Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Plant Science Today (PST)

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp3 (2026): Climate-Weed Nexus: Innovations for Sustainable Farming (CWIS 2025)

Genetic variability assessment of rice genotypes for drought stress tolerance under controlled conditions

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13457
Submitted
30 December 2025
Published
16-04-2026

Abstract

Drought is the major abiotic stress that limits rice productivity in rainfed lowland and upland ecosystems. Rice yields in drought-prone rainfed systems remain low and tend to be unstable.  We investigated the response of fifteen rice genotypes under control and drought conditions. Irrigation was given regularly for both the control and drought treatments up to flowering according to their duration and then irrigation was withdrawn for a period of 14 days to create drought conditions. Observations on physiological parameters were taken at this stage. Results revealed that total biomass plant-1, total grain weight plant-1, number of panicles, relative water content, membrane stability index, chlorophyll a, total chlorophyll content and plant height decreased significantly under drought conditions compared to the control condition. Analysis of genotype and genotype × trait exhibited that PC1 and PC2 governed 56.20 % variability under control conditions, while under drought conditions, they accounted for 54.6 % of variability. In drought conditions, the most contributing traits were found to be chlorophyll a content (35.3 %), total grain weight (33.5 %), total chlorophyll content (30 %), plant height (26.6 %), total biomass (24.7 %) and number of panicles (20 %). Since total grain weight governed maximum genetic variability, clustering of genotypes based on relative grain weight resulted in four distinct clusters. Out of 15 rice genotypes, 6 belonged to the efficient cluster, 5 to the moderately efficient cluster, 3 to the moderately inefficient cluster and one was included in the inefficient cluster. The genotypes identified in this study may be utilised as ‘donors’ by the breeders to develop drought-tolerant cultivars in rice.

