Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Study of weed growth and its interaction with direct-seeded rice (DSR) under different herbicides and irrigation conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13154
Submitted
11 December 2025
Published
20-04-2026

Abstract

Rice cultivation continuously remains important for food and livelihood security. The forecasts of increasing water shortage under a changing climate and rising labour scarcities in agriculture have brought a paradigm swing in rice cultivation from the transplanting method (flooded) to direct-seeded rice (DSR). Despite all these returns, the potential yield losses through enormous weed threats under DSR remain a challenge and may reduce yield by up to 50 %. Several Southeast Asian nations have seen a transition in long-term DSR agriculture towards dominating grassy weeds, including Echinochloa crusgalli, Leptochloa chinensis and Ischaemum rugosum. DSR favours the proliferation of grasses and sedges over broadleaf weeds due to the absence of flooding, which is a natural weed suppressant in TPR. Early flooding in TPR can effectively suppress weed emergence, whereas DSR offers limited scope for early flooding since most rice cultivars are intolerant to anaerobic conditions during the germination process. However, anaerobic germination-tolerant rice varieties may enable early flooding and better weed control in DSR. Soil moisture, tillage techniques and application time all have a significant impact on their control efficacy. Crop phytotoxicity and decreased herbicide efficacy might result from improper soil moisture at the time of application. Herbicides may be washed away by excessive irrigation after application, while absorption may be hampered by inadequate moisture. Studies advise using herbicides soon after irrigation when the soil is sufficiently saturated. The efficacy of herbicides is also affected by variations in seasonal rainfall. For DSR systems to maintain productivity and reduce weed-related losses, integrated weed management, which includes prudent herbicide usage and water management, is essential.

References

  1. 1. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. World agricultural production: rice. Washington (DC): USDA-FAS; 2025 [cited 2026 Mar 15]. Circular Series No.: WAP 3–25. Available from: https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/0422110
  2. 2. Anand S. Indias’ rice output may hit record 152 MT in 2025–26, says US Department of Agriculture. The Economic Times [Internet]. 2024 Oct 10 [cited 2026 Mar 15]. Available from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/indias-rice-output-may-hit-record-152-mt-in-2025-26/articleshow/125920140.cms
  3. 3. Valera H, Balié J. The outlook of the rice economy. Los Banos (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute; 2020;8(2):35.
  4. 4. Singh G, Ranguwal S. Optimizing water and energy use in rice production through direct seeding in Punjab, India. Indian J Ecol. 2024;51(6):1209–11.
  5. 5. Chaudhary A, Venkatramanan V, Kumar Mishra A, Sharma S. Agronomic and environmental determinants of direct seeded rice in South Asia. Circ Econ Sust. 2023;3(1):253–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00173-x
  6. 6. Kumar V, Ladha JK. Direct seeding of rice: recent developments and future research needs. Adv Agron. 2011;111:297–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1
  7. 7. Chakraborty D, Ladha JK, Rana DS, Jat ML, Gathala MK, Yadav S, et al. A global analysis of alternative tillage and crop establishment practices for economically and environmentally efficient rice production. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9342. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09742-9
  8. 8. Hellin J, Balié J, Fisher E, Kohli A, Connor M, Yadav S, et al. Trans-disciplinary responses to climate change: lessons from rice-based systems in Asia. Climate. 2020;8(2):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8020035
  9. 9. Rao AN, Brainard DC, Kumar V, Ladha JK, Johnson DE. Preventive weed management in direct-seeded rice: targeting the weed seedbank. Adv Agron. 2017;144:45–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.02.002
  10. 10. Laik R, Sharma S, Idris M, Singh AK, Singh SS, Bhatt BP, et al. Integration of conservation agriculture with best management practices for improving system performance of the rice–wheat rotation in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2014;195:68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.06.001
