Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2026)

Exploring the potential of Quercus in Morocco: Distribution, applications, gaps and future directions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13222
Submitted
10 February 2026
Published
24-09-2026 — Updated on 30-09-2026
Versions

Abstract

Climate change is increasingly affecting ecosystem stability and food security in Morocco, highlighting the need to better understand and utilise resilient forest resources. In this context, Quercus species stand out for their wide distribution, adaptability and multiple uses. This review synthesises current knowledge on their distribution, phytochemical composition and potential applications, while identifying key research gaps and perspectives. Quercus ilex L. dominates approximately 23.5 % of Moroccan forests, reflecting its high adaptability, while Quercus suber L. covers about 7 % and retains economic importance due to cork production. However, fragmented and outdated distribution data limit the
effectiveness of ecosystem monitoring and management strategies. Phytochemical studies reveal considerable variability in total polyphenol content (TPC), with values for the most studied species (Q. ilex, Q. suber and Quercus coccifera L.) acorns ranging 2.39–450 mg GAE/g depending on origin and climate. In contrast, relatively similar TPC values reported for leaves across different origins and climatic conditions suggest a potential effect of genetic stability. Bark contains the highest number of identified phenolic compounds (38 compounds), followed by acorns (32 compounds), leaves (25 compounds) and wood (13 compounds), reflecting their functional roles. Despite this potential, several species remain
understudied (Quercus faginea Lam., Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus lusitanica Lam.) and the translation of these resources into practical applications remains limited. Overall, this review highlights the strong influence of environmental and genetic factors on phenolic variability as well as the imbalance in research efforts. It advocates for a more integrated approach combining ecological, biochemical and ethnobotanical perspectives to support the sustainable use of Quercus species in Morocco.

References

  1. 1. Tollefson J. Earth breaches 1.5 °C climate limit for the first time: What does it mean? Nature. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00010-9
  2. 2. Schilling J, Freier K, Hertig E, Scheffran J. Climate change, vulnerability and adaptation in North Africa with focus on Morocco. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2012;156:12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.021
  3. 3. Flores A, López-Upton J, Rullán-Silva CD, Olthoff AE, Alía R, Sáenz-Romero C, et al. Priorities for conservation and sustainable use of forest genetic resources in four Mexican pines. Forests. 2019;10(8):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10080675
  4. 4. Tischenko L, Williams M, DeMerchant I, Sambaraju K, Zacharias M, Soolanayakanahally R, et al. Oak genomics for nature-based solutions: Shaping future forests and resilient landscapes in Canada. Tree Genet Genomes. 2024;20(3):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-024-01645-x
  5. 5. Rey M, Labella-Ortega M, Guerrero-Sánchez VM, Carleial R, Castillejo MÁ, Ruggieri V, et al. A first draft genome of holm oak (Quercus ilexsubsp. ballota), the most representative species of the Mediterranean forest and the Spanish agrosylvopastoral ecosystem "dehesa". Front Mol Biosci. 2023;10:1242943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1242943
  6. 6. Wang TR, Ning X, Zheng SS, Li Y, Lu ZJ, Meng HH, et al. Genomic insights into ecological adaptation of oaks revealed by phylogenomic analysis of multiple species. Plant Divers. 2025;47(1):53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2024.07.008
  7. 7. Ennajah A, Sai-Kachout S, Mechergui R, Fkiri S, Stiti B, Baraket M, et al. Climate change resilience in Mediterranean mixed-oak forest landscapes. In: Moukrim S, Lahssini S, editors. Forest vulnerability and climate risk assessment: Dynamics, disturbances and resilience. Hershey (PA): IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2026. p. 101–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-2600-0783-9.ch004
  8. 8. Wang Y, Xu C, Wang Q, Jiang Y, Qin L. Germplasm resources of oaks (Quercus L.) in China: Utilization and prospects. Biology (Basel). 2022;12(1):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010076
