Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

A review of weeds management approaches in potato in India

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13287
Submitted
20 December 2025
Published
04-06-2026

Abstract

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is a globally vital staple food. Weeds infestation remains a major challenge to potato cultivation worldwide. They compete with crop plants for nutrients, sunlight, space and water, ultimately reducing both yield quantity, quality and enhancing insects and diseases infestation. Effective weeds control through different practices is crucial for maximising potato production. Once weeds have established themselves in a field, it becomes difficult to control and eradicate them. Prevention is a key component of integrated weed management (IWM). In developing countries, hand and manual weeding and herbicide use are the most common methods for weeds control. However, the intensive use of herbicides has been accompanied by high production costs, weeds resistance, environmental pollution (especially surface water contamination) and adverse effects on non-target organisms. Consequently, reliance on herbicides alone is no longer considered sustainable. Therefore, focus is now on new methods of weeds control, such as cultural, biological, mechanical and biotechnological approaches that can be used in conjunction with chemical weeds control. Biotechnology is closely related with chemical weeds management because it helps in development of herbicide tolerant crops and makes herbicides use more sustainable and cost-effective. These weeds control methods can be combined as IWM to mitigate the negative environmental impacts of herbicides. Recognising the critical role of weeds management, this review aims to highlight emerging weed management strategies for potato cultivation.

References

  1. 1. Buono V, Paradiso A, Serio F, Gonnella M, De Gara L, Santamaria P. Tuber quality and nutritional components of “early” potato subjected to chemical haulm desiccation. J Food Compos Anal. 2009;22:556–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2009.01.001
  2. 2. Pandey NK, Chakrabarti SK, Singh B, Tiwari JK, Buckseth T, Rawat S. Production and post-harvest technology in potato research. Shimla: ICAR-CPRI; 2017.
  3. 3. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2021.
  4. 4. Eurostat. The EU potato sector: statistics on production, prices and trade; 2020.
  5. 5. Devaux A, Gofart JP, Petsakos A. Global food security: contributions from sustainable potato agri-food systems. Dordrecht: Springer; 2020. p. 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28683-5_1
  6. 6. Bhullar MS, Kaur S, Kaur T, Jhala AJ. Integrated weed management in potato using straw mulch and atrazine. Hort Technol. 2015;25:335–9. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.25.3.335
  7. 7. Shehata SA, Abozien HF, Abd El-Gawad KF, Elkhawaga FA. Safe weed management methods as alternative to synthetic herbicides in potato. Res J Pharm Biol Sci. 2017;8:1148–56.
  8. 8. Swanton CJ, Weise SF. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 1991;5:657–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00027512
  9. 9. Chethan CR, Chander S, Kumar SP. Dynamic strength-based dryland weeders – ergonomic and performance evaluation. Indian J Weed Sci. 2018;50:382–7. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2018.00081.3
  10. 10. Roslim MHM, Juraimi AS, Che’Ya NN. Using remote sensing and an unmanned aerial system for weed management in agricultural crops. Agronomy. 2021;11:1809. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091809
  11. 11. Zhang Y, Massel K, Godwin ID, Gao C. Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement. Genome Biol. 2018;19:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1586-y
  12. 12. Busi R, Vila-Aiub MM, Beckie HJ. Herbicide-resistant weeds: from research and knowledge to future needs. Evol Appl. 2013;6:1218–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12098
  13. 13. Ramesh K, Matloob A, Aslam F, Florentine SK, Chauhan BS. Weeds in a changing climate: vulnerabilities, consequences and implications for future weed management. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:95. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00095
  14. 14. Romero A, Chamorro L, Sans FX. Weed diversity in crop edges and inner fields of organic and conventional dry-land winter cereal crops in NE Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2008;124:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.002
  15. 15. Alagbo O, Akinyemiju O, Chauhan B. Weed management in rainfed upland rice fields under varied agro-ecologies in Nigeria. Rice Sci. 2022;29:328–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.11.004
  16. 16. Clay SA, Lems GJ, Clay DE, Forcella F, Ellsbury MM, Carlson CG. Sampling weed spatial variability on a field-wise scale. Weed Sci. 1999;47:674–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500091323
  17. 17. Bala B, Sharma SD, Sharma RK. Knowledge and adoption level of improved technology among rural women owing to extension programmes. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2006;19:301–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971344120060208
  18. 18. Duhan JS, Kumar R, Kumar N, Kaur P, Nehra K, Duhan S. Nanotechnology: the new perspective in precision agriculture. Biotechnol Rep. 2017;15:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.03.002
  19. 19. Manorama K. Weed management in potato in Nilgiris. J Indian Potato Assoc. 2004;31:91–3.
