Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp5 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Genetic variability, correlation, path analysis and genetic divergence for yield traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13599
Submitted
9 January 2026
Published
30-08-2026

Abstract

Twenty cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes were evaluated during the summer of 2022 at the Horticultural Research Centre, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, to estimate genetic variability and selection parameters for 16 quantitative traits. The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design (RBD) with three replications at 90 × 60 cm spacing. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant differences among genotypes for all traits, indicating the presence of substantial variability. High genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation were recorded for average fruit weight, fruit yield per hectare, vine length and number of fruits per plant, while all traits exhibited high heritability coupled with moderate to high genetic advance as percent of mean, suggesting the predominance of additive gene action. Fruit yield per hectare showed highly significant and positive correlations with fruit yield per plot, fruit diameter, number of fruits per plant, average fruit weight, number of leaves per plant, fruit length and vine length at both genotypic and phenotypic levels, whereas days to first male and female flower anthesis and days to first fruit harvest were negatively associated. Genotypic path analysis revealed high positive direct effects of fruit diameter, fruit yield per plot, days to first male and female flower anthesis, vine length, node number to first male and female flower anthesis, number of fruits per plant and average fruit weight on fruit yield per hectare. Mahalanobis D² analysis grouped the genotypes into five clusters, with maximum inter–cluster distance between clusters III and V, indicating high genetic divergence and suggesting that crosses between these clusters may produce superior segregants for yield and related traits.

