Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Silicon-mediated regulation of plant stress responses: Transport mechanisms, molecular crosstalk and agricultural prospects

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13754
Submitted
21 January 2026
Published
05-05-2026

Abstract

Plants face diverse environmental stresses throughout their life cycle that establishes a perennial evolutionary pressure for plants. This creates a challenge for plant health and survival, raising major concerns about global health and food security. Plant stress plays a vital role in understudying plant physiology and its impact on the yield of agricultural fields, which will elucidate key aspects of plant morphological, physiological and metabolic changes. This study explores the multifaceted role of silicon (Si) in mitigating plant stress and its application for improving agricultural yield. It moves beyond the current paradigm of passive mechanical support by exploring the Si transport cascade through the influx-efflux transporter and its crosstalk with plant defence hormones. Furthermore, this paper highlights different techno-economic assessments (TEA) of Si-based biofertiliser including life cycle assessment (LCA) and reinforce its commercial viability of Si-mediated involvement in sustainable strategies in agriculture. Unlike previous reviews, this work uniquely integrates Si transporter biology, hormonal crosstalk and TEA/LCA perspectives, while explicitly identifying key knowledge gaps including transporter diversity across non-model crops, long-term nano-Si field safety and species-specific variability and their practical implications for sustainable agriculture. This underscores the significance Si-based stress management as a sustainable and eco-friendly strategy for climate-resilient agriculture, offering significant potential to enhance global food security. Future research should focus on developing Si-efficient crop varieties and integrating Si management with precision agriculture technologies to maximise stress tolerance and agricultural productivity.

References

  1. 1. Jalal A, Wang Y, Cai C, Ayaz A, Alabbosh KF, Khan KA, et al. The architecture of adaptive lignin biosynthesis navigating environmental stresses in plants. J Agron Crop Sci. 2025;211(1):e70012. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70012
  2. 2. Xu Y, Bu W, Xu Y, Fei H, Zhu Y, Ahmad I, et al. Effects of salt stress on physiological and agronomic traits of rice genotypes with contrasting salt tolerance. Plants. 2024;13(8):1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13081157
  3. 3. Rahim HU, Ali W, Uddin M, Ahmad S, Khan K, Bibi H, et al. Abiotic stresses in soils, their effects on plants and mitigation strategies: a literature review. Chem Ecol. 2025;41(4):552–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2024.2439830
  4. 4. Vagelas I, Michail G, Madesis P. Microbial biostimulants. In: Pests and diseases: a global threat to plants. Apple Academic Press; 2024. p. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003484837-1
  5. 5. Bhat MM, Bashir Z, Hamid B, Nisa M. Organic farming. In: Impact of the synthetic fertilizer pesticides on soil health and soil microbiology. CRC Press; 2025. p. 282–302. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003491460-12
  6. 6. Ali AM, Bijay-Singh. Silicon: a crucial element for enhancing plant resilience in challenging environments. J Plant Nutr. 2025;48(3):486–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2406479
  7. 7. Mittal U, Kumar V, Kukreja S, Singh B, Pandey NK, Goutam U. Role of beneficial elements in developing resilience to abiotic and biotic stresses in plants: present status and future prospects. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022;42(6):3789–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10840-w
  8. 8. Murali-Baskaran RK, Senthil-Nathan S, Hunter WB. Anti-herbivore activity of soluble silicon for crop protection in agriculture: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;28(3):2626–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11453-0
  9. 9. Liang Y, Nikolic M, Bélanger R, Gong H, Song A. Silicon in agriculture. Springer; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9978-2