  20. 20. Punia SS, Yadav D, Garg R, Lathwal OP. Weed flora of potato in north eastern Haryana. Indian J Weed Sci. 2007;39:78–80.
  21. 21. Laloo. Ecological studies of weed flora of different crop fields in high altitude and heavy rainfall area of Meghalaya. Flora Fauna. 2004;10:93–7.
  22. 22. Yadav SK, Bag TK, Srivastava AK, Yadav VP. Bio-efficacy of weed management practices in rainfed potato. Indian J Weed Sci. 2021;53:54–8. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2021.00007.1
  23. 23. Umiyati U, Kurniadie D, Ratna I, Anjarsari D. Biodiversity of weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Pangalengan and Cikajang Sub-districts of Indonesia. Potato J. 2023;50:66–76.
  24. 24. Sumekar Y, Kurniadie D, Umiyati U, Widayat D, Mubarok S. Dominant weeds diversity in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) crop in Garut Regency, West Java, Indonesia. J Biol Sci. 2018;18:500–5. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2018.500.505
  25. 25. Shehata SA, Abozien HF, Elkhawaga FA. Weed control efficacy, growth and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by alternative weed control methods. Eur Potato J. 2018;62:132–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-018-9404-1
  26. 26. Mehmeti A, Fetahaj R, Tiriqi L, Zogaj M, Demaj A. Weed flora of potato crop in Kosovo. Bulgar J Agric Sci. 2019;25:103–8.
  27. 27. Kalinova S, Hristoskov A. Species composition and density of the weeds in areas with mid-early and late potatoes. Agrarni Nauki. 2011;3:41–7.
  28. 28. Kennedy M. Potato weed management practices in Kenya. Wikifarmer; 2017.
  29. 29. Monteiro A, Henriques I, Moreira I. Critical period for weed control in potatoes in the Huambo Province (Angola). Planta Daninha. 2011;29:351–62. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000200013
  30. 30. Reddy RVS, Nanjappa HV, Krishnappa KS, Thirumalaraju GT, Gowda TNV, Shankaranarayana V. Economics of chemical and cultural weed control methods in potato. J Indian Potato Assoc. 1993;20:252–4.
  31. 31. Khurana SC, Thakral KK, Bhatia KK. Effect of pendimethalin and isoproturon on weeds and tuber yield of potato. J Indian Potato Assoc. 1993;20:255–7.
  32. 32. Gerassimos GP, Reichel P, Karouta J, Andújar D, Gerhards R. Weed identification in maize, sunflower and potatoes with the aid of convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens. 2020;12:4185. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244185
  33. 33. Fanos T, Belew D, Nebiyu A. Effect of planting depth and time of earthing-up on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield and yield components. Int J Afr Asian Stud. 2015;15:61–78.
  34. 34. Nandekar DN. Efficacy of prometryn herbicide for weed management in potato under Satpura zone of Madhya Pradesh. Potato J. 2005;32:91–2.
  35. 35. Mohaniya LS, Sasode DS, Gupta V, Bagri US. Influence of integrated weed management practice on weed population and yield of potato. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11:670–5.
  36. 36. Jalavandi M. Study the different adding soil time’s effect on the potato yield. Arak Natural Resources and Agriculture College; 2004. p. 41–6.