  9. 9. Backs J, Ashley M. Quercus conservation genetics and genomics: Past, present and future. Forests. 2021;12(7):882. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070882
  10. 10. Eckardt NA, Ainsworth EA, Bahuguna RN, Broadley MR, Busch W, Carpita NC, et al. Climate change challenges, plant science solutions. Plant Cell. 2023;35(1):24–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac303
  11. 11. Pencák T, Đorđević D, Tremlová B. Utilization of oak (Quercus genus) tree parts in the food industry: A review. Maso Int J Food Sci Technol. 2024;13(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjfst-2023-0003
  12. 12. Muluneh MG. Impact of climate change on biodiversity and food security: A global perspective—a review. Agric Food Secur. 2021;10(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00318-5
  13. 13. Singh A, Teron R. Traditional agroforestry for food security and agrobiodiversity: The Angami Naga Nhalie-Teizie binary system in Nagaland, India. Sustain Agri Food Environ Res. 2023;11(X):1–20. https://doi.org/10.7770/safer-V11N1-art2318
  14. 14. Gribbe S, Enderle L, Weigel R, Hertel D, Leuschner C, Muffler L. Recent growth decline and shifts in climatic growth constraints suggest climate vulnerability of beech, Douglas fir, pine and oak in northern Germany. For Ecol Manage. 2024;566(10):122022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122022
  15. 15. Talucder M, Ruba U, Robi M. Potentiality of neglected and underutilized species (NUS) as future resilient food: A systematic review. J Agric Food Res. 2024;16(Suppl 3):101116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101116
  16. 16. Hoban S, Hvilsom C, Aissi A, Aleixo A, Biala K, Ekblom R, et al. How can biodiversity strategy and action plans incorporate genetic diversity concerns, plans, policies, capacity and commitments? BioScience. 2024;75(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae106
  17. 17. Serbouti S, Ettaqy A, Boukcim H, El Mderssa M, El Ghachtouli N, Abbas Y. Forests and woodlands in Morocco: Review of historical evolution, services, priorities for conservation measures and future research. Int For Rev. 2023;25(1):121–45. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554823836838745
  18. 18. Viscosi V. Geometric morphometrics and leaf phenotypic plasticity: Assessing fluctuating asymmetry and allometry in European white oaks (Quercus). Bot J Linn Soc. 2015;179(2):335–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12323
  19. 19. Pullin AS, Stewart GB. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol. 2006;20(6):1647–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
  20. 20. Ikraoun H, El Mderssa M, Nassiri L, Ibijbijen J. Assessment of the organic carbon stock in the green oak forest in the Moroccan Oulmes Central Plateau. E3S Web Conf. 2022;351:01096. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235101096
  21. 21. Mderssa ME, Benjelloun H, Zaher H, Zennouhi O, Nassiri L, Ibijbijen J. Estimating the sequestration potential of organic carbon in forest soils in the Central Middle Atlas: A tool to fight climate change. Atlas J Biol. 2019;16:603–10. https://doi.org/10.5147/ajb.v0i0.198
  22. 22. Sbay H. National report on the state of forest genetic resources [in French]. Rome: FAO; 2013.
  23. 23. Szabłowska E, Tańska M. Acorn flour properties depending on the production method and laboratory baking test results: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021;20(1):980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12683
  24. 24. Simeone MC, Grimm GW, Papini A, Vessella F, Cardoni S, Tordoni E, et al. Plastome data reveal multiple geographic origins of Quercusgroup Ilex. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1897. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1897
  25. 25. Bouandas A, Belhoucine-Guezouli L, Oliva F, Gaouar Semir BS, Bendjebbar K, Vázquez Pardo FM, et al. Morphological and taxonomic analysis of the Quercus fagineaand Quercus canariensis(Fagaceae) complexes in Algeria. Int J Plant Biol. 2024;15(4):927–43. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15040066
  26. 26. Laakili A, Belkadi B, Medraoui L, Alami M, Yatrib C, Pakhrou O, et al. Diversity and spatial genetic structure of natural Moroccan Quercus suberL. assessed by ISSR markers for conservation. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2018;24(4):643–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0538-z