References

  1. 1. Bimpong IK, Serraj R, Chin JH, Ramos J, Mendoza EMT, Hernandez JE, et al. Identification of QTLs for drought-related traits in alien introgression lines derived from crosses of Oryza sativa cv. IR64 × Oryza glaberrima under moisture stress. J Plant Biol. 2011;54:237–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-011-9161-z
  2. 2. Baldoni E, Bagnaresi P, Locatelli F, Mattana M, Genga A. Comparative leaf and root transcriptomic analysis of two rice japonica cultivars reveals major differences in the root early response to osmotic stress. Rice. 2016;9:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0098-1
  3. 3. Yi Y, Hassan MA, Cheng X, Li Y, Liu H, Fang W, et al. QTL mapping and analysis for drought tolerance in rice by genome-wide association study. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1223782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1223782
  4. 4. Sandhu N, Kumar A. Bridging the rice yield gaps under drought: QTLs, genes and their use in breeding programs. Agronomy. 2017;7:27. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7020027
  5. 5. Cheeseman J. Food security in the face of salinity, drought, climate change and population growth. In: Khan MA, Ozturk M, Gul B, Ahmed MZ, editors. Halophytes for food security in dry lands. Academic Press; 2016. p. 111–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801854-5.00007-8
  6. 6. Lesk C, Rowhani P, Ramankutty N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production. Nature. 2016;529:84–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16467
  7. 7. Pandey V, Shukla A. Acclimation and tolerance strategies of rice under drought stress. Rice Sci. 2015;22:147–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2015.04.001
  8. 8. McCouch SR, McNally KL, Wang W, Sackville Hamilton R. Genomics of gene banks: a case study in rice. Am J Bot. 2012;99:407–23. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100385
  9. 9. Voss-Fels K, Snowdon RJ. Understanding and utilizing crop genome diversity via high-resolution genotyping. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14:1086–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12456
  10. 10. Tiwari S, Lata C, Chauhan PS, Nautiyal CS. Pseudomonas putida attunes morphophysiological, biochemical and molecular responses in Cicer arietinum L. during drought stress and recovery. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;99:108–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.11.001
  11. 11. 11. Tiwari S, Lata C, Singh Chauhan P, Prasad V, Prasad M. A functional genomic perspective on drought signalling and its crosstalk with phytohormone-mediated signalling pathways in plants. Curr Genom. 2017;18:469–82. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202918666170605083319
  12. 12. Bhandari U, Gajurel A, Khadka B, Thapa I, Chand I, Bhatta D, et al. Morpho-physiological and biochemical response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to drought stress: A review. Heliyon. 2023;9:e13744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13744
  13. 13. Donde R, Kumar J, Gouda G, Gupta MK, Mukherjee M, Baksh SY, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity of drought tolerant and susceptible rice genotypes using microsatellite markers. Rice Sci. 2019;26:239–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2019.01.004
  14. 14. Roy S, Verma BC, Banerjee A, Kumar J, Ray US, Mandal NP. Genetic diversity for drought and low-phosphorus tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties and donors adapted to rainfed drought-prone ecologies. Sci Rep. 2021;11:13671. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93325-2
  15. 15. Gurumurthy S, Sanjay UN, Amaregouda A, Apoorva A, Kruthika S, Durga G, et al. Understanding the impact of combined heat and drought stress on the reproductive process of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Physiol Rep. 2024;29:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-023-00749-1
  16. 16. Barrs HD, Weatherley PE. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci. 1962;15:413–28. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
  17. 17. Blum A, Ebercon A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 1981;21:43–7. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100010013x
  18. 18. Kumar P, Yadav S, Singh MP. Bioregulators application improved heat tolerance and yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by modulating zeaxanthin cycle. Plant Physiol Rep. 2020;25:677–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-020-00555-z
  19. 19. Kamarudin ZS, Yusop MR, Mohamed MTM, Ismail MR, Harun AR. Growth performance and antioxidant enzyme activities of advanced mutant rice genotypes under drought stress condition. Agronomy. 2018;8:279. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8120279
  20. 20. Hussain T, Hussain N, Ahmed M, Nualsri C, Duangpan S. Responses of lowland rice genotypes under terminal water stress and identification of drought tolerance to stabilize rice productivity in southern Thailand. Plants. 2021;10:2565. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122565
  21. 21. Zhu Q, Hassan MA, Li Y, Fang W, Wu J, Wang S. Physiological and transcriptomic characterization of rice genotypes under drought stress. Agronomy. 2024;14:2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102247
  22. 22. Farooq M, Kobayashi N, Ito O, Wahid A, Serraj R. Broader leaves result in better performance of indica rice under drought stress. J Plant Physiol. 2010;167:1066–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.03.003
  23. 23. Gaballah MM, Metwally AM, Skalicky M, Hassan MM, Brestic M, El Sabagh A, et al. Genetic diversity of selected rice genotypes under water stress conditions. Plants. 2020;10:27. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010027
  24. 24. Ndikuryayo C, Ndayiragije A, Kilasi NL, Kusolwa P. Identification of drought tolerant rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes with Asian and African backgrounds. Plants. 2023;12:922. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040922
