehensive review. Premier J Sci. 2025;9. https://doi.org/10.70389/PJS.100074
  59. 59. Orasugh JT, Gabi B, Zaman A, Banerjee P, Chattopadhyay D. Challenges in the scale-up of MES for wastewater treatment. In: Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes. Elsevier; 2023. p. 257–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88505-8.00006-1
  60. 60. Kuremaganahalli Basavaraja A, Kyathanahally Rajashekarappa K, Basavarajappa A, Neelagund SE, Hanumanthanaik D, Dummi Mahadevan G. Efficient biodegradation of textile azo dye Congo red by thermophilic Geobacillus thermoleovorans. Bioremediation J. 2025:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889868.2025.2549005
  61. 61. Schultz J, Modolon F, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS. Shedding light on the composition of extreme microbial dark matter: alternative approaches for culturing extremophiles. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1167718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1167718
  62. 62. Guo MT, Rotem A, Heyman JA, Weitz DA. Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput biological assays. Lab Chip. 2012;12(12):2146–55. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc21147e
  63. 63. Murray EM, Allen CF, Handy TE, Huffine CA, Craig WR, Seaton SC, et al. Development of a robust and quantitative high-throughput screening method for antibiotic production in bacterial libraries. ACS Omega. 2019;4(13):15414–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01461
  64. 64. Jasińska A, Walaszczyk A, Paraszkiewicz K. Omics-based approaches in research on textile dye microbial decolorization. Molecules. 2024;29(12):2771. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29122771
  65. 65. Zhou X, Fornara D, Ikenaga M, Akagi I, Zhang R, Jia Z. The resilience of microbial community under drying and rewetting cycles of three forest soils. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01101
  66. 66. Zhu D, Adebisi WA, Ahmad F, Sethupathy S, Danso B, Sun J. Recent development of extremophilic bacteria and their application in biorefinery. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00483
  67. 67. Jirasaranporn A, Jantharadej K, Wongwailikhit K, Chawengkijwanich C, Lohwatcharin J, Suwannasilp BB. A pilot-scale anaerobic moving-bed biofilm reactor with PVA gel beads as media for the treatment of fish canning industry wastewater. Water Reuse. 2022;12(2):206–22. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2022.090
  68. 68. Miah MS, Hossain MS, Ali MS, Shahid SB, Sharmin S, Zakir HM. Textile effluent treatment in a pilot-scale UASB bioreactor followed by biofilter and aerobic processes. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng. 2025;11:101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.101075
  69. 69. Papadia S, Rovero G, Fava F, Di Gioia D. Comparison of different pilot scale bioreactors for the treatment of a real wastewater from the textile industry. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2011;65(3):396–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.01.002
  70. 70. Uddin M, Islam MK, Dev S. Investigation of the performance of the combined moving bed bioreactor-membrane bioreactor (MBBR-MBR) for textile wastewater treatment. Heliyon. 2024;10(10):e31358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31358
  71. 71. Justino CI, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos TA. Recent progress in biosensors for environmental monitoring: a review. Sensors. 2017;17(12):2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122918
  72. 72. Darwish MA, Abd-Elaziem W, Elsheikh A, Zayed AA. Advancements in nanomaterials for nanosensors: a comprehensive review. Nanoscale Adv. 2024;6(16):4015–46. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NA00214H
  73. 73. Shamshad J, Rehman RU. Innovative approaches to sustainable wastewater treatment: a comprehensive exploration of conventional and emerging technologies. Environ Sci Adv. 2025;4(2):189–222. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4VA00136B
  74. 74. Agarwala O, Das M, Bhandary S, Ghosh A. Bio-nanotechnology for effluent treatment. In: Sustainable Effluent Treatment and Resource Recovery. Vol. 1. ACS Publications; 2025. p. 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2025-1517.ch006

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.