Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 13 No. sp2 (2026): Recent Advances in Agriculture

Elucidating the efficacy of hot water treatment on managing anthracnose and stem-end rot diseases of mango cv. ‘Ambika’

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.13802
Submitted
23 January 2026
Published
05-05-2026

Abstract

‘Ambika’ is a coloured mango variety with high export potential; however, it suffers substantial postharvest losses due to decay, primarily caused by anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc.) and stem-end rot (Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Pat.) Griff. & Maubl.). Being a late-maturing cultivar harvested during the rainy season, infections often originate in the field and progress during postharvest handling, thereby reducing fruit quality, shelf life and marketability. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of different hot-water treatment (HWT) combinations in controlling decay and maintaining quality in mango cv. ‘Ambika’. Naturally infected fruits were subjected to hot water treatments at 48 °C for 60 min and 52 °C for 10 min, dips in 5 % salt solution, plain water and an untreated control. After treatment, fruits were air-dried, packed in corrugated fibre board boxes (CFB) with or without ethylene ripening sachets and stored at ambient conditions. The lowest incidence of anthracnose (1.8 %) and stem-end rot (18.2 %) after 9 days of storage was recorded in fruits treated at       52 °C for 10 min. This treatment also maintained higher fruit firmness (> 1.0 kg cm-2) and total soluble solids (TSS) (> 20 °Brix). In contrast, fruits treated at 48 °C for 60 min exhibited superior biochemical quality, including higher total phenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, antioxidant activity and improved skin colour development (higher a* and b* values). Overall, hot water treatment at either 48 °C for 60 min or 52 °C for 10 min is recommended as an effective postharvest practice to reduce anthracnose and stem-end rot diseases and enhance the quality of mango cv. ‘Ambika’ during storage.