References

  1. 1. Sitterly WR. Breeding for disease resistance in cucurbits. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1972; 10:471–90. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.10.090172.002351
  2. 2. Kirkbride JH Jr. Biosystematics monograph of the genus Cucumis (Cucurbitaceae). Boone (NC): Parkway Publishers; 1993. p. 159.
  3. 3. Perl-Treves R, Galun E. The Cucumis plastome: physical map, intrageneric variation and phylogenetic relationships. Theor Appl Genet. 1985; 71:417–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251182
  4. 4. Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT: Cucumber production statistics. 2023.
  5. 5. National Horticulture Board. Horticultural statistics at a glance. India: NHB.
  6. 6. Hassan AAM. Pumpkin, watermelon, cantaloupe and cucumber (Cucurbita pepo): production technology, physiology, agricultural practices, harvesting and storage. Egypt: Arab House for Publishing and Distribution; 2001.
  7. 7. Toman SS, Al-Taey DKA, Al-Tawaha AR, Sirajuddin SN, Rasyid I, Hassan AA. Effect of foliar application and mineral fertilizer on growth parameters and auxins, GA and CK content in cucumber leaves. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020; 492:012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012009
  8. 8. Zhou Z, Dong Y, Sun H, Yang A, Chen Z, Gao S, et al. Transcriptome sequencing of sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus) and identification of gene-associated markers. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014;14(1):127–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12147
  9. 9. Afangideh U, Uyoh EA, Ittah M, Uko AE. Morphological characterization of some cucumber cultivars (Cucumis sativus L.). J Sustain Trop Agric Res. 2005;14:13–18.
  10. 10. Subramanian A, Subbaraman N. Hierarchical cluster analysis of genetic diversity in maize germplasm. Electron J Plant Breed. 2010; 1:431–36.
  11. 11. Tadkal R, Rajasree V, Swarnapriya R, Senthil N, Raveendran M. Exploring genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in growth and yield traits of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).
  12. 12. Singh RK, Chaudhary BD. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers; 1985.
  13. 13. Brown AH. Genetic structure of crop landraces and the challenge to conserve them in situ on farms. In: Genes in the field: On-farm conservation of crop diversity. Ottawa (ON): IDRC; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049824.sec2
  14. 14. Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: ICAR; 1954.
  15. 15. Burton GW. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proc 6th Int Grassl Congr. 1952; 1:227–83.
  16. 16. Falconer DS. Introduction to quantitative genetics. England: Longman Group Ltd; 1996.
  17. 17. Robinson HF. Quantitative genetics in relation to breeding in the centennial of Mendelism. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 1966; 26:171–87.
  18. 18. Allard RW. Principles of plant breeding. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1960.
  19. 19. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in soybean and their implications in selection. Agron J. 1955;47(10):477–83. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700100008x
  20. 20. Al-Jibouri H, Miller PA, Robinson HF. Genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agron J. 1958;50(10):633–46. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000100020x
  21. 21. Dewey DI, Lu KH. Correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J. 1959;51:515–18. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
  22. 22. Mahalanobis PC. Analysis of race mixture in Bengal. J Asiatic Soc Bengal. 1925; 1:1.
  23. 23. Rao CR. Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1952. p. 390.
  24. 24. Sheoran OP. Statistical Package for Agricultural Scientists (OPSTAT). Hisar: CCS Haryana Agricultural University.
  25. 25. Al-Hayali REY, Al-Jaf IHM, Al-Miahy FHR, Al-Dulaimy AFZ. Evaluation of orange and biofertilizer on some yield traits of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Bionatura. 2023;8(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/CSS/S2023.08.01.46
  26. 26. Veena R, Sidhu AS, Pitchaimuthu M, Souravi K. Character association for fruit yield and yield traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Electron J Plant Breed. 2013;4(1):1108–12.
  27. 27. Singh DK, Padiyar S, Choudhary H. Biochemical characterization of parthenocarpic gynoecious cucumber lines, hybrids and wild relatives. Indian J Hortic. 2010;67(3):343–47. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2015.00067.5
  28. 28. Ullah MZ, Hasan MJ, Chowdhury AZMK, Saki AI, Rahman AHMA. Genetic variability and correlation in exotic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) varieties. Bangladesh J Plant Breed Genet. 2012;25(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjpbg.v25i1.17008
  29. 29. Rajawat KS, Collis JP. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for quantitative and qualitative traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2017;6(4):882–85.
  30. 30. Hosamani MV. Assessment of variability and genetic divergence in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). 2017.
  31. 31. Arab Salmani K, Hakimi Y. Evaluation of genetic diversity among superior cucumber genotypes using morphological and pomological traits. Int J Hortic Sci Technol. 2024;11(2):229–48.
  32. 32. Athira KS, Pradeepkumar T, Kutty MS, Minimol JS, Mathew D, Rashmi CR. Genetic variability and correlation analysis in parthenocarpic cucumber under protected cultivation. J Sci Res Rep. 2025;31(4):746–55. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2025/v31i42998
  33. 33. Chikezie OE, Peter EO, Christian UA, Uche PC. Phenotypic and genotypic variation in cucumber genotypes. Chil J Agric Res. 2016;76(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392016000300007
  34. 34. Mohanty BK, Mishra RS. Genetic variability and parameters for yield and its components in pumpkin. Indian J Hortic. 1999;56(4):90–120.
  35. 35. Jat RK, Ameta KD, Choudhary RC. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in valan kakri (Cucumis sativus L.). Ecoscan. 2014; 6:317–22.
  36. 36. Mehta P, Sharma P, Kaur M, Sharma A, Bhardwaj N. Correlation and path analysis in parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Veg Sci. 2022;49(1):116–19. https://doi.org/10.61180/vegsci.2022.v49.i1.19
  37. 37. Tadkal R, Rajasree V, Swarnapriya R, Senthil N, Raveendran M. Selection of yield-associated traits using correlation and path analysis in cucumber. Int J Res Agron. 2024;7:414–17. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2024.v7.i7Sf.1079
  38. 38. Pal S, Sharma HR, Das A, Pandav AK. Character association and path analysis for fruit yield in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2017;10(2):163–68. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-732X.2017.00019.5
  39. 39. Sharma S, Kumar R, Chatterjee S, Sharma HR. Correlation and path analysis for yield and its attributes in cucumber. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6(2):2045–48.
  40. 40. Kumar S, Kumar D, Kumar R, Thakur KS, Dogra BS. Genetic variability and divergence for fruit yield and quality traits in cucumber. Univ J Plant Sci. 2013;1(2):27–36. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujps.2013.010201
  41. 41. Rani VU, Sahu GS, Tripathy P, Das S, Badu M, Balo S, et al. Genetic divergence in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes for yield and quality traits. Indian J Agric Res. 2025;59(3):442–46. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJARe.A-6097
  42. 42. Ahmed I, Rohman MM, Hossain MA, Molla MR, Azam MG, Hasan MM, et al. Phenotypic variation in cucumber landraces for climate-resilient cultivar development. Life. 2022;12(8):1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081235

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.