  10. 10. Schaller J, Puppe D, Kaczorek D, Ellerbrock R, Sommer M. Silicon cycling in soils revisited. Plants. 2021;10(2):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020295
  11. 11. Kaur H, Greger M. A review on Si uptake and transport system. Plants. 2019;8(4):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8040081
  12. 12. Kovács S, Kutasy E, Csajbók J. The multiple role of silicon nutrition in alleviating environmental stresses in sustainable crop production. Plants. 2022;11(9):1223. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091223
  13. 13. Liu X, Van Hoek WJ, Vilmin L, Beusen A, Mogollón JM, Middelburg JJ, et al. Exploring long-term changes in silicon biogeochemistry along the river continuum of the Rhine and Yangtze (Changjiang). Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(19):11940–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01465
  14. 14. Xiao Z, Yan G, Ye M, Liang Y. Silicon relieves aluminum-induced inhibition of cell elongation in rice root apex by reducing the deposition of aluminum in the cell wall. Plant Soil. 2021;462(1–2):189–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-04850-y
  15. 15. Huang S, Ma JF. Silicon transport and its homeostasis in rice. Quant Plant Biol. 2025;5:e15. https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2024.19
  16. 16. Konishi N, Mitani-Ueno N, Yamaji N, Ma JF. Polar localization of a rice silicon transporter requires isoleucine at both C- and N-termini as well as positively charged residues. Plant Cell. 2023;35(6):2232. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad073
  17. 17. Ma JF, Yamaji N. Functions and transport of silicon in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(19):3049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-7580-x
  18. 18. Nawaz MA, Azeem F, Zakharenko AM, Lin X, Atif RM, Baloch FS, et al. In-silico exploration of channel type and efflux silicon transporters and silicification proteins in 80 sequenced Viridiplantae genomes. Plants. 2020;9(11):1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111612
  19. 19. Mitani-Ueno N, Ma JF. Linking transport system of silicon with its accumulation in different plant species. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;67(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1845972
  20. 20. Barreto RF, Barão L. Silicon: transcellular and apoplastic absorption and transport in the xylem. In: de Mello Prado R, editor. Benefits of silicon in the nutrition of plants. Cham.: Springer; 2023. p. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26673-7_2
  21. 21. Sun H, Duan Y, Mitani-Ueno N, Che J, Jia J, Liu J, et al. Tomato roots have a functional silicon influx transporter but not a functional silicon efflux transporter. Plant Cell Environ. 2020;43(3):732–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13679
  22. 22. Mitani N, Yamaji N, Ma JF. Identification of maize silicon influx transporters. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;50(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn110
  23. 23. Réthoré E, Ali N, Yvin JC, Hosseini SA. Silicon regulates source to sink metabolic homeostasis and promotes growth of rice plants under sulfur deficiency. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(10):3677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103677
  24. 24. Sahu PK, Jayalakshmi K, Tilgam J, Gupta A, Nagaraju Y, Kumar A, et al. ROS generated from biotic stress: effects on plants and alleviation by endophytic microbes. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1042936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1042936
  25. 25. Mostofa MG, Rahman MM, Ansary MMU, Keya SS, Abdelrahman M, Miah MG, et al. Silicon in mitigation of abiotic stress-induced oxidative damage in plants. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2021;41(6):918–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1892582
  26. 26. Cabello GGC, Rodriguez AR, Gondal AH, Areche FO, Flores DDC, Astete JAQ, et al. Plant adaptability to climate change and drought stress for crop growth and production. CAB Rev. 2023;2023:0004.