  11. 11. Kumar V, Jat HS, Sharma PC, Singh B, Gathala MK, Malik RK, et al. Can productivity and profitability be enhanced in intensively managed cereal systems while reducing the environmental footprint of production? Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018;252:132–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.006
  12. 12. Kakumanu KR, Kotapati GR, Nagothu US, Kuppanan P, Kallam SR. Adaptation to climate change and variability: a case of direct-seeded rice in Andhra Pradesh, India. J Water Clim Change. 2019;10:419–30. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2018.141
  13. 13. Gathala M, Kumar V, Sharma PC, Saharawat Y, Jat HS, Singh M, et al. Optimizing intensive cereal-based cropping systems addressing current and future drivers of agricultural change in the northwestern Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2013;177:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.06.002
  14. 14. Ladha JK, Rao AN, Raman AK, Padre AT, Dobermann A, Gathala M, et al. Agronomic improvements can make future cereal systems in South Asia far more productive and result in a lower environmental footprint. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22:1054–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13143
  15. 15. Padre AT, Rai M, Kumar V, Gathala M, Sharma PC, Sharma S, et al. Quantifying changes to the global warming potential of rice–wheat systems with the adoption of conservation agriculture in northwestern India. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;219:125–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.020
  16. 16. Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA). Cereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) Phase II annual report 2013. New Delhi (India): International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center; 2017.
  17. 17. Bhullar MS, Singh S, Kumar S, Gill G. Agronomic and economic impacts of direct seeded rice in Punjab. Agric Res J. 2018;55:236–42. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2018.00038.8
  18. 18. Devkota M, Devkota KP, Acharya S, McDonald AJ. Increasing profitability, yields and yield stability through sustainable crop establishment practices in the rice–wheat systems of Nepal. Agric Syst. 2019;173:414–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.022
  19. 19. Das TK, Ghosh S, Das A, Sen S, Datta D, Ghosh S, et al. Conservation agriculture impacts on productivity, resource-use efficiency and environmental sustainability: a holistic review. Indian J Agron. 2021;66:S111–27.
  20. 20. Kumar R, Choudhary JS, Mishra JS. Outburst of pest populations in rice-based cropping systems under conservation agricultural practices in the middle Indo-Gangetic Plains of South Asia. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3753. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07760-w
  21. 21. Ziska LH, David RG, Burgos N, Caicedo J, Gressel N, Lawton-Rauh L, et al. Weedy (red) rice: an emerging constraint to global rice production. Adv Agron. 2015;129:2–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.09.003
  22. 22. Van Chin D. Biology and management of barnyardgrass, red sprangletop and weedy rice. Weed Biol Manag. 2001;1:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2001.00009.x
  23. 23. Yaduraju NT, Mishra JS. Sedges in rice culture and their management. In: Singh Y, Singh G, Singh VP, Singh P, Hardy B, Johnson DE, et al., editors. Direct seeding of rice and weed management in the irrigated rice–wheat cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Pantnagar (India): Directorate of Experiment Station, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology; 2005. p.17.
  24. 24. Fried G, Kazakou E, Gaba S. Trajectories of weed communities explained by traits associated with species’ response to management practices. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2012;158:147–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.005
  25. 25. Gaba S, Fried G, Kazakou E, Chauvel B, Navas ML. Agro-ecological weed control using a functional approach: a review of cropping systems diversity. Agron Sustain Dev. 2014;34:103–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0166-5
  26. 26. Susha VS, Das TK, Nath CP, Pandey R, Paul S, Ghosh S. Impacts of tillage and herbicide mixture on weed interference, agronomic productivity and profitability of a maize–wheat system in the North-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Res. 2018;219:180–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.003
  27. 27. Juraimi AS, Najib MYM, Begum M, Anuar AR, Azmi M, Puteh A. Critical period of weed competition in direct seeded rice under saturated and flooded conditions. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci. 2009;32:305–16.