References

  1. 1. Bini K, Krishnan AG, Jacob J, Supriya R, Thomas KS. Mango: The King of the Tropics. In: Uthup TK, Karumamkandathil R, editors. Economically Important Trees: Origin, Evolution, Genetic Diversity and Ecology. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity. Singapore: Springer; 2024;37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5940-8_8
  2. 2. Galan Sauco V. World mango production and trade. Acta Hortic. 2025;1415:1–18. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2025.1415.1
  3. 3. Kumar A, Kumar A, Prakash S, Kumar V, Singh A, Singh MK, et al. Evaluation on morphological and quality attributes of mango cultivars in western Uttar Pradesh. J Adv Bio Biotech. 2024;27:485–98. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i91320
  4. 4. Arauz LF. Mango anthracnose: economic impact and current options for integrated management. Plant Dis. 2000;84:600–11. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.6.600
  5. 5. Prusky D, Falik E, Kobiler I, Fuchs Y, Zauberman G, Pesis E, et al. Hot water brush and method for control of postharvest diseases caused by Alternaria rot in mango fruits. Acta Hortic. 1997;455:780–85. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.455.99
  6. 6. Kobiler I, Shalom Y, Roth I, Akerman M, Vinokur Y, Fuchs Y, et al. Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid on the incidence of side and stem end rots in mango fruits. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2001;23:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00092-8
  7. 7. Johnson GI, Hofman PJ. Postharvest technology and quarantine treatments. In: Litz RE, editor. The Mango: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford: CAB Int.; 2009:528–605. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845934897.0529
  8. 8. Haggag WM. Mango diseases in Egypt. Agric Biol J North Am. 2010;1:285–89. https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2010.1.3.285.289
  9. 9. Anwar R, Malik AU. Hot water treatment affects ripening quality and storage life of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Pak J Agric Sci. 2007;44:27–34.
  10. 10. Shiesh C, Lin H. Effect of vapor heat and hot water treatments on disease incidence and quality of Taiwan native strain mango fruits. Int J Agric Biol. 2010;12:673–78.
  11. 11. Mansour F, Abd-El-Aziz S, Helal G. Effect of fruit heat treatment in three mango varieties on incidence of postharvest fungal disease. J Plant Pathol. 2006;88:141–48.
  12. 12. Dessalegn Y, Ayalew Y, Woldetsadik K. Integrating plant defense inducing chemical, inorganic salt and hot water treatments for the management of postharvest mango anthracnose. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2013;85:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.05.003
  13. 13. Esguerra EB, Chavez SM, Traya RV. A modified and rapid heat treatment for the control of postharvest diseases of mango (Mangifera indica Linn. cv. Carabao) fruits. Philipp Agric Sci. 2006;89:125–33.
  14. 14. Huan C, Han S, Jiang L, An X, Yu M, Xu Y, et al. Postharvest hot air and hot water treatments affect the antioxidant system in peach fruit during refrigerated storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2017;126:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.11.018
  15. 15. Kim Y, Brecht JK, Talcott ST. Antioxidant phytochemical and fruit quality changes in mango (Mangifera indica L.) following hot water immersion and controlled atmosphere storage. Food Chem. 2007;105:1327–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.03.050
  16. 16. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. In: Methods Enzymol. Academic Press; 1999;299:152–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1
  17. 17. Nithianantham K, Shyamala M, Chen Y, Latha LY, Jothy SL, Sasidharan S. Hepatoprotective potential of Clitoria ternatea leaf extract against paracetamol induced damage in mice. Molecules. 2011;16:10134–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules161210134
  18. 18. Lenucci MS, Cadinu D, Taurino M, Piro G, Dalessandro G. Antioxidant composition in cherry and high-pigment tomato cultivars. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:2606–13. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052920c
  19. 19. Budde CO, Polenta G, Lucangeli CD, Murray RE. Air and heat treatments affect ethylene production and organoleptic quality of ‘Dixiland’ peaches. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2006;41:32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.02.009
  20. 20. Fallik E, Tuvia-Alkalai S, Feng X, Lurie S. Ripening characterization and decay development of stored apples after a short pre-storage hot water rinsing and brushing. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2001;2:127–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-8564(01)00032-7
  21. 21. Ghasemnezhad M, Marsh K, Shilton R, Babalar M, Woolf A. Effect of hot water treatments on chilling injury and heat damage in ‘Satsuma’ mandarins: antioxidant enzymes and vacuolar ATPase and pyrophosphatase. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2008;48:364–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.09.014
  22. 22. Ketsa S, Chidtragool S, Lurie S. Pre-storage heat treatment and post-storage quality of mango fruit. HortScience. 2000;35:247–49. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.35.2.247
  23. 23. Pavoncello D, Lurie S, Droby S, Porat R. A hot water treatment induces resistance to Penicillium digitatum and promotes the accumulation of heat shock and pathogenesis-related proteins in grapefruit flavedo. Physiol Plant. 2001;111:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110103.x
  24. 24. Le TN, Shiesh CC, Lin HL. Effect of vapor heat and hot water treatments on disease incidence and quality of Taiwan native strain mango fruits. Int J Agric Biol. 2010;12:673–78. https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2010.v12i02.23
  25. 25. Nelson SC. Mango anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides). Plant Dis. 2008;PD-48.
  26. 26. Lazan H, Ali Z, Lee K, Voon J, Chaplin G. The potential role of polygalacturonase in pectin degradation and softening of mango fruit. ASEAN Food J. 1986;2:93–98.
  27. 27. Ali ZM, Armugam H, Lazan H. Galactosidase and its significance in ripening mango fruit. Phytochemistry. 1995;38:1109–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(94)00804-3
  28. 28. Brecht JK, Yahia EM. Postharvest physiology. In: Litz RE, editor. The Mango: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2009:484–528. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845934897.0484
  29. 29. Jacobi KK, Macrae EA, Hetherington SE. Effect of hot air conditioning of ‘Kensington’ mango fruit on the response to hot water treatment. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2000;21:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00163-0
  30. 30. Chien PJ, Sheu F, Yang FH. Effects of edible chitosan coating on quality and shelf life of sliced mango fruit. J Food Eng. 2007;78:225–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.022
  31. 31. Djioua T, Charles F, Lopez-Lauri A, Filgueiras H, Coudret A, Ducamp-Collin MN, et al. Improving the storage of minimally processed mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) by hot water treatments. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2009;52:221–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.10.006
  32. 32. Mirdehghan SH, Rahemi M, Serrano M, Guillen F, Martinez-Romero D, Valero D. Pre-storage heat treatment to maintain nutritive and functional properties during postharvest cold storage of pomegranate. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:8495–500. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0615146

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.