  27. 27. Mundada PS, Jadhav SV, Salunkhe SS, Gurme ST, Umdale SD, Barmukh RB, et al. Silicon and plant responses under adverse environmental conditions. In: Husen A, editor. Plant performance under environmental stress. Cham.: Springer; 2021. p. 357–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78521-5_14
  28. 28. Mushtaq N, Altaf MA, Ning J, Shu H, Fu H, Lu X, et al. Silicon improves the drought tolerance in pepper plants through the induction of secondary metabolites, GA biosynthesis pathway and suppression of chlorophyll degradation. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024;214:108919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108919
  29. 29. Kim YH, Khan AL, Waqas M, Lee IJ. Silicon regulates antioxidant activities of crop plants under abiotic-induced oxidative stress: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00510
  30. 30. Arif Y, Singh P, Siddiqui H, Bajguz A, Hayat S. Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in plants: an omic approach towards salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;156:64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.042
  31. 31. Joshi S, Nath J, Singh AK, Pareek A, Joshi R. Ion transporters and their regulatory signal transduction mechanisms for salinity tolerance in plants. Physiol Plant. 2022;174(3):e13702. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13702
  32. 32. Mahmood MZ, Odeibat HA, Ahmad R, Gatasheh MK, Shahzad M, Abbasi AM. Low apoplastic Na⁺ and intracellular ionic homeostasis confer salinity tolerance upon Ca₂SiO₄ chemigation in Zea mays L. under salt stress. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1268750. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1268750
  33. 33. Riaz M, Zhao S, Kamran M, Ur Rehman N, Mora-Poblete F, Maldonado C, et al. Effect of nano-silicon on the regulation of ascorbate-glutathione contents, antioxidant defense system and growth of copper stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:986991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.986991
  34. 34. Mao W, Guo L, Sun T, Song X, Gao S, Li X, et al. Exogenous application of silicon and spermidine alleviate cadmium toxicity by modulating endogenous polyamines level and glutathione metabolism in Salix matsudana Koidz. seedlings. J Plant Growth Regul. 2025;44(5):2583–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-024-11570-x
  35. 35. Cui B, Liu R, Flowers TJ, Song J. Casparian bands and suberin lamellae: key targets for breeding salt tolerant crops? Environ Exp Bot. 2021;191:104600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104600
  36. 36. Kosakivska IV, Babenko LM, Romanenko KO, Korotka IY, Potters G. Molecular mechanisms of plant adaptive responses to heavy metals stress. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45(2):258–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.11503
  37. 37. Jain S, Muneer S, Guerriero G, Liu S, Vishwakarma K, Chauhan DK, et al. Tracing the role of plant proteins in the response to metal toxicity: a comprehensive review. Plant Signal Behav. 2018;13(9):e1507401. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2018.1507401
  38. 38. Zhai F, Yin M, Mao J, Liu J, Li H, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of silicon on the transport, subcellular distribution and chemical forms of lead in Salix viminalis L. Plant Soil Environ. 2025;71(4):249–58. https://doi.org/10.17221/8/2025-PSE
  39. 39. Yang W, Feng H, Zhou J, Jia T, Tang T, Zhang H, et al. Exogenous silicon induces aluminum tolerance in white clover (Trifolium repens) by reducing aluminum uptake and enhancing organic acid secretion. PeerJ. 2024;12:e17472. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17472
  40. 40. Vaculík M, Lukačová Z, Bokor B, Martinka M, Tripathi DK, Lux A. Alleviation mechanisms of metal(loid) stress in plants by silicon: a review. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(21):6744–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa288
  41. 41. Puppe D, Kaczorek D, Stein M, Schaller J. Silicon in plants: alleviation of metal(loid) toxicity and consequential perspectives for phytoremediation. Plants. 2023;12(13):2407. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132407
  42. 42. dos Santos TB, Ribas AF, de Souza SGH, Budzinski IGF, Domingues DS. Physiological responses to drought, salinity and heat stress in plants: a review. Stresses. 2022;2(1):113–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses2010009
  43. 43. Dündar G, Ramirez VE, Poppenberger B. The heat shock response in plants: new insights into modes of perception, signaling and the contribution of hormones. J Exp Bot. 2025;76(7):1970–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae419
  44. 44. Puppala N, Nayak SN, Sanz-Saez A, Chen C, Devi MJ, Nivedita N, et al. Sustaining yield and nutritional quality of peanuts in harsh environments: physiological and molecular basis of drought and heat stress tolerance. Front Genet. 2023;14:1121462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1121462
