Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Social network analysis for mapping stakeholders of litchi supply chain in Bihar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13104
Submitted
6 December 2025
Published
06-05-2026

Abstract

Litchi, a sub-tropical fruit crop, plays a crucial role in supporting rural livelihoods in Bihar, which contributes nearly three-fourths of India’s total litchi production. However, despite having considerable potential, its contribution to Bihar’s economy remains limited owing to structural inefficiencies and weak coordination among stakeholders in the litchi supply chain. The highly perishable nature of the fruit, inadequate infrastructure and fragmented stakeholder linkages further constrain its economic performance. Therefore, understanding stakeholder interactions is essential for strengthening supply chain governance. This study applies social network analysis (SNA) using the Net-Map methodology to examine the structure, roles, power relations and interconnections among key stakeholders in the litchi supply chain of Muzaffarpur district, Bihar. A symmetric square matrix was created to establish linkages among stakeholders, along with an influence-power matrix that was tabulated to evaluate their relative influence and strategic positioning. Centrality measures, including degree, closeness, betweenness and eigenvector centrality, were computed using Gephi software to identify dominant and intermediary actors. The findings reveal that pre-harvest contractors and growers occupy central and highly influential positions within the network, while institutional actors such as government agencies and research institutes remain moderately connected. Weak integration between institutional and primary actors limits innovation diffusion and coordinated market expansion. Strengthening stakeholder collaboration through targeted policy interventions and improved network connectivity can enhance efficiency, reduce post-harvest losses and expand export potential. The study demonstrates the importance of SNA as a diagnostic and policy-support tool for improving agricultural value chains and boosting farmers’ economic returns in Bihar.

References

  1. 1. Sahni RK, Kumari S, Kumar M, Kumar M, Kumar A. Status of litchi cultivation in India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(4):1827–40. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.904.214
  2. 2. Schiffer E, Hauck J. Net-Map: Collecting social network data through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods. 2010;22(3):231–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10374798
  3. 3. Acharjee G, Upadhyay AD, Tamuly A, Pal P. Supply chain management of litchi: A case study in Sonitpur district of Assam. Assam (India); 2021. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.2.2021.17
  4. 4. National Horticulture Board. Area and production statistics of horticulture crops. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India; 2023.
  5. 5. Directorate of Horticulture, Bihar. Statistical handbook of horticulture crops; 2022.
  6. 6. Mitra SK. Post-harvest management of litchi in India: Challenges and prospects. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 2018;75(1):1–10.
  7. 7. Porter ME. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press; 1985.
  8. 8. Adil A, Syarief R, Widiatmaka, Najib M. Stakeholder analysis and prioritization of sustainable organic farming management. Sustainability. 2022;14(24):16706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416706
  9. 9. Schiffer E, Hauck J. Net-Map: Collecting social network data and facilitating network learning. Field Methods. 2010;22(3):231–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10374798
  10. 10. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2018.
  11. 11. Brandes U, Borgatti SP, Everett MG. Network analysis and centrality: Concepts and applications; 2016.
  12. 12. Dinh PT, Huyen M, Tung N, Tu B, Hung P. Factors affecting lychee supply chain linkage and business performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2022;10(1):43–8. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.10.011
  13. 13. Erçetin ŞŞ, Neyişci NB. Social network analysis: A brief introduction. In: Chaos, complexity and leadership. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 167–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18693-1_16
  14. 14. Siems E, Seuring S. Stakeholder management in sustainable supply chains: A case study of a German apparel frontrunner. Bus Strategy Environ. 2021;30(7):3105–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2792
  15. 15. FAO. Developing sustainable agricultural value chains. Rome: FAO; 2014.
  16. 16. Pathak GP, Kumar BG, Seema S. Supply chain analysis of litchi in Muzaffarpur district of Bihar. Bihar (India); 2017.
  17. 17. Nadhika K, Krishnan Kutty J. Stakeholder analysis for farmer-inclusive value chain development in mango. J Ext Educ. 2017;29(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.26725/JEE.2017.1.29.5797-5805
  18. 18. Porter ME. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press; 1985.
  19. 19. Porter ME. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press; 1985.
  20. 20. Reardon T, Timmer CP, Barrett CB, Berdegué J. The rise of supermarkets in developing countries. Am J Agric Econ. 2003;85(5):1140–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2003.00520.x
  21. 21. Rosales AP, Linnemann AR, Luning PA. Net-Map analysis of stakeholder roles and influence in agri-food systems. Food Control. 2023;154:109966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109966
  22. 22. Schiffer E, Waale D. Tracing power and influence in networks: Net-Map as a tool for research and strategic network planning. Washington (DC): IFPRI; 2008.
  23. 23. Scott J. Social network analysis. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2017. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716597
  24. 24. Sivakumar D, Korsten L. Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). In: Postharvest biology and technology of tropical and subtropical fruits. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2011. p. 361–409. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857092885.361
  25. 25. Asir M, Darma R, Arsyad M. Study on stakeholders' position and role in agricultural supply chain. Int J Supply Chain Manag. 2019;8(1):1–9.
  26. 26. Tabassum S, Pereira FS, Fernandes S, Gama J. Social network analysis: An overview. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2018;8(5):e1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1256
  27. 27. Valente TW, Coronges K, Lakon C, Costenbader E. How correlated are network centrality measures? Connections. 2008;28(1):16–26.
  28. 28. Vinokurov E, et al. Global value chains and connectivity. J Econ Integr. 2019;34(3):394–418.
  29. 29. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
  30. 30. Birthal PS, Joshi PK, Gulati A. Vertical coordination in high-value commodities. MTID Discussion Paper No. 85. IFPRI; 2005.
  31. 31. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.