  37. 37. Sakadzo N, Tafirenyika F, Makaza K. Effects of time of earthing up on yield and yield parameters of Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Zaka District. Zim Agric Sci. 2019;1:39–46. https://doi.org/10.30560/as.v1n1p39
  38. 38. Sheley R, Manoukian M, Marks G. Preventing noxious weed invasion. Montana State University; 2002.
  39. 39. Patil S, Bainade SP. A review integrated weed management practices in cotton. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11:565–8.
  40. 40. Scavo A, Restuccia A, Abbate C, Mauromicale G. Seeming field allelopathic activity of Cynara cardunculus L. reduces the soil weed seed bank. Agron Sustain Dev. 2019;39:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0580-4
  41. 41. Gallandt ER. How can we target the weed seedbank? Weed Sci. 2006;54:588–96. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-063R.1
  42. 42. Pannacci E, Lattanzi B, Tei F. Non-chemical weed management strategies in minor crops. Crop Prot. 2017;96:44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.012
  43. 43. Scavo A, Mauromicale G. Integrated weed management in herbaceous field crops. Agronomy. 2020;10:466. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040466
  44. 44. Sardana V, Mahajan G, Jabran K, Chauhan BS. Role of competition in managing weeds: an introduction to the special issue. Crop Prot. 2017;95:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.011
  45. 45. Chauhan BS, Singh RG, Mahajan G. Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture. Crop Prot. 2012;38:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.03.010
  46. 46. Willey RW, Heath SB. The quantitative relationship between plant population density and crop yield. Adv Agron. 1969;21:281–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60100-5
  47. 47. Bosnic AC, Swanton CJ. Influence of barnyard grass time of emergence and density on corn. Weed Sci. 1997;45:276–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500092833
  48. 48. Gupta V, Joshi E, Singh DSL, Kasana BS, Singh YK. The effect of chemical and non-chemical control methods on weeds and yield in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivation. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8:2737–47. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.807.342
  49. 49. Zhao H, Xiong YC, Li FM. Plastic film mulch for half growing-season maximized WUE and yield of potato via moisture-temperature improvement. Agric Water Manag. 2012;104:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.11.016
  50. 50. Bharati S, Joshi B, Dhakala R, Paneru S, Dhakal SC, Josh KR. Effect of different mulching on yield and yield attributes of potato in Nepal. Malays J Sustain Agric. 2020;4:54–8. https://doi.org/10.26480/mjsa.02.2020.54.58
  51. 51. Dvořák P, Tomášek J, Kuchtová P, Hamouz K, Hajšlová J, Schulzová V. Effect of mulching materials on potato production. Rom Agric Res. 2012;29:201–9.
  52. 52. Johnson JM, Hough-Goldstein JA, Vangessel MJ. Effects of straw mulch on pest insects, predators and weeds in watermelons and potatoes. Environ Entomol. 2004;33:1632–43. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-33.6.1632
  53. 53. Kar G, Kumar A. Effects of irrigation and straw mulch on water use and tuber yield of potato in eastern India. Agric Water Manag. 2007;94:109–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.004
  54. 54. Salim M, Alam MK. Effect of legume intercrop and conventional methods of weed suppression on tuber yield of potato. Bangladesh Agric Res J. 2021;18:1–5.
  55. 55. Liebman M, Dyck E. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol Appl. 1993;3:92–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941795
  56. 56. Buhler DD, Liebman M, Obrycki JJ. Theoretical and practical challenges to an IPM approach to weed management. Weed Sci. 2000;48:274–80. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0274:TAPCTA]2.0.CO;2
  57. 57. Rieger M, Krewer G, Lewis P. Solarization and chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for pre-plant soil treatment of strawberries. Hort Technol. 2001;11:258–64. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.11.2.258
  58. 58. Arora A, Tomar SS. Effect of soil solarization on weed seed bank in soil. Indian J Weed Sci. 2012;44:122–3.