  27. 27. Belahbib N, Pemonge MH, Ouassou A, Sbay H, Kremer A, Petit RJ. Frequent cytoplasmic exchanges between oak species that are not closely related: Quercus suberand Q. ilexin Morocco. Mol Ecol. 2001;10(8):2003–12. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01330.x
  28. 28. Aissi A, Beghami Y. Geometric morphometrics use in the examination of subgenus Quercus leaf shape variation in Algeria. Folia Oecol. 2022;49(2):175–81. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2022-0020
  29. 29. Khatouri M. Growth and yield of young Quercus ilex coppice stands in the Tafferte forest (Morocco). Vegetatio. 1992;99(1):77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118212
  30. 30. Laaribya S. A review analysis of the degradation of cork oak forests in North Atlantic Morocco. J Biometry Stud. 2023;3(2):2. https://doi.org/10.61326/jofbs.v3i2.05
  31. 31. Aissi A. New insights about Quercus faginea (s.l.) taxonomic status in northern Africa. Mediterr Bot. 2023;44:e82996. https://doi.org/10.5209/mbot.82996
  32. 32. Sohretoglu D, Renda G. The polyphenolic profile of oak (Quercus) species: A phytochemical and pharmacological overview. Phytochem Rev. 2020;19(6):1379–1426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-020-09707-3
  33. 33. López-Hidalgo C, Trigueros M, Menéndez M, Jorrin-Novo JV. Phytochemical composition and variability in Quercus ilexacorn morphotypes as determined by NIRS and MS-based approaches. Food Chem. 2021;338:127803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127803
  34. 34. Amessis-Ouchemoukh N, Ouchemoukh S, Meziant N, Idiri Y, Hernanz D, Stinco CM, et al. Bioactive metabolites involved in antioxidant, anticancer and anticalpain activities of Ficus caricaL., Ceratonia siliquaL. and Quercus ilexL. extracts. Ind Crops Prod. 2017;95:6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.007
  35. 35. Custódio L, Patarra J, Alberício F, Neng NR, Nogueira JMF, Romano A. Extracts from Quercus sp. acorns exhibit in vitro neuroprotective effects through cholinesterase inhibition and protection of SH-SY5Y cells from hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;45:114–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.011
  36. 36. Lassoued R, Abderrabba M, Mejri J, Benahmed W, Benhmed A, Ferhi M. Physicochemical, morphological and functional characteristics of starch isolated from Quercus ilex and Quercus coccifera. Emir J Food Agric. 2023;35(12):1–8. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2023.3185
  37. 37. Vinha AF, Costa ASG, Barreira JCM, Pacheco R, Oliveira MBPP. Chemical and antioxidant profiles of acorn tissues from Quercusspp.: Potential as new industrial raw materials. Ind Crops Prod. 2016;94:143–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.027
  38. 38. Rtibi K, Hammami I, Selmi S, Grami D, Sebai H, Amri M, et al. Phytochemical properties and pharmacological effects of Quercus ilex L. aqueous extract on gastrointestinal parameters in vitro and in vivo. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;94:787–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.008
  39. 39. Cantos E, Espín JC, López-Bote C, de la Hoz L, Ordóñez JA, Tomás-Barberán FA. Phenolic compounds and fatty acids from acorns (Quercusspp.), the main dietary component of free-range Iberian pigs. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(21):6248–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030216v
  40. 40. Hadidi L, Babou L, Zaidi F, Valentão P, Andrade PB, Grosso C. Quercus ilex L.: How season, plant organ and extraction procedure can influence chemistry and bioactivities. Chem Biodivers. 2017;14(1):e1600187. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201600187
  41. 41. Taib M, Damiri F, Rezzak Y, Berrada M, Bouyazza L. Chemical composition, nutritional and antioxidant activity of two Quercus species acorns growing in Morocco. Lett Appl Nanobiosci. 2024;13(1):20. https://doi.org/10.33263/LIANBS131.020
  42. 42. Makhlouf FZ, Squeo G, Barkat M, Trani A, Caponio F. Antioxidant activity, tocopherols and polyphenols of acorn oil obtained from Quercus species grown in Algeria. Food Res Int. 2018;114:208–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.010
  43. 43. Dallali S, Zouaouia R, Dallalic D, Jdidia S, Toumia L. Determination of selected biochemical parameters in leaves of Quercus ilex L. (Fagaceae) collected from Djebel Zaghouan (Tunisia). Arab J Med Aromat Plants. 2021;7(1):1.
