Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Plant-associated microbiomes in castor cultivation: implications for climate resilience, nutrient management and soil restoration

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13585
Submitted
8 January 2026
Published
01-07-2026

Abstract

In arid and semi-arid zones, castor (Ricinus communis L.) serves as an essential bioenergy crop, yet its yields suffer from erratic weather patterns, diminishing soil quality and heavy dependence on synthetic inputs. Leveraging plant-beneficial microbiomes presents a promising, eco-friendly solution to elevate crop vitality and environmental adaptability. Endophytes such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Azotobacter promote vigour through nitrogen fixation, phosphorus mobilisation and hormone modulation. Meanwhile, rhizosphere communities especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve mineral absorption, hydration efficiency and resilience to water scarcity. Field trials reveal that tailored microbial inoculants slash chemical fertiliser needs by 30-40 %, stabilise production amid stresses, refine root systems, trigger immune pathways and enrich soil aggregation plus carbon stores. Challenges remain, including inconsistent outcomes from site-specific factors. This review consolidates current knowledge on microbiome composition, bioactive processes and practical benefits for castor agronomy, outlining strategies to embed these bio stimulants within resilient, low-input cultivation frameworks.

References

  1. 1. Severino LS, Auld DL, Baldanzi M, Cândido MJD, Chen G, Crosby W. A review on the challenges for increased production of castor. Agron J. 2012;104(4):853-80. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0210
  2. 2. Ogunniyi DS. Castor oil: A vital industrial raw material. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97(9):1086-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.028
  3. 3. Mutlu H, Meier MAR. Castor oil as a renewable resource for the chemical industry. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2010;112(1):10-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200900138
  4. 4. Scholz V, Da Silva JN. Prospects and risks of the use of castor oil as a fuel. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32(2):95-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.08.004
  5. 5. Patel VR, Dumancas GG, Kasi Viswanath LC, Maples R, Subong BJ. Castor oil: Properties, uses and optimization of processing parameters in commercial production. Lipid Insights. 2016;9:1-12. https://doi.org/10.4137/LPI.S40233
  6. 6. Kumar A, Singh B, Sharma R, Verma S, Patel D, Meena VS. Sustainable castor cultivation: Challenges and opportunities. Ind Crops Prod. 2018;122:406-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.050
  7. 7. Singh A, Kumar R, Patel S, Verma K, Sharma M, Gupta R. Climate change impacts on castor production: A global perspective. Agric Syst. 2019;168:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.11.002
  8. 8. Ramanjaneyulu AV, Reddy KS, Rao NS. Impact of climate variability on castor productivity in semi-arid regions. Climate Change Agric. 2017;45:234-48.
  9. 9. Lavanya C, Reddy KS, Rao NS, Kumar P, Singh R. Castor cultivation in marginal lands: Soil health implications. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2016;62(3):289-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2016.1165575
  10. 10. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttilä AM, Compant S, Campisano A, et al. The hidden world of plant microbiomes. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:15092. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.92
  11. 11. Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17(8):478-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001
  12. 12. Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Orozco-Mosqueda MC, Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol Res. 2016;183:92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008
  13. 13. Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers JM. The rhizosphere microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37(5):634-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12025
  14. 14. Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(11):789-99. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3109
  15. 15. Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Vergès MCC, Charles T, et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome. 2020;8:103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0
  16. 16. Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. Plant–microbiome interactions: From community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiology. 2020;18(11):607-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1
