Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp3 (2026): Climate-Weed Nexus: Innovations for Sustainable Farming (CWIS 2025)

Soil biological health under integrated weed management strategies in grain cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13466
Submitted
31 December 2025
Published
23-04-2026

Abstract

Soil biological indicators such as microbial population and enzyme activities are highly sensitive to chemical weed control and serve as early signals of soil health. Integrated weed management (IWM) with low-dose, high-efficiency herbicides is considered to be environmentally acceptable; however, its impact on soil biological functioning is poorly understood. In the present study, the influence of IWM, comprising pre- and post-emergence herbicides, wheel hoe weeding and hand weeding on soil microbial population and enzymatic activities was evaluated for 2 seasons in grain cowpea. Results indicated that all herbicide applications significantly reduced bacterial, fungal and actinomycete populations temporarily up to 15 days after spraying (DASP), but this reduction was more intense under chlorimuron-ethyl and haloxyfop-R-methyl treatments. Microbial count gradually increased over time as herbicide concentrations declined in the soil, reaching the initial levels by 30 DASP. Dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase and acid phosphatase activities decreased shortly after the application of the herbicides but returned to pre-application levels by 30 DASP, indicating soil resilience and microbial adaptation. However, hand weeding and untreated weedy plots showed higher microbial and enzymatic activities due to increased organic inputs and reduced chemical stress. Among the herbicides evaluated, diclosulam and pretilachlor were identified as the least disruptive to soil biological health. The results indicated that although herbicides may temporarily suppress soil biological activity, the soil system shows strong potential for recovery under integrated weed management practices.