  45. 45. Yu T, Xin Y, Liu P. Exogenous abscisic acid improves the filling process of maize grains at different ear positions by promoting starch accumulation and regulating hormone levels under high planting density. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04755-9
  46. 46. Nega A. Climate change impacts on agriculture: a review of plant diseases and insect pests in Ethiopia and East Africa, with adaptation and mitigation strategies. Adv Agric. 2025;2025:5606701. https://doi.org/10.1155/aia/5606701
  47. 47. Leroy N, Tombeur F De, Walgraffe Y, Cornélis JT, Verheggen FJ. Silicon and plant natural defenses against insect pests: impact on plant volatile organic compounds and cascade effects on multitrophic interactions. Plants. 2019;8(11):444. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8110444
  48. 48. Prats E, Carver TLW, Lyngkjær MF, Roberts PC, Zeyen RJ. Induced inaccessibility and accessibility in the oat powdery mildew system: insights gained from use of metabolic inhibitors and silicon nutrition. Mol Plant Pathol. 2006;7(1):47–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00315.x
  49. 49. Abdel-Haliem MEF, Hegazy HS, Hassan NS, Naguib DM. Probing the effects of silicon amendment on combined stressors on rice: lead pollution and blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) infection. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;264:115443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115443
  50. 50. Pereira LF, Martins SCV, Aucique-Pérez CE, Silva ET, Ávila RT, DaMatta FM, et al. Silicon alleviates mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis on rice leaves infected by Monographella albescens. Theor Exp Plant Physiol. 2020;32(2):163–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-020-00178-7
  51. 51. Ratnayake RMRNK, Daundasekera WAM, Ariyarathne HM, Ganehenege MYU. Some biochemical defense responses enhanced by soluble silicon in bitter gourd–powdery mildew pathosystem. Australas Plant Pathol. 2016;45(4):425–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0429-0
  52. 52. Sun S, Yang Z, Song Z, Wang N, Guo N, Niu J, et al. Silicon enhances plant resistance to Fusarium wilt by promoting antioxidant potential and photosynthetic capacity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1011859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1011859
  53. 53. Cerkauskas RF, Ferguson G. Management of powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii) on greenhouse cucumber in Ontario. Can J Plant Pathol. 2014;36(1):22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2013.878754
  54. 54. Resende RS, Rodrigues FA, Soares JM, Casela CR. Influence of silicon on some components of resistance to anthracnose in susceptible and resistant sorghum lines. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2009;124(3):533–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-009-9430-6
  55. 55. Al-Sadi AM. Bipolaris sorokiniana-induced black point, common root rot and spot blotch diseases of wheat: a review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.584899
  56. 56. Mapuranga J, Chang J, Yang W. Combating powdery mildew: advances in molecular interactions between Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici and wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1102908. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1102908
  57. 57. Shetty R, Jensen B, Shetty NP, Hansen M, Hansen CW, Starkey KR, et al. Silicon induced resistance against powdery mildew of roses caused by Podosphaera pannosa. Plant Pathol. 2012;61(1):120–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02493.x
  58. 58. Niwas R, Chand G, Gupta RN. Fusarium wilt: a destructive disease of banana and their sustainable management. In: Mirmajlessi SM, editor. Fusarium - an overview of the genus. Intech; 2022. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101496
  59. 59. Medrano YD, Duza GM, Casauay RB, Dawan AF, Alcomendras LGL. Efficacy of rice hull ash against bacterial leaf blight, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Indian J Sci Technol. 2021;14(37):2880–7. https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v14i37.570
  60. 60. Wang L, Gao Y, Jiang N, Yan J, Lin W, Cai K. Silicon controls bacterial wilt disease in tomato plants and inhibits the virulence-related gene expression of Ralstonia solanacearum. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(13): 6965. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23136965
  61. 61. Jia L, Han Y, Hou M. Silicon amendment to rice plants reduces the transmission of southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus by Sogatella furcifera. Pest Manag Sci. 2021;77(7):3233–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6365
  62. 62. Yu J, Yu X, Li C, Ayaz M, Abdulsalam S, Peng D, et al. Silicon mediated plant immunity against nematodes: summarizing the underlying defence mechanisms in plant–nematode interaction. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22):14026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232214026
  63. 63. Ahammed GJ, Yang Y. Mechanisms of silicon-induced fungal disease resistance in plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;165:200–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.031