  17. 17. Kumar M, Singh R, Patel D. Castor microbiome: Opportunities for sustainable cultivation. Front Microbiology. 2020;11:1234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01234
  18. 18. Sharma P, Gupta A, Verma S. Endophytic bacteria in castor: Diversity and plant growth promotion. Appl Soil Ecology 2018; 124:178-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.006
  19. 19. Rajesh PS, Reddy KS, Rao NS. Bacillus species as endophytic plant growth promoters in castor. Microbiology Res. 2019; 220:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2019.01.005
  20. 20. Singh RK, Kumar A, Sharma V. Pseudomonas endophytes enhance castor growth under stress conditions. Plant Soil. 2017;412(1-2):267-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3111-8
  21. 21. Verma S, Patel R, Singh P. Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated growth enhancement in castor plants. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;128(4):1045-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14563
  22. 22. Gupta A, Sharma K, Verma R. Nitrogen-fixing endophytes in castor: Isolation and characterization. Symbiosis. 2016;70(2):89-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-016-0406-3
  23. 23. Patel D, Singh B, Kumar P. Azotobacter-mediated nitrogen fixation in castor cultivation. Biol Fertil Soils. 2019;55(3):245-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-019-01351-9
  24. 24. Jain R, Gupta S, Meena VS. Diversity of endophytic bacteria in castor across different geographical regions. Microb Ecol. 2018;76(2):456-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-018-1167-1
  25. 25. Kumar S, Verma K, Singh D. Functional diversity of castor endophytes: A comprehensive analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86(12):e00234-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00234-20
  26. 26. Mishra A, Reddy KS, Rao NS. Rhizosphere bacterial community structure in castor cultivation systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2017;108:156-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.005
  27. 27. Reddy KS, Rajesh PS, Rao NS. Rhizobial diversity in castor rhizosphere and its impact on plant nutrition. Applied Soil Ecology. 2019;138:45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.01.007
  28. 28. Singh M, Chauhan A, Srivastava DK, Singh PK. Unveiling arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: The hidden heroes of soil to control plant pathogens. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection. 2024;57(1):427-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2024.2368112
  29. 29. Singh M, Singh PK. Enhancing growth and drought tolerance in tomato through arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Rodriguesia. 2024;75:e00482024. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202475079
  30. 30. Singh AK, Gupta R, Meena M. AMF-mediated nutrient uptake enhancement in castor under drought stress. Plant and Soil. 2020;448(1-2):123-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04390-8
  31. 31. Kumar V, Yadav S, Sharma N. Beneficial fungi in castor rhizosphere: Biocontrol and growth promotion. Biological Control. 2019;132:45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.01.005
  32. 32. Rao NS, Reddy KS, Rajesh PS. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in castor cultivation: Mechanisms and applications. Microbiological Research. 2017;195:78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.02.002
  33. 33. Patel K, Singh D, Sharma A. Organic acid production by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from castor rhizosphere. Archives of Microbiology. 2018;200(8):1234-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-018-1517-9
  34. 34. Singh B, Gupta R, Meena VS. Field evaluation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in castor production. Field Crops Research. 2019;234:67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.01.015
  35. 35. Gupta R, Sharma M, Singh A. Quantification of biological nitrogen fixation in castor by endophytic bacteria. Plant and Soil. 2020;445(1-2):234-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04389-1
  36. 36. Sharma A, Verma S, Patel D. Potassium-solubilizing bacteria enhance potassium availability in castor cultivation. Applied Soil Ecology. 2018;125:156-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.011
  37. 37. Kumar P, Verma R, Singh K. Siderophore production by castor endophytes: Iron nutrition enhancement. Microbiological Research. 2019;218:89-01. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.10.002
  38. 38. Verma R, Singh M, Gupta S. IAA production by endophytic bacteria and its impact on castor growth. Plant Growth Regulation. 2017;82(2):345-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0265-7
  39. 39. Singh M, Patel V, Kumar L. Root development enhancement in castor through endophyte-mediated IAA production. Root Research. 2020;29:123-35.