  28. 28. Yaduraju NT, Mishra JS. Sedges in rice culture and their management. Direct seeding of rice and weed management in the irrigated rice–wheat cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. 2008:191–203.
  29. 29. Singh SSK. Production potential of the direct-seeded rice–wheat cropping system. Direct seeding of rice and weed management in the irrigated rice–wheat cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. 2008;1:61.
  30. 30. Rodenburg J, Bastiaans L, Kropff MJ. Characterization of host tolerance to Striga hermonthica. Euphytica. 2006;147:353–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-9030-2
  31. 31. Rao AN, Moody K. Weed ecology in farmers’ transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). In: 17th Anniversary and Annual Convention of the Pest Control Council of the Philippines; 1986 May 8–10; Iloilo City, Philippines. Los Baños: IRRI; 1986.
  32. 32. Estioko LP, Miro B, Baltazar AM, Merca FE, Ismail AM, Johnson DE. Differences in responses to flooding by germinating seeds of two contrasting rice cultivars and two species of economically important grass weeds. AoB Plants. 2014;6:plu064. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu064
  33. 33. Opena JL, Chauhan BS, Baltazar AM. Seed germination ecology of Echinochloa glabrescens and its implication for management in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS One. 2014;9(3):92261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092261
  34. 34. Kumar V, Singh S, Chhokar RS, Malik RK, Brainard DC, Ladha JK. Weed management strategies to reduce herbicide use in zero-till rice–wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Weed Technol. 2013;27(1):241–54. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-12-00069.1
  35. 35. Yadav DB, Yadav A, Gill G. Direct seeded rice in north-western India: shift in weed flora and its management. In: 25th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference; 2015 Oct 13–16; Jabalpur, India. Hyderabad: Indian Society of Weed Science; 2015. p. 58.
  36. 36. Yaduraju NT, Rao AN, Bhullar MS, Gill JS, Malik RK. Direct-seeded rice (DSR) in India: new opportunities for rice production and weed management in post-COVID-19 pandemic period. Weeds J Asian-Pac Weed Sci Soc. 2021;3(2):30–48.
  37. 37. Smith RJ, Fox WT. Soil water and growth of rice and weeds. Weed Sci. 1973;21:61–3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500031702
  38. 38. Zuo R, Qiang S. Species and dynamics of floating weed seeds in paddy field. Biodivers Sci. 2008;16:8–14. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2008.07094
  39. 39. Li RH, Qiang S. Composition of floating weed seeds in lowland rice fields in China and the effects of irrigation frequency and previous crops. Weed Res. 2009;49(4):417–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00709.x
  40. 40. Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Implications of narrow crop row spacing and delayed Echinochloa colona and Echinochloa crus-galli emergence for weed growth and crop yield loss in aerobic rice. Field Crops Res. 2010;117(2–3):177–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.02.014
  41. 41. Shekhawat K, Rathore SS, Chauhan BS. Weed management in dry direct-seeded rice: a review on challenges and opportunities for sustainable rice production. Agronomy. 2020;10(9):1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091264
  42. 42. Trivedi N, Dubey A. Degradation studies of pendimethalin by indigenous soil bacterium Pseudomonas strain PD1 using spectrophotometric scanning and FTIR. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(7):4499–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02439-8
  43. 43. Xu L, Yuan S, Wang X, Chen Z, Li X, Cao J, et al. Comparison of yield performance between direct-seeded and transplanted double season rice using ultrashort duration varieties in central China. Crop J. 2022;10(2):515–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2021.07.003
  44. 44. Tian J, Li S, Xing Z, Cheng S, Guo B, Hu Y, et al. Differences in rice yield and biomass accumulation dynamics for different direct seeding methods after wheat straw return. Food Energy Secur. 2022;11(4):425. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.425
  45. 45. Martin R, Som B, Janiya J, Rien R, Yous S, Chhun S, et al. Integrated management of weeds in direct-seeded rice in Cambodia. Agronomy. 2020;10(10):1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101557
  46. 46. Jabran K, Farooq M, Hussain M, Khan MB, Shahid M, Lee DJ. Efficient weeds control with penoxsulam application ensures higher productivity and economic returns of direct seeded rice. Int J Agric Biol. 2012;14(6):901–7.