  25. 25. Zaman NK, Abdullah MY, Othman S, Zaman NK. Growth and physiological performance of aerobic and lowland rice as affected by water stress at selected growth stages. Rice Sci. 2018;25:82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2018.02.001
  26. 26. Gana AS. Screening and resistance of traditional and improved cultivars of rice to drought stress at Badeggi, Niger State, Nigeria. Agric Biol J N Am. 2011;2:1027–31. https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2011.2.6.1027.1031
  27. 27. Kumar A, Dixit S, Ram T, Yadaw RB, Mishra KK, Mandal NP. Breeding high-yielding drought-tolerant rice: genetic variations and conventional and molecular approaches. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:6265–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru363
  28. 28. Ghazy MI, El-Naem SA, Hefeina AG, Sallam A, Eltaher S. Genome-wide association study of rice diversity panel reveals new QTLs for tolerance to water deficit under the Egyptian conditions. Rice. 2024;17:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-024-00703-1
  29. 29. Sakran RM, Ghazy MI, Gaballah MM, Hussein FA, Aamer SM, Ghazy HA, et al. Genetic variability in physiological and agronomic traits of newly developed rice lines under well-watered and water-deficit conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2025;25:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07436-3
  30. 30. Kamoshita A, Babu RC, Boopathi NM, Fukai S. Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of drought-resistance traits for development of rice cultivars adapted to rainfed environments. Field Crops Res. 2008;109:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.06.010
  31. 31. Jia Y, Liu H, Wang H, Zou D, Qu Z, Wang J, et al. Effects of root characteristics on panicle formation in japonica rice under low temperature water stress at the reproductive stage. Field Crops Res. 2022;277:108395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108395
  32. 32. Silva M de A, Jifon JL, Silva JAGda, Sharma V. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2007;19:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003
  33. 33. Awaji SM, Hanjagi PS, Repudi SR, Suravi US, Baig MJ, Swain P. Identification and characterization of drought tolerant rice genotypes using physiological and biochemical traits. ORYZA-Int J Rice. 2022;59:221–31. https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2022.59.2.12
  34. 34. Swapna S, Shylaraj KS. Screening for osmotic stress responses in rice varieties under drought condition. Rice Sci. 2017;24:253–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2017.04.004
  35. 35. Dien DC, Mochizuki T, Yamakawa T. Effect of various drought stresses and subsequent recovery on proline, total soluble sugar and starch metabolisms in rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Plant Prod Sci. 2019;22:530–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2019.1647787
  36. 36. Sikuku PA, Onyango JC, Netondo GW. Physiological and biochemical responses of five nerica rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties to water deficit at vegetative and reproductive stage. Agric Biol J N Am. 2012;3:93–104. https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2012.3.3.93.104
  37. 37. Nithya N, Beena R, Stephen R, Abida PS, Jayalekshmi VG, Viji MM, et al. Genetic variability, heritability, correlation coefficient and path analysis of morpho-physiological and yield related traits of rice under drought stress. Chem Sci Rev Lett. 2020;9:48–54. https://doi.org/10.37273/chesci.cs142050122
  38. 38. Mishra SS, Behera PK, Panda D. Genotypic variability for drought tolerance-related morpho-physiological traits among indigenous rice landraces of Jeypore tract of Odisha, India. J Crop Improv. 2019;33:254–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2019.1579138
  39. 39. Bangar P, Chaudhury A, Tiwari B, Kumar S, Kumari R, Bhat KV. Morphophysiological and biochemical response of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) varieties at different developmental stages under drought stress. Turk J Biol. 2019;43:58–69. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1801-64
  40. 40. Upadhyaya H, Panda SK. Drought stress responses and its management in rice. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M, Nahar K, Biswas JK, editors. Advances in rice research for abiotic stress tolerance. Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814332-2.00009-5
  41. 41. Pinto SD, Souza AE, Oliva MA, Pereira EG. Oxidative damage and photosynthetic impairment in tropical rice cultivars upon exposure to excess iron. Sci Agric. 2016;73:217–26. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0288
  42. 42. Chutia J, Borah S. Water stress effects on leaf growth and chlorophyll content but not the grain yield in traditional rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) genotypes of Assam, India II. Protein and proline status in seedlings under PEG induced water stress. Am J Plant Sci. 2012;3:971–80. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.37115
  43. 43. Henry A, Wehler R, Grondin A, Franke R, Quintana M. Environmental and physiological effects on grouping of drought-tolerant and susceptible rice varieties related to rice (Oryza sativa) root hydraulics under drought. Ann Bot. 2016;118:711–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw068
  44. 44. Rejeth R, Manikanta ChLN, Beena R, Roy S, Manju RV, Viji MM. Water stress mediated root trait dynamics and identification of microsatellite markers associated with root traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2020;26:1225–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00809-y
  45. 45. Beena R, Praveenkumar VP, Vighneswaran V, Narayankutty MC. Bulked line analysis: a useful tool to identify microsatellite markers linked to drought tolerance in rice. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2018;23:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-017-0321-0
  46. 46. Prathi NB, Salim AP, Beena R, Achuthan VP, Abdulla NP. Morpho-physiological and proteomic analysis to identify and characterise the traditional rice genotypes for drought tolerance. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2018;23:785–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0405-5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.