References

  1. 1. Nihal PM, Ameena M, Susha VS, Kalyani MSR, Mani KM, Keshavrao CB, et al. Herbicide-based weed management in blackgram (Vigna mungo L.): A review. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2025;28(3):75–87. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i32071
  2. 2. Neemisha, Sharma S. Soil enzymes and their role in nutrient cycling. In editors: Giri B, Kapoor R, Wu QS, Varma A. Structure and functions of pedosphere. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 173–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8770-9_8
  3. 3. Stepniewska Z, Wolinska A. Soil dehydrogenase activity in the presence of chromium (III) and (VI). Int Agrophys. 2005;19(1):79–83.
  4. 4. Arya SR, Ameena M. Herbicides effect on soil enzyme dynamics in direct-seeded rice. Indian J Weed Sci. 2016;48(3):316–8. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00077.0
  5. 5. Kalyani MSR, Ameena M, Srinivas Y, Shanavas S, Susha VS, Sethulakshmi VS. Bio-efficacy of new herbicide molecules for weed management in grain legumes. J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2024;27(1):191–204. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i1691
  6. 6. Sinha A, Singh JK, Rajpoot SK, Vijayakumar S, Singh A. Efficacy of haloxyfop-R-methyl on weed control, yield and economics of soybean. Indian J Weed Sci. 2025;57(1):146–9. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-8164.2025.00024.3
  7. 7. Kalyani MSR, Ameena M, Pillai S, Raj SK. Standardization of land preparation to exhaust tuber reserve and regeneration of purple nut sedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Indian J Ecol. 2024;51(3):559–63.
  8. 8. Kerala Agricultural University. Package of practices recommendations: Crops. 15th ed. Thrissur: Kerala Agricultural University; 2024. p. 329.
  9. 9. Johnson LF, Curl EA. Methods for research in the ecology of soil borne plant pathogens. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co.; 1972. p. 247.
  10. 10. Casida LE Jr, Klein DA, Santoro T. Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 1964;98(6):371–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004
  11. 11. Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1988;20(5):601–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(88)90141-1
  12. 12. Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1977;9(3):167–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(77)90070-0
  13. 13. Cycon M, Piotrowska-Seget Z. Biochemical and microbial soil functioning after application of sulfonylurea herbicides. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:16297–309.
  14. 14. Gao Z, Gu C, Fan X, Shen L, Jin Z, Wang F, et al. Biochemical insights into the biodegradation mechanism of typical sulfonylurea herbicides and association with active enzymes and physiological response of fungal microbes: A multi-omics approach. Environ Int. 2024;190:108906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108906
  15. 15. Shultana R, Ali Tan KZ, Rana M, Roy TK, Naher UA, Ibne Baki MZ, et al. Exploring the impact of agricultural pesticides on soil microbes: A comprehensive review. Egypt J Soil Sci. 2025;65(3):1247–71. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2025.371094.2081
  16. 16. Xu J, Zhang Y, Dong F, Liu X, Wu X, Zheng Y. Effects of repeated applications of chlorimuron-ethyl on soil microbial biomass, activity, and microbial community in the greenhouse. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;92(2):175–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-013-1156-7
  17. 17. Zhou Y, Ma J, Zhang S, Song X, Jiang X, Zhang Q. The impact of the herbicide haloxyfop-R-methyl on the development of Spartina alterniflora roots. Environ Technol Innov. 2025;37:103994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103994
  18. 18. Senseman SA. Herbicide handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence (KS): Weed Science Society of America; 2007. p. 243–6.
  19. 19. Brown A, Brosnan J, Basinger N, Porter W, Henry G. Impact of verticutting on the efficacy and soil activity of ALS-inhibiting herbicides for dallisgrass control. HortScience. 2022;57(2):290–6. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16209-21
  20. 20. Bamal D, Duhan A, Pal A, Beniwal RK, Kumawat P, Dhanda S, et al. Herbicide risks to non-target species and the environment: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2024;22:2977–3032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-024-01773-9
  21. 21. Rose MT, Cavagnaro TR, Scanlan CA, Rose TJ, Vancov T, Kimber S, et al. Impact of herbicides on soil biology and function. Adv Agron. 2016;136:133–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2015.11.005
  22. 22. Karpouzas DG, Vryzas Z, Martin-Laurent F. Pesticide soil microbial toxicity: Setting the scene for a new pesticide risk assessment for soil microorganisms (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem. 2022;94(10):1161–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2022-0201
  23. 23. Kocak B. Recent advances in relationship between herbicides and β-glucosidase activity in soil ecosystems. In editor: Kocadoru Y. Article and reviews in science and mathematics. Platanus Publishing; 2024.
  24. 24. Du Z, Zhu Y, Zhu L, Zhang J, Li B, Wang J, et al. Effects of the herbicide mesotrione on soil enzyme activity and microbial communities. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;164:571–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.075
  25. 25. Baboo M, Pasayat M, Samal A, Kujur M, Maharana JK, Patel AK. Effect of four herbicides on soil organic carbon, microbial biomass C, enzyme activity and microbial populations in agricultural soil. Int J Res Environ Sci Technol. 2013;3(4):100–12.
  26. 26. Kaur P, Kaur J, Kaur H. Fate of halosulfuron-methyl and its effects on enzymatic and microbial activities in soils of different textures. Pedosphere. 2023;33(6):880–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.03.009
  27. 27. Singh MK, Singh NK, Singh SP. Impact of herbicide use on soil microorganisms. In editors: Singh P, Singh SK, Prasad SM. Plant responses to soil pollution. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 179–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4964-9_11
  28. 28. Lal G, Hiremath SM, Chandra K. Imazethapyr effects on soil enzyme activity and nutrient uptake in greengram (Vigna radiata L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(3):247–53. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.027
  29. 29. Dhakad U, Yadav DL, Yadav RK, Singh P. Effect of pre- and post-emergence herbicides alone and in mixtures on soil dehydrogenase, microflora and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.) in vertisols. Pharma Innov J. 2022;11(7):1863–6.
  30. 30. Douibi M, Carpio MJ, Rodríguez-Cruz MS, Sánchez-Martín MJ, Marín-Benito JM. Changes in soil microbial parameters after herbicide application in soils under conventional tillage and non-tillage. Processes. 2024;12(4):827. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040827

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.