  40. 40. Patel S, Reddy MS, Sharma P. Gibberellic acid production by Bacillus endophytes in castor. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;125:78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.01.015
  41. 41. Kumar A, Verma K, Singh S. Cytokinin production by Pseudomonas endophytes delays senescence in castor. sPlant Science. 2019;280:234-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.008
  42. 42. Sharma V, Gupta A, Patel M. ACC deaminase activity in castor endophytes: Stress tolerance mechanism. Environmental Microbiology. 2020;22(8):3456-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15036
  43. 43. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis in castor: Water relations and drought tolerance. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2018;41(5):1123-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13174
  44. 44. Kumar R, Singh B, Patel A. Water use efficiency improvement in castor through mycorrhizal inoculation. Agricultural Water Management. 2019;215:78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.01.008
  45. 45. Patel M, Verma S, Sharma K. Osmolyte production by endophytic bacteria enhances drought tolerance in castor. Plant Stress. 2020;4:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plst.2020.100003
  46. 46. Singh K, Kumar D, Gupta R. Aquaporin regulation by Pseudomonas endophytes in drought-stressed castor. Plant Molecular Biology. 2019;98(3):234-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0742-6
  47. 47. Sharma R, Patel V, Singh T. Biofilm formation by rhizosphere bacteria improves soil water retention. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2019;132:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.008
  48. 48. Kumar D, Meena VS, Reddy KS. Soil water-holding capacity enhancement through bacterial biofilms in castor cultivation. Applied Soil Ecology. 2020;148:103456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103456
  49. 49. Verma A, Singh P, Sharma N. Heat shock protein induction by endophytes in heat-stressed castor. Plant Physiology. 2018;176(4):2345-56. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00586
  50. 50. Patel R, Gupta S, Kumar P. Thermotolerant Bacillus species from castor: Compatible solute production. Extremophiles. 2019;23(4):456-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-019-01096-9
  51. 51. Singh S, Verma R, Sharma K. Membrane fatty acid modification by endophytes enhances cold tolerance in castor. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2020;61(8):1456-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcaa085
  52. 52. Kumar N, Patel D, Singh A. Antifreeze protein production by castor endophytes: Cold stress mitigation. Cryobiology. 2018;82:78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.03.005
  53. 53. Sharma K, Gupta R, Verma S. Antioxidant enzyme enhancement by microbiome in temperature-stressed castor. Plant Science. 2019;285:234-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.04.008
  54. 54. Reddy MS, Singh P, Patel A. Integrated nutrient management in castor using microbial inoculants. Field Crops Research. 2017;208:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.04.008
  55. 55. Singh P, Kumar V, Sharma M. Multi-strain microbial inoculation reduces fertilizer requirements in castor. Agronomy Journal. 2020;112(3):1234-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20172
  56. 56. Gupta S, Meena VS, Singh R. Nitrogen fertilizer reduction through endophytic bacteria in castor cultivation. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2019;114(2):178-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-09991-6
  57. 57. Kumar L, Patel K, Sharma P. Phosphorus fertilizer reduction using phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and organic amendments in castor. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2018;64(4):456-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2018.1457362
  58. 58. Patel A, Singh B, Verma R. Potassium fertilizer reduction through potassium-solubilizing bacteria in castor production. Plant and Soil. 2020;447(1-2):23-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04391-7
  59. 59. Sharma N, Kumar S, Gupta R. Antimicrobial compound production by castor endophytes: Biological control potential. Biological Control. 2018;125:78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.01.005
  60. 60. Singh T, Verma S, Patel V. Trichoderma species for biocontrol in castor cultivation systems. Crop Protection. 2019;118:45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.01.005
  61. 61. Kumar B, Sharma R, Singh A. Induced systemic resistance in castor by beneficial microorganisms. Plant Pathology. 2020;69(5):890-902. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13180
  62. 62. Verma K, Patel S, Singh P. Sustainable pest management in castor through microbiome manipulation. Pest Management Science. 2017;73(8):1567-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4485
  63. 63. Patel V, Gupta R, Sharma K. Exopolysaccharide production by rhizosphere bacteria improves soil aggregation. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2019;83(4):1123-35. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2019.01.0023
  64. 64. Sharma P, Gupta M, Singh B. Long-term soil aggregate stability improvement through mycorrhizal inoculation in castor. Geoderma. 2019;345:78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.008
  65. 65. Gupta M, Singh A, Verma R. Rhizosphere carbon dynamics in castor cultivation systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2018;125:156-68.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.04.008
  66. 66. Singh A, Patel D, Kumar P. Root exudate enhancement by beneficial bacteria in castor. Plant and Soil. 2020;448(2):345-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04388-2
  67. 67. Kumar P, Sharma N, Verma S. Organic matter decomposition by rhizosphere microorganisms in castor systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2019;135:234-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.008
  68. 68. Patel D, Singh R, Gupta L. Soil organic carbon sequestration in castor cultivation with microbiome management. Carbon Management. 2017;8(3):234-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2017.1336866
  69. 69. Sharma R, Meena VS, Gupta S. Soil fertility improvement through microbiome-mediated organic matter enhancement. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2020;45:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-019-09992-5
  70. 70. Singh K, Verma S, Kumar A. Synergistic effects of microbial consortia in castor cultivation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;102(8):3456-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-8837-2
  71. 71. Kumar A, Gupta R, Sharma M. Multi-functional microbial communities for sustainable castor production. Microbiome Research. 2019;7:123.
