Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Systems-level analysis of growth, yield architecture and profitability of ginger genotypes (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) across sequential sowing patterns

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13269
Submitted
18 December 2025
Published
06-07-2026

Abstract

Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) is an economically important spice crop valued for its culinary, medicinal and industrial uses. Its productivity is highly influenced by agronomic factors, particularly planting time and selection of suitable varieties, which can significantly affect growth and yield performance under varying environmental conditions. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of different planting dates and ginger varieties on growth, yield and economic returns to determine the most suitable combination for enhanced productivity. A field experiment was laid out in randomised block design with dates of planting (25th April, 15th May and 5th June) as the main plot treatments and three varieties as subplot treatments (Rajgarh local, Sirmaur local and Himgiri) with 3 replications. Growth parameters, rhizome yield and economic returns were recorded and analysed over two consecutive years. During both years, 5th June planting and the Himgiri variety showed the significantly highest growth and yield parameters, while the lowest growth and yield parameters were observed on 25th April planting and Sirmaur variety. Sowing of ginger on 15th May and 5th June produced significantly higher rhizome yield than sowing on 25th April. During both years, the maximum rhizome yield (193.18 q/ha) was recorded when sowing was done on 5th June, but it was at par with sowing on 15th May (182.32 q/ha). Sowing on 5th June recorded mean net returns of Rs. 451034 with benefit-cost ratio of 2.80. There was no significant difference among the genotypes evaluated. Himgiri gave the highest yield of 181 q/ha, followed by Rajgarh and Sirmaur. Planting ginger in early June or mid-May significantly enhances yield and profitability compared to late April planting. Although varietal differences were not significant, Himgiri showed superior performance and can be recommended for higher productivity under similar agro-climatic conditions.

References

  1. 1. Vasala PA. Ginger. In: Handbook of herbs and spices. Elsevier; 2012. p. 319–35. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857095671.319
  2. 2. Nair KP. The agronomy and economy of ginger. In: Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) – world’s invaluable medicinal spices. Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 245–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29189-1_15
  3. 3. Ramkumar TR, Karuppusamy S. Plant diversity and ethnobotanical knowledge of spices and condiments. In: Bioprospecting of plant biodiversity for industrial molecules. Wiley; 2021. p. 231–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119718017.ch12
  4. 4. Indian Horticulture Database. National Horticulture Board, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India; 2019. p. 14.
  5. 5. Behl T, Rocchetti G, Chadha S, Zengin G, Bungau S, Kumar A, et al. Phytochemicals from plant foods as potential source of antiviral agents: an overview. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14:381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14040381
  6. 6. Selva Rani A, Subbulakshmi S, Sudha R, Kavitha K, Nazreen Hassan SH, Muthulakshmi M, et al. Synergizing sustainability: integrated nutrient management and intercropping for optimal coconut cultivation in South India. Horticulturae. 2024;10:653. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10060653
  7. 7. Singh K, Bhardwaj DR, Kaushal R, Kumar P, Kumar J, Sharma P, et al. Evaluation of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) productivity and economics under Melia composita Willd. based agroforestry system in the mid-hills of northwestern Himalayas: effects of tree spacing and use of vegetative mulch. Agroforestry Systems. 2024;98:1303–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-01001-x
  8. 8. Chandra Nainwal R, Krishna Tewari S. Ginger based agro-forestry systems for livelihood to rainfed areas. In: Ginger – cultivation and use. IntechOpen; 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108041
  9. 9. Ali MH, Talukder MSU. Increasing water productivity in crop production—a synthesis. Agric Water Manag. 2008;95:1201–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.008
  10. 10. Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Arolu F, Murugesu S, Chukwu SC, Salisu MA, et al. Genetic diversity and utilization of ginger (Zingiber officinale) for varietal improvement: a review. AIMS Agric Food. 2024;9:183–208. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2024011
  11. 11. Berni R, Cantini C, Romi M, Hausman JF, Guerriero G, Cai G. Agrobiotechnology goes wild: ancient local varieties as sources of bioactives. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:2248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082248
  12. 12. Goudar SA, Gangadharappa PM, Dodamani SM, Lokesh C, Dharamatti VU. Evaluation of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) genotypes for growth and yield attributes. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5(2):994–9. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2888
  13. 13. Pagano E, Maddonni GA. Intra-specific competition in maize: early established hierarchies differ in plant growth and biomass partitioning to the ear around silking. Field Crops Res. 2007;101:306–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.12.007
  14. 14. Ishinrine YH, Hossain MA, Motomura K, Akamine H, Hirayama T. Effect of planting date on emergence, growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in Okinawa prefecture, southern Japan. Jpn J Trop Agric. 2004;18:10–16.
  15. 15. Babu MS, Kumar BP, Swami DV, Krishna KU, Emmanuel N. Quality of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) genotypes under shade net condition of coastal Andhra Pradesh. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(7):696–700. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.607.086
  16. 16. Kandiannan K, Chandaragiri KK. Influence of varieties, dates of planting, spacing and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and quality of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Indian J Agril Sci. 2006;76:432–4.
  17. 17. Ghosh DK, Hore K. Economics of a coconut-based intercropping system as influenced by spacing and seed rhizome size of ginger. Indian J Hort. 2011;68:449–52.
  18. 18. Mondal R, Kumar A, Gnanesh BN. Crop germplasm: current challenges, physiological-molecular perspective, and advance strategies towards development of climate-resilient crops. Heliyon. 2023;9:e12973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12973
  19. 19. Ebert A. Potential of underutilized traditional vegetables and legume crops to contribute to food and nutritional security, income and more sustainable production systems. Sustainability. 2014;6:319–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010319
  20. 20. Bian D, Jia G, Cai L, Ma Z, Eneji AE, Cui Y. Effects of tillage practices on root characteristics and root lodging resistance of maize. Field Crops Res. 2016;185:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.008
  21. 21. Thakur D, Münzbergová Z. Rhizome trait scaling relationships are modulated by growth conditions and are linked to plant fitness. Ann Bot. 2022;129:529–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcac023

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.