  59. 59. Stapleton JJ, Molinar RH, Lynn-Patterson K, Feeters SK, Shrestha A. Soil solarization provides weed control. Calif Agric. 2005;59:84–9. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v059n02p84
  60. 60. Benvenuti S, Selvi M, Mercati S, Cardinali G, Mercati V, Mazzoncini M. Stale seedbed preparation for sustainable weed seed bank management. Sci Hortic. 2021;289:112–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110453
  61. 61. Azadbakht A, Akbar MT, Ghavidel A. Effect of chemical and non-chemical methods of weed control in potato cultivation in Ardabil Province, Iran. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2017;15:1359–72. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1504_13591372
  62. 62. Barba P. Protection of potato plantations against weed infestation. Ziemniak Polski. 2015;1:11–7.
  63. 63. Kumar R, Bhatia AK, Singh D. Efficiency of different herbicides alone and their combination with optimum time of application to control weeds in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Haryana. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2017;14(1):453–60. https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2464
  64. 64. Shafiq M, Kaur S. Weed control using paddy straw mulch in integration with herbicides in autumn potato in North-West India. Potato Res. 2021;64(2):4–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-021-09504-1
  65. 65. Singh SP, Rawal S, Dua SK, Sadaworty VK, Roy MJ, Singh BP. Evaluation of propaquizafop – a new molecule as post emergence herbicide in potato. Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5(5):1216–20.
  66. 66. Lavlesh M, Raghav M, Sati UC, Sati K. Weed management in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using manual and chemical methods. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6(5):585–8.
  67. 67. Raj R, Kar S, Nandan R, Jagarlapudi A. Precision agriculture and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). In: Unmanned aerial vehicle: applications in agriculture and environment. Springer; 2020. p. 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27157-2_2
  68. 68. Amarananjundeswara H, Prasad PS, Shetty S, Sandhya GC. Effect of herbicide on weed management in potato. Int J Econ Plants. 2021;8(1):10–4.
  69. 69. Chandel SKS, Singh BK, Singh AK, Singh B, Kumar A, Aakash. Effect of chemical and mechanical weed management on potato production and relative composition of weed under Varanasi region. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(22):1201–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231487
  70. 70. Boyd NS. Evaluation of pre-emergence herbicides for purple nutsedge control in tomato. Weed Technol. 2015;29:480–7. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-14-00133.1
  71. 71. AGROFIT. Sistema de Agrotóxicos Fitossanitários do MAPA; 2019.
  72. 72. Boydston RA. Potato and weed response to post-emergence-applied halosulfuron, rimsulfuron and EPTC. Weed Technol. 2007;21:465–9. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-040.1
  73. 73. Hutchinson PJS. Comparison of flumioxazin and rimsulfuron tank mixtures for weed control in potato. Weed Technol. 2007;21(4):1023–8. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-184.1
  74. 74. Vasilakoglou I, Dhima K, Paschalidis K, Gatsis T, Zacharis K, Galanis M. Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) control in potato by pre- or post-emergence applied flumioxazin and sulfosulfuron. Chil J Agric Res. 2013;73:24–30. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392013000100004
  75. 75. Chettri M, Bandhopadhyay P, Mukhopadyay SK. Chemical weed control on potato in the new alluvial zone of eastern India. J Crop Weed. 2006;2(1):23–5.
  76. 76. Gopinath KA, Mina BL. Use of herbicides in integrated weed management in field crops of Uttarakhand hills. Indian Farm. 2009;59:14–17.
  77. 77. Inderjit, Keating KI. Allelopathy: principles, procedures, processes and promises for biological control. Adv Agron. 1999;67:141–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60515-5
  78. 78. Williams MM II, Walsh DB, Boydston RA. Integrating arthropod herbivory and reduced herbicide use for weed management. Weed Sci. 2004;52(6):1018–25. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-034R
  79. 79. Prashanthi SK, Kulkarni S. Aureobasidium pullulans, a potential mycoherbicide for biocontrol of eupatorium (Chromolaena odorata) weed. Curr Sci. 2005;88(1):18–21.