  44. 44. Sánchez-Hernández E, Balduque-Gil J, Barriuso-Vargas JJ, Casanova-Gascón J, González-García V, Cuchí-Oterino JA, et al. Holm oak (Quercus ilex subsp. ballota) bark aqueous ammonia extract for the control of invasive forest pathogens. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911882
  45. 45. Lavado G, Ladero L, Cava R. Cork oak (Quercus suber L.) leaf extracts as natural antioxidants in cooked meat. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;160:113086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113086
  46. 46. Fernandes A, Sousa A, Mateus N, Cabral M, de Freitas V. Analysis of phenolic compounds in cork from Quercus suber L. by HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS. Food Chem. 2011;125(4):1398–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.10.016
  47. 47. Fernandes A, Fernandes I, Cruz L, Mateus N, Cabral M, De Freitas V. Antioxidant and biological properties of bioactive phenolic compounds from Quercus suber L. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(23):11154–60. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902093m
  48. 48. Touati R, Santos SAO, Rocha SM, Belhamel K, Silvestre AJD. The potential of cork from Quercus suberL. grown in Algeria as a source of bioactive lipophilic and phenolic compounds. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;76:936–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.074
  49. 49. Santos SAO, Pinto PCRO, Silvestre AJD, Neto CP. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of phenolic extracts of cork from Quercus suberL. Ind Crops Prod. 2010;31(3):521–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.02.001
  50. 50. Gezici S, Sekeroglu N. Neuroprotective potential and phytochemical composition of acorn fruits. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;128:13–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.082
  51. 51. Ito H, Yamaguchi K, Kim TH, Khennouf S, Gharzouli K, Yoshida T. Dimeric and trimeric hydrolyzable tannins from Quercus coccifera and Quercus suber. J Nat Prod. 2002;65(3):339–45. https://doi.org/10.1021/np010465i
  52. 52. García L, Martínez-Expósito R, Fernández de Córdova ML, Llorent-Martínez E. Determination of the phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of leaves and fruits of Spanish Quercus coccifera. J Chem. 2018;2018:2573270. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2573270
  53. 53. Sari S, Barut B, Özel A, Kuruüzüm-Uz A, Şöhretoğlu D. Tyrosinase and α-glucosidase inhibitory potential of compounds isolated from Quercus coccifera bark: In vitro and in silico perspectives. Bioorg Chem. 2019;86:296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.02.015
  54. 54. Ferreira JPA, Miranda I, Sousa V, Pereira H. Chemical composition of barks from Quercus faginea trees and characterization of their lipophilic and polar extracts. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197135
  55. 55. Cadahía E, Muñoz L, Fernández de Simón B, García-Vallejo MC. Changes in low molecular weight phenolic compounds in Spanish, French and American oak woods during natural seasoning and toasting. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(4):1790–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0006168
  56. 56. Alañón ME, Castro-Vázquez L, Díaz-Maroto MC, Hermosín-Gutiérrez I, Gordon MH, Pérez-Coello MS. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of different woods used in cooperage. Food Chem. 2011;129(4):1584–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.013
  57. 57. Nonaka GI, Sakai T, Nakayama S, Nishioka I. Tannins and related compounds, 101: Isolation and structures of C-glycosyl hydrolyzable tannins from Turkish galls. J Nat Prod. 1990;53(5):1297–300. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50071a024
  58. 58. Bainbridge DA. Use of acorns for food in California: Past, present, future. Agric Food Sci. 1987;15:453–8.
  59. 59. Sebti M, Assaf N, Demdoum S, Muir G. Use of oak acorns in the preparation of couscous bil ballout in Jijel, Algeria [in French]. Rome: FAO; 2021. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb3865fr
  60. 60. Taib M, Bouyazza L, Lyoussi B. Acorn oil: Chemistry and functionality. J Food Qual. 2020;2020:8898370. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8898370
  61. 61. Akcan T, Gökçe R, Asensio M, Estévez M, Morcuende D. Acorn (Quercus spp.) as a novel source of oleic acid and tocopherols for livestock and humans: Discrimination of selected species from Mediterranean forest. J Food Sci Technol. 2017;54(10):3050–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2740-3
  62. 62. Shahamati M, Ahmadi P, Tabibiazar M, Fazelioskouei T, Azadmard-Damirchi S, Zargaraan A. Characterization of acorn oil and its application in carnauba wax-based oleogel and chocolate spread. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;260(Pt 2):129571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129571
  63. 63. Martins R, Garzon R, Peres J, Barros A, Raymundo A, Rosell C. Acorn flour and sourdough: An innovative combination to improve gluten-free bread characteristics. Eur Food Res Technol. 2022;248:1691–702.