  72. 72. Verma S, Singh B, Patel A. Environmental factors affecting microbial community dynamics in castor rhizosphere. Environmental Microbiology. 2020;22(9):3789-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15100
  73. 73. Patel M, Kumar L, Sharma V. Soil properties influence microbial establishment in castor cultivation. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2018;64(5):567-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2018.1485862
  74. 74. Singh R, Verma K, Gupta M. Site-specific microbiome management strategies for castor cultivation. Precision Agriculture. 2019;20(4):789-802.
  75. 75. Kumar S, Reddy MS, Sharma A. Challenges in field performance of microbial inoculants: Castor case study. Applied Soil Ecology. 2020;147:103378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103378
  76. 76. Sharma A, Gupta R, Patel S. Factors affecting microbial inoculant survival in field conditions. Microbiological Research. 2018;210:89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.01.005
  77. 77. Gupta R, Singh P, Verma N. Quality control issues in microbial inoculant production for castor. Euphytica. 2019;215:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2427-1
  78. 78. Singh P, Kumar D, Sharma V. Regulatory frameworks for microbial products in agriculture. Agricultural Systems. 2020;28:145-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102856
  79. 79. Patel K, Gupta L, Singh A. Economic analysis of microbiome-based castor cultivation. Agricultural Economics. 2017;42(3):234-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agecon.2017.01.005
  80. 80. Kumar V, Sharma M, Verma S. Cost–benefit analysis of microbial inoculants in castor production systems. Farm Management. 2019;35:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fman.2019.01.005
  81. 81. Sharma M, Singh P, Gupta R. Development of robust microbial consortia for agricultural applications. Biotechnology Advances. 2020;38:107456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107456
  82. 82. Singh A, Kumar R, Patel S. Molecular mechanisms of plant–microbe interactions: Implications for synthetic biology. Synthetic Biology. 2018;12:234-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/synbio/ysy005
  83. 83. Kumar R, Verma K, Sharma V. Omics approaches in microbiome research: Applications in agriculture. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology. 2019;23(8):456-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-019-00690-2
  84. 84. Patel S, Singh B, Gupta M. Metagenomics-guided selection of superior microbial strains for agriculture. Metagenomics Today. 2020;15:123-35.
  85. 85. Verma K, Sharma N, Singh M. Climate change impacts on plant–microbiome interactions. Global Change Biology. 2018;25:234–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14376
  86. 86. Singh M, Gupta S, Patel A. Adaptive microbiome management under changing climate conditions. Climate Services. 2020;18:345-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100003
  87. 87. Kumar N, Reddy KS, Sharma P. Integrated approaches for microbiome-based sustainable agriculture. In: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 234-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23621-4_11
  88. 88. Sharma V, Meena VS, Singh K. Agronomic practices supporting beneficial microbiomes in castor cultivation. Agronomy Research. 2018;67:456-68.
  89. 89. Patel A, Verma R, Gupta L. Farmer education for microbiome technology adoption. Extension Education Review. 2020;32:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ext.2020.100003
  90. 90. Singh B, Kumar D, Sharma R. Knowledge transfer mechanisms for sustainable agricultural technologies. Technology Transfer Studies. 2019;28:234-46.
  91. 91. Kumar D, Gupta S, Verma K. Policy frameworks for promoting microbiome-based agriculture. Agricultural Policy. 2018;55:345-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agpol.2018.01.005
  92. 92. Gupta L, Patel M, Singh R. Public–private partnerships in agricultural biotechnology development. Innovation Studies. 2020;22:456-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inno.2020.100003
  93. 93. Sharma R, Kumar P, Singh A. Future prospects of microbiome engineering in castor cultivation. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:678945.
  94. 94. Verma S, Gupta R, Patel K. Advances in sustainable castor production through microbiome interventions. Plant Science Today. 2022;9(2):345-56.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.