  80. 80. Grossman K. On the mode of action of the herbicides cinmethylin and 5-benzyloxymethyl-1,2-isoxazolines: putative inhibitors of plant tyrosine amino transferase. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68:482–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2319
  81. 81. Mukherjee PK, Rahaman S, Maity SK, Sinha B. Weed management practices in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J Crop Weed. 2012;8(1):178–80.
  82. 82. Kebede G, Sharma JJ, Dechassa N. Evaluation of chemical and cultural methods of weed management in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Gishe district, North Shewa. Ethiop J Nat Sci Res. 2016;6(5):28–47.
  83. 83. Nassar AK, Ibade KW, Karakoç OC. Weed management in potato crops using herbicide metribuzin in integration with agronomic operations. SABRAO J Breed Genet. 2024;56(3):1236–43. https://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2024.56.3.30
  84. 84. Shannon D, Clay DE, Sudduth KA. An introduction to precision agriculture. Precis Agric Basics. 2018;3:6–11.
  85. 85. Young SL, Pitla SK, Van Evert FK, Schueller JK, Pierce FJ. Moving integrated weed management from low level to a truly integrated and highly specific weed management system using advanced technologies. Weed Res. 2017;57:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12234
  86. 86. Krishna KR. Agricultural drones: a peaceful pursuit. Boca Raton (FL): Apple Academic Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315195520
  87. 87. Hunter JE, Gannon TW, Richardson RJ, Yelverton FH, Leon RG. Integration of remote-weed mapping and an autonomous spraying unmanned aerial vehicle for site-specific weed management. Pest Manag Sci. 2020;76(4):1386–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5651
  88. 88. Zhang W, Miao Z, Li N, He C, Sun T. Review of current robotic approaches for precision weed management. Curr Robot Rep. 2022;3:139–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-022-00086-5
  89. 89. Rasmussen J, Nielsen J, Streibig JC, Jensen JE, Pedersen KS, Olsen SI. Pre-harvest weed mapping of Cirsium arvense in wheat and barley with off-the-shelf UAVs. Precis Agric. 2019;20:983–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-09625-7
  90. 90. Ecorobotix. Passez au désherbage intelligent avec Ecorobotix; 2021. https://www.ecorobotix.com/en/
  91. 91. Earthsense; 2021. https://www.earthsense.com
  92. 92. Sanders JT, Everman WJ, Austin R, Roberson GT, Richardson RJ. Weed species differentiation using spectral reflectance land image classification. In: Proc. SPIE 11007, Advanced Environmental, Chemical and Biological Sensing Technologies XV, 110070P; 2019. p. 109–17. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2519306
  93. 93. Esposito M, Crimaldi M, Cirillo V, Sarghini F, Maggio A. Drone and sensor technology for sustainable weed management. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2021;8:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00217-8
  94. 94. Fuentes-Pacheco J, Torres-Olivares J, Roman-Rangel E, Cervantes S, Juarez-Lopez P, Hermosillo-Valadez J, et al. Fig plant segmentation from aerial images using a deep convolutional encoder-decoder network. Remote Sens. 2019;11:1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101157
  95. 95. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Cornell University; 2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.1556
  96. 96. Dua VK, Ahmad I, Rawat S, Lal S, Singh BP. Web-based potato weed manager. Potato J. 2016;43(1):93–7.
  97. 97. Rawal S, Khan MA, Dua VK, Singh SP, Yadav SK, Lal SS, et al. Weed management in potato. Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India: CPRI; 2014. p. 78.
  98. 98. Roychoudhury S, Brahmachari K, Deb R, Mandal SS. An integrated approach to manage weeds in groundnut–upland rice–potato cropping sequence. Crop Weed. 2011;7(1):120–3.
  99. 99. Wong ACS, Massel K, Lam Y, Hintzsche J, Chauhan BS. Biotechnological road map for innovative weed management. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:887723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.887723
  100. 100. Yu Q, Liu S, Yu L, Xiao Y, Zhang S, Wang X. RNA demethylation increases the yield and biomass of rice and potato plants in field trials. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1581–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00982-9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.