  64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-03996-y
  65. 64. Pasqualone A, Makhlouf FZ, Barkat M, Difonzo G, Summo C, Squeo G, et al. Effect of acorn flour on the physico-chemical and sensory properties of biscuits. Heliyon. 2019;5(8):e02242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02242
  66. 65. Szabłowska E, Tańska M. Acorns as a source of valuable compounds for food and medical applications: A review of Quercus species diversity and laboratory studies. Appl Sci. 2024;14(7):2799. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072799
  67. 66. Chebli Y, El Otmani S, Hornick JL, Keli A, Bindelle J, Cabaraux JF, et al. Forage availability and quality and feeding behaviour of indigenous goats grazing in a Mediterranean silvopastoral system. Ruminants. 2022;2(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants2010004
  68. 67. Zeineldin M, Sabek A, Barakat R, Elghandour M, AZM S, Oca-Jiménez R. Potential contribution of plant bioactives to ruminant productive performance and their impact on gastrointestinal parasite elimination. Agrofor Syst. 2018;94(4):1415–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0295-6
  69. 68. Chebli Y, Chentouf M, Cabaraux JF, El Otmani S. Floristic composition, diversity, palatability and forage availability of forest rangelands in the southern Mediterranean region of northern Morocco. Land. 2023;12(1):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010215
  70. 69. Mezni F, Stiti B, Fkiri S, Ayari F, Slimane LB, Ksouri R, et al. Phenolic profile and in vitro anti-diabetic activity of acorn from four African Quercus species (Q. suber, Q. canariensis, Q. coccifera and Q. ilex). S Afr J Bot. 2022;146:771–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.12.023
  71. 70. Custódio L, Patarra J, Alberício F, Neng N da R, Nogueira JMF, Romano A. Phenolic composition, antioxidant potential and in vitro inhibitory activity of leaves and acorns of Quercus suber on key enzymes relevant for hyperglycemia and Alzheimer's disease. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;64:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.001
  72. 71. Hemida H, Doukani K, Zitouni A, Miloud B, Beggar H, Bouhenni H. Assessment of wound healing activity of ethanolic extracts of Pistacia lentiscus L. leaves and Quercus ilex L. bark in full-thickness skin excision in rats. Adv Tradit Med. 2022;22(3):589–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13596-021-00557-8
  73. 72. Carriço C, Ribeiro HM, Marto J. Converting cork by-products to ecofriendly cork bioactive ingredients: Novel pharmaceutical and cosmetics applications. Ind Crops Prod. 2018;125:72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.092
  74. 73. Malki F, Karkouri J, Sabir M, Ibijbijen J, El M, Dallahi Y, et al. Assessment of the storage potential of organic carbon in Maamora forest soils: A strategic guidance tool for reforestation. Soil Environ. 2022;41(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.25252/SE/2022/232782
  75. 74. Ribeiro S, Cerveira A, Soares P, Ribeiro N, Camilo Alves C, Fonseca T. Natural regeneration of cork oak forests under climate change: A case study in Portugal. Front For Glob Change. 2024;7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1332708
  76. 75. Boulmane M, Santa-Regina MC, Halim M, Khia A, Oubrahim H, Abbassi H, et al. Organic carbon storage in evergreen oak forest ecosystems of the Middle and High Moroccan Atlas areas. Open J For. 2015;5(3):3. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2015.53023
  77. 76. Ikraoun H, El Mderssa M, Aliyat F, Nassiri L, Ibijbijen J. Assessing carbon storage and biomass in Moroccan cork oak forests. Ecol Eng Environ Technol. 2024;25:43–53. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/186550

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.