  47. 47. Awan TH, Sta Cruz PC, Chauhan BS. Agronomic indices, growth, yield contributing traits and yield of dry-seeded rice under varying herbicides. Field Crops Res. 2015;177:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.001
  48. 48. Singh Y, Singh G, Johnson D, Mortimer M. Changing from transplanted rice to direct seeding in the rice–wheat cropping system in India. In: Toriyama K, Heong KL, Hardy B, editors. Rice is life: scientific perspectives for the 21st century. Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute; 2005. p. 198–201.
  49. 49. Chauhan BS, Awan TH, Abugho SB, Evangelista G, Sudhir Y. Effect of crop establishment methods and weed control treatments on weed management and rice yield. Field Crops Res. 2015;172:72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.011
  50. 50. Saha S, Munda M, Patra BC, Satapathy BS. Protocol for herbicide-based weed control in rice. NRRI Technology Brief 03. Cuttack (India): ICAR-NRRI; 2018.
  51. 51. Singh Y, Singh VP, Singh G, Yadav DS, Sinha RKP, Johnson DE, et al. The implications of land preparation, crop establishment method and weed management on rice yield variation in the rice–wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Res. 2011;121(1):64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.11.012
  52. 52. Scott HD, Paetzold RF. Effects of soil moisture on the diffusion coefficients and activation energies of tritiated water chloride and metribuzin. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42:23–7. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200010006x
  53. 53. Walker A. Availability of atrazine to plants in different soils. Pestic Sci. 1972;3(2):139–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2780030205
  54. 54. Moyer JR. Effects of soil moisture on the efficacy and selectivity of soil-applied herbicides. Rev Weed Sci. 1987;3:19–34.
  55. 55. Juraimi AS, Uddin K, Anwar P, Muda MT, Ismail MR, Man AB. Sustainable weed management in direct seeded rice culture. Aust J Crop Sci. 2013;7(7):989–1002.
  56. 56. Baltazar AM, De Datta SK. Weed management in rice. Weed Abstr. 1992;41:308–495.
  57. 57. Levene BC, Owen MDK. Effect of moisture stress and leaf age on bentazon absorption in common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 1995;43(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500080747
  58. 58. Chauhan BS, Johnson DE. Growth response of direct-seeded rice to oxadiazon and bispyribac sodium in aerobic and saturated soils. Weed Sci. 2011;59(1):119–22. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-10-00075.1
  59. 59. Singh S, Bhushan L, Ladha JK, Gupta RK, Rao AN, Sivaprasad B. Weed management in dry seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivated in the furrow irrigated raised bed planting system. Crop Prot. 2006;25(5):487–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.08.004
  60. 60. Rao AN, Johnson DE, Sivaprasad B, Ladha JK, Mortimer AM. Weed management in direct seeded rice. Adv Agron. 2007;93:153–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1
  61. 61. Stickler RL, Knake EL, Hinesly TD. Soil moisture and effectiveness of pre-emergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 1969;17(2):257–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500031453
  62. 62. Chauhan BS, Opena J. Weed management and grain yield of rice sown at low seeding rates in mechanized dry-seeded systems. Field Crops Res. 2013;141:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.002
  63. 63. Onwuchekwa-Henry CB, Van Ogtrop F, Roche R, Tan DK. Evaluation of pre-emergence herbicides for weed management and rice yield in direct-seeded rice in Cambodian lowland ecosystems. Farming Syst. 2023;1(2):100018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100018
  64. 64. Friesen HA. The movement and persistence of dicamba in soil. Weed Sci. 1965;13(1):30–3. https://doi.org/10.2307/4041091

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.