  64. 64. Osibe DA, Hojo Y, Shinya T, Mitani-Ueno N, Galis I. Comprehensive analysis of silicon impact on defense and metabolic responses in rice exposed to herbivory stress. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1399562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1399562
  65. 65. Wang M, Gao L, Dong S, Sun Y, Shen Q, Guo S. Role of silicon on plant–pathogen interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00701
  66. 66. Mir RA, Bhat BA, Yousuf H, Islam ST, Raza A, Rizvi MA, et al. Multidimensional role of silicon to activate resilient plant growth and to mitigate abiotic stress. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:819658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.819658
  67. 67. Yu Y, Gui Y, Li Z, Jiang C, Guo J, Niu D. Induced systemic resistance for improving plant immunity by beneficial microbes. Plants. 2022;11(3):386. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030386
  68. 68. Kour D, Negi R, Khan SS, Kumar S, Kaur S, Kaur T, et al. Microbes mediated induced systemic response in plants: a review. Plant Stress. 2024;11:100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100334
  69. 69. Yao X, Guo H, Zhang K, Zhao M, Ruan J, Chen J. Trichoderma and its role in biological control of plant fungal and nematode disease. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1160551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1160551
  70. 70. Debona D, Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE. Silicon’s role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2017;55:85–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035312
  71. 71. Sohel Rana M, Ahmed S, Basher T, Anjuman S, Aunni A. Plant hormones: the essential regulators of growth and development in plants through complex signaling pathways and interactions. Aust Herb Insight. 2023;6(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.25163/ahi.619959
  72. 72. Müller D, Leyser O. Auxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching. Ann Bot. 2011;107(7):1203. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr069
  73. 73. Majda M, Robert S. The role of auxin in cell wall expansion. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4):951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19040951
  74. 74. Waadt R, Seller CA, Hsu PK, Takahashi Y, Munemasa S, Schroeder JI. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(10):680. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00479-6
  75. 75. Verma KK, Song XP, Liang Q, Huang HR, Bhatt R, Xu L, et al. Unlocking the role of silicon against biotic stress in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1430804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1430804
  76. 76. Jiang H, Song Z, Su QW, Wei ZH, Li WC, Jiang ZX, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic reveals silicon enhances adaptation of rice under dry cultivation by improving flavonoid biosynthesis, osmoregulation and photosynthesis. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:967537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.967537
  77. 77. Tripathi DK, Vishwakarma K, Singh VP, Prakash V, Sharma S, Muneer S, et al. Silicon crosstalk with reactive oxygen species, phytohormones and other signaling molecules. J Hazard Mater. 2021;408:124820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124820
  78. 78. Devireddy AR, Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Mittler R. Integration of reactive oxygen species and hormone signaling during abiotic stress. Plant J. 2021;105(2):459–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15010
  79. 79. Yadav N, Garg VK, Chhillar AK, Rana JS. Towards smart agriculture through nano-fertilizer: a review. Mater Today Sustain. 2025;30:101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101100
  80. 80. Mukarram M, Zehra A, Afzal S, Sliacka Konôpková A, Khan KA, Alqahtani AR, et al. Beyond essentiality: silicon as a systems regulator of photosynthesis under stress scenarios. Front Plant Sci. 2026;16:1690421. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1690421
  81. 81. Wei J, Liu L, Wei Z, Qin Q, Bai Q, Zhao C, et al. Silicon nano-fertilizer-enhanced soybean resilience and yield under drought stress. Plants. 2025;14(5):751. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14050751
  82. 82. Alvarez J, Datnoff LE, Snyder GH. The economics of silicon applications on rice and sugarcane in Florida: FE475/FE475. EDIS. Vol. 2004(8). Gainesville, FL. 2004. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fe475-2004
  83. 83. Tayade R, Ghimire A, Khan W, Lay L, Attipoe JQ, Kim Y. Silicon as a smart fertilizer for sustainability and crop improvement. Biomolecules. 2022;12(8):1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12081027
  84. 84. Sukuman T, Gheewala SH, Saizen I, Prapaspongsa T. Life cycle assessment of agricultural systems toward circularity. Sustain Prod Consum. 2025;